Joshua's Conquest and The Mystery of Ai - The Exodus

Подписаться 33 тыс.

Просмотров 20 тыс.

50% 1

-- Patterns of Evidence Quick Links --
► SHOP ONLINE - store.patternsofevidence.com/
► BECOME A MEMBER - digitalpatternsofevidence.vhx...
► DONATE - patternsofevidence.com/donati...
► THINKER UPDATES - patternsofevidence.com/sign-up/
► PRESS INQUIRIES - patternsofevidence.com/press/
-- Find us on Social Media --
► Facebook - / patternsofevidence
► Twitter - / pattofevidence
► Instagram - / patternsofevidence
► RU-vid - / patternsofevidence
► LinkedIn - / patterns-of-evidence
► Pinterest - / pattofevidence
What is the Patterns Of Evidence Film Series?
Patterns of Evidence is a documentary film series that travels through the Bible, investigating evidence of its historical credibility, the accuracy of its transmission through the centuries, and how it impacts the modern world.
Timothy Mahoney is an award-winning investigative filmmaker, raised as a Christian, who now has the same question that many today are asking: Did the stories recorded in the Bible really happen?
In this film series, he sets off to seek answers by traveling to the locations where biblical events are said to have happened. Along the way, he interviews leading archaeologists and scholars from all over the world who argue all sides of the debate about the credibility of the Bible. The biblical stories are retold, accompanied by dramatic reenactments and special effects.
Patterns of Evidence lets the viewer draw their own conclusions as it takes them on a journey to the ancient world of the Bible. This refreshingly balanced approach is inspiring and intellectually challenging for both skeptics and believers alike, providing profound new evidence that affirms the Bible.
Thinking Man Films is the production company for the Patterns of Evidence film series and television programs. Thinking Man Media is the book publishing, curriculum development, and distribution company for Patterns of Evidence media.
-- Patterns of Evidence Films --
► "The Exodus" - Is the history found in the Bible credible? Is there any physical evidence to support the biblical story of the Exodus? An in-depth investigation by filmmaker Timothy Mahoney searches for answers to these questions amid startling new finds that match the Bible’s account of the Exodus from Egypt.
► "The Moses Controversy" - The film uncovers a new pattern of evidence that some believe link the Israelites to the world’s first alphabet. Was this a divine gift necessary for the Israelites to read the words given to Moses at Mt Sinai?
► "The Red Sea Miracle" - In this investigation Timothy Mahoney examines the journey to the crossing location, looking at two competing views of the Red Sea Miracle. The investigation raises giant questions about the real location for the crossing site and its implications on your view of God. The answers to these questions point to one of two very different realities.
► "The Red Sea Miracle II" - How could thousands of feet of water be parted at the Red Sea? Or was the sea merely parted by the act of wind in nature, through a shallow Egyptian lake? Mahoney investigates these locations to see if any have a pattern of evidence matching the Bible. This cinematic journey leads him to inquire… “Do miracles still happen today?”
-- Endorsement --
“Patterns of Evidence is an engaging, visually pleasing and fascinating piece of film-making, whatever one believes.” - Rabbi Adam Jacobs, Huffington Post
“Could this be a ‘Restore to Factory Settings’ moment? . . . Truth matters. People want to know the answers.” - Gregory Alan Thornbury, Christianity Today
-- Awards --
Winner of 13 film festival awards in 2014 including:
► Best Director - Worldfest Houston
► Best Picture - ICVM
► People’s Choice Award - Magnolia International Film Festival
► Best Cinematography, Best Sound, Best Editing - RealHeart International Film Festival Toronto

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

10 июл 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 48

@surferdude4487 11 месяцев назад

The dates not lining up is a problem with Egyptology, not The Holy Bible.

