Legalize All Drugs 

Hank Hill sing it!

Hank Hill Wise words Hank, Kahn still thinks you're an idiot though.

out of context.

coolguy98 How is it out of context?

+Fell Man I suppose you believe Ben Franklin was referring to narcotics trade when he quoted this right? I mean I'm willing to bet he would be for meth, cocaine, herroin to be sold on the free market. Afterall didn't he help write a list of laws?

It's low IQ tribalism

I’d rather them administer he selves with gov offered clean needles etc

True, I‘m from Switzerland, heard the stories from grandparents about the Heroin problem 30 years ago. I called the services that give you free Heroin to see if there were any conditions for getting the Heroin (there aren‘t). It works. If just the US wouldn‘t be so ignorant of the successes of other countries.

@@diabloaklandYOU would rather? Based on what? That you're a medical professional? 😂🤦🏽

Let's start an international online petition guys!! Atleast get this discussion started in the media and among the policy makers! C'mon guys!!

OPEN MIND Man sieht dich überall - unglaublich :D

Endlich ich habe eine zweite Flasche Kürbiskernöl gefunden

✡️🐀

Hell yeah

Poopy

Xaezes This guy is dumbass. you know how much people will be violent because of these dangerous drugs get real as result it will be lot of people fall victim because of someone on drugs.

but the government is smart. you think they care about our safety? drugs are illegal so politicians can appeal the elderly by giving a (I will keep your kids off drugs) speech. drugs are such a pain in the ass to tax cause people can just grow weed and poppys (opium) themselves. it also gives them a reason to fine you and search you. again the government are clever sly bastards.

TheStrawbeery Benjamin franklin once said “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.” do you deserve both? people are violent cause they are constantly rejected, hated, judged, stressed and tossed in our overcrowded prisons cause they are unhealthy. wouldn't you be angry too? if someone on drugs is violent they should be charged for their violence, not for the drugs. people should be innocent before proven guilty instead of being thrown in (pound me in the ass prison) cause they MIGHT be violent.

TheStrawbeery wrong

TheStrawbeery Three people gave thumbs up to this comment. It didn't even make sense.

rmcdaniel423 I KNOW I WOULD BECAUSE I NEED TO BE TAKEN CARE OF BY THE STATE; I CANT THINK FOR MYSELF AND I CAN ONLY USE BIG LETTERS BECAUSE MY VIEW IS GROUNDLESS AND NEEDS TO BE REPEATED LIKE PROPAGANDA TILL MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!! DRUGS ARE BAD DRUGS ARE BAD!

Nope its a phone call away delivery service too :)

+Omega Point Singularity wtf shut up

Rusty Shackleford his statement makes no sense at all, its for one point of view then another

raise your hand if you think trends change over time, and if something is illegal and becomes legal, it becomes more widely used. Who here ever smoked a cigarette, but wouldn't have if they were illegal?

ayoutubechannel no freedom granted for drug users hah!

Freedom is for communists.

@Sahnz :D Me too. TheMilitant.com

LET FREEDOM RING🇺🇸 Free & not policed on our own personal behavior, free to make our own choices good or bad, not have someone else decide what's good or bad for us, from alcohol to nicotine the most addictive substances on earth we have our uncontrolled freedom to decide🇺🇸

h i that's cause America is currently under a semi-communist political structure.

Hank Hill Government is not the problem. The government would make sure that the drugs pass quality tests, so you anarchist wankers would still be "oppressed".

professional cum gargler Wait, heroin isn't supposed to have fentanyl in it?

beamohawk ikr

Von Huxley but some people use electric grills and not everyone even uses a grill so some people wouldn't find a use for this "more propane" you suggested!

yeah and get a guy blow devil's breath to your face and steal all your shit

1. this guy said legalise drug use not legalise drugging others. 2. scopolamine (hyoscine) is pretty much completely legal. using it to harm other is not, not becasue of the drug used, but because harming others is obviously illegal. kkind of like shoving alcohol down someones throat is probably considered assault or something like that. possession of 'devils breath' is not illegal. no one in history has been arrested for it and it is unscheduled worldwide (not sure about the uk legal high ban but that shit makes no sense anyway)

Vini Franchelli legalizing the use of drugs, pretty much legalizes it's selling allowing for an easy way to use them for other crimes

Look up your economy after Nixon started the war on drugs. Coincidence ? nope. It is a jobs program essentially.

slumdog then people are kiling each other.

