JFK assassination: Father, son probe single-bullet theory 

I doubt it.

So heres the thing, jfk whether that day or in the future was going to be assasinated. He got involved with the wrong people and made the wrong enemies, especially his relationship to the cia. Doubt the world would be radically different, but you never know.

*tink!* Kennedy: "What was that? Why is everyone running? Why's the driver freaking out?

Everyone who watched the UA s2 knows that he would have started a nuclear war that would wipe us out😂

why didn’t he go in something like a bullet proof jeep or something? more over that, why didn’t the secret service do anything after they heard the very first shot? they left him vulnerable and wide open for an easy shot

BRUH LOL

Same

Bruh

Same

“Yo what’s up I’m alive btw”

Read the Steven King book, "11/22/63". The book does this exact same senerio. They actually stop the assassination. The moral of the story in this book, "Be careful what you wish for."

You are just being silly.

Terrible joke. grooooan.

​@@peterfraser9070comedy is subjective

@@AlfredoReyes-eb5tb Comedy is not pretty - Steve Martin

3rd shot looks like a shotgun blast tho.

When he fired the first shot, the car was moving basically perpendicular to the shot; it was moving from left to right as Oswald was looking at it. That's not an easy shot, especially when he was most likely very nervous before taking that shot. When he took the second shot, the car was almost moving directly away from him; the target wasn't moving much on any axis. Easier shot. Same for the third shot. So the shots became easier.

Back and to the left

First shot was deflected by the tree or street sign arm. That's why James Teague was hit with an off-angle fragment.

@@zachary5101 I used to think the same thing. But watch the stabilized Zapruder film. JFK actually moves forward slightly on the third shot before moving backward. The backward movement was muscle movement. Before I read Gerald Posner's book I was prepared to slam it like I'd done to so many other "Oswald did it" books. This one convinced me I had been wrong about the JFK assassination for over 40 years.

+Zerynity That jet fuel doesn't melt bars of soap.

C'mon! it was Nuetrzina special 6.5mm accepting soap bro .

That your career will be significantly improved when you use pseudoscience to moronically explain the "crazy bullet theory" that is scoffed since the FBI report of Dec 1963 that was put in to the Warren commission!

@Warren Peace Yep, two days ago I got a stroke and I was finally convinced by the Warren Committee, so thank you mr. Warren for your excellent job! Oswald was definitely on steroids, firing 4 shuts in 5,4', all by himself from back and to the right of the president's car and that's why JFK jolted back and to the left with parts of his brain splattering on the back of the car... Please bring some more "scientists" to make soap tests to explain these facts too, I cannot wait for some more laughs! LOL

Lol gotta love fake news

The third one to the head was from the front.

Did you ever think about the fact that the bullet might have ricoched off of something and hit him in the head?

Vilbacon Valcea: That is not a fact. The fact is that there is no evidence for such a thing. Did you have something in particular in mind, by the way?

Realbillball He was in the sewer(seen in ALL videos, including this CGI) and had a "can't miss" point blank shot from the curb sewer opening, which was only slightly ahead of the limo on the President's side of car. This shooter was the "fail safe" shooter, and was only to fire if the job wasn't done successfully already.

Not a single bullet. Ive watched videos over and over. He gets shot in the neck first and then after he went to grab his neck, boom the right side of his head blows open. Theres no way one bullet can do that. Not to mention that the first bullet also struck the front passenger. It slows the bullet down

The public was kept from seeing the film play for 12 years. Thank God for Mr. Groded who showed it on an early Haraldo show.

I can't believe they released the Zapruder film 12 years after the assassination.

unfortunately the Zapruder film we see today isn't the orginal, the CIA got hold of the film shortly after the shooting and altered it, removing frames of the head wound and when the limo slowed to a stop.

The person who did it was sitting in the far back and to the left of the limo... back and to the left.. Back and to the left! Now, Who is sitting in the backseat to the left of Johnny? I'll give you three guesses but you're only going to need one!🏌🏿‍♂️The person who did it was sitting in the far back and to the left of the limo! I repeat: Back and to the left...Back and to the left! Now, Who was sitting in the 'back' to the 'left' of Johnny? I'll give you three guesses but you're only going to need one!🏌🏿‍♂️

@@thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303 There is NO WAY Jackie killed him. That is the absolutely most absurd theory of all time.

The doctors at Parkland did not speculate on whether wounds were enterance or exit. They knew instantly that JFK had fatal wounds and simply did what they could to alleviate pain. They did not examine the body, which was covered in blood obscuring detail, thoroughly at all. In fact, they had no idea that he had a wound in his back, they never turned him over.

Not true. Dr Perry has always testified it was an exit wound. Privatly maybe a differant story

Connolly did not know whether or not the first shot fired struck Kennedy. He heard the rifle shot and turned to look behind him, but did not see him. He said this over and over. As Connolly was turning to his right to see if he could find Kennedy that way, that was when he was struck by the second shot. That bullet struck both men. Connolly never was certain that the first shot struck Kennedy and he never avowed that it did. His testimony on this never changed, and there are several vids of him speaking about it on RU-vid.