@ThomasFuchs7 2 месяца назад

Yes. And the timeline, that Patterns of Evidence: Exodus made up in the last ≈16 minutes. They had nearly everything. In the right time. Middle Broze II C Creation 4119 before the change of times flood 2463-2462 ʾAbrām/ʾAbrāhām 2111-1934 2036 mooving to Kenaʿan and Mizrayim, meeting with Mentuhotep II -> 430 a until the Exodos 2011 Jīzchāq born 2006 weaned, Hagār und Yischmāʿēʾl sent away -> 400 a under influence of Kemet 1874 Yaʿaqōb flees to the Uncle 1867 marriages 1 and 2 of 4 1867/1866 Reʾūbēn born Gad and ʾĀschēr where twins, as Sebulūn and Dīnāh 1860 Yōsēph born 1854 Yaʿaqob returns to Kenaʿan 1843 Yōsēph sold to Potiphar, Chiefbodyguard of (Sesostris III) Senwosret Chai-kau-Re ≈1882-arround 1842 3X Years 1830 Yōsēph meets Amenemhet III Ni-maat-Re ≈ 1842-1795 ≈ 10-19 Years coregent of his father 1832 1st bad year 1821 the family moves to Kemet -> 215 a until the Exodos 1686 Moschēh born 1694-1685 Cha-Nefer-Re Sobekhotep IV Daughter of the Pharaoh is just a title for his wife. Confirmed by the history and Maneto. 1646 Flight to Mideyān from Meri-kau-Re Sobekhotep VII arround 1646-1644 BC, the 7th-10tb after Sobekhotep IV. 1607 return after the death of Djed-hotep-Re Dedumose I?, to Djed-nefer-Re Dedumose II (Timaios) Maneto 1st plague August/September 1606 7th plague January/February, 9th plague March Chamsin or Vulkan, 10th plague March/April -> 40 a 11th plague Hyqsos invasion 1605 errection of the Tent of Encounter or Get-together 2 spys -> 599 a until 1st house 1567 -> 300 a until Yāʾīr 1566-1560 conquest of the Holy Land 1560-1546 rest 1546 Kūshān-Rishathayim 1267-1249 Yāʾīr 1227-1221 Yipthach 1095-1056 Shāʾūl 1056-1016 Dāwīd 1016-976 Shelōmōh 1013-1006 templeconstruction. 480 a + 114 a of evil rulers before and after the Juges 976 Rechabʿām 1Kgs 12 ->390 a 975- Yarobeʿam bēn Nebat 918-897 ʾAchab 886-858 Yehu 727-698 Yehiskiyāhū 722 Yissrāʾēl deported in 4 steps 606 Dānīʾēl deported to Bāb-ilani 597 Yechēzqʾēl deported 586 Yerūschālajim destroyed, 3rd deportation of Yehūdāh 582 4th deportation 538 beginning of the return 445 Neh 1 -> 69×7a×360 d until Palmsunday arround Sukkōth 2 Yēschūaʿ born arround Chanukāh 3 magicians from Pars-a arround February 1 Hērōdēs the Great died CANGE OF THE TIMES Pässach 11 Yēschūaʿ in the Templarea End 28 Yōchānān the Baptist January 29 baptism of the Lord 15th Nīsān, 10th (12th) April 32 Golgotha 1Kgs 3:1 Pa-seba-chai-en-niut-meri-Amun I Aa-cheper-Re-setep-en-Amun arround 1040-arround 994 14:25 971 Shishak Scheschonq-meri-Amun-netjer-heqa-Iunu „Sjsk“ Hedj-cheper-Re setep-en-Re? 946-24 Much to early. 2Kgs 17:4 Soʾ is Sheshonq VI 727-715? Pianchi/Pije/Meriamunpianchi User-maat-Re/Men-cheper-Re 746-716 BC??? MeriAmun Osorkon IV Aa-cheper-Re-setep-en-Amun 732/730-715/713 BC??? 18,21 Schebitko/Schabataka Djed-kau-Re 716-707/706 Jer 24,30 Ez 29,2 Chophraʿ Wah-ib-Re/Haa-ib-Re 10th February iulianic 589-570 Isa 19:4 It was not until around 670 before the "birth of Christ" that Psammetich I (664-610; Father of Nekau II Wehem-ib-Re 610 to 595 2Kgs 23:29-39 2Chr 35:20; 36:4 Jer 46:2), brought the sub-kingdoms together under his harsh rule. He uprooted 120,000 locals who were to build the Suez Canal in hard forced labor. The grandson of Chophraʿ Wah-ib-Re/Haa-ib-Re (February 10, jul. 589 to 570 before the "birth of Christ" Jer 44:30, the son of Psammetich II Nefer-ib-Re 595-February 9, 589), is overthrown by local troops in 570. This was the end of the hated rule of the dynasty of Psammetich I Eze 30,32 at the further invasions in Bāb-ilani. This was his end.

@detroitpolak9904 21 день назад

That’s like saying “Slavery being illegal is a problem with the Constitution, not the Bible.”

@detroitpolak9904 21 день назад

Sorry I said Bible. I meant to say slavery was endorsed by the HOLY Bible.

