Meerkat Demo Unreal Engine 4.26 vs Unreal Engine 5.4 RTX 4080 Graphics Comparison

Подписаться 129 тыс.

Просмотров 84 тыс.

50% 1

Meerkat Demo Unreal Engine 4.26 vs Unreal Engine 5.4 RTX 4080 Graphics Comparison | Default Project Settings | Lumen
Enjoying my videos? Consider supporting me on Patreon: / cycu1
or directly on RU-vid: / @cycu1
Get Meerkat Demo here: www.unrealengine.com/marketplace/en-US/product/meerkat-demo-06
Music: The Bazaar Canon by Hanu Dixit
Gameplay was captured in 4K Ultra Settings on following rig:
-Gigabyte RTX 4080 Eagle OC 16GB amzn.to/3pYRibp
-Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX amzn.to/3rD1sit
-Gigabyte UD1300GM PG5 amzn.to/43toTIc
-Intel i7 13700K amzn.to/3rAzGD5
-Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB amzn.to/43x9pmr
-Samsung 980 Pro SSD 2TB / 1TB / 500GB amzn.to/44WEl0F
-Barracuda 4TB HDD amzn.to/3DmANZD
-Windows 11 amzn.to/3PYzmIy
-Be quiet! Silent Loop 2 360mm amzn.to/3KawpRl
-Be quiet! Pure Base 600 BGW20 amzn.to/44y2lam
Thanks for using my Amazon Affiliate links!
Timestamps:
Unreal Engine 4.26.2 00:00
Unreal Engine 5.4.1 01:22
Side-by-Side 02:43
Stills 04:04
Kanał GRANALIZA po polsku:
/ @granaliza
Cycu1 Bilibili official Channel: space.bilibili.com/3537123885...
Consider supporting my channel for cool bonuses:
/ @cycu1
Looking good quality gameplay for your own videos?
Consider subscribing my other channels to be up to date!
Cycu1 Xbox Archive / @cycu1xboxarchive130
Cycu1 PlayStation Archive / @cycu1playstationarchi...
Cycu1 Nintendo Archive / @cycu1nintendoarchive454
Looking for gift cards?
PSN: amzn.to/3eFkAjM
Xbox: amzn.to/3gzvsl8
Nintendo eShop: amzn.to/2TRMbqf
Looking for RTX Graphics Cards? Check on Amazon: amzn.to/3dzcGYZ
Follow me on Twitter: / cyckiewicz
Find me on Facebook: / cycu1yt
Cycu1's friends:
Jabcook:
/ jabcook
Easy Unboxing:
/ @easyunboxing
Quick Expert Reviews
/ @quickexpertreviews
FA Gamez:
/ mrxboxgamer007
#unrealengine5 #UnrealEngine #UE5 #RTX4080

Игры

Опубликовано:

27 май 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 232

@Cycu1 14 дней назад

Get Meerkat Demo here: www.unrealengine.com/marketplace/en-US/product/meerkat-demo-06 Enjoying my videos? Consider supporting me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/Cycu1 or directly on RU-vid: ru-vid.com/show-UCD3rfp47a3xZuqHhllcIvIAjoin

@josefabuaisheh6262 5 дней назад

Thanks for the comparison. Obviously the realtime raytracing GI is missing in UE5, which leave the image slightly less saturated in the shadows. However I really love the sharp details and the much better render of the depth of field in UE5. The Fur looks so much better in UE5. The one issue apart from the late loading meshes, is the ghosting effects of UE5's temporal super resolution, or Anti Aliasing. I've hoped they would have fixed this by now.

@kevinsteelflex7371 14 дней назад

This demo was clearly more designed for the older engine's use of artificial GI so it looks more saturated in spots. UE5 just removes the baked lighting or whatever the original artistic intent was.

@Oozaru85 13 дней назад

It removed all the bounce lights, which makes it look very unrealistic, imo.

@ralphyralph1604 13 дней назад

Ist not exactly removing light, the surfaces just behave different. 5:10 e.g. the underside of the rock is darker in 4. All in all, I don't see any major improvement, the reflection is just set up differently.

@enricod.7198 11 дней назад

10% difference for half the fps.

@ingamgoduka57 11 дней назад

Unreal engine 5 lumen still needs a traditional path-tracing it lacks diffuse bounce lighting for albedo Nvidia Path-tracer is still unmatched.

