"Jerusalem Has Come." - Kingdom of Heaven (2005)  

I own the DVD and have since they released it. Excellent Movie.

Your website doesn't even work 😑

@@Giftedsoul123you were phished

Where i cant see any link sir .

Not going on your site hahhaah

He sent them, so they could check if baldwin was true to his word also

@@octupusrift5407Smart, we should have more people like you

@@octupusrift5407 Exactly, It was not just respect and benevolence motivating his moves, but wits and wisdom

Did he actually send his physician?

​@@joeschmoe2659of course. That Saladin you're talking about. Truly a man of his word.

I didn't even know it was ed Norton until a few months ago 😂

@@gazbo81 that's how good we was 👍🏼

@@Rydonattelo yeah mate brilliant actor brilliant movie 👊👍

That is mr. Norton!?

Dont really know him but searched who it was afterwards because really liked his performance and now i instantly notice when hes in something i see on youtube

Lol

@@tentaplayz36912000 years away? You mean like 800

But in reality what happened is that they actually fought and there was a battle where Saladin was almost killed, and even tho he had x3 King Baldwin's army Saladin lost , and only 10% of Saladins army returned to Damascus

@@christiansaii6197 exactly, Saladin was wary of a worthy adversary.

@@dad_moose yeah he waited until the 16 yo king to die to start the invasion , i mean come on , the movie shows nothing about the Battle of Montgisard , which literally was the shown scene !!!

Good luck finding anyone possessing a quarter of their calibre

Imagine believing the white washed Ridley Scott movie as fact. The movie was wildly historically inaccurate, unfortunately people get their history from TV series and movies today.

Saya percaya sebelom Dunia mahu Kiamat, Islam Dan Christian akan bersatu buat kali terakhir saya sudah baca ia akan terjadi

because at that time, the elites are few, thats why respect is everywhere.

Ghassan Masoud a great actor

Because he's Arabian great actor from Damascus syria witch is also the country of salah Al deen ( syria 🇸🇾 )

@@ALPHA.LION. Salahdin was a kurd though

​@@ALPHA.LION. Salahuddin was Kurdish wasn't he?

Salah Al Din was from Kurdistan, and Kurdistan is divided between Syria, Iraq, Irán, Turquey and a little bit in Armenia, and Salah Al Din was from the Kurdistan part wich is in Iraq , the city of Tikrit

Cuz he knew salah eldin well .. he can.t

​@@ahmedgamal-uo6ekThen King Baldwin defeated saladin ✌

​@@reddevilmufc24lol that's not true

@@lCo8084 Ever heard about BATTLE OF MONTGISARD?

@@reddevilmufc24 Ever heard about Battle of HATTIN ? and many others after the simple battle that you praise, which ended with heavy losses for both sides!?

Lots of love to my Syrian brothers and sisters from India!❤

he is a great Syrian actor

Yeah❤

@@Khalid-bz5efindeed ghassan Massoud

youtube mary and jesus in the quran and mohmmad in the bible and the Torah and the scientific miracles of the quran and mohmmad in hindu scripture

Edward norton

Not at all costs

If I may add it is the respect for wisdom and fear of the outcome that he retired as suggested, but of course, the mutual respect helped.

@@waitam5014in truth he withdrew because he knew that it was a losing battle

Well spoken.

This wasnt peace, it was an agreement on who got to commit the violence of vengeance against a mutal enemy.

Chivalry still existed in the Medieval period. That said, Charles Martel pretty much dispatched the entire invading Muslim armies in 732AD

Reynault de chatillon was the cause of this war. Google him and his story

Sources: trust me bro

That's absolutely false. Saladin immediately attacked upon taking power and tried to take advantage of the 16 year old Baldwin. Baldwin, for his part, took the newly formed Knights Templar and nearly killed everyone in Saladin's army. They chased him halfway back to Egypt trying to end the threat before it began. So no, they were very much enemies. The respect was in their acknowledging how formidable of foes they were.

