Janet/Lauren The Mortician Update: Joint Statement and Warning From The Court 

@@acmhfmggru Janet, is that you?

@@acmhfmggru you think the problem was in the operation of the seat? Do you think a non engineer is qualified to pick up a phone, look at it and predict where and how it will break and have suggestions on how the phone could be made safe? Or is this Lauren still thinking having ovaries makes you expert on anything pertaining to children?

​@@wmdkitty 😂😂😂👏

​@@acmhfmggrunot janet, so you must be lauren

​@@acmhfmggru What are you doing? that is quite literally what happened. this isn't hate train jumping this is just factually accurate

Implications? What word did you mean to use there? Indication? I just want to understand your comment.

@@Teenywingimply is used appropriately here. they’re using “implications” in the sense that her lack of knowledge suggests she is incompetent in her career. indication would also be appropriate, given the context, but it isn’t the only word that would suit their sentence.

The truth isn't defamation. 😛

@@Teenywing The comment was clear with Al appropriate use of vocabulary.

Cash grab from emotionally agitated

That one may be defamatory against the law profession 😂

This ☝️

Allegedly

that's a new level of main character syndrome... emailing the court for a case completely unrelated to themselves just wow

I fully agree... But amicus curiae briefs are also a thing. Clearly there is a line between the two, but exactly where and why at that point is an interesting question in its own right.

Even the founding fathers wrote letters to the courts, it’s just become so much easier to do with email.

LOL! True! It's along the lines of "Hey! Don't be stupid!" Sadly, that has to be said too.

Right?? Like I would never even think of that… it’s like asking to see the manager of the airport (anyone remember that Karen?).. Janet would be a good name for Karen like lawyers, bc man she’s nuts.

Words of wisdom.✌🏻

Not the flaming diaper dumpster! 😭 💀🤘

That'd be one helluva needlepoint throw pillow!

Today I learned to not email the court and to not put my hands into a dumpster full of flaming diapers…thx Ian😂 Janet updates always make my day better.

F*cking right it's not cool, it's burning poop!

Thx for the laugh 😅✌🏻

😂😂

Runkle posted! It's about The girlies vs janet!!! Plans on hold!!

That's what 2x speed is for.

@@JayeEllisbut we allow for ad time

They can’t, the grass offends them.

@@rhondasisco-cleveland2665it tries to pull its leave underground when they pass, lol😂

Today I learnt the expression “main character syndrome” and I love it

But they then raised a whole bunch more, though who knows if they’ll have enough if this keeps going. They may wind up needing to ask for more money again eventually. Janet and Lauren are really wasting everyone’s time and money with their nonsense lawsuit

@@genericname8727 I'm glad they did but the utter waste of money deliberately because they have the money power is horrendous and they deserve to get into trouble for that - guess it's different in America but if that happens in some other countries they are hauled over coals with their bare ass so to speak!

@@rsh793 If The Girlies win then Lauren and Janet will likely have to pay lawyer fees for The Girlies. In addition to all of their own time and money that they've wasted. So their can be some consequences, beyond the reputational damage that comes with filing ridiculous lawsuits like this.

Wonder if the people who donated will get their money back if Janet and Lauren have to pay all the court fees for the other side. If they get all that money, they theoretically could pay everyone back. If not, they'd end up making a profit off the people who donated. Wonder if they have said anything about that on the donation page.

@@orchdork775 idk. I would expect they’d maybe reserve it for a while in case Janet and Lauren try refiling somewhere else if that’s an option? As someone who donated twice, I wouldn’t mind them keeping anything the court awards as compensation for the stress and wasted time. Idk if paying people back would even be a realistic option since the money is going straight to their lawyers’ bank accounts. They stressed not to donate unless you had the money to and I donated expecting not to see the money again, so I’m not expecting to be paid back. My money went to paying for their legal fees, and if they win then I got what I hoped to out of donating tbh. I certainly wouldn’t complain if I’m paid back though lol. It’s possible they’ll be awarded partial lawyer fees so they can’t guarantee they’ll get back the same amount they received either. I guess they can cross that bridge when they come to it.

​@@acmhfmggruseriously? You obviously have no life if you have time to sit around and correct grammar in an online comment section.....🤦🏻

@@scottbattaglia8595 They don't. That person is going around screeching about hate trains against the poor poor mortician.