@surferdude4487 20 дней назад

@@detroitpolak9904 True, there were laws about slavery in the Holy Bible. They were mostly about how a slave should be treated and under what circumstances a slave must be release. But that does not change the fact that the time-line currently held by main-stream Egyptologists is wrong. The people that build the ancient pyramids and the Sphynx were much more ancient than the people that held Isreal captive.

@ThomasFuchs7 17 дней назад

No. It was not. Not in this sense. The Bible knew and fortold, in example Deut 28 that this things happened and did not say, that it is good. Espacially not, that we shall do this.

@EcclesiastesLiker-py5ts 4 месяца назад

I would live to one day go to see these sites, and people like you are doing wonderful work in allowing people to see the real places, not just the traditional sites, and not taking the popular, easy route and deciding that the primary litterary source from the period is just plain wrong.

@M0rmagil Год назад

You guys are putting out some really good stuff. I appreciate your work.

@honorablevessel 7 месяцев назад

1:50 This woman is a historian/archaeologist. She is NOT a linguistics or poetry expert. There are multiple examples in the Old Testament where the author would use the contemporary name of a city when describing it in ancient times (when it had a different name). It would be like a modern person referring to New York City back in the year 1635. Techanically there was no New York City in 1635 because it was still going by the name New Amsterdam.

@kvelez Год назад

1:56 Thanks for the fact. God bless. 7:44 Praise God. 11:48 Interesting.

@yosefgreen3130 Год назад

I is a 👁

@mdb1239 Год назад

Whether it is the real Ai or not maybe is debatable (although I think the case for it being Ai is very strong). But what this destroyed fortress proves with the in-situ New Kingdom scarab of Amenhotep II (and its pottery) is that the pottery found in Jericho in the destruction layer (where the walls came tumbling down) dates from the time of the New Kingdom and Amenhotep II.

@cobrasuites1205 8 месяцев назад

Yes the king of Ai in the future .is the or a antichrist once a force gets him or one of them and let's say throws him out front of the city gates like the white house well then we will know that when they react and go after them it will expose the side of the antichrist.

@patrickhenry2845 Год назад

Joshua was a true Warrior. People forget too, that Moses was an Egyptian military Commander. Before God called him.

@randywise5241 11 месяцев назад

I would like to thank the Associates of Biblical researcher's work. And this channel for its efforts. Thank you.

@surrenderdaily333 10 месяцев назад

I am so glad you found the TRUE Ai. You're doing a great job. I wanted to be an archaeologist when I was a kid. But this is almost as good. Thanks for sharing all of these videos!

@sandeepdevraj7697 11 месяцев назад

The Word of God is true, Amen

@TLMcRae-uu1cz 3 месяца назад

This seems to be very well researched!

@tomvh9982 2 месяца назад

Impressive

@samuelwetterau9226 9 месяцев назад

Kenneth Kitchen once wrote: „Excavations at Et-Tell have failed to produce any proper evidence of occupation there after the Early Bronze Age (c. 2400 BC), apart from a small Israelite settlement (Iron I) of c. 1200-1050. Despite assertions made to the contrary, this situation suggests that Et-Tell is not Ai but another ancient site (Beth-Aven?), and that Ai must be looked for somewhere else in the area and not at Et-Tell. When mounds and literary evidence fail to agree in other cases, topographers and archeologists do not panic but simply use their common sense, recognize that they were probably mistaken in their identification, and proceed to search elsewhere in the region. The problem of Ai should be regarded in exactly the same way.“ (Kenneth Kitchen, Ancient Orient and Old Testament, p. 63-64) In a footnote to the text he remarked: „It is only the approximate geographical suitability and the presumed play on the name that has suggested Ai, and no scrap of positive proof (such as inscriptions in situ as at Gezer) exists to justify Noths uncritical belief (VTS, VII, p. 273) that the equation of Et-Tell is „beyond doubt“. There are very serious doubts on both grounds cited…“

@GONAVYDAS05 6 месяцев назад

The lost people’s insistence on looking in the wrong time/place reminds me of the guy who comes to a drunk in the dark looking for something on the ground. He asks, “What are you looking for?” Drunk: “My keys.” Guy: “Are you sure you lost them here?” Drunk: “No, I lost them half a block down, but the light is better here.” Dan 7:25 tells us that Satan tries to change the times. This is a perfect example.

@acwilsn 8 месяцев назад

It is very interesting how when it comes to biblical research, archeologists seem to be in the repeated habit of looking in the wrong place and then declaring the bible to be nothing more than myth and legend.