@@Sagan_Starbornyeah that was only after the Muslims had taken nearly all of the Iberian Peninsula.

you need to read some more history. Leaders were rarely up front. You know why? Because its stupid. This is for dramatic effect

It was leaders now its more like planners or mastermind only

@@nicholasbrown4109 yapper, battle of Mohács

This never happened. They had spokesmen for these kind of negotiations.

Imagine thinking a work of fiction is a documentary. Leaders have rarely fought their own battles. If you knew basically any real history you'd know this

But he should have said "Wa Alaikum" only

@@user-fd6lv6fk9t Why? If I may ask, I'm not very knowledgeable about arabic

​@@Maxcario this question has been bothering for a long time. And no one has given me a direct answer. "Salam" means peace. So by removing that word, wouldn't it make the sentence in complete?

Well, "Salam" does mean peace, and if you remove it, it could be seen as rude or incomplete. The Qur'an says: "When you are greeted with a greeting, greet in return with what is better than it, or (at least) return it equally" (al-Nisa’ 4:86).

​@@persona8439 The first replier probably meant that because of a misinterpretation. The Sunna states: When the Jews greet you, they usually say, 'As-Samu 'alaikum (Death be on you),' so you should say (in reply to them), 'Wa'alaikum (And on you). However, Baldwin said "As-salam 'alaikum" not "As-Samu" so in return, salahaddin indeed should have said "Wa-alaikum salam" not "Wa-alaikum"

Probably due to copyright

Agreed

Likely legal reasons or somethingto do with yt policy, as pointed out above

Most certainly because of previously stated terms and conditions.

Nobody forced you to watch this video, you could've searched for a version without music

Its a shit movie!... only coz they try to portray it historically accurate and its totally fictitious.

​@@nachodiaz2221it's not a shit movie at all. It's the best movie based on crusades. The director's cut shows marvelous character development too

Name of film?

@@kimberlycrichton2932kingdom of heaven

😅😅😅😅😅 i am a woman 😊 but I am a french historian

Montana ftw

@@Mathiakle u DO know why right?

@@devastationofmankind3495 because Montana is the goat.

@@Mathiakle ohhh RU-vid deleted my comment, what's the matter RU-vid?...talking about Dr. Ted Kazinszky is a no no?

I don't think it edges Gladiator but it's close

Disagree with the Gladiator take but I do enjoy this film

The only problem with this movie is Orlando Bloom. He was all the rage back then because of lord of the rings, but that man cant act for shit

I'm not really educated on Jerusalem history but why are they using the symbol of the cross? They don't believe in jesus

​@@cbass7283This was during the time of the crusader state of Jerusalem. They very much believed in Jesus.

I'am Muslim and I love and I follow to Prophet Jesus (HZ.İSA)

@@irfancalskan9229 Jesus was an Israeli Jew, still follow him?

Moses: Hear O Israel, Lord, our God is one. Jesus: Hear O Israel, Lord, our God is one. Muhammad: Say: God is One. Peace, be upon them all.

@@Darktemplar99999 I am a Muslim. The Allah (God) sent all the prophets. Jesus is not God and is just one of those prophets. Finally, Allah sent the prophet Muhammad. No other prophet will come to the world. This is where Israel's creates, the problem and they do not accept that a prophet from the Arab race can come. The basic principle of being a Muslim is to believe in all the prophets sent by Allah and to love them. With greetings and respect. :)

@@irfancalskan9229 you certainly do not respect Jesus if you believe Muhammad over him.

This is going into my quotes

That’s like saying sitting still is moving, and that moving is useless to going somewhere. Only through much power to inflict war can you have peace.

No....

It depends. Are you at peace because you can’t beat others, or are you at peace despite being able to beat others. One is restraint, and therefore strong, and one is inherently weak. Same goes for war, and why you fight. Are you fighting to take and steal what is not yours, or are you defending yourself and others for the sake of your land and people.

Genuinely a great quote.

In the movie or in actual history?

​@@aaditkhan728 In reality. Immunity of messengers has been a thing since the ancient times. Of course, it's not like it never happened, but generally, killing of messengers has been considered a very serious offense, both in legal and religious terms.