Karl Dutton THRUTH!!!! and WEED !

And cocanie!

Let's just say every drug should be legal. I think if drugs were legal i could take care of my self and take the enough amount without overdosing with whichever drugs i'm taking. Anyone has there responsibility of using what ever they want to. Imagine how much work Albert Hoffmann needed to create such discovery know as LSD.

Known as* sorry for my spelling ;)

Karl Dutton I so agree , educated them about it first ..

Did you ever take drugs? There is a slightly difference between eating a big mac and sniffing coke.

Not enough of a difference to be messing around with our collective freedom.

Seb you say that because overeating is normalized. Everybody is doing it. The majority of people in America and Canada, including myself, are addicted to fast food and junk food. It's not easy to cut it out. It's been scientifically proven that junk food can have a similar effect on your brain as drugs, and is more addictive than a lot of drugs out there. There are millions of people struggling with weight issues simply because they are addicted to junk food, the same way addicts are addicted to coke

NunYaaBizz Well if you put it that way then everything your body needs is a drug : sleeping is a drug, taking sunlight is a drug, relaxing is a drug, working out is a drug, loving is a drug, sex is a drug, communicating is a drug, etc. Anything that your body needs will obviously make you feel better and make you want more otherwise how would life know how to survive. Let's just say that some "drugs" are worse than others. Let's also say that if everytime you over-ate you would have sniffed a line of coke instead you would probably be long gone by now or be a total brain-vegetable.

Well I didn't really clarify but I'm talking about people who have issues overeating junk foods such as cookies, cakes, chips etc. It's fine having junk food every now and then but there are a lot of people that have issues with binging. When you eat junk foods your brain releases a surge of dopamine. After a while it goes away and your left with cravings for sweets even if you just ate. When eating junk food/foods high in sugar brain scans show your brain has the same type of activity as someone using cocaine. if a person who eats a lot of junk food and foods high in sugar changes their diet to a healthy one, they will experience withdrawal effects and intense cravings. With a diet high in junk food you will be fatigued, decreased brain function, poor sleep, mood problems, increased risk of diabetes and heart attacks, increased blood pressure,etc. etc. Look how many people are dying of heart attacks, diabetes, high blood pressure and they still can't stop eating junk food. People who are obese, want to lose weight, but can't stop giving into cravings of junk food. tell me it's not like a drug. Binging on junk foods isn't the same thing as sleep, where sleep is a necessity and eating foods that have an abnormally high amount of sugar and sodium isn't

Legalize Bleach 2017

It's not illegal to chug bleach or own it. Go figure...

Go for it. No one cares.

Hooptie Hamburger lol

No you cant do that you might die. you must suffer with rest of us

+Jeremy X Actually it is, especially mislabeled drugs such as Nbomes.

It doesn't make economic sense for a dealer to cut drugs with poison. You want your customers to come back not die. Dangerous combinations do happen though. I know ecstacy tablets sometimes have dxm in them which causes serotonin syndrome when taken with mdma. Also NBOMEs and 2Cs are sometimes sold as LSD.

Arthur Thats what I mean, and its actually more common to find NBOMEs nowadays than pure LSD. You can also look at Pill reports a large percent of MDMA is not pure anymore. Why? Because when selling in raves and clubs repeat customers are rare, and ontop of this a lot of times the difference is unknown to uneducated individuals.

Yeahhh except that purity is going to be expensive. How is the government going to compete price wise with the drug dealers who are cutting it with other shit?

Alyssa Feliciano The cut shit will suck, and people will realize that they get better quality when they buy it legally. It will be more expensive, but dealers would have to step their game up if they want to compete.