Only one problem with that is the bullet that entered Connolly's back keyholed. That means sideways. It had to have hit something first.@@rossie714

the doctors at Parkland did not know there was a back wound. It makes the theory of the front neck wound flimsy without counting for the back wound at the time. Also, the back wound was never found to have an exit -- meaning it had to either be in the body or it had to exit the neck. It seems to me the neck wound is from the back with the head wound possibly from the side/front

JakeyBoy me too

Lol same

Lmao same

Same

same here

Also using Black Ops models

the thing with computerized modelling....garbage in means garbage out

@Goose Tater HaHa LoL, lOoK i'M gOnNa ShAmE oN hIm JuSt BeCaUsE oF a MiStAkE

@Goose Tater not a native speaker so my English is alright given the context. Odd thing to point out.

@Goose Tater you deleted your comment

my teacher showed us in the assasination vid if you watch the driver closely he reaches back and point and him right before the 2nd shot

The driver shot him it’s on film clearly. Over the shoulder bam 💥

@@jimmyjewtron2845 exactly

@brob-zy8zi While you were napping, the ARRB already examined the "unreleased files" (of which there's not many left), and reported there was nothing to suggest much less prove, a conspiracy.The "hidden" files are the last gasp by conspiracy kooks that have nothing left. They have no evidence of a conspiracy and no clue who or what else to blame.

James Files who was the actual shooter will be back at the Grassy Knoll this fall in 2023: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BXv9GJFLsr0.htmlsi=NVvXu_y4A50J0-C9

You are absolutely correct- this video is a joke. how much longer must we put up with all this crap.

Try and keep up.

Podunk Alabama, huh? Apparently you’re not aware of UAB hospital where the first heart transplant in Alabama was performed, or countless other major shooting trauma operations have been performed.

EXACTLY. It's not even cose. So when people purposely overlook this it's very dissapointing..even more dissapointing if they simply didn't look at the autopsy photos to be certain.

This is false. You are referencing the poorly referenced dot made on the face-sheet diagram, which was later corrected by the pathologist who drew it. It’s the painstaking measurements and precise anatomical location that matters, not an approximated dot on comic-book diagram. The back wound was above the scapula (shoulder blade) and was measured with great precision. You will look up the precise locations and will know what’s true, but you will refuse to acknowledge it. It’s how the conspiracy-minded brain works.

the where talking about the neck of JFK because that's where he was shot the 1st time but ik what you mean because the other was also shot

Unfortunately this is what happens when you go up against the federal bank,look up executive order 11110

@@bemotivated8443 ...and when you want to dissolute the CIA and put it under direct presidential control. When you want to withdraw troops from a small Asian country when millions of tons of military equipment is waiting nearby from the unfought end of the 2nd World War. When you want to put and end a billion dollar Casino and drug related mob and government business. When you just want Cuba be.

in what bones and organs did Kennedy get shot?

@@ignatziusturret5641 These 2 government puppets are spreading untruth. If one takes some time and looks at all the _real_ evidence--and there are mountains of it--there is *_no way_* that Oswald acted alone.....if he even acted at all. Very Best Regards, Tom Scott Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System _Our American Injustice System_ _Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_

That shot can be clearly seen coming from behind on the Zapruder film.

That only happened in that Kevin Costner movie.

JFK The film that exploded the stupid idiotic theory of one man with a Magic Rifle firing Magic Bullets etc.. killing our President.

@@vernpascal1531 JFK the movie has fallen off the Cliff of relevance. The Original Zapruder film that proves a Single shot struck JFK and Connolly still Wins the Day.

They did. Watch the entire episode, not shown here. It was aired on PBS. You can pay RU-vid & watch the entire episode. It was excellent & I am totally convinced that Oswald was the lone gunnan. All the other conspiracy garbage you hear is just that, garbage. You can't argue with physical evidence.

" we all knew " - reeeeeallly definitive

It's remarkable that they're still keeping it up.

❤

Correct, except the cover up is wholly justified and the American people are far better off being left in the dark.

@@nancycombsify yeah, too bad there's all these scientific, fact-based, repeatable ballistic tests that keep getting in the way of them (keeping it going)..

The average American believes that Oswald never handled a rifle before the day he assassinated JFK. Oswald actually practiced with the Carcano rifle before he assassinated JFK.

@@radar0412 -Hey unless you are blind and disregard physics, which you must if you swallow the official garbage, the head shot came from The Grassy Knoll....

@@vernpascal1531 The shot to the back of JFK'S head came from the back. It can be clearly seen on the Zapruder film. There's even an autopsy photograph of the entry wound to the back of JFK'S head. Somehow I have a feeling the garbage you've swallowed is enough to fill The Lincoln Tunnel.

You just need to know how the works and understand bulletspeed to predict a shot that will hit

@TermsofService He barely qualified with a rifle. Horrible shooter.

Pfft if youre scared of that then please, never become president, we need bravery and leadership

+ adrixlly Sure you can! All you gotta do is pledge your support for all the secret societies.

Too bad, I would voted for you. Have a good day.

adrixlly 😂😂💪🏽

adrixlly Too bad you seemed like the one to have made a better president than that comic with orange face with the fluffy hair.

Lol

Literally In Mary Moorman's photo. As In, You can See Him. Right There In The Window 4.bp.blogspot.com/-L83z3F_FExo/T9O4z82JSfI/AAAAAAAABpM/utf4KJ0h5zU/s2500/Mary-Moorman-Photo.jpg

No.

