Jane Eyre (1961) | Full Movie

Подписаться 47 тыс.

Просмотров 28 тыс.

50% 1

🎥 TenaaTV presents: Jane Eyre
A young Jane Eyre, fresh from the orphanage, is looking forward to her job as governess to a little girl at Thornfield Hall. Edward Rochester, the cold forbidding master of Thornfield Hall, brings on a terrifying secret.
#janeeyre #orphanage #secret #tenaatv
---------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to the channel and click the bell icon to be notified of all the latest releases:
/ @tenaatv
---------------------------------------------------------------
Watch More:
► Here And Now : • Here And Now (2018) | ...
► Dead Evidence: • Dead Evidence (2001) |...
► The French Way: • The French Way (1945) ...
---------------------------------------------------------------
Connect with TenaaTV:
Like TenaaTV on Facebook: / tenaatv
Follow TenaaTV on Twitter: / tenaatv
Follow TenaaTV on Instagram: / tenaatv
NOTE: All content uploaded to TenaaTV has been legally licensed to us by the producer or distribution company representing content ownership. Rights are licensed either worldwide or for specific territories. If you are a rights owner and believe there is an error with your content, please contact us at hello@tenaa.tv.

Опубликовано:

1 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 56

@here_we_go_again2571 5 месяцев назад

I had not seen this version. It is mentioned at the IMDb site. Sally Anne Howes is delightful as Jane Eyre

@yolandemuller 10 месяцев назад

bonjour, merci pour cette diffusion. Mais il y a au moins 3 coupures de son assez longues, ce qui est fort dommage.

@marymagmartha7453 5 месяцев назад

Now, that was an experience 😊 I stuck with it though. Through the self-indulged screenwriting, stage performance feel, audio problems at key points, and zealous directing, I stuck with it. If you knew nothing about the emotional depth of Ms Bronte's classic, this adaptation would be taken as is. But for Fans of the written work and history of many award-worthy performances, Fans may grimace, shake their head and give a hard sigh, but we would get through it. Popcorn 🍿 and 🥤 Soda Pop may help😊 Yes, this was definitely an experience...

@jennifersmith5436 2 месяца назад

I like the microphone boom popping down from time to time But that's how it was back then. I love every version Viva la difference !

@OneKindWord 7 месяцев назад

At the end of her story, Charlotte Brontë writes that Jane Eyre and Mr. Rochester have been married for ten blissful years and that she and Rochester enjoy perfect equality in their life together. She says that after two years of blindness, Rochester regained sight in one eye and was able to behold their first son at his birth.

@marymagmartha7453 3 дня назад

I love how Ms. Brontë often broke through that "fourth wall" and would address, "Reader..." at key moments throughout this written word😊 The first time I read "Jane Eyre", it surprised me. It was almost as if, Ms. Brontë knew we were present, watching her life unfold, peeking over her shoulder as she wrote, reminding us of parts we may have forgotten ~ At the Conclusion when she writes, "Reader, I married him" it still brings a smile to my face that We knew before "John & Mary"...

@joylederman4501 8 месяцев назад

Too many scenes missing sound! This was obviously a made-for-television adaptation with some very serious changes to the plot. Glad I saw this but I wouldn't recommend it to other Jane Eyre enthusiasts.

@OneKindWord 7 месяцев назад

True. For example, no horse scene for the first meeting with Mr. Rochester because it couldn’t be done due to production restrictions.

@lechat8736 8 месяцев назад

They should have saved the money and the time for this production. They literally butchered Brontë`s work. Too much of the original work was altered and Charlotte`s passion erased. In my opinion, it was wrong they were allowed to use the original title.

@maricarmenmendez6658 6 месяцев назад

@lechat8736. NO PUEDO ESTAR MÁS DE ACUERDO CON USTED EN SU OPINIÓN. ES HORRIBLE UN BODRIO TOTAL. LE VOY A DAR MÍ OPINIÓN DÓNDE ESTÉ TIMOTHY DALTON Y ZELAH CLARKE. QUE SE QUITEN TODOS LOS DEMÁS. CON TODOS MÍS RESPETOS POR QUE CADA CUAL TIENE SÚ FAVORITA. UN SALUDO MUY CORDIAL. MARI CARMEN.

@mortalclown3812 5 месяцев назад

Poor Zachary Scott. He only lived a few years after this was broadcast. Rest in paradise, old chap. Re: the script: There were a few lines that were good, but the overall evisceration of the plot combined with loss of nuance made it a confusing, altogether different story. On a good day, these aren't easy characters to play. On a cramped set in less than an hour's time, maybe it was a bit too much to hope. Here's to Jane Eyre. Long may she live... unabridged.