@josefabuaisheh6262 5 дней назад

Baked lights are actually the most accurate Lighting with the downside of rendering moving shadows, other than of course pathtraced offline renderers. Most AAA-Games still bake plenty of very detailed environments. However I think with UE5's Lumen, they deactivated the realtime raytracing Method that was used in UE4 and replaced it with a much less performance intensive solution, that works perfectly together with nanite, but is arguably less visually stunning. It would be interesting to see, how Unreal Engines Path Tracer would render this video offline! Or you could try to get some of the missing GI back in UE5: "From the project editor UI select "Edit -> Project settings → Engine → Rendering-> Global Illumination → Dynamic Global Illumination Method". From the drop down list select your preferred method (which can be None, lumen, Screen Space, Standalone Ray Traced, or an external plugin). or you can manually edit the DefaultEngine.ini in .../path_to_your_UE5_project/config/DefaultEngine.ini Go to the [/Script/Engine.RendererSettings] section in the configuration file and set the following variable to your preferred method and set r.DynamicGlobalIlluminationMethod to 0, 1, 2 or 3 (e.g " r.DynamicGlobalIlluminationMethod=0 ). By default, it is set to "1" which corresponds to "lumen". The methods, as listed above, are None (0), lumen (1), Screen Space (2), Standalone Ray Traced (Deprecated) (3)."

@MariusMerchiers 7 дней назад

4:58 that's just wrong in UE5.4 The inside of the egg is completely black. But UE4 does it more realistically because light penetrates the shell a bit. Also where is all the global illumination gone in UE5.4 The underside of the egg shell is just black?

@GameOver_Official_Channel 3 дня назад

👍

@lyrand6408 8 дней назад

0:56 Vs 2:18 Massive difference in how light scatters and where shadows are 'supposed' to go. It's more "real" in UE 5.4, but it's more vibrant in UE 4.26.

@josefabuaisheh6262 5 дней назад

UE4 actually uses real time raytracing to produce accurate bounce lights. UE5 uses Lumen, which cannot render bounce lights, outside their vision.

@kassperplus 14 дней назад

4.26 is more beautiful, 5.4 is more realistic/natural but also make it look dull

@FantasyNero 13 дней назад

I don't think realistic looks that way, some scenes are more realistic in UE4 like in this too dark shadow inside the hole 3:38

@melxb 13 дней назад

@FantasyNero it's not all too dark, when the little guy is on top of the egg it makes the egg look like it's floating for unreal 4, UE5 is more realistically grounded, not perfect given this was applied to something old after the fact, but still u can see it's doing things more realistically especially in other moments where u see light and color bounce like the canyon behind the meerkat when he is on top of the egg and then also on the egg shell when he is inside the hole

@Oozaru85 13 дней назад

The UE5 version has no bounce lights, while UE4 has them. Maybe a bit too strong in the 4 version, but at least they are there. In 5 they are totally gone. Just dull, black and grey shadows.

@kassperplus 13 дней назад

@@Oozaru85 actually there is but much reduced or not as vibrant

@melxb 13 дней назад

@Oozaru85 yes it does have bounce light, ue4 imo is doing it incorrectly not accounting for the sky hue mixed in the open space

@roooooargh 14 дней назад

This demo was done with the capabilities of Unreal Engine 4. The artist adapt their artistic vision to the tools of unreal 4. Make this comparison is curious to watch how is the compatibility between two versions of Unreal (I think there are issues in the scattering propriety of the egg material, the fur rendering of the eagle and the global lighting in the unreal 5 footage). But is not barely useful to compare anything else.

@marcosvfg100 8 дней назад

This video clearly demonstrates why transferring a game or animation from one engine to another is not a straightforward process. All the work on lighting, textures, antialiasing, etc., for this animation was created with the limitations of UE4 in mind. When the person transferred the animation to UE5.4, they didn't adjust the lighting or textures, which are overly sharp, nor did they use the new tessellation tools for fur, feathers, and terrain details. As a result, the original version is obviously more visually appealing.

