I've been an avid RU-vid car channel fan for many years and I'm really enjoying this homegrown Aussie channel. EVO, MotorTrend and Chris Harris, watchout! Also, to help me afford a new Mazda 2, anyone wanting to buy a 2004 Ford Fiesta LX with only minor death trap issues should call me. I will throw in a free fourth wheel at no extra cost for the lucky buyer. For you, special price!
I found a audi a1 2015 selling very cheap. But Ive been saving for the mazda 2(grand i touring) for a while and I dont know which to choose. Some tell me to choose audi because its a premium car but it seems that the mazda 2 is just a better car overall. I think Ill be getting the mazda 2 grand i touring white model
curious why mazda only puts those narrow wheels on there, could handle even much better if it were on wider less profile tyres like the other two. would look much nicer, too.
Downsize engine with their smal low presure turbo, stops around at 3000rpm and above you will notice that the engine is actually too small for the car. And will use more fuel. Mazda N/A engine's loves to revs. More rpm means more power en torqeu. Will match the claimed fuel consumption more, and is more reliable because no susceptible toy turbo.
That thing with the turbo will happen only if you’re going to high speeds, I honestly doubt that Mazda2 will get to even 160 km/h with that naturally aspirated trashy engine, German power is better
@@victor10197 Mazda 2 90BHP topspeed 184km/h 0 to 100 in 9,4 sec. Also available in 115bhp, topspeed 200 km/h 0 to 100 in 8,7sec What 160kmh? So you stick with your lawn mower engine ok? 1.0 3 cilinder. Only little turbo boost in low revs, after that no boost anymore. Then it's stil a smal trashy engine.
Audi a1 1.4t 0-100 8.9s A1 Sline 2.0t 0-100 6.5s +Audi a1 ncap rating 5 stars Mazda 2 rating 4 stars, poor protection child occupants So I prefer my turbo “lawnmower” motor who also is quicker, but my family’s safety is top priority
@@victor10197 Really? a 2.0T is faster than a 1.5 N/A engine? You know what? An 4.0 V8 N/A engine is also faster than a 2.0T. What i want to make clear is, compare with similar power. Example a Polo (same car as a A1) with a 1.0 95bhp is slower than a Mazda 90bhp. Polo 0 to 100 in 10,8 sec. Mazda 2, 4 star crash rating? Check again. Mazda 2 always been a 5star rating. Check you're facts first bro...