@PatCox-c3i 7 месяцев назад

Thank you for posting this version, it is one I had not seen before. I appreciate watching the various verions of this romantic story. This rendition may not be the best, but I enjoyed the different take. Having to shorten the book to a mere one hour is a challenge and the imagination that the screen writers use to fill the gaps are always entertaining as well as imaginative. Thank you, again.

@mortalclown3812 5 месяцев назад

Your balanced remarks made me delete my own as it was too complaining. Sure, we'd all love to see a perfect Jane Eyre - one not truncated or miscast, perhaps. But I did just revisit the Welles' version, setting high the bar. 😊 Blessing to you, years down the line from another Bronte lover.

@SMtWalkerS 2 месяца назад

I agree. It is always interesting to see how they approach it, and the performances of the two leads. I'm always pleased when I find a version I have not seen before.

@thewindinthewillows692 10 месяцев назад

Weak version, couldn't stand to watch more than a few minutes... PS. (a few months later) Now I saw everything and it gets better by the end. So please have patience and watch until the end. :) A pity they didn't keep the original, beautiful dialogue. St. John Rivers as a comical character, that's new to me. :) It's interesting that this is the only version where Mr. Rochester openly revolts against her narrow, rigid moral views, I often thought that indeed her views were rather narrow, but we can't judge, considering a woman's reputation at that time was very important.

@JanScott-m9q 10 месяцев назад

It's dreadful.

@maricarmenmendez6658 9 месяцев назад

¿DE DÓNDE SACARON ESTA ""RELIQUIA""ES QUE NO HAY POR DÓNDE COGERLA. ES HORRIBLE, BOCHORNOSA. ME PARECE ESTA VERSIÓN UNA FALTA DE RESPETO A CHARLOTTE BRONTE. PÉSIMOS ACTORES LO ÚNICO QUE HACEN ES GRITAR. ES UN DESPROPÓSITO, ESTA VERSIÓN. DE PENA.😢😢😢

@thewindinthewillows692 9 месяцев назад

@@maricarmenmendez6658 I don't understand who gave 40 likes.

@maricarmenmendez6658 9 месяцев назад

@@thewindinthewillows692 TE PIDO DISCULPAS PERO NO ENTENDÍ LO QUE ESCRIBES PORQUE NO ENTIENDO EL INGLÉS NI LO SE ESCRIBIR. NUEVAMENTE TE PIDO DISCULPAS. SÍ ES MÍ OPINIÓN SOBRE ESA ""RELIQUIA"" DE . "JANE EYREY "DE RELIQUIA NADA DE NADA. ES UN BODRIO ES BOCHORNOSO. SÍ NO TE GUSTÓ MÍ OPINIÓN TE PIDO PERDÓN PORQUÉ YO SE QUE CADA UNA TIENE SÚ *JANE EYRE * FAVORITA. LA MÍA ES LA DEL AÑO 1983 CON TIMOTHY DALTON Y ZELAH CLARKE. UN SALUDO MUY CORDIAL. MARI.

@sohara.... 9 месяцев назад

Yes, it seems to have lost the dramatic impetus of the original.

@barbarabrown7974 8 месяцев назад

Ironic Joan Fontaine introduced this. She played Jane in the 1940s version. I've seen worse versions of Jane Eyre, but this is not very good.

@nicoleackerman205 6 месяцев назад

The 1932 one that is bad and I swear the set the later repurposed as the set for As The World Turns when it first aired.

@farmeherrangoonwalla 8 месяцев назад

Indeed very different from several adaptations seen so far. But then its director s prerogative n perspective plus adds a new angle to the film.

@antoniettalazzarini5909 11 дней назад

Perché mai i sottotitoli non ci sono mai perché tanti bellissimi film devono goderseli solo chi sa l'inglese è una vergogna 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

@Pfias-CB.unvergessen 7 месяцев назад

I think this version has a lot of theatre

@cristinacastro6257 8 месяцев назад

el libro es mejor

@CCC-rd3gc 5 месяцев назад

книга лучше любой из экранизаций, но мне всё равно интересно смотреть, как все по-разному пытались снять эту историю. и некоторые версии я люблю особенно сильно

@bcsurvivor4713 3 месяца назад

Well of course!

@farmeherrangoonwalla 8 месяцев назад

Concised version yet retains content n plot well. Nice dialogue n acting.

@SMtWalkerS 2 месяца назад

This is an interesting old adaptation. Love the old Breck ads interspersed. The actress makes a lovely Jane. I always find it puzzling when scriptwriters throw out original dialog created by the author of a classic and insert their own hackneyed words. Why not use the original, beautiful dialog?

@barbarabrown7974 8 месяцев назад

Very condensed. What would you expect with a running time of less than an hour. Sally Ann Howes is best known for Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.