@ufokuk77 14 дней назад

@3:24 objects like the rock surface in the background looks alot more natural in ue4

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

Seems major issue is that is something wrong with the setup of the sub surface scattering in the egg shell material making it look less translucent in the UE5 version. I think this is why many claim it needs more bounce light. look at the rocks. Plenty of bounce there. Almost as much as UE5 Apart from less saturation. But that is an art choice in the UE4 version. This can easily be fixed in the UE5 version with just a color grading curve. No what makes the egg look more realistic in the UE4 version is the translucent material that seems to not be working properly in the UE5 version and that is why the egg look so “dark”

@marcosvfg100 8 дней назад

@leecroft7311 13 дней назад

Thank you for the side by side from 2:46 Honestly i couldn't see any difference between them when watching. UE4 is more fun to watch but a little bit too orange. UE5 has better dark levels for shadows but the overall image isn't as much fun to watch, slightly dull. But again watching them one at a time without the side by side i honestly couldn't see any difference between them.

@TurboLight 7 дней назад

It looks more visually appealing because of how the post-processing and shading were adjused to fit the scene in UE4, all of which doesn't transfer too well into UE5.

@adaptivegame9353 11 дней назад

This is not correct comparison. First of all, you must desable Lumen and bake light in ue5. Second, you must ensure that the postprocess is set up the same. I see that this is not the case. And other, and other, and other.... fps count, render time, used technologies...

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

Exactly

@FinalFreakOpa 6 дней назад

Ok die technischen Fähigkeiten sind echt beeindruckend aber unreal4 ist ausgereifter als die 5 dadurch sieht das bild stabiler aus aber bei der unreal5 sind die lichteffekte der Wahnsinn. Bei den Farben und Kontrasten glaub ich ist das Einstellung

@demianoviedo9722 14 дней назад

Hair looks much better in UE4

@kenhutchinson2655 10 дней назад

Eagle too !

@KristenJelly 13 дней назад

I faced a similar problem when I moved from 5.1 to 5.3, all the lighting became dull and the picture was more blurry, I tried many times to render my latest scene in version 5.3, but every time I faced problems. Even though I use post-processing for my scenes every time, it doesn't improve the situation. Even lut presets.

@tslater2005 12 дней назад

Yeah UE 5 clearly needs some time imo

@PromptKing 3 дня назад

That light scattering makes a whole lot of difference and I also notices smoother shadow edges in UE4 but overall both impressive Nanite offer more details

@toutagamon 13 дней назад

I didn't even know, that UE4 could produce these kind of graphics. Is there a precompiled version somewhere, so we can test ourselves? What are the vram usage difference, between the two versions and what about different resolutions? 1080p, 1440p, 4k?

@3jsjeosn 4 дня назад

This was baked lighting in version 4

@3jsjeosn 2 дня назад

It was actually raytracing, Im mistaken

@Selxis 10 дней назад

We're definitely seeing diminished returns with newer iterations of graphics engines.

@svaretsky 8 дней назад

Больше багов, чем улучшений. Нереалистичные солнечные блики, сверкающие глаза

@rezanz3779 5 дней назад

just the addition of ambient occlusion?

@johnsmith-xs1vf 14 дней назад

It's got to the point now where consumer grade graphics chips can render CG quality like movies

@michal7x7 14 дней назад

I assume you're watching on some tiny screen becase it's nowhere CG quality. It's painful to watch.

@YOEL_44 13 дней назад

This is not a good example of that with the super low amount of samples per frame they're using, yet your claim it's been possible for over 10 years now.

@johnsmith-xs1vf 12 дней назад

@@michal7x7 No

@MonsieurKraken 12 дней назад

That's CGI, the only difference is it being real time or not. And to be fair Unreal 4 looks...not really good ? The LOD pop in at the beginning is painful. We've been able to render movie CGI like scenes in real time for years, it just need to be a small scene not a whole ass game

@Kalantinus94 11 дней назад

Is there any original video? RU-vid compression ruined the quality and both looks almost the same

@waltuhputurdaway 8 дней назад

U blind?

@ralphyralph1604 13 дней назад

They both look good, but I don't know where the mega improvement is in this scene. the surfaces just behave differently. E.g. The surface of the egg is diffuse in 5, does not reflect as much, absorbs light. I like it better in 4, the ambient light influences the color of the egg 4:44, in 5 not at all 4:51.

@alexanderjantzem239 8 дней назад

Pourquoi on passe de 360p en unreal 4 à 720p en unreal 5. Il faut le mettre à qualité égale

@BB_O_99 12 дней назад

Funny how the fake bounce light made it looked "better", sometimes the best solution is the artist solution.