Yes! It thew his head back and to the left blowing the back of his skull off. The doctors at parkland ER said the back of his skull was blown off as well. Magic bullet: Yes a bullet can go into yaw after the first hit but at that velocity, there's no way it had enough time to make such radical changes in direction. They also totally discount the witnesses on the ground and on the bridge who heard the shot from the grassy knoll and saw the smoke. They also said it was a different sound.

The fatal shot came from the gutter as he rode by..and cia and mob joined forces to take jfk out.

@@markherring3513 You forgot Castro, and his supporters and opponents, the Soviets .... oh, and Uncle Tom Cobbly and all.

Tried to help the people

Donald Trump tried and the swamp is tightening their grip.

@@valdavis4474 dude you're about to start a war

He was just a person trying to expose the false idealism the government was in. It was ruining our society . . He was tired of being the face of deception.

What was he exposing and help us with what?

Yes , unfortunately!

Because it was the government

Shhhh. Common sense and logic isn't allowed here.

@@anthonydyson1654 -Yes it's the conspiracy theorists with common sense,logic and the truth. Lone Nutters are just disruption agents...

He got hit from the back. The movement 'back and to the left' happened because his head had nowhere else to go after the initial impact of the bullet. His head moved forward at first , then recoiled back and to the left. His chin probably hit the top of his chest before recoiling. This happened in a microsecond.

@Goose Tater r/ihaveastroke

Martin McDonald 😂😂😂😂😂

Martin McDonald begins the gun silly

She was busy feeding the tigers. Do we know what she fed them? Her husband...

Yooo

Morgan Marsh dont know for sure

Donnell Vickers enlighten us then

@@hop4784 they still saying that there was One SHOOTER' impossible look at the film his head went VIOLENTLY TO THE LEFT AND BACK, it was clearly a frontal head shot.

@Donnell Vickers One shooter two bullets.

@@Lolpy. i still think that is was more then one shooter, cause his head popped open from the front to the back, if he got shot from the back his head would have went forward

@@donnellvickers6314 exactly and don't let any debunker shill tell you otherwise...

*Gun shot*

I Am Kennedy, I Am Not Accustomed To Tragedy! **Cries**

Clone high........f-funny

Gun shot and losing their new born son.

You beat me to it

Right. So if you don't listen to The Connally's, or both Dr. Gregory, and Dr. Shaw who treated Connally, and the 2 Autopsy Assistants and the 2 Federal Agents who didn't believe the SBT...Oh Brother! IOW-Just don't listen to those who were there and make up a hail mary story and with authority can sell it to the media .

And two separate shots means two shooters: conspiracy.

@@brianlecloux6508 But there was just one shooter. It is a absolute FACT someone fired a rifle owned by Oswald 3 times from the 6th floor at 12:30 pm Dallas time. The media boys only heard three shots as did many others so there isn't a second shooter period.

@@boblackey1 Incorrect. There were five shots. That is rock solid evidence from the acoustics analysis done by BBN and validated by Weiss and Ashkenasy. The shot from the Knoll killed JFK as seen on the Z film. There were two head wounds on the President, one low from the back, causing subcortical damage as shown in the official photos and x rays, the other from the right front causing cortical damage, as shown on the official photos and x rays. These wounds are discontinuous caused by separate bullets of different ammunition. There is NO evidence that rifle was fired on 11/22/1963. The Warren Report was a WHITEWASH.

Connelly was mistaken. But Connelly wasn't mistaken about ALL the shots coming from the rear over his right shoulder. Connelly wasn't mistaken when he said when the President was shot from behind that blood and body tissue sprayed all over the jump seat and he and his wife WHO WERE SEATED IN FRONT ON THE PRESIDENT. Connelly was also right when he said this idea that Earl Warren, Richard Russell, Gerald Ford and the other members of the Warren Commission were part of some conspiracy, Connelly said he would accept at all and it's completely ridiculous...that he knew all those men very well and they would never be involved with such a thing.

They work for the illuminati you see the eye

Probably!

Loyal Ronin I

No they are the killers!

Nope. They just have a lot of common sense and proof.

What you say is totally accurate. Why don't the lone-nut theorists comprehend this?

The bullet came from the 6th floor window; why would the bullet enter lower than it exited? The original source of the idea of a lower entry wound is the hole in his jacket; but the jacket was bunched up as a photo of him right b4 getting shot clearly shows. Parkland doctors did NOT make the original sketches of entry wounds; they didn't examine the 2 exit wounds and didn't turn him over and see the 2 entries. When Ford said he "moved the entry location up", do you think he was admitting to being a part of a cover-up to high treason? When he answered. "clarification", he meant he was changing the incorrectly low (based on jacket) entry location to the actual correct higher location. "In addition the neck wound came from the front as clearly shown in the Zapruder film.": Can you explain this statement??

Wrong, they never saw the back wound.

didn't think you could back any of that up.

@@peterfraser9070 Dr Mcallen on the 6th floor podcast said the never turned him. over.

They probably used the same model.

Complete nonsense at all levels; for one the second bullet is flattened-visibly misshapen, if you examine it front on.