@@MosoKaiser exactly

@@MosoKaiserreminds me of "this is spartaaaa!!!"

@@hazryl That is exactly it. The dude even said "No one threatens a messenger. This is madness". And killing a messenger is a direct declaration of war which is why Saladin wanted to go in there. But Baldwin had to take responsibility and punish Reynold for his actions or else Saladin would. Baldwin sought for the least bloodshed and took matters into his own hands.

@LCARSDATANODE all great thing is difficult Just look at the effect from the movie.. It was 2005 And after 18 year still people talk about him

His stance..head..energy from behind the mask..wow

I love characters with masks. They tend to be so well-written.

And the guy playing master chief says you can't empathize with someone who doesn't show their face lol

Today’s world leaders can learn a lot from this scene

😂👏🏼

That was the first draft

❤❤❤

youtube mary and jesus in the quran and mohmmad in the bible and the Torah and the scientific miracles of the quran and mohmmad in hindu scripture

What’s a Chad ?

( It seems war crimes are still accepted )

@@Sarah00787 nah back then you could admit to war crimes and no one would have cared normally

Even today ​@@Brodes235 look at usa and Israel 😂😂😂

Probably because he knew that when Jerusalem was recaptured by the Christians they would harm Muslim citizens

@@raju123ban Exactly. Child-killers.

Not only that Persian doctors were ahead of their time back then too. They were seen as the greatest in the world.

That was a regal thing one king did for another. Back then royalties were truly noble and earned their thrones and titles in battle.

But in reality what happened is that they actually fought and there was a battle where Saladin was almost killed, and even tho he had x3 King Baldwin's army Saladin lost , and only 10% of Saladins army returned to Damascus

@@christiansaii6197 The battle was imminent as one king fought another for domination over Jerusalem and all of the land. But both sides stuck to the rules of fair play and chilvary. Let the better man and his army win. It's not a victory if it's won by dishonest means. No such thing in international relations and politics of the day.

Autocorrect give you one?

Salahuddin

As a Muslim, I agree

Unfortunately, Islam never had a reformation.

Too much inbreeding for that.

Adam seeker

He knew he would be destroyed. But i think also he knew Baldwin was a real man of his word. There was trust even between 2 mortal enemies.

​@@user-uw6du9dl8znot even close! salahudin won the battle and he took back jerusalem

​@user-uw6du9dl8z More like Baldwin army would've been l destroyed as Muslims fought with faith and help from almighty, Allah, it has been proven in the last 1400yrs, the first war Muslims fought against pagan Arabs was 300 Muslims against 1000 pagans with better tactics and logistics, Allah gave them practical victory, the Muslims deated super power of its time, such as Persian empire Byzantine Romans etc

@@Mu5tyLaghmani They didn't defeat Isabella of Spain did they though :D

@@Mu5tyLaghmani The hell? Do you realize european crusaders came into MUSLIM land and stayed there in some capacity till to this day. These crusaders werent even close to the full might of europe, it was just a small fraction. Meanwhile muslims mustered everything they had. Byzantine defeated itself, the hell are you talking about?

Directors cut is fantastic

Agreed. It’s a really well written movie

how to get it

A new Saladin will come in which Palestine will be liberated and Jerusalem will once again be as it was.😢

youtube mary and jesus in the quran and mohmmad in the bible and the Torah and the scientific miracles of the quran and mohmmad in hindu scripture

No that is the foundational directive of Hamas and every other Palestinian organization.

Sinwar: genocide prospect Bagdadi: genocide prospect Assad: genocide prospect Saddam: genocide prospect Khomeini: genocide prospect and the list goes on and on...

​@Darktemplar99999 they genocide Muslims not others

@@MdKashif-vl3mx Muslims genocide others.

@@MdKashif-vl3mx Kurds are predominately Christians. The majority of those targeted for Genocide by Muslim leaders are Jews first, then Christians, then other muslims who do not follow the Sunni/Shia tenants.