And they were legal for thousands of years beforehand. Interesting how the overdose epidemic only happens when it's restricted. It's almost like prohibition directly causes these deaths

Also so many people have such a variety of ideas on which drugs they perceive as healthy or acceptable versus unhealthy and advocation for the legalization of all drugs finally curbs the argument. So there's that.

Harris Anderson because people are still doing drugs. Do you think people that shoot heroin or sniff coke are all like, "this is ok, this isn't unhealthy at all"

@@karthikj.8238 your reply...it doesn't make sense.

@white "Let everyone do what they wish"

Yeah telling people not to have any responsibility for their own actions is such a great message! Way to go! I suppose you feel the same about anti-maskers and anti-vaxxers right? People should be able to do whatever they want with their physical bodies right? Including stealing, fighting, assualting, committing fraud, oh wait a second are almost ALL LAWS based on what people do with their physical bodies? Aren't all laws based on morality? I'd love to hear your answer.

@@rs72098 listen Tucker Carlson, you really don't have a clue.

@@rs72098 Doing whatever you want with your own body very obviously doesn't extend to hurting others. Legalizing drug use doesn't mean legalizing any other crimes that drugs may or may not induce, you still have to be responsible for your actions when they have direct consequences for others. Alcohol being legal doesn't mean you can start assaulting people legally when your drunk. What an asinine point.

@@cooperkern4112 ok so hurting yourself is fine bc you are not harming others,but when something bad happens to you,you will go ask for help and get involved in a situation(yes i know you WILL go out of your wat to ask for help bc you guys are so predictable)

@@rs72098 What he's saying is the exact opposite of "not having any responsibility for ones action". Stealing, fighting, assaulting and committing fraud all involve other people, not ones own body. And no not all laws are based on what people do with their physical bodies, most laws are based on the interaction between individuals.

+Gediminas Jesinas No. It's still a nanny state policy. The police should have no rights to confiscate substances.

+Turnipkin Yeah, but it would be easier to convince goverment and society to accept decriminalization. It would eventually evolve into legalization of export, selling and full legality.

Gediminas Jesinas True.

+Gediminas Jesinas I'd take decriminalization over criminalization any day.

decriminalization is not legalization

Join the Libertarian Party of Texas. Its headquarters is in Austin.

I'm a Libertarian.

So you're okay with date rape drugs, heroin, cocaine, fetanyl, Carfentanil being sold freely on the streets and in stores?

Certainly not solely weed, but all psychoactive compounds (mushrooms, LSD, peyote, etc) should be legal, if not recreationally, at least medicinally (to treat depression, anxiety, drug addiction such as alcoholism, heroin addiction, etc). This only makes sense.

@BladerNation So what? Theives are are already stealing, murders are already being committed, does that mean we have to legalize these crimes too?

Yes!!!! Let's get the government OFF our backs and vote libertarian!!!

Just like every country on the planet right? You do realize every country on Earth has some form of FDA laws right?

@@rs72098 Ok and?

@@kyled1673 What I'm saying is it makes sense to have pharmaceutical regulations or things can get out of hand quickly and people die. It's perfectly normal for drugs to be regulated.

@@rs72098 you're just a disgusting statist that wants to hand more power to the government and take our liberties and freedom.

Absolutely, me too. Especially if you look at the developments right now. Fentanyl and Synthetic Cannabinoids have caused a stark increase in drug deaths. The drug mafia in Europe has gotten bigger and bigger in the last years - and with them comes violence and death. At the very least, I would love for Cannabis, Magic Mushrooms, LSD, MDMA and Ketamine to become legal, and there might even be a small chance with those substances.

Can’t wait either !

And DMT, MDMA, and shrooms

+UncleJemima59 And crack. For science.

How about we legalize ALL drugs instead of just the ones you just want to take... idiot.

and mdma (and all other amphetamins), shrooms, dmt. well legalise all psychedelics :)

weed and ecstasy

that's how I feel. People will always murder, murder will always exist so make murder legal

+tristan slaughter Actually if we legalized murder, murders would "only" go up SLIGHTLY. That is true, because it's just human decency most people have. The point you are missing is that punishment exists to protect society. Also, it is wrong in a fundamental way to murder someone, so it being legal would just be wrong in a civilized society. All this does NOT apply to personal drug use, it's insane to suggest that.