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

I mean it was fake. I bet it was done with GI calculations. It’s just baked do not realtime. And this makes me think that reason UE5 version looks dull is that the it has not be properly set up. As lumen should be able to produce same / similar results as UE4 for this scene. I just think original scene had great art / light direction. While the new one basically was just converted abd tweaked to have good light direction

@BB_O_99 9 дней назад

@@litjellyfish I think in the 4.26 they used the regular "ambient" sky and ground light or just a sun light rotated toward the "sky" without casting shadows, like I usually do. That way you can control the amount of fake bounce light in those desert scenes, wich looks quite good if all scenes are outdoor areas. The 5.4 is calculating more precise real time shadows and GI, that kills the fake sun bounce from small areas and made it look dull in some scenes. But if you check at 3:39 you can see that the scene has less light bleeding in 5.4 and it look better in my opinion. One solution for that is keeping the light on but reduce the power and disable it in the sequencer while the indoor scenes are happening.

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

@@BB_O_99 yes for sure. Totally agree. Also I think the translucent/sub surface scattering setup on the egg shell itself is a bit off in the new version. That is what I think many react o no

@fulsaymefunplay4173 13 дней назад

turn off HDR = Unreal engine 5.4

@GemboyTV 4 дня назад

How many hours did you render this on 4080?

@Cycu1 4 дня назад

It's real time demo.

@nolancheck1465 3 дня назад

There's something wrong with the UE5 demo - in the thumbnail, you can see the inside of the egg is totally black and there's no reflected light on the bottom of the egg. I honestly think there's a glitch.

@pablob7133 9 дней назад

Cycu? Był taki super recenzent albo w PSX Extreme albo w Secret Service ale raczej w PSX :)

@dark_teacher 10 дней назад

음 고정gi를 거의다 내리고 앰비언트 오클루전을 먼거리 고정으로 적용했다가 근거리실시간으로 부드럽게 처리 할수있게됬다는 걸까 여전히 둘중하나는 포기한게 보이는데 최적화 문제로 쓸때없는 연산을 줄이겠다 인듯 최적화가 전부니까 만점드려요 제작과정이 더좋아진게 크니

@bravointheua 14 дней назад

What is the difference in performance?

@majstorringo 14 дней назад

UE 5.4 is more realistic, where the difference between the two engines is lumen and nanites. A revolutionary tool that owns UE5. Now the second question is why the developers have not used the full potential of UE5 yet

@bravointheua 14 дней назад

@@majstorringo nah, my question is - "what is the difference in performance?" Like what is the difference in FPS, GPU/CPU load and multithreading between UE 4.26 and UE 5.4?

@majstorringo 14 дней назад

@@bravointheuaEverything same, almost🤔, only as i sad. LUMEN AND NANITE UNIQUE TECHNOLOGY for UE5.

@henrik5299 14 дней назад

@@majstorringo you still didn't answer 😆

@abhirupkundu2778 13 дней назад

@@bravointheuaobviously ue 5.4 has far less performance because of accurate lighting and shadows. This video didnt use lumen and nanites, else it would look photirealistic

@herveheron49400 7 дней назад

I'm not a professional, but I have the impression that the light and shadows are consistent with UE 5( Example :5,46 min the animal's belly). Which gives a more realistic image. With perhaps a better worked LUT, I don't know? But I prefer the visual of UE 5.

@TonySmileeque 10 дней назад

who's made the sound design? Why nobody doesn't define that is very hard work?

@nfarquhar 6 дней назад

WetaFX did the sound

@mixaliskontou5829 12 дней назад

4 have more colors but 5 is more realistic colors but they both beautiful

@MkDanzo 9 дней назад

UE4 version looks artistically better for the scene imo (Probably because it had extra care which considered color grading and shading as there were limitations in UE4). The UE5 part looks like it was just ported to the new engine with no extra tweaks to retain some of the art style even though the tools are more advanced. The reddish tint on the UE4 one (with lack of higher grade shadows) is better for 3d cartoons/adventure games, while the UE5 one would better fit some action movie CGI/action games. All just my opinions, but we should remember that digital content should have differentiation and character to avoid feeling the same.