One bullet is plausible if it hits Kennedy without striking bone. It has now been slowed enough to not fragment. It passes though Connelly sideways (he did have an oval entrance wound). It strikes bone at his wrist sideways which shatters that. Still too slow to fragment the bullet. The bullet they found was deformed sideways btw.

Bingo! Ballistics science is pure evidence, period. The two bullets which hit JFK were totally dissimilar because they were fired from two different rifles. Forensics 101 - frangible bullets break apart, full metal jacket rounds stay intact.

@@user6008 learn that you can have two type of bullets (HP,and FMJ) within the same mag. Alternating the types for a reason

@@THEAMERICAN-ob2wt Sure you can have two types of rounds in the weapon but not two sizes. A round going through bone causes a slightly larger hole than the round fired. The 6mm hole in the back of Kennedys skull would not allow a 6.5mm Carcano round to pass. Now on the other hand.... a 5.56mm round could.

Bullsh$t, but the “ official” line.

Wrong. The first shot missed, the second hit Kennedy in the neck, passed through him, and then hit Connally in the back and wrist. The third shot was the fatal one. It is possible, it's been re-recreated, get a job or a better hobby.

@@c.j.giordano2129 If you'd bothered to read the autopsy, the wound was 5.5 inches below his mastoid process, which is the bony part of the ear; And 5.5 inches from the tip of the right acromion process, which is the pointed part of the shoulderblade. So at the base of the right side of his neck. It grazed the right side of his C6, came out his throat, and continued on a roughly downward angle, hitting John Connally in the back and continued onwards before striking his right wrist. And the shot did not come from the front. There was a small entry wound in the back right of his head right on the part of his hair, and the force of the shot carved a trench in his head and blew out skull fragments from the back to the front right. A bullet coming out to the front and right would force your head in the opposite direction. So...back and to the left. Back And to the left.

I’ve shot a lot of guns and have never seen a bullet go through something and come out pristine. I don’t think it could have gone through two people and not have major damage

@@gregirwin6046 Who said it was? The bullet started to tumble before hitting John Connally and hit him at an odd angle, almost lengthwise.

@@c.j.giordano2129 I don't know how to argue with someone who doesn't understand basic human anatomy. The C in C6 stands for "cervical", as in your cervical vertebrae. The bones IN YOUR NECK. And the C6 isn't even the lowest! It counts down from the top, 1 to 8. Your C6 is in the base of your neck. The bullet grazed just to the right of it, passing through his neckstrap muscles. He wasn't sitting straight up and down when he was hit, he was leaning slightly forward, which gave the bullet the trajectory to pass out of the front, tumble through Connally's torso, rebound off one of his ribs, smash his wrist, and stop in his leg.

I believe you!

@ray h. I do

@@gonogazz you shouldn't

Yes 1+1 = 5.

Ignorant

@Random Account Yeah

Few can put all of the evidence in play. Can you?

@Laika24102007 According to official US documents all of the evidence is gone? Read the WCR.

They even forgot the simplest thing ever: the gun wasn't pointed straight out.

the "magic bullet" has slowed down considerably once it hits Connolly's wrist, so it isn't going to act like a direct hit at that point.

John Connally still had bullet fragments in his chest and wrist when he was buried; far more than what was missing from the magic bullet, not to mention bullet fragments found elsewhere. The magic bullet theory is BS.

@@chriswolney5002 lol that you could ever know the number/size/weight of the fragments that remained in Connolly chest or what was 'missing' from the bullett is really kind of laughable.

@@rrh1980Obviously you didn't read my entire post. You either lack critical thinking skills, or have an agenda. You don't need to know bullet fragment details to conclude that the 'official' narrative of what happened is highly suspect.

You got that right and a helluva lot more than one.

Vern Pascal duh

You are the other!!

Check history, lady bird would do Anything to get lbj in the White House ANYTHING!!

Go watch it again. You clearly see the driver finish the job

The one thing most people ignore is the fact that JFK was NOT in line with Connolly's seat. It was a jump seat that was inward 1 foot from Connolly's. The bullet didn't stop and turn 90 degrees like conspiracy theorists claim. It went thru JFK and straight into the back of Connelly's shoulder. Then, thru his wrist and ending up lodged in his thigh. No magic bullet.

The bullet was found intact on Connelly’s gurney. A bullet that hit 2 bones would be distorted.

Calling critical thinkers who should be questioning narratives, “conspiracy theorists”, completely discredits you and all of your posts. You are not looking for truth but to suit a narrative. People that are not critical thinkers such as yourself will most often be wrong and somebody’s fool.

That was the second and last bullet. They were talking about the first bullet that went through Kennedy's neck and struck the passenger in front. Not sure how resistant that soap is but it wouldnt take much for a bullet to go through a human's neck.

@@BlackWolf-kr7wo I love how they examine one small aspect that maybe could have been theoretically possible- yet they don't address the fact that Fletcher Prouty, literally the chief of Special Operations for The Joint Chiefs of Staff when Kennedy was killed, has unequivocally stated that Kennedy was killed in a highly orchestrated fashion- and that it was immediately covered up at the highest levels.

And what would u know karen....

@@ethanchen2891 she knows more than a chump like you.

