SeinfeldSpitstain, can you do me a favor and put this on a million usb drives and scatter then randomly around the world? I want future archeologists to view this comedy/drama of life.
Well, they will probably just think the same of us that we now think of the slavery in egypt a few thousand years ago from now... Just that we are being made to slaves with the help of money instead of food. But basically it's the same.
And all day and all night and everything he sees is just blue like him, inside and outside Blue his house, with a blue little window and a blue corvette and everything he sees is blue for himself and everybody around cause he ain’t got nobody to listen to
@@myapapaya2317 im blue if i was green i would die if i was green i wound die if i was green i would die, im blue if i was green i would die if i was green i would if iwas green i would die.
I get it I forgot what his name is but there is like a evil twin of sonic and the song is sonic escaped from the city so sonic will screw him up if he was green
But you have to wonder if this video was made for the sake of morbid humor or if the creator is legit depressed and feels caught in a cycle. I hope they're okay, personally this video made me feel worried and genuinely upset by the end of it. It really is all a pointless cycle, isn't it?
it would appear that in this instance that way more than the collar is blue lol 😁. but technically the work depicted in the video is actually white collar for being in an office as opposed to manual labor. needless to explain though is that the video more generally questions the point of any life/work at all in any form.
I remember when I found this at 15-16 and I just thought it was edgy. I’m two years out of school working a full time schedule and I relate to this now in a way that I wish I didn’t.
6 years ago I used to laugh about this video. I watched this today again and I realized it is my daily routine. This video warned me long before about how adult life is, now its too late to change it :( Sorry about the sad reflections guys, keep on scrolling down lol
Coal Ore According to the chemtrail conspiracy theory, long-lasting trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft are chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed for sinister purposes undisclosed to the general public.[1] Believers in the theory argue that normal contrails dissipate relatively quickly, and contrails that do not dissipate must contain additional substances.[2][3] These arguments have been dismissed by the scientific community: such trails are normal water-based contrails (condensation trails) that are routinely left by high-flying aircraft under certain atmospheric conditions.[4] Although proponents have attempted to prove that the claimed chemical spraying does take place, their analyses have been flawed or based on misconceptions.[5][6] Because of the widespread popularity of the conspiracy theory, official agencies have received many inquiries from people demanding an explanation.[2] Scientists and government officials around the world have repeatedly needed to confirm that supposed chemtrails are in fact normal contrails.[7] The term chemtrail is a portmanteau of the words chemical and trail, as contrail is a contraction of condensation trail.[8] Believers in the conspiracy theory speculate that the purpose of the claimed chemical release may be for solar radiation management,[2] psychological manipulation, human population control, weather modification, or biological or chemical warfare, and that the trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems.[1][9][10] Contrails are formed at high altitudes (5-10 miles or 8-16 kilometers), and any chemicals released at such a height would disperse harmlessly and fall many hundreds of miles away, or degrade before touching the ground.
Can we all agree that 2023 was the fastest year?(also Im gonna update my comment every specific time if I dont die I promise, I will live my life with this gem)
block david my theory is it goes with the theory of life: Why does life exist?Popular hypotheses credit a primordial soup, a bolt of lightning and a colossal stroke of luck. But if a provocative new theory is correct, luck may have little to do with it. Instead, according to the physicist proposing the idea, the origin and subsequent evolution of life follow from the fundamental laws of nature and “should be as unsurprising as rocks rolling downhill.”From the standpoint of physics, there is one essential difference between living things and inanimate clumps of carbon atoms: The former tend to be much better at capturing energy from their environment and dissipating that energy as heat. @7 and further elaborated in @9901352 that the entropy produced by a thermodynamic process, such as the cooling of a cup of coffee, corresponds to a simple ratio: the probability that the atoms will undergo that process divided by their probability of undergoing the reverse process (that is, spontaneously interacting in such a way that the coffee warms up). As entropy production increases, so does this ratio: A system’s behavior becomes more and more “irreversible.” The simple yet rigorous formula could in principle be applied to any thermodynamic process, no matter how fast or far from equilibrium. “Our understanding of far-from-equilibrium statistical mechanics greatly improved,” Grosberg said. England, who is trained in both biochemistry and physics, started his own lab at MIT two years ago and decided to apply the new knowledge of statistical physics to biology.Using Jarzynski and Crooks’ formulation, he derived a generalization of the second law of thermodynamics that holds for systems of particles with certain characteristics: The systems are strongly driven by an external energy source such as an electromagnetic wave, and they can dump heat into a surrounding bath. This class of systems includes all living things. England then determined how such systems tend to evolve over time as they increase their irreversibility. “We can show very simply from the formula that the more likely evolutionary outcomes are going to be the ones that absorbed and dissipated more energy from the environment’s external drives on the way to getting there,” he said. The finding makes intuitive sense: Particles tend to dissipate more energy when they resonate with a driving force, or move in the direction it is pushing them, and they are more likely to move in that direction than any other at any given moment.