@kcrcbest Год назад

wooow very interesting thanx

@Lutzbartend 4 месяца назад

“There’s a chance archeologists are looking at the wrong location” Wow you don’t say…

@flolou8496 Год назад

But there are so many ''experts and liberal scholars'' who say Moses is a myth? how can the story of Moses be a myth, but these ruins of Jericho and the other city's are very mixed with Joshua's history in the bible, (it gets very confusing to say the ruins match the bible description's, but Joshua and Moses are not real people, )

@amam4339 28 дней назад

There is a simple for that. The name Ai was a later description oh an older mame. An anchronistic name just like Ramasses

@jsto6056 11 месяцев назад

The smug arrogance of atheist "archeologists" accusing us of "narrative" is really rich.

@katservices 3 месяца назад

Have they found the kings remains at the north gate?Jos 8:29

@walterulasinksi7031 Год назад

To have all the evidence, one needs to ask, Where did the Hebrews get all the food and weapons needed to participate in this conquest of the Levant ? Only one possible answer comes about that does not form a contradiction. Circa 1500 BCE, Ahmose is credited with having reunited Egypt and then driving out the Hyksos north to the border of the Hittites, modern day Turkey. Archeologists have dated the destruction of Jericho yo Circa 1500 BCE. For any participation, Joshua would have had to receive arms from the Dynastic Egyptian forces and fought along side them. As the forces pressed northward, the refugees dispersed into various fortified cities. And stirred up the lower class populace to disrupt the normal workings of the city making it easier to destroy the rulers. Where this was not effective, then a direct onslaught would occur. Such tactics makes use of non-combatants to greatest effect.

@dovbarleib3256 5 месяцев назад

One of the candidates for HaAi is in the Samarian/Benjamite Jewish settlement of P'sagot?

@wizzardofpaws2420 6 месяцев назад

I heard they carried off the gate sockets to use for toilet seats.

@joshuaderilus 10 месяцев назад

🪽🌬️✡️✝️🕎🌞🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌄🎶🎼🎵

@canadiankewldude Год назад

*_Eph _**_6:12_**_ For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places._* *_- KJB_* TPTB support the wrong dates in the middle east to undermine the Bible and Christianity, making Jesus look as a liar. He is the only way to eternal salvation.

@gorillawalk2 3 месяца назад

1. The account in Joshua says that he and his army camped to the North and that the valley was located between him and the city of Ai. The valley you refer to is to the west of Khirbet el-Maqatir. Thus disproving that this site relates to the biblical account based on simple geography. 2. Further more, you describe the site you are arguing for at Khirbet el-Maqatir as only 3 acres in size. Joshua 7 does mention that is was a small town. But also specifically mentions that Joshua initially sent "3000" warriors to attack, at which point the men of Ai "came out of the city" and defeated the Israelites. This seems unlikely that a small 3 acre fortress would house enough warriors that could be sent out to so easily defeat the alleged Israelite army of 3000. Indeed in Joshua 8, the Israelites required 30,000 warriors to defeat the city of Ai. So your claim fails based on the basic geography and on the simple military logistics of the situation. Khirbet el-Maqatir does not substantiate the biblical story.

@strickersniper7909 3 месяца назад

Joshua 7:4-5 about 3000 of the people made the attack but they fled before the army at ai, who killed 36 of them. They pursued them from the city gate to the Sheba rim and defeated them on the descent, so that the confidence of the people melted away like water. Sounds like Joshua sent enough people but upon the site of another army they fled the scene. This is a discipline issue on the side of the commander of the division sent to try and take the city. Tactically it makes sense to something different from the first attempt if a battle fails. Because the army at ai thought that Joshua was going to do something similar to the failed attempt in chapter 7 ,but Joshua went with an ambush instead of confronting the army at ai up front in chapter 8. Feel free to add something different if you disagree with my interpretation of the text.

@detroitpolak9904 21 день назад

So the Canaanites invented AI and because of the Hebrews were only rediscovering this technology 3,000 years later?

@krishnaabreakingnews Год назад

Before god of Abram called him Ra-Moses was fighting wars for god of Rameses called Ra-Amon. This all symbolism for the age of RAM or Aries ♈

@TappioLopullinen-us8dx Месяц назад

The earth ıs flat plane, not a spinning ball. There is no "outer space". "For the pillars of the earth are the Lord's; He has set the circle of the earth upon them." - 1. Book of Samuel 2:8 - Bible 1933/1938