They were talking about the bullet that hit his neck

I don't know what moment you are reffering to, but what they display on the table actually is the bullet itself. the whole cartridge is far larger and has a bottle neck. Also the 6.5mm Carcano bullet is round nosed like the one shown here. Apart from that, the whole report is pure MSM rubbish and doesn't explain anything. What they are telling makes as much sense as if they would say: when the trigger is pulled, this rifle goes BANG and a bullet flies out this end - and this prooves that the "single bullet" theory is correct.

@@JosipRadnik1 yes the bullet on the table is correct, I was referring to the brief animation

@@jonathankirchberger5526 I am answering a bit late, but the animation is also correct. The carcano slug was crimped into the casing creating that line. It is a very long slug and that line is clearly shown in photos of the slugs taken from the crime scene.

IMO, it came from the gutter as JKF rode by.

Agree with all you said Ken. Curious, where do you think the shooters were located?

You do know that a high powered rifle can go thru one person and go thru a second one, right?

“in the throat at the top of his tie from the "front" ( as documented at parkland by the truma personnel)” Nonsense. Dr. Humes found bruises in the neck that couldn’t have been caused by the tracheotomy because the circulation of blood in the body was nearly nonexistent at that point. Without blood, there could be no bruise-that is, there could only be damage to tissue, not discoloration of the tissue. The bruising of the neck muscles and right lung had to have been caused while the president’s heart and lungs were still operating sufficiently to permit a bruise to occur. In short, these bruises, which lay along a path between the president’s back and his throat wound, could only have occurred prior to the incisions that were made at Parkland Hospital (i.e., they had to have been made at the time of the shooting), and hence, the damage found there had to have been the result of a bullet entering the president’s back and exiting the throat. Also, JFK’s shirt collar shows that the fibers were pushed OUTWARDS. “the right side of the head from the front ( as documented in the Z film )” The ZF shows the head moving FORWARDS as seen here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-o0d6LG27hQM.html Enhanced frames show brain matter sprayed forward. “most likely by a frangible round” Nope. Dr. Charles Petty of the HSCA forensic pathology panel responded to Dr. Wecht’s frangible-bullet theory in his testimony before the committee. “I happen to be the coauthor of the only paper that has ever been written about the wounding capabilities of frangible bullets…[They are] used in shooting galleries…[and] are specifically designed to break up on the backdrop of the…gallery so as not to ricochet and cause injury to either the shooters or the people who work in the gallery…Such bullets and the breakup products of [these] bullets are easy to detect in X-rays. There are no such fragments in the X-ray of the late president’s head. There was no frangible bullet fired. I might also add that frangible bullets are produced in .22 caliber loads and they are not produced [for] larger weapons.” In fact, all eight of Dr. Wecht’s colleagues on the HSCA forensic pathology panel rejected his frangible-bullet hypothesis as well as any hypothesis concerning a bullet striking the president’s head in the area of the exit wound. “We believe strongly that another missile did not enter the right front of the head within the area of the large defect. We find no evidence supporting this speculation in the photographs of the head or brain, or in any of the X-rays of either adjacent bone fragments or the left side of the head where, in such an event, one might expect such a bullet to lodge. No other missile was found, and the majority [of the forensic panel excluding Dr. Wecht] knows of no bullet that would completely disintegrate on hitting the soft tissue of the brain, as Dr. Wecht suggests.” Truma personal at parkland dealt with gunshot wounds on a regular basis at that time as I'm sure they do now and as a result are and were very qualified with regards to entry and exit wounds. “ They were focused on saving his life, not determining where the wounds came from. The very nature of an emergency trauma room at a hospital is such that forensically precise and accurate descriptions of the character of a gunshot wound cannot be expected. In fact, a 1993 article in JAMA reported that “the odds that a trauma specialist will correctly interpret certain fatal gunshot wounds are no better than the flip of a coin.” A study conducted by investigators at Bowman Gray School of Medicine at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, from 1987 to 1992, compared the post-mortem findings of a board-certified forensic pathologist with the medical records of emergency medicine physicians, trauma surgeons, and neurosurgeons. It was discovered that out of forty-six cases, trauma specialists made errors in 52 percent, either in differentiating the exit and entrance wound or in determining the number of bullets. In 15 percent of the cases, the trauma specialist made both types of error. As expected, multiple gunshot wounds (the situation with the president) were more often misinterpreted, accounting for 74 percent of the errors. Even single gunshot wounds were misclassified in 37 percent of the cases.

The problem I have is when you said the throat shot was from the front. If that shot came out the back of the neck, it would have been a pretty big and jagged hole. That hole was the size of a pencil. That was the shot he got behind the road sign. When he appears from behind the sign he's holding his throat. Your description of bullet #1 and bullet #2 are the same bullet. The third bullet was the head shot. The first shot deflected off the traffic light support hanging over the road. He never got hit in the throat from the front.

@@robertromero8692 Unfortunately the video you linked is from the government edit version, not original Z film. The 2 frames they look at actually don't show any movement of the head when you watch the spacing along Jackie's arm and the back of the seat with relation to JFK's head.

the unaccountable shot was the first one, that was assumed to have missed. the zapruder film basically confirms this.

Multiple witnesses said they heard at least six shots. Can you confirm?