You dont understand what he did. Aslama alaikam (cant spell lol) is a positive thing the way salaadin says his reply is a refusal.

@@joemartin6549no, it's not.

Oh my.. joemartin dont you dare to ever say something you know nothing of. When someone says Assalamu alaikoum in means peace be upon you and alaikum salam is how you reply to that and means and upon you be peace

@@thetraveler6947 authenticity: traditional, mainstream circles, this document is and continues to be almost universally accepted as genuine by Islamic scholars. This view is echoed by some of Islam's greatest scholars and historians, including al-Khallal (d. 923 AD), Ibn Hazm (d. 1063 AD), al-Tartushi (d. 1126 AD), Ibn Qudama (d. 1123 AD), Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1138 AD), Ibn ‘Asakir (d. 1176 AD), Ibn al-Qayyim (d. 1350 AD), Ibn Kathir, al-Hindi and ‘Ali ‘Ajin. The eighth-century Hanafi jurist, Abu Yusuf, further noted that the terms in the Pact dealing with dhimmis are clearly in agreement with the Qur'an and hadith literature. Therefore, the Pact "stands till the day of resurrection." We will neither erect in our areas a monastery, church, or a sanctuary for a monk, Nor restore any place of worship that needs restoration Nor use any of them for the purpose of enmity against Muslims. We will not prevent any Muslim from resting in our churches whether they come by day or night, and we will open the doors [of our houses of worship] for the wayfarer and passerby. Those Muslims who come as guests, will enjoy boarding and food for three days. We will not allow a spy against Muslims into our churches and homes or hide deceit [or betrayal] against Muslims. We will not teach our children the Qur'an, Publicize practices of Shirk (polytheism), Invite anyone to Shirk or prevent any of our fellows from embracing Islam, if they choose to do so. We will respect Muslims, Move from the places we sit in if they choose to sit in them. We will not imitate their clothing, caps, turbans, sandals, hairstyles, speech, nicknames and title names, or ride on saddles, Hang swords on the shoulders, collect weapons of any kind or carry these weapons. We will not encrypt our stamps in Arabic, or sell liquor. We will have the front of our hair cut, Wear our customary clothes wherever we are, Wear belts around our waist, Refrain from erecting crosses on the outside of our churches and demonstrating them and our books in public in Muslim fairways and markets. We will not sound the bells in our churches, except discretely, or raise our voices while reciting our holy books inside our churches in the presence of Muslims, Nor raise our voices [with prayer] at our funerals, or light torches in funeral processions in the fairways of Muslims, or their markets. We will not bury our dead next to Muslim dead, or buy servants who were captured by Muslims. We will be guides for Muslims and refrain from breaching their privacy in their homes.' We will not beat any Muslim. These are the conditions that we set against ourselves and followers of our religion in return for safety and protection. If we break any of these promises that we set for your benefit against ourselves, then our Dhimmah (promise of protection) is broken and you are allowed to do with us what you are allowed of people of defiance and rebellion. At first reading, it may seem like this pact was drafted by the Christians themselves. However, the terms were dictated to them by Umar. This is standard procedure for agreements and contracts. This, along with the true purpose of some of its demands, are confirmed by Ibn Kathir in his widely accepted tafsir.

@@joemartin6549 bro what are you talking about lol im not even arab and i know you have no idea what your talking about bud.

❤❤❤

youtube mary and jesus in the quran and mohmmad in the bible and the Torah and the scientific miracles of the quran and mohmmad in hindu scripture

@@infiniteinspiration1628 youtube mary and jesus in the quran and mohmmad in the bible and the Torah and the scientific miracles of the quran and mohmmad in hindu scripture

Yes

100% correct 👏👏👏👏👍 We have such potential but waste it on petty things

you do realize both parties butchered and raped the other en masse -but they both were great leaders

Agreed 💯

This was a movie, dude, and while people acted like this We can't lose something we never had to begin with lol

@@BlueRidgeBubble : Then you are indeed lost as a human being. Because all it would take is for people to be taught how to act when they are young, and essentially not tolerate this "I want everything", safe space bullshit, that makes the current generation look as if they're all related to Veruca Salts somehow. Because you obviously don't know or don't care about the fact that most of the actual, real-life historical accounts, did speak of both Baldwin and Salahudin in the way they are portrayed here. So how you say, "It's only a movie," when fact is, it's a very historically accurate movie, I don't know. Are you daft? Ignorant? Or both?