No, they keep it going just to see how it get funnier

@@acmhfmggru Pedant. 🔔🔚

​@@Longshot441 they’re saying other troll comments in other threads. Idk if they have any beliefs of their own. I think they just want to provoke people into replying with mean things like a form of digital self-harm (which typically involves people creating fake accounts to post hateful things towards themselves, but some people seem to try and provoke others to leave the comments too). They’re best ignored I think.

It's so PERFECT 😂

You're not misremembering. Plaintiffs said they were in settlement discussions with KC. Now it seems they're backtracking that statement because, as far as I'm aware, that was false. They were never in settlement discussions and this filing now proves that.

I'm so glad I'm not the only one who went "wait didn't they say they were doing a settlement discussion earlier??" These people man!

First amendment, ever heard of it?

@@ForakusI have. Inappropriately messaging authority in ways that interfere with their jobs is not covered by the first amendment.

@@Forakus The first amendment protects you from government retaliation. Not general consequences of your actions.

@@ruralmetalhead People have been writing to the courts concerning ongoing issues since the founding fathers. Free speech and peaceful redress of governance. The courts aren't immune from public messaging, same as the other branches.

@@ShaggyRogers1 That's not what people are talking about here, and you know it.

Exactly how excited are you? Victorian corn novel excited, or...😂😂😂

@@brendaleelydon-carpenter1554Idk I mean this story in particular is pretty darn juicy so I’m probably a 7/10 excited when an update comes out though I do want the case to get tossed sooner than later because I feel really bad for the defendants.

😂😂😂😂😂😂

Should have done like I did and cleared the path first 😂

It will be an interesting argument that Janet put in jeopardy by being a co-plaintiff instead of filing separately. Also admitting to the wellness check creates a quagmire as lawyers who participate in crimes, can obliterate privilege. Swatting was a misdemeanor in Georgia when they did it, though it recently was upgraded to a felony.

@@DaraJillbruh. Creating a situation where someone is likely to be shot at was a misdemeanor???? At least they updated it...

@@Akatsuki69387 if done to an individual and not like a government building, yup misdemeanor. The new law is being reconciled by the Georgia House and Senate and is expected to fully pass. It has increased punishment for someone who does it repeatedly.

@@DaraJill We're talking a lawyer that thought putting a "you can't say bad things about this product" in a pre-purchase popup was legally binding. Somehow, I don't think she's considered that her actions almost certainly voided confidentiality.

@@tzvikrasner6073 💯💯

it tends to take a very long time, sometimes years, for someone to get disbarred.

Have you ever heard of the “parasocial relationship” phenomenon? Because…. They’re not your “girlies.” They don’t know who you are. They don’t even know you exist.

Yay for the Girlies, I love DWKT! I hope the judge sees the amount of money they had to raise to fight this ridiculous lawsuit and makes Janet pay it back with interest

@@lisainthestudio I'd want adjusted for inflation.

I love BC. I don't get up there often enough anymore. I miss snowshoeing at Whistler - Blackcomb. It's beautiful. Cheers from your neighbor south of the border.

I'm pretty sure he said in a prev video that they keep this going to prevent them for going to higher court (or what you call that in the usa) because this court "dismissed the case without giving proper time and chance to give information" or something. And going to higher up would cost a lot more and last a lot longer. So its better for everyone if this court just listens to all this bs.

Funnily enough, yes. Remember how Musk was forced to buy Twitter. In theory that same sort of thing could force someone to sell a pony. Actually, Ponys probably come up in divorces procedings. Which means the court really does award someone a pony.

The original creation of the job Enrolled Agents, which predate the IRS but were essentially early IRS agents, was actually because people were filing false claims that Union had taken their ponies. So the EAs were created as independent way of verifying claims of ponies/horses to the government. I'm almost certain there were court cases involved somewhere. I just don't know how there could not be. In those cases, the court could make the government buy ponies for people/give them the money to go get their replacement ponies for the ones the government took during the Civil War.