There was a report of a bullet hitting the curb and a piece of the concrete flew up and cut a guy's face. That was reported the week after JFK died. I haven't heard anything about this since.

"Back....and to the left" was a quote from the movie JFK. It's a movie, not a documentary. Doesn't mean it's true. You need to talk with a qualified ballistics expert.

@@thelakeman5207 look at the footage mate. It’s clearly visible.

It doesn't.

Doesn’t the Zapruder film show that he’s hit in the side of the head?

How do you know that? The whole right side of his skull was blown off. Just his scalp was left.

Yes, there's so many things wrong with The Single Bullet Theory no honest person could accept it. 1. Both FBI Agents denied it in their initial report and 30 years later to the ARRB. 2. Both Autopsy Assistants in interviews said back wound never exited throat 3.Both Doctors who worked on Connally who had seen 100's of bullet wounds in Korea and WW2, did not believe it. There's a lot more but that should be enough not to believe it.

The driver killed him which is why they call it the magic bullet because it’s impossible

@Joel Le Bras: Put your brain-Bras on straight. The Z-film shows Connally and JFK reacting at the same instant to the bullet that passed through both of them. Your 2-1/2 seconds timing is pure "magic" nonsense.

@@apointofinterest8574 What an imagination ! Nobody can see such a thing in the Z-film and Conally always said he was hurt by a separate shot. But you may be know that point better than Conally himself ? Notice I would'nt be surprised : in that case everything is possible even a supernatural intervention.

@@JoelLeBras Someone, in the heat of the moment (Connally) cannot always judge exactly what has happened. They're too close to the forest to see the trees. Subsequent calm and thorough investigations confirmed it was a single bullet that hit both men. Even the governor later publicly agreed with the WC's conclusions.

I through i was the only one seeing that

The tumbling bullet is a myth. Dr Shaw didn't describe a wound caused by a tumbling bullet. He had the best view of JCs back.

@@81overon Simply not true. You're posting stupid drivel. Connelly's scars prove the bullet was tumbling end over end.

@@TheMrSuge Connally's scar is from a horizontal incision that Dr Shaw made to clean out the wound.

@@wilsont1010 More drivel. There is a straight line from the 6th Floor corner window of the TSBD through JFK and Connely.

they succeeded in creating confusion, around the most important obvious fact: those were multiple shots from different angles by different snipers, on top of Oswald casual and imprecise shooting

Purefoldnz thats how it works

Purefoldnz No ..it was a glancing shot..from the side ..opesite from grassy nole

It didn't come out in perfect condition, it was compressed from the side after entering Connolly in yaw. Watch "Cold Case JFK." It will clear up a lot of the confusion.

I listen to the Haags, not conspiracy theorists. I find them to be highly credible. As Luke, the father, says, the Kennedy assassination is the classic shooting reconstruction case. The bullets Oswald used were extremely rare, military style bullets from the first World War. They are highly stable, with a blunt, cylindrical tip. If the Haags thought something was out of the ordinary they would have said so. The bullet wasn't pristine, it was flattened, from contacting Connolly in yaw. It entered Connolly in yaw because it had already passed through something/someone (Kennedy). There was bullet wipe on Kennedy's jacket (a circular initial entry wound), but none on Connolly's (a rectangular entry wound from a bullet in yaw---again, it had already passed through something). It's all pretty logical, and more importantly, it's scientifically repeatable, as the Haags have demonstrated. The idea that the trajectories don't work out (passing through Kennedy then into Connolly) has also been disproved. Kennedy's skull fractures all radiate forward, which contradicts the grassy knoll, frontal shot theories. Kennedy's forward movement after being shot from the rear is also scientifically explainable, but it doesn't "seem" to make sense so people don't dig further.

1. Nobody in Dealey Plaza thought they were hit by the same bullet! 2. The EOP wound vanished from the official record in 1966,though it was seen by at least 8 witnesses,including the 3 Doctors and Dr. Finck said ,and I believe Humes too for the HSCA that photos were taken of this wound and they also vanished 3. Roughly 90% of the Autopsy Photos have disappeared or were destroyed-we have the testimony of WH Photographers Knudsen& O'Donnell which in tandem destroy the official story. So, the real kooks are the insulting arrogant windbags who argue the official BS!

but you do know that the driver slowed the car down after the first hit right?

The vehicle was moving slow. Then even slower after the first hit. Not hard to hit if you've ever shot a gun

@@brendenperry3770 From the angle and height he was shooting at, it’s a hard shot

*car crashes*

WAAA-

Gun shot and losing their baby son

*car explodes*

“ I’m a Kennedy! I’m not used to tragedies..”

Connolly, in his autobiography, said the bullet fell out of his leg onto the operating room floor, where a nurse placed it into a bag.

Oswald acted alone, period. But what I won't explain is this fact - three bullets, two rifles, one shooter.....Oswald. Let it rest, Americans are better off not knowing the truth.

@@user6008 By Oswald, do you mean the high school drop out from the deep south that spoke fluent Russian? Maybe they all do, I don't know that many. I do know the simple fact that Oswald's scope was misaligned, When the army tested it they had to repair it first. And the rifle was either a Mauser or Carcano, depending on the day. I understand the doubt, there were only 92 witnesses that said the shots came from the "little hill."

