McLaren's Montreal Miss | F1 Round up with SeedStream 

It could well happen...

@@F1Elvis why didn’t you drop a supercharger in my Kombi instead of putting solar power on it😂😂😂

They probably will!

Why? For following team orders? For being the fastest driver they have this year? Whole things blown out of proportion imo & reeks of a new TP tryna make him mark in the sport/take attention away from himself/wider failings.

Certainly sounds sensible

No business being at the front?! He's in a Red Bull, Perez has no business being in the midfield. This narrative trying to be peddled that the Red Bull isn't the fastest car is laughable...

@@w4lsh your one of the only ones with that opinion. The fact of the matter is that he didn't have the speed in the beginning because the RB20 has a far narrower window of operation than certainly the McLaren, but towards the latter stages of the race he somehow found more speed. We've witnessed that with Max on a number of occasions now. If you can't see past you not liking him then that's your problem.

Or the problem is not as bad as he said... People complained or said Lewis did that as well - but all quiet on the Max front for some reason when the same thing happens.

@@cylonred8902 oh definitely they have. Prime Lewis was fully capable of taking a troubled car to wins in those three years of driving a tricky McLaren. Don't make it an argument of Lewis V Max again. It's getting terribly old. Prime Max is every bit as good as prime Lewis and let that be the end of it.

@@Roguescienceguy Never said he/they could not - just pointing out that they seems to be treated a bit differently and I DO wonder - since everyone can hear - if the messages are not quite as bad as they seem...

Thanks for the info

I don't believe he had bad luck in Canada, just a bad call from the team...

@@F1Elvis Maybe, but wasn't he 15 seconds ahead of Max before the safety car? By the last safety car, he was right by max with better tyres and he still couldn't reel him in. Not sure what strategy would have matter with a certain Ferrari causing the last safety car and bunching the field yet again. Even if he was ahead of Max by the last safety car, he didn't seem to have the speed to keep up with Max in dry conditions.

​@@gpajeI agree either Marc. They could and should have pitted at the same time as everyone else. We've seen the footage and there was enough time to do it. It's like they left him out to try and keep that large gap, which is ridiculous considering in any scenario the cars will just be bunched up again. There was absolutely nothing to gain by staying out. As for being slower on that final tyre, that is a strange one. Did Lando push too hard on first lap and lose performance? Did Max have a slight adjustment during the pit to improve driveability? Was Lando busy holding back to keep Oscar under 1 second to try and secure double podium? I'm thinking the latter as he was radio'd after a few laps to say leave Oscar. As soon as he did Max didn't pull away any further and Lando left Oscar in the dirt. Overall not a bad performance but those few bad calls definitely cost them imo.

@@gpaje In Miami there was nothing Max or Red Bull could have done better. In Canada McLaren COULD have given the instruction to Lando to pit at the last possible opportunity if SC on dash appeared and have sent the pitcrew out just in case. Then on the second inter stint the McLaren was the fastest car, Lando could have pushed earlier and therefore decreased the gap to Max which in return would give the overcut a way higher chance. In fact there was a real chance for him to stay ahead if he came out ahead because it was too wet offline. It's debatable whether Max's pace at the end was good enough to overtake Lando if he were P1 on the slick stint. I don't think it was, especially given Max made up a lot of time during braking and going into corners. In my opinion the strength of the McLaren on the inters and Merc on the slicks was if excecuted better greater than what Max and Red Bull had to offer.

Lando is becoming Mr. “could have, should have, would have, if if if 🙄

Glad you like it!

No, he was still coming along the back straight....

There are strict restrictions on placent of ballast, but it could have a small effect.

It was amazing, but in truth he was out of control and just about got away with it.

@F1Elvis that thought never crossed my mind - but with that information and watching it again it does seem a lot clearer now

They've had these simulation tools for a long time, they're incredibly accurate

👍

Same here, used it when it first came out but didn't seen that great. Now it's a 'proper' app and use it all the time.

I get what you're saying but that's not what happened this time, McLaren just made the wrong call.

👍👍👍

Dannii Minogue dumped him in 2001 and he's hated Australian's ever since.

@@Melbourne-s4x I said that a couple days ago to someone in a comment. My old man once said to me you can’t trust any man under five foot six…. I’m pretty sure Villeneuve is about that tall with hair on his head😂😂😂

No one can possibly have any idea at this point. It's literally made up speculation with zero foundation. I hope they can be competitive, but I have no idea yet.

He had more than enough time. Teams have to be ready for this, the accident happened some time before that, so they knew it was likely coming.

@@F1Elvis your analysis is much more believable than Karoon's

Best car

@@1Pandemoonium one thing is for sure....it isn't the best car anymore, a pity you don't see unique talent!

I don’t think they are short changed. I think Max tends to just highlight their shortcomings!

@@officialWWM I think with Albon and Gasly they much less patient. When Max was moved up and was very aggressive and wrecked they showed a lot of tolerance. I think it was last year when Max was told to let Perez pass and he refused for whatever reason, nothing happened. I think more time and effort is put into setting up his car for him versus the number two.

