M26E1 vs Tiger II turret edge | T33E7 | Armor Penetration Simulation 

Press 4

@@susah135 go to control panel, and press uninstall... So glad Starfield, and BG3 are so close to each other... WT is like the chan, was never good, will never get better only worse. stupid devs should of just caved years ago to their asian playerbase and made AU/JP servers and just bright colored anime skins for everything for a premium of course.

@@susah135world of tanks eww 🤮

The gunner has been wounded!

​@@Zosteriaswar thunder

Nah, not enough pen, No crew damage....

@@johnwalker7592 are you joking? hahaha

​@@thiagorodrigues5211 Vidja game joke.

If welded right the welds should be strong than the metal itself but then again that was produced 80 ish years ago so things can change and welds could have been weaker.

@@doggofroggo9117 Mind you that late war steel used on German tanks was bad as well as generally production quality therefore a need for simple things It wouldn;t be as bad as Soviet weldings of course,non the less a simple crack can be detrimental

@MrTrool323 I assume since they needed more tanks that they over looked and rushed things so I believe you are right that those welds would be a weak point.

​@@doggofroggo9117 The weld filler material is usually stronger than the base material, but on heat treated parts like tank armour the heat affected zone around the weld will result in the overall welded structure being weaker than a solid piece of the base material- basically the heat of welding messes up the heat treatment of the armour plate. This also assumes they did full penetration welds. Usually to achieve that you'd have to Vee out a whole heap of material so you can build up weld filler to the full depth of the joint. Which they might have avoided, in part to minimise the heat affected zone.

@nerd1000ify they could have also done it to increase production because they were already behind so that would make a lot of sense that they didn't weld properly

soviet 150mm he shells from the is 2 would shatter the frontal armor in 1 or 2 hits.

@@iron_potato40k You mean 122mm? Or KV-2?

@@iron_potato40k IS-2 with 150mm ? what kind of super sekrit tonk is that? xdd

​@iron_potato40k i was thinking that is2 had 122mm. Not 150 mm. Isu had 150 mm

@@christians.597 sekrit dokumentz

Yea, spalling would still kill you tho. But its an interesting thought

The T33 is the successor to the M77 and was used in the M26 Pershing. The Super Pershing used the T33 under a different name. After the war, a new metallurgy and hardening level of T33 was tested and it is T33E7. The final version of the T33E7 was the M318 standard for the M46 Patton.

​@@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 Thanks man, let me read about it. A shame we didn't see much of the Pershing's capabilities during the war. We only know it ruined North Koreans day when it arrived during the Korean war.

​@@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 The Super Pershing had a longer gun barrel , your stats are from this gun . The T33 from the M26 had 853m/s and 206mm at 100m 90° .

@@5co756 no

​@@5co756His stats are for the T54 90mm gun.

Weld can fail easier than monolithic material.

If you could hit it then yes, but that does not happen in real combat. And and close range that 90mm round would certainly get through the front of the turret, unless at a bad angle.

I am not convinced that this precedent is so widespread. Apart from the famous Soviet "test", the tiger's armor looks quite good in many other photos. But if the community likes the idea, I could do it.

Thank you for the consideration and reading comment!

I mean at these speeds, basically. It's just a ballistic cap, it barely barely does anything for penetration besides keeping the round going fast and accurate

That would be nice. All unused ammo can be eaten (っ˘ڡ˘ς)

I say chocolate.

@@EpicShermanTank thanks but i was just joking about how it bent and broke in the vid lol

​@@mmmyes9353 So what do you expect would happen?

yeah, the chunks of spall are only moving around 200-300m/s

It is just 200 to 300 m/s. A light tap. Hans is dead from internal bleeding.

Damn he really gave a heart to this comment

M26E1 was the variant of the Pershing with the longer 90mm.

@@NotTheCIA1961 This is the T26E1 , just a prototype with the long 90mm . Never went into mass production , there was no M26 with this long gun .

@@5co756 T26-E1 is the prototype of the M26. You're likely confusing it with the T26-E1-1, which is the super pershing (I know, VERY logical naming schemes for the American prototypes....) M26E1 was the further evolution of the Super Pershing, but was nixxed in favor of the M46. Edit - just did some more looking. M26E1 got nixed in favor of the M26A1, which evolved into the M26E2, which got redesignated to the M46.

@@5co756 The M26E1 is an M26 with a T54 gun, similar to the SuperPershing gun but more modern. Spend five minutes searching before you start writing that something doesn't exist...

@@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 Where did you find real data about an M26E1 with a long 90mm gun ? This 90mm doesn't fit in a normal Pershing turret without this springs on top and this was the T26E1 aka Super Pershing . There is almost no data online of such a tank , in 5 minutes you find thousands of WoT and WT articles . But that's a game .....

Extremely unlikely, IFVs are designed to take machine gun and autocannon fire, not tank main guns or large ATGMs, even obsolete cannons

​​@@thezig2078Bradley's have taken hits and 'survived', which is possible if nothing explosive is hit like the ammo belt. Thin armor and large size in IFVs may ironically make survival better, due to 7039 and 5083 aluminum armor. Same goes for the BMPs

Why would you need a video on that. The turret wouldnt probably even stop an anti tank rifle from WW2 like the PTRD. It has like 20-30mm RHA (no solid information on that, just my guess).

@@nuklear7074Afaik the base bradley was designed to fully protect against 14.5mm AP, the more modern up armoured versions have 20mm of Appliqué Steel on top of the Aluminium and provide protection against 30mm AP.

@@Awsomeguy1236 Thanks for the info. Still the turret is no match for anything other then autocannons. An 125mm dart would most likely vaporize anything inside that small turret or atleast take out firecotrol systems and a crew member.