@@arthurmoore9488 I honestly continue to enjoy the fact that Musk was forced to follow through with the purchase. His offer was never anything but an attempt to bolster right-wing conspiracist claims that the platform was rife with bots supporting Dem politicians, which was why he continued to insist they were hiding the "real" bot counts. It's the same with Trump's initial 2016 run. He never expected to win, and was planning on spending the next several years getting money off conspiracy theorists without the scrutiny that came with being President. You could see that from his face when the race was called. The fact that both of them wound up getting destroyed by their attention-seeking gambits is just hilarious.

Yes, if it's actually the (personal) property in question. In my country, Cattle and horses are explicitly mentioned in law as the sort of movable property that needs to be adjudicated in court in cases of ownership dispute...

If they award ponies, please can they send me Twilight Sparkle?

In modern usage, the ‘comes now’ is old usage. I bet that was a typo.

Lmaooooo 😂😂

Janet doesn’t want any of that Runkle smoke!

​@@basicallyno1722Thinking it might also be because Runkle is Canadian... I'm not seeing too many US-based outlets covering it at all tbh.

@@basicallyno1722 For real! haha

@@novalinnhe And that is just what I was thinking.

Purely on the name alone, I now want Ian to cover it, too! 😅

@@ThatAdamIsMild check out MadCatster, he's also a lawyer and has been closely following all of iilluminaughti's legal shenanigans. since it sounds like you're unfamiliar with this case, i do hate to tell you but it's not anything about the fun wackjob conspiracy stuff like you might be thinking, and it's actually a much, much heavier situation. however, if you enjoy watching a tyranical chronic narcissist get their ass repeatedly handed to them in spite of their escalating attempts to become a comic book super villain, then this is indeed the case for you! highlights include the time she (plaintiff) tried to have a man's (defendent) house foreclosed on him days before christmas in an act so cartoonishly evil, it's hard to believe she's real. janet makes me laugh, but iilluminaughtii and i live in the same state, potentially in the same or a nearby zip code, so i live in fear knowing there's a non-zero chance of me bumping into her, and i can't promise myself or anyone else that i'd be chill about it...

If you haven't seen his videos already, you might enjoy the MadCatster. Like Ian, he's a lawyer and he's been covering the Illuminaughtii lawsuit for a while. I think him and Ian are acquainted with each other.

I second the recommendation of Madcatster! As stated, he is a lawyer that also breaks down cases & has been following the iilluminatii nonsense since the beginning. Plus, rescue cats! You can't lose! 😺

@@ThatAdamIsMild oh she is a special kind of psycho

perhaps... Jananigans 😆

​@@DaraJill oh, that is the term of choice now! 😆

Markie and Runkle are in the UK and Canada, respectively. Suing them is prohibitively expensive. I also assume she is not targeting Madcatster because, being a lawyer as well, he can more effectively fight her on the cheap.

Not entirely. Lauren previously had her followers harass and mass report another TikTok creator, a certified child car seat expert, because he criticized her for improperly calling a car seat unsafe. Said safety expert was a gay man, and she implied it was "weird" that he had so many child products, without having children, and that he claimed to know more than her, a mother. This is what begot the accusations of homophobia and transphobia she's now suing over. Which, Lauren and Janet, both plaintiffs, called in a wellness check to one of the defendants after she (Kitty), posted a tik tok about the situation. The whole thing is a mess, top to bottom, but crazier that the View. 😂

Also seems like a huge waste of resources to go through discovery and depositions if they aren't needed (if the case get dismissed)

15:44 Sounds like that is exactly what the judge is going to do though....

Very doubtful. What would he be witness too or provide evidence for? He's just commentating on stuff the court already know and are doing.

@@ArthurRichardSole "it's not just you American lawyers, Canadian lawyers also think she's being stupid." "They're kinda asking the court to order the Internet to stop being the Internet."

​@@benjaminshropshire2900I really hope the court doesn't need an expert on the court...

@@skachor I was more thinking an expert on *other* courts and the internet.

pretty sure he would attempt to get dismissed as biased or whatever. I seriously doubt Ian wants to be involved other than as a spectator and he would know what tools to use to get out of it.

I always believed and have been taught, that being professional, is not something you are, it's what you do and how you do it.

@@novalinnhe I think I've watched them all, but I missed that part. Care to let me in on it?

and giggles

You have to ask the court's permission to file an amicus brief.