Murder is quite a spurious point in the argument of legalizing drugs. So I won't justify retarded comments. Murder is morally wrong if you are religious or not. I am not religious but I understand that morality of protecting life is important. No one will argue in giving ppl free choice to murder. It's never justifiable (war aside.. Even then I don't know) but Legalizing drugs is completely justifiable in every way. Freedom of choice to acquire of ingest something natural or something man made is a freedom we do not have but should have. But sadly until the majority of us in this country are educated the government and the alcohol , tobacco and pharma companies and lobbyists will continue to reap the rewards of it being illegal until we finally evolve someday and FoRCE them to change and allow us the freedom to take and use what we choose! I hope I get to see that day

RML 3000 v wouldn't making drugs also be morally wrong

Laws stop individual murderers, just like they stop individual drug dealers. What they don't stop is the drug market. It would still exist even if there were only five drug dealers left. They would sell all of the drugs, and all of the users would still be getting them. Arrest four of them, and there is one drug dealer selling all of the drugs. The next day, another hundred thousand come to power. The war on drugs is extremely moronic.

JD4Trojhans Where is your limit? Alcohol? Coffee? Dark Chocolate?

He supports legalization. He said he can't imagine legalization doing more harm than prohibition.

Which country has the highest crime rate in the world?? Have you compared incarceration rates with them?

*"Prohibition is a word usually used by people who don't understand that prohibition is everywhere, and in all 195 countries."*

@@rs72098 Cockroaches are also everywhere, and shitty opinions.

Yeah? Would you feel the same about Fentanyl, Carfentanil and Meth?

@@rs72098 To be fair I'd say it's on par actually. I can't tell you how many times I've walked out of events just to satisfy cravings. Definitely put a wedge in between me and my social and professional life, especially the out of control food cravings.

@@rs72098 fentanyl exist because of the opioid crackdown no one willing wants to do fentanyl they just can’t get they’re hands on oxy anymore

Yeah? So freedom means that I can sell poison for profit as a consumer good?

Hate to ruin your plan Mr. Hall, but Portugal cut their overdose rate in half when they decriminalized all drugs. They also experienced a 71% reduction in new cases of HIV for intravenous drug users. Legalization will also cause a dramatic reduction in violent crime (street shootings, robberies, burglaries, etc.). Switzerland experienced this when they started making heroin available to users at safe injection facilities. At the end of the day, legalization will save thousands of lives.

@Ethan Steel Of course there is a difference, and legalization (ending prohibition) is the way toward eliminating the violence tied to the illicit market. In case you misunderstood my comment, I was stating what legalization would do beyond mere decriminalization.

That's why it will never happen to much money in locking people up for selling and using drugs and to many people thinking they know how you should live .

good point, the war on Drugs must be eliminated

Yes because only drug crimes are committed 🤔

Wait a second, so if you sell poison berries to people for food it should be okay? After all it's from the Earth right? "For both thorns and thistles it shall bring for us".

@@rs72098 Capitalism breeds alienation that's why drugs have a market in a capitalist economy.

I'm going to go out on a limb & guess you were never arrested for your drug use & that you're white. Just because if you are arrested for abuse (using, selling, stealing to get drugs, assault while under the influence) or a minority it doesn't matter how long you're "clean & sober" for because you are always stigmatized. Whether it be by not being able to get a job, a loan, go to college, or just by society. The Drug War is very biased & sadly most addicts can be clean for years & never truly gain freedom from their addiction due to racism.

Shut up! Everything is not about race.

So you're saying that Krokadil, Heroin, Fentanyl and Carfentanil should all be legal and easily purchased at the store??

KingJustice98 yep!

@@rs72098 everything

Your opinion is misinformed and I’ll founded.

@@rs72098 no one willingly wants to buy fentanyl 😂😂😂I bet you are never talked to a drug addict in your life but yes people should be able to buy whatever they want

That's not correct. Drug addicts do not determine the supply of illegal drugs, just like consumers do not determine the supply of oil. Supplies of anything can be cut off despite the demand.