I think the car is harder to drive than we've been led to believe ,. Max can wrangle it much better than Perez..

@@michaeldorich4485 but Max is the world champ. I makes sense to put the effort into that car!

@@officialWWM That doesn't make sense to me. You're trying to win a team championship and you want both drivers to have a car they can drive to the best of their ability. When Rosberg and Hamilton were going after each other their cars were equal and Hamilton had won championships.

I don't know if he chased money, but he definitely hasn't fulfilled his potential.

Sorry about that.

Because it was dropping carbon fiber over the track and making the track unsafe. Also a broken part of the car could come off and hit another/driver. Its dangerous and that's why Red Bull got a fine and Perez got a grid place penalty for the next race.

@@chriscollins550 didn’t look like it was dropping any pieces, and if driven relatively slow nothing was gonna fall off. What could’ve been is not a way of judging anything… like when drivers walk across the track, and get fined… why….??? if there are no cars for like 15-20 gap in that section, how is that dangerous? What is a car gonna fall from heaven, or all of a sudden decrease it’s time of arrival by 20 seconds? I get the whole carbon flying around, but that did not look to be the case there. Some common sense judgment would be nice. They enforce 1 rule and completely ignore other rules. It’s stupid…can they please come up with rules they can actually agree to enforce?

Like declare the track is wet????? it’s raining why do we need to declare anything? I run whatever tire I deem appropriate for the current road conditions, can someone please tell me what’s that rule about? What if my F1 car is faster on inters than slicks, why does anyone need to care?? It’s my decision to run whatever tire I want. That was a new one for me this weekend. Boiled my brain

@@viktortulbya2107 Because of the FIA regulations on running both set's of compound tyers on a normal dry day but when it's wet and declared by the fia they can run wet tyers and not have to use both other compound of tyers.

@@viktortulbya2107 carbon did come off Perez car. Next driver walking on the track is very dangerous they have been killed before doing that. Most of the f1 driver's have hearing problems that's why in interview you see them turn their head's to the side so they can hear the question they also don't know we're the other car's are on track after they got out the car because they no longer have information from the pit crew.

I thought it would need to be a really big bag for 2025

Red Bull slightly less overpowered / dominant than it’s been for some years and Max is already looking to be struggling a bit, with McLaren and Ferrari taking some wins this year, and Max needing magic safety cars to get wins like Canada. Absolutely no chance he could take the WDC in the Merc lmao

The fia have handed Red Bull a fine and Perez has been given a grid place penalty for the next race.

@@chriscollins550 Thank you, I was aware that there was a minor grot at the team, but they deliberately left Checo out to help Max, as opposed to being courteous to the other racers..

It was a consequence of a mistake, but not foul play. Should we penalise the outcome or the offence?

yes.. Thus on the basis It being a self induced slow speed spin, and not a crash collision or mech failure ,, surely sainz had the ability to stop his prolonged roll back

Google it....

Is anyone saying otherwise?

​@@F1Elvisyou are...

Interesting....

Excellent point , fyi- personally couldn’t get Pirelli tires to work on my car 😂

@@markmcintyre4050 I could, the P zero's had excellent grip 👌 however the degradation was too big for my liking 😂

Yeah, chassis, aero, etc have nothing to do with how the tyres come alive and/or degrade😂

@@bennylloyd-willner9667 yes, it does, but how much of that is by design? Other categories don't experience the same issues. I think because they just have a proper tyre. No tricks, no bells, no whistles. Just a racing tyre. Like how much aero development is put in keeping those stupid tyres alive versus making the cars quicker in absolute laptime?

​they are ask to make the tyers degrad and the driver's with car design have to make make them work. It adds in a unknown and team's have to work around it with strategy. They could make long lasting race tyers but f1 didn't want that in fact they want to make them a steep softer and even harder to get into working temp and then banning tyer blankets to make it even more verbal and harder for the team's and driver's. F1 is more than just about who can go fastest and push the car. F1 about strategy working tyers and managing fule loads in to the stint

Data says difference or do you not look at thr time delta

Never any guarantees, but it would've been theirs to lose at that point

He is still a multiple race winner in multiple cars

@@soostdijk Neither I nor Jaques deny that. Did you hear specifically what Jaques said? Also that is what Zak Brown said, we had to go for a multiple race winner. Until the truth became apparent when Lando stomped him into the dust and McLaren had to buy him out. Getting money is a better skill than driving as far as Daniel goes. Yuki seems to be better than him too. Obviously Max as better. He did nothing at Renault. He lucked into several wins. Maybe he 'was' 'good' but he was never elite and never worth all the accolades. Checo Perez is a 'multiple race winner' too. About the same standard each. Average.

It's a given surely

Yeah, but behind Red Bull. Not enough curbs😂

They have them!

@@F1Elvis I’m not so sure about that.

Bye then. Its not a dodgy app its been verified. What was crap about it.

Err ok 😂

Elvis, love your comments and enjoy seeing a bit of English countryside along the way. Much more interesting (and worth the occasional wind noise) than watching someone sitting at home behind a mic. You always seem to cover (and provide your take on) all the main stuff that has gone on the prior race . Keep it up.