“This means clumps of atoms surrounded by a bath at some temperature, like the atmosphere or the ocean, should tend over time to arrange themselves to resonate better and better with the sources of mechanical, electromagnetic or chemical work in their environments,” England explained.Self-replication (or reproduction, in biological terms), the process that drives the evolution of life on Earth, is one such mechanism by which a system might dissipate an increasing amount of energy over time. As England put it, “A great way of dissipating more is to make more copies of yourself.” In @7 in the Journal of Chemical Physics, he reported the theoretical minimum amount of dissipation that can occur during the self-replication of RNA molecules and bacterial cells, and showed that it is very close to the actual amounts these systems dissipate when replicating. He also showed that RNA, the nucleic acid that many scientists believe served as the precursor to DNA-based life, is a particularly cheap building material. Once RNA arose, he argues, its “Darwinian takeover” was perhaps not surprising.The chemistry of the primordial soup, random mutations, geography, catastrophic events and countless other factors have contributed to the fine details of Earth’s diverse flora and fauna. But according to England’s theory, the underlying principle driving the whole process is dissipation-driven adaptation of matter.This principle would apply to inanimate matter as well. “It is very tempting to speculate about what phenomena in nature we can now fit under this big tent of dissipation-driven adaptive organization,” England said. “Many examples could just be right under our nose, but because we haven’t been looking for them we haven’t noticed them.”Scientists have already observed self-replication in nonliving systems. According to new research led by Philip Marcus of the University of California, Berkeley, and @2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Michael Brenner, a professor of applied mathematics and physics at Harvard, and his collaborators present theoretical models and simulations of microstructures that self-replicate. These clusters of specially coated microspheres dissipate energy by roping nearby spheres into forming identical clusters. “This connects very much to what Jeremy is saying,” Brenner said.Besides self-replication, greater structural organization is another means by which strongly driven systems ramp up their ability to dissipate energy. A plant, for example, is much better at capturing and routing solar energy through itself than an unstructured heap of carbon atoms. Thus, England argues that under certain conditions, matter will spontaneously self-organize. This tendency could account for the internal order of living things and of many inanimate structures as well. “Snowflakes, sand dunes and turbulent vortices all have in common that they are strikingly patterned structures that emerge in many-particle systems driven by some dissipative process,” he said. Condensation, wind and viscous drag are the relevant processes in these particular cases.“He is making me think that the distinction between living and nonliving matter is not sharp,” said @20130716, and certain molecular changes Louis has recently studied.If England’s approach stands up to more testing, it could further liberate biologists from seeking a Darwinian explanation for every adaptation and allow them to think more generally in terms of dissipation-driven organization. They might find, for example, that “the reason that an organism shows characteristic X rather than Y may not be because X is more fit than Y, but because physical constraints make it easier for X to evolve than for Y to evolve,” Louis said.“People often get stuck in thinking about individual problems,” Prentiss said. Whether or not England’s ideas turn out to be exactly right, she said, “thinking more broadly is where many scientific breakthroughs are made.” Or I just randomly copied and pasted this...
Work at an office, they said. You will have a great future, they said. I'm glad I'm a DJ, where work is not everyday, but I still get good payment, plus I do my hobby! Don't apply for a job just for money. Do something you actually enjoy!
this explain life pretty well. all you do is get up to work so you can go home, rest, and do it again, give or take a few things in between that dont really matter.
@@mazarinivmikeoxlong-dedica969 key that you need to get a link Link will lead you to the next step To person that makes it first to the end gets 100$ Good luck
I feel like this is a metaphor for the pointlessness of life. I mean, you just wake up everyday and do the same shit and then do it again the next day. Or I'm on that side of youtube again
Yo listen up here's a story about a little blue guy who lives in a blue world, and all day and all night and everything he sees is just blue. Like him inside and outside, blue his house with a blue little window and a blue corvette and everything is blue to him and himself and everybody around. Because he ain't got nobody to listeeen
This is art. He sends a message without it seeming like it. I really hope he isn't quitting youtube bc his videos have very deep messages if you just look for them
@@irthaer_158you have to be American to understand but why go to work get $100 then give $30 to the government for taxes and God forbid you get hurt,the bill will be $20000
When I first saw this video, it made me think of how all of us go through the same routines every day. We wake up, go to work, come home exhausted, go to sleep, rinse and repeat. I thought it was a brilliant, yet humorous analysis of the hard working men and women in 1st world countries...Then I saw who made the video...
I must apologize, but I have to take the other side and disagree with your statement due to my ignorance on the subject at hand we are currently trying to debate. Please understand and go along with your day and do whatever that may bring pleasure to your current state of existence.