That's because adults run the country and not anarchists.

you think that now...

All drugs should be legal, not just opiates.

So Fentanyl and Carfentanil should be legal?? You realize how many people with just a small amount of that can kill? You're perfectly ok with those being sold at Walmart without a prescription?

Kronos camron same situation

Because what you put in your body can negatively impact other members of society. A drunk driver puts alcohol in his body and he drives on the same road as you do, that affects you. If you buy heroin you are also funding an illegal trade that kills people. You also are giving money to an entity that will no doubt use the profits to buy more of the drug and sell to more users who suffer medically. If you have health insurance, you are using other people's money to stop your addictions that damage your body. If you use government medicaid, you are also using tax payer money on your addictions. That's why the government is involved.

Frozen Tundra No, I do NOT use drugs. I used when I was a teen to my early 20's, but I haven't used anything in about 20 years. I live in Central Texas and am aware of the drug wars in Mexico. Legalization and government oversight could alleviate a lot of the crime associated with the drug trade. I think all drugs should be certified and go through a strict oversight process, like diamonds out of Africa. If people are going to do drugs (legally), then they should have the security in knowing that the drugs did not cause harm to others from cultivation to processing. I am a proponent for legalization not because I want to do drugs, but because I believe people in the US should be free to do them if they want, without harming others. Our current drug policies harm everyone directly or indirectly attached to the drug itself. Drugs are amoral. The laws, are the immoral thing. They create the crime, they create the murder. People are going to do drugs no matter what.

Make all drugs legal but put danger advices clearly in the package for the consumer to be aware of. Things like reactions in poly drug us, which can be avoided by knowing which react with which

​@ICEGOD KAZZY well yes gun licenses too, the State has no right to impinge upon an adults individuals personal freedom to possess a firearm and what if somone needs to buy one in a hurry, what if like a single mother is being stalked by some crazed man whos gonna break into her house any day now. She wouldn't have time nor money to get a license. passionate gun owners are generally speaking responsible enough to use them safely, as the culture they will subscribe too is ingrained with gun safety. Criminals will just buy guns off the black market and most of all, gun shop owners aren't robots, they have the right to not sell someone a gun if they feel their untrustworthy or unsafe with it and kick you out of their store.

ICEGOD KAZZY It is a natural and Constitutional right, our natural birthright from God: the right to self-preservation. Its main reason: a final deterrent against foreign and domestic tyranny. (See communist democides of 20th century.) Its secondary, commonsensical reason: to defend against civilian criminals (home defense, self-defense and defense of others). A privilege requires a license or permit; a right does not. “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.” (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105) “If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262) ANY free man or woman has the unfettered RIGHT to own, possess, carry (concealed or openly) and lawfully use ANY weapon ANYWHERE he/she has a legal right to be. Period. Part of the price of freedom is occasional or potential danger. An absolute GIVEN of totalitarianism/communism (you know, where guns are banned) is that you have no freedom, and no security: your survival, imprisonment or execution is at the whim of oligarchical bureaucrats. To quote Benny Franklin: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." #ShallNotBeInfringed

So how about you legalize all crime while you're at it?

And watch the world burn and descend to Chaos. 😈

I see, so telling people to wear masks during a pandemic, or wearing a seatbelt is also a war on personal freedom right?

@@rs72098 yes. Absolutely.

@@cloroxbleach3809 So telling people not to steal, not to commit fraud, not to murder, not to sell poison for profit, is also a war on personal freedom??? Where does this logical fallacy end??

@@rs72098well, not wearing a mask during the pandemic would hurt others, as you're spreading the virus. The same can't be said about drugs, where you're only 'damaging' yourself

+coolguy98 that is the most biggest bullshti ever let help the bad guys good idea not like that hasnt been shown tr the history to be the worst thing ever

+Ante Prs I know, it's called sarcasm. I just wanted everyone to see how ludicrous the idea of how legalization can solve all problems when it actually creates more problems.