@@ericbedenbaugh7085 There were two Oswalds. Different men.

@@Frip36 I've heard that theory. I'm not sure what to think about it.

They certainly did not explain that = = Because they couldn’t ! Oswald supposedly shot at General Walker weeks earlier and Missed. His First shot at Kennedy = = A Miss ( presumably the most likely to be a hit for aiming etc ) ~ ~ And then Two Bang On Shots with the second one looking most likely to have come from the front = = Oswald sure improved a lot from the first two shots ( that we know about ) = = He sure improved on the job = = The assassination went all too well ( from the Killer / killers point of view ) and everthing went so well from that point of view = = It is really plausible that Oswald did this = = The Loser who couldn’t get anything right = = suddenly did .Exact right place right time ~ Two very good shots ( with one looking like it came from the front ) It’s a stretch to believe all of this ! ! ~ A Big Stretch.

It wasn't in "perfect" shape. It was compressed so that the circular shape of the bullet became oval after contacting Connolly in yaw.

@@williamtaylor5193 Contacting Connolly in yaw? What are you talking about? Do you ever read WC testimony?

@@81overon The hole in Connolly's jacket was rectangular, unlike Kennedy's initial entry wound, which was circular. It's not a difficult concept.

@@williamtaylor5193 Dr Shaw didn't operate on Gov Connally's jacket. I've been studying this case since the late 60s. You have to come up with something better than a hole in a jacket. Pure nonsense.

“Additionally the Doctor that looked at the president in the hospital claimed the neck shot in the front was an entrance hole.” There were several doctors at Parkland hospital. Here’s what some of them had to say: Dr. Marion Jenkins: “I thought this was a wound of exit because it was not a clean wound, and by ‘clean,’ [I mean] clearly demarcated, round.” Dr. Charles Baxter: “We…did not determine at that time whether this represented an entry or an exit wound. Judging from the caliber of the rifle that [was] later found…this would more resemble a wound of entry. However…depending upon what a bullet of such caliber would pass through, the tissues it would pass through on the way to the [throat], I think that the wound could well represent either an exit or entry wound.” The Parkland doctors were confused because they never turned JFK over. They never saw the entrance wound on his upper back. Fibers in the front of the shirt collar were pushed OUTWARDS, indicating an exit wound in front. "It actually defies the laws of Physics. " Wrong. It fits very well with the laws of physics.

What if the gun that killed JFK was installed in the dashboard of the vehicle, aimed at Kennedy, and fired upwards, through JFK, toward the book depository, where the second gun was planted, and where lee Harvey Oswald was told to be by his co-workers, who were CIA operatives posing as employees?

CIA did this crime. CIA makes stories to cover up the truth. People have researched extensively and know who killed their president.

Through and throughs happen all the time. Just ask the director of Rust. in fact slowing and yawing of the bullet is the only explanation for the wounds on Connelly.

Governor Connally ALWAYS stuck to his testimony that he was hit by a SECOND bullet after he heard a shot and turned around and saw President Kennedy holding his throat. This is completely verified by watching the Z-film.

I thought the same thing, but then I realized that this is just how the bullet head looks. See 1:37

Finally. He*ck youtube algorithm, seriously

There were also 41 bullet fragments in Connally’s body

Aaaand, my comment is deleted again.

WRONG lol take a better look and edit this comment.

MK ULTRA

Tony Yu ya, and a piece of the back of Kennedy’s head got blown off, which means a second shot came from the front...

@Birken Schimpff No en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy#/media/File%3AHSCA-JFK-head-7-125.jpg

@@Birkbirk1 how many people have you seen shot in the head?

@@Lolpy. if you believe in that diagram then you have less brains in your head than JFK ended up with! 28 doctors at Parkland Hospital witnessed seeing a 4 inch hole in the lower back right portion on his head. They can't all of imagined it! Please do some revision and open your mind, no pun intended.

William Crookshank Yeah. This is hard to watch eh? That bullet didn’t ricochet like that and then turn up looking g perfect..

Warren Peace ... ? Yes it was. It was intact. INTACT! My lord. “No it wasn’t” Input mate, well done. X

Warren Peace It can be both. And it can also be one or the other. You see they are descriptive words :) The bullet was perfectly intact. :) Unlucky mate.

@@creativeamerican8811 the bullet shatters when going inside a hard or even touching a hard surface for example the bones, muscles and skin.

:emojiwithfingerguns: Yeah shatters.. So not intact Warren deleted his comments I think.. Meh bored of it all now. No one wants to believe the truth anyway. That’s the key.

Conelly knew that you don't hear the shot that hits you, due to his wartime experience, he also heard the first shot, so he knew it didn't hit him. He didn't hear the second shot, which penetrated both men.

@@theincorruptedeye8226 amen

@@theincorruptedeye8226 Bingo. 1st round missed, 2nd hit JFK and Connelly and the 3rd exploded JFK's skull.

First shot missed everyone. Second shot hit Kennedy in the neck and Connally in the back. Third shot, well you've seen what that did.

​@@thelakeman5207 explains to me why the reaction is off in the video.

TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE Fell in the car, some bits of the trunk and maybe some outside of the car, and yes some on the windshield and some hit the cat windshield in front

everywhere. Nellie Connelly said there were pieces of brain tissue on the inside of the limo, on the trunk and Clint Hill running up to the limo got some on him, pretty gruesome.

Which is what .223 military fragmentation round is designed and engineered to do.

No it didn’t, it went through his head and was lodged in his limo, might’ve also been the one on connallys stretcher, who knows, this case will *never* be solved

@@suspense8282 It was solved in 1992.

That is a very serious question!!!!!!! Maybe Gerald posner should be the one to answer it!!!!!

@@suspense8282 Nope... frangible bullet. Not a full metal jacket

He shot 3 times and 2 got hit, 1 in head and other in shoulder/neck

AVH Gaming what do you think about another shooter

I cant lie he does

Leroy he was in the military

I know I'm late for this but why he was such a great shot is because he was in the marines in 1956 where he earned a sharpshooter qualification

It's not you gun specialist!

It certainly shows these ppl have no clue what they are doing.

It sounds like great evidence.. but the quality is very poor. And other experts hear 3 shots. They can't even reliably identify which officer's radio it came from. Also none of the witnesses heard that many shots. Most everyone heard 3. The most interesting thing of that audio to me is that you hear the voice of officer Tippit. He'll later be shot and murdered by Oswald.

Maybe all those shots were echoes off the buildings.

Problem is, the police open mic captured shots and echoes.

The audio was analysed and compared with Zapruda film. Conclusion made. Then later the audio debunked. Then later another audio team reestablished the findings of the first and debunked the debunker. Amazing how it works. 😊

Yes it took 2.3 secs to reload the bolt action and that did not include aiming. The last two shots were less than 0.75secs. if you watch Helmer Reenberg footage there is a railroad switching room control guy Lee Bowers who raps out the rythmn on a table. Tap..... tap tap.

well...it didnt go thru the seat, so go back to the drawing board. and once it goes thru kennedy it isnt acting like a "fired bullet" that you are guessing it is acting like...its tumbling and a lot slower...so its not gonna create the wounds and look like you think.

@@rrh1980 how’s that explain the right side of his skull being blown out? There’s a second shooter.

@@midwestprepper4345 the bullet exploded out the right side of his head....that is an exit wound.

@@rrh1980 correct it is a exit wound. Look how his body reacts though. There’s definitely a second shooter as the right side is blown out. Now that round hitting has to have either came from his left or from in front of him. Now you and I both know by common sense when a bullet hits bone it’ll deviate from its course(depending on the type of cartridge; ie caliber, ammunition type: fmj etc etc) so if there was only one shooter how come Oswald died in jail under police custody? Why is Kennedys investigation and autopsy reports still classified till this day? Just saying this all seems awfully suspicious.

In decades no one has ever said the bullet went through the seat. But just adding in a little lie makes the reast of your story seem better, right. At least to you. The bullet was deformed. It was a fully jacketed and meant to go through things relatively intact. Not like the frangible rounds in later years.

He was an adulterous drug addict with ties ties to the mafia.... its declassified do your homework. Yet I have to agree I woulda hung out with him . And not traumatic compared to a fatality "mortal combat" 🤣

@@Hateandlotus Yeah I heard he had a sultry affair with Marilyn Monroe, thus being an unfaithful husband.

He also wasted a lot of American money during the Cold War and was very uneducated, especially due to his age/experience. He was a “yes” man-very easy to convince.

Ahhh I love when first graders do their first president reports. It so cute

Nobody even mentions the most obvious thing that nullifies this whole program. They have the bullet entrance in the base of the neck. The entrance was 6 inches below the base of the neck! FBI Report,Dr. Boswell Autopsy Face Sheet etc.

***** What Science exactly? Please don't say physics?!!? Come on tell me?

You believe Kennedy and Connolly were hit with the same bullet? You believe there was only one shooter? Not one expert marksman has ever replicated this then add to this the fact Oswald had a had not fired a rifle that day. The FBI has his parafin test which is clear.

No expert marksman has ever replicated the shooting with the same rifle.

***** So uh.....where's your evidence? I see you spouting off yet presenting nothing of substance. Oh that's right, nevermind....you can't. :-)

Halotest100 I don't know where you're getting your information, but it's been done many times. You need to expand your research. Stay away from the JFK movie, and people like Jesse Ventura.

That soap is equivalent to human tissue..so therefore it is the best example for testing.

no it wasn't

@@chadhaire1711 yea it was

There was not a bullet from the front. The last shot (The one which blows away JFK's skull) came from behind. That "explosion" is actually an exit wound.

Yes there was a bullet from the front which entered JFK's right temple. An explosive round.

@@mezchr Why is practically all of the exit damage shown in the film forward of JFK's right ear then?

Oh yes, *do* see the Zapruder film, which plain as day shows very obvious exit damage forward of JFK's right ear, but shows practically no damage behind the ear. It also plainly shows the majority of the bloody spray exiting forward.

@@Caeruleo There may have been "exit damage" but the damage we see in the Z film and that which we do not see in the Z film was not only caused by a shot from behind but from both directions (front and back). There was a massive, gaping (soft ball size) wound in the back of JFK's head observed by Parkland doctors.