Maybe the fact that they were in the battle and see it had something to do with it. Our leaders also should participate in war. Would be ending much sooner.

Great word they both wanted justice.

I think not , Muslims man are strong not only bc of numbers it’s bc of their faith and loyalty take example of Khalid bin Waleed his army was was so few in numbers and their equipment was primitive compared to their enemy’s and he took out 2 super powers of his time the Roman’s that was 10 times his army’s size and the Persian army who was also equivalent to the Roman army and yet the Muslims won , their faith and loyalty is what makes them strong not their number, so I’d say salahudeens army would have won this fight in an open ground fight Kalid bin waleed once said to the Roman army “I come to you with men who desire death as ardently as you desire life “ The Muslims back than didn’t enjoy the luxury of this life but what comes after this life

@@Unforgettable.1 That is why muslims got their sodomised ass handed to them more than not? Muslims fought in their territory for their homes. Any expansion of muslims were dont into tribal lands. Wow. Good job. Stop lying to yourself.

This is movie, Salahuddin is greater in the history than the movie, his great qualities wasn't represented well but props to West for still portraying him as honorable ruler he is

​@christains back then had the same faith and determination but now today sadlyUnforgettable.1

​@@Unforgettable.1 didnt He also screw Kids though?

Almost But in reality what happened is that they actually fought and there was a battle where Saladin was almost killed, and even tho he had x3 King Baldwin's army Saladin lost , and only 10% of Saladins army returned to Damascus

@@christiansaii6197 damn, so they didnt have terms irl

😂

Underrated comment 👌🏽

In sense, based on other comments here, it was kinda like that between the two of them.

Great leaders of its time

Achilles: Imagine a king that fights his own battles!. Salhudin: Hold my prayer mat! Baldwin: Hold my cross!

Napoleon Bonaparte

Idk man Napoleon was great leader until it got a head of him and costed him.

@@FatalS420 ISIS: We will invade Russia Napoleon and Hitler: Laughs in fascist!

I have only ever seen him in this but he was outstanding as was the rest of the cast. Beautiful movie

Ridley Scott, he touched upon the essence of that history. I think Indian movies also do a good job with grand scale movies such as Bahuballi 1&2, Bajirao Mastani, Jodhaa Akbar, Padmavaat, movies worth watching. Breath taking cinematography and story lines.

@@binthamadicamara2077 Bahubali not so much, it is goofy and fictional but the others are excellent and also historical to an extent

Agreed great movie, show humans rising above the status quo in order to save lives.

The film is full of lies and anti Christian, eg the Knights Templar were never hanged in Jerusalem they were very moral and were the Best soldiers of their time ,

So the Templars were the best soldiers their time ? I guess that’s why they couldn’t hold Jerusalem And needed 5 crusades , and lost To Sal ahdin

And as for morality .. you can’t be serious. Where is the morality in the invasion of someone else’s homeland … where is the morality in having your pope at the head of your army chopping off heads Where is the morality of auctioning off the papacy to the highest bidder for money and favours I could go on but it would take all day to describe the morality of the Christians ,

@@josephlacorte-jd9wu ah , there was never that many of them , read some history books

yes

😂😂😂

How much longer is the director version? I've only ever seen this film on regular TV so I doubt I've seen director cut.

@@mattgosling2657 it’s about 45 minutes longer if im remembering correctly. Like 3 1/2 hour run time

Bharat wale❤

هي بوصلة العالم من يمتلكها هو القوي في عصره

Movie name??

Arab culture had way more to flex at that time honestly .. Arabia was far ahead of Europe in that era in healthcare, personal hygiene, art, etc