+coolguy98 well the only difference here is that the legalization of all drugs doesn't create more problems and in fact solves alot of the problems we currently have :)

+DotaSchool please explain how

One big problem we have today is that the drugs are distributed by a black market. So we got no quality control and many drugs get diluted with substances who are much more dangerous than the drug itself. In Germany (where i am from) we had a case where a dealer added lead to his cannabis which resulted in a dozen of people being in the hospital. Thankfully nobody died but cannabis normally wouldn't bring them close to dying. Or take heroin as an example: In todays street heroin only 5 - 15% are actual heroin the rest are things it is cut with. Those added substances can be strychnine (rat poisen) or other dangerous substances. Additionally if you buy drugs from the black market you don't know how pure they are which can result in overdoses. This happens especially with heroin since you normally get such an unpure product. However if you come across purer heroin where 20 - 40 % are actually heroin and you do your normal dose you can easily die from that. Those problems would be solved by a legalization because then the drugs would be pure. Another point is the extreme violance in countries like mexico. 40000 people died there in the past 5 years because of the war on drugs and its getting more and more daily. If drugs would be leaglized the cartels would lose their only income and the extreme violance would stop. There are many more arguments but i'm to tired right now^^ Now its time to explain why I think there wouldn't be more problems if drugs would be legalized: 1. The consumers of those drugs are already here today. It's not like legalization would create a big drug problem (and if it did i personally would be fine with that). There may be an increase in the number of consumers but as portugal shows its likely that this would be on "light" drugs (such as cannabis or mdma) and there would be a decrease of consumers on "hard" drugs (such as heroin or crack). 2. There would be benchmarks on how much you could take and drive without a much higher risk of an accident just like we have benchmarks today with alcohol. 3. You can use the tax money you get from the drugs and invest them in prevention where studies have shown that its most effective. This decreases the number of consumers. 4. It would be social acceptable and no one would get his life destroyed by once being in prison for drug related reasons. 5. You keep alot of money away from organized crime. I could add alot more points but i'm really tired right now. If you (or someone else) got any arguments against me write them down and we can discuss about them. And if you are right then I'll change my opinion. But be aware that I've discussed with many people and no one was even close to being able to convince me. The only thing I want from you is to be as open minded as me and recognize when the other persons arguments are better than their own :)

God does not exist

+Mikey johnson present proof or withdraw your hypothesis.

+Omni Modus Well every single contradiction in the bible just watch an atheist channel I don't want to explain it all

+Mikey johnson contradictions in an ancient book doesnt proove anything. ive seen plenty of docus, whats your point? ive seen pro/theist, anti/atheist, polytheist, neutral, historical docus etc. thats not a valid argument for anything.

He also gave his followers laws and regulations on how to live. He told Eve not to eat from the tree of knowledge which she did and that's how death entered the world. Weeds rose up out of the earth due to the sin of man. Not everything on earth is meant for consumption.

bbob70 When the fuck did he say that decriminalizing is the same as legalizing? He just supports legalization!

***** 3:50, in his own words Portugal decriminalized the possession of small amounts of drugs if it was not for trade, that does not mean they are legal. So the effects of that policy can't be compared to what he's suggesting, which is full legalization.

bbob70 I think He simply believes that decriminalizing (which is the closest thing to legalizing) is good, and legalizing is better.

+bbob70 He just said that when Portugal decriminalized the possession of drugs drug use did not grow significantly. His point is that if we legalize all drugs drug use won't increase as much as some people believe.

bbob70 I'm sorry I shouldn't have called you a word.

***** no it is more the variance in dosages that causes death, especially when mixed with alcohol

***** yes and no, i agree that the main reason people die is because they have no idea what the actual dose is or with not knowing what will happen if they mix, but downers is not a good classification and kind of pointless when it comes to talking about drug interactions, and the impurities tend to be inert

***** classification of a downer is not a good predictor of drug drug interactions

Brian Burke The problem with your outrageous statement is that ... there ARE drug users today - alive and thriving.

Brian Burke Okay we're agreed. In the mean time then before all this funny business with drug legalization takes place, I'm going to attempt to drink 50 pints of whisky during a five minute interval because I also accept Darwin's theory and will it to take place, hopefully you will join me in this endeavour. Perhaps you wouldn't mind going first.