@hislittlemrs1833 2 месяца назад

It's hard to see a 30+ woman play the part of an 18yr old jane. And too many beautiful scenes are changed or missing.

@barbarabrown7974 8 месяцев назад

I must say this version actually has Jane put out the fire. Very little of Charlotte's beautiful dialogue.

@lechat8736 8 месяцев назад

I agree.

@AuthorAnnStanley 2 месяца назад

Wow Mr. Rivers is quite a characiture. The complete opposite of the real Mr. Rivers.

@CCC-rd3gc 9 месяцев назад

Конечно, это весьма специфическая версия. Так же жаль, что не всё было слышно. Но было всё равно интересно увидеть не знакомую прежде для меня экранизацию. Спасибо, что загрузили это сюда. Но конец мне почти понравился :)

@lottajohansson6790 12 дней назад

Do you ask mee to merry you . And hi anser whoop whoop whoop . That was so funy replic ever 😅❤

@wmden1 10 месяцев назад

Goes without saying, this is a very condensed version. How was it managed to lose the sound during a majority of the key scenes. From reading the book a few times, Rochester and Jane, in this rendition were both a bit too nice looking. I thought George C. Scott made the best movie Rochester, and Susannah York was a bit too attractive, though she played a great part. There is another old movie version where both fit the looks, according to the book's indication, very well.

@here_we_go_again2571 5 месяцев назад

The 1970 version with George C. Scott and Susannah York was nice. But I agree, Susannah was almost too pretty for the role. My favorite older, Jane Eyre version is the 1943 adaptation by 20th Century Fox's Robert Stevenson staring Joan Fontaine and Orson Welles. The worst version that I have seen, so far, is the version by Monograph studios (1934) that starred Virginia Bruce and Colin Clive The 1949 version by the Westinghouse Hour that stars Charlton Heston, Betty Furness and Mary Sinclair is somewhat better than the monograph one. Heston's uber masculinity permeates the film.

@mortalclown3812 5 месяцев назад

@@here_we_go_again2571 Enjoyed your comments very much. Frankly, I try to savor something in all the versions - if only because, in my nascent dotage, reading shrill critiques is vexing. After all, the book is long, with many paths and detours. Almost any version will be found wanting. The power of Welles' Rochester, albeit abetted by a false, less pert, nose, swarthy complexion and the acting talent of Joan Fontaine, is probably my favorite. His tenderness was well-opposed by the 'scary' side of ER - that thing that was almost parodied in too many stage/ screen Jane Eyres. Edward Fairfax Rochester is not an easy role to play. With that in mind, a few thoughts on 'the lad'... Dalton might've been miscast, simply for being too gorgeous - a la 'Funny Girl''s Nicky Arnstein - "Oy! The groom was prettier than the bride!" - but I liked that miniseries. Ciaran Hinds' Rochester ached in ways that were believable. Actually, one sees that his might've been the exact visage Bronte had in mind for the character. And the perfection of Samantha Morton's Jane collided with him perfectly. Glad to see Heston get props for his turn at bat, too. Not sure I've seen him so young in anything else. (Fwiw, I knew CH through work and cared about him. Sure wish I'd known about that production at the time, because he was delightful and open when it came to discussing such things.) McCarthy, McNee, Hurt, Jayston - all terrific actors - just less ER than we desired/ needed. Last - and certainly not least - is George C. Scott. I don't agree with all of the was 'wrong' with him/York as the leading couple - chief among the barbs - were ones about York's age. Yet I wonder if GCS's particular brand of sexy would've even worked with a younger actress than SY's Jane. Ah - Fassbender and Stevens. I appreciated them both. Stevens gave new complexity to ER and won me over by the end. Oh my. Now I'm seeing all of these actors in my mind's eye - ones who'd be perfect - and oh so wrong - for Edward. Anyone you can think of who should've had a try?

@here_we_go_again2571 5 месяцев назад

@@mortalclown3812 Thank you, I enjoyed reading your opinion of the actors playing EF Rochester. "Nascent dotage" That is where I am at too. 😁 "The Golden Years turn to brass quickly" is my new mantra. I have not seen all of the versions of JE. Last night I did see the 2006 version with Ruth Wilson and Toby Stephens. I thought that both suited the description of Jane and Rochester in the novel. If Rochester doesn't creep me out at some point I view the portrayal as a failure. My inner self screams: "DANGER! Get away from that weirdo!" when he reaches that point in the novel (prior to and just after the interrupted marriage ceremony). Unlike Jane, I have not been raised in a harsh, sparse, and very sheltered environment.

@OneKindWord 7 месяцев назад

She’s rather buxom for the Jane Eyre character and the acting by everyone is forced and stilted. Was it because a tv performance didn’t allow time for much rehearsal?