Yeah, David Navara. He is extremely friendly and polite in real life but at the same time ambitious and almost bloodthirsty over the chessboard. Unfortunately, he is usually making some small inaccuracies in his games which always prevented him achieving a stable position among top super GMs. But when he's playing in his best shape and form he can destroy anyone.
It's hard to assume anyone in the chess community over the age of 18 is "friendly and polite" considering what occurs to female chess players like Anna cramling. You can say he's good at chess but let's not talk as if you know him personally. Even if you played him you couldn't claim to know him.
@@magikavoncary so, your original comment just said he's friendly and good at chess? If you're going to imply my comment is worthless then what is yours? You don't know him so you can't say for certain that he's like you say, and anyone who just watched this video can obviously tell he's good at chess. Your original comment is just as worthless as my reply so don't be a hypocrite. My point was only not to spread assumptions.
@@davidsantiago7808 Your comment could win a Olympics medal for the most worthless comment, yes:-) My comment is about David Navara's not fulfilled potential. Not sure why you focused on my remark about his friendliness and politeness and even managed to pull Anna Cramling into this. Unbelievable. My first reaction was "Jesus Christ" *facepalm*. Btw, I know David personally. He's from my country. We are not friends or close to each other but he's very important for our dwindling chess community. I can guarantee he is the last person to ever bother Anna. He is very autistic. But in his own high functioning way. He is almost too polite and nice. It might even be a little detrimental to his performance.
Please enter at least some info like when was this played? If you steal his streams for content at least let us know if that was yesterday or 4 years ago.
@@Alkyen and thanks to people like you, copyright gets annoying. I don't even think magnus care. It's not like the channel owner is making profit of this game. don't be a douchbag.
At 05:17, why not bishop d4 check? And then combinations with the rook? Magnus seems to say “I’m not convinced”. Is he referring to that bishop d4 check? I just want to understand thx
#5:15 would taking the pawn with the bishop be as bad as it looks? If you next take the other pawn on e4 with the rook he cant both defend his bishop and his f4 pawn and defending h4 doesn't seem doable? Or will the problems on the c file get overwhelming? Whites bishop and knight don't seem very mobile.
@@bearlivesmatter what is so lol about my question? thanks for answering I guess. Oh, and what is the "#" for in Rf6? Shouldn't just Rf6 be enough? I've seen the use of the # also by stockfish
I think Magnus just said that for something to say. He wasn't playing any faster than Magnus and I thought it was kinda normal to blitz out the first 5 or 6 moves of openings you've played a thousand times.
@@LightHunter001 it doest nt matter what he is . He still looks like a clown .and greatest chess player in history ? ? Bro he will be never be as Good as boby fisher or Mikhail Tal .its not just about ELO its about how creative u r with pieces
@@ChessPlanet1 So, there are chess websites that have been calculating the moves that bots would make for about 10 years now. If you're noticeably fast and consistently make the same calculations as the bot, which requires superhuman reaction, hardly anyone calculates like that, then they'll ban you from the site :)
@@ChessPlanet1 So, there are many sites where admins, sorry to say, couldn't care less about reaction times, and the number of cheaters is almost impossible to outsmart. So if you always wonder how someone can react so quickly, there's a good chance they're using AI or a bot. There are people who download various programs and adjust them to cheat with the algorithms of different programs. There are plenty of opportunities for cheating if the entire game isn't closely monitored. I'm sorry to delve into this topic, I hope you don't mind, but I think chess is perhaps the easiest for players to be more open to cheating because its interface is simple, unlike a three-dimensional game, for example...