@jjvictor66 8 дней назад

better lighting and ambient occlusion

@KORNdog1986 5 дней назад

The faked GI light bounce of UE4 is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. It's making it look a lot warmer and pleasing to look at. You could probably easily achieve the same look in UE5 though if you wanted to.

@dez770 11 дней назад

only thing I thought seeing this is, do I need a new GPU? 😅

@THEpirateshunter 12 часов назад

so better fur and shadows?

@bpwilko 14 дней назад

Definitely 5 I hate that over warm orange colour tone they made last Gen games look I prefer the more natural look and less orange, looks more photo real .

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

Well this is light and art direction and nothing to do with natural or not. Don’t you think you have those colors for real?

@bpwilko 8 дней назад

@@litjellyfish yes that's probably true like when I using the E3 Witcher 3 lighting mod makes the games look 100 times better , it's crazy how much lighting can effect colour .

@litjellyfish 8 дней назад

@@bpwilko Yes I still say this (and also sound sometimes) is often undervalued. In all areas. UI, Apps, 2D Games, 3D. Many thing colors is just for stylized games and that its just to have good materials and pop some lights and a sun and thing GI will make everything look good. Nope. Its as with films, to built a feeling using light and light color. Compare say the latest Alien movies with the first one (and Blade Runner) the lighting is realistic still its better than real sometimes

@tuapuikia 8 дней назад

Ff7 rebirth issue, the damn blurry image problem 😅

@arielvallejos3527 7 дней назад

que le pasó al ojo en el min 3:39 en UE5 jajaja

@ArTuRkrut13 8 дней назад

В 5 версии анрила яйцо сделали камнем и его стенки перестали пропускать солнечный свет😮

@NextgenPL 14 дней назад

Very small differences. I bet UE 5 vs UE 6 will be not visible difference for nomal people casue We right now are really close to perfectioon...

@TheDrunkenPL 14 дней назад

The same thing people said about mid 2000 graphics like GTA 4 or Gears of War :)

@kassperplus 14 дней назад

Nah these were huge upgrade, GTA 4 used all new engine for a 2008 game@@TheDrunkenPL

@kpo1233 14 дней назад

They just imported the project to unreal 5

@abhirupkundu2778 13 дней назад

@@kpo1233yea, they didn't turn on the 2 most imp settings in ue 5.4, lumen and nanites. L

@crus9792 8 дней назад

и что я тут должен увидеть? я вижу, что 4 куда лучше смотрится! очередное доказательство того, что с каждым годом графика ни как особо не меняется (есть исключения конечно), а требования к играм многократно возрастают!

@electricowboy 11 дней назад

This is a UE 4 engine demo running on compatibility mode on UE 5, so is basically the same demo running twice with some compatibility adjustments. For those wondering how is possible that UE 4 looks so good it is because UE 4 is already an extremely capable and almost photorealistic engine. This is why many upcoming current gen games are still using it instead of UE 5, it is lighter to run and based on the current console hardware capabilities actually it doesn’t make almost sense to use UE 5

@silverwerewolf975 13 дней назад

Looks so blurry... fuck taa. this is a fucking blurry mess

@user-cd6yy2pe5x 11 дней назад

More physics in the world around!!!

@beelz6739 11 дней назад

corporates needs you to find the differences between this engine and this engine they're the same engine, just drop the games

@glpam 4 дня назад

UE 4 is better in my opinion, because the colors are bright and not boring, while UE 5 looks duller and darker I don't know why the higher the graphics, the darker the colors, just look at the game Ghost of Tsusima, where the PS 5 version has more cinematic images than the PC version with the MAX setting

@Decoding_Master 9 дней назад

GI is Missing in ue5 you should reinstall the ue5

@wingedhussar1453 5 дней назад

i rmemeber the older version ue4 looked better but now with updates ue 5 blows it out

@ukasztarnowski7605 9 дней назад

No difference except a little bit more shadow and darker color pallete in UE 5

@Deniz-vy3fp 12 дней назад

Only more Shadow?

@SerdceDanko 11 дней назад

For reality of Unreal Engine - add shader cache compilation stutters to this clip.

@athinadrk2882 14 дней назад

I can't understand but ,U4 looking more beautiful at my eyes🤔how could it be possible???👍🎮🤔

@bernout 13 дней назад

Because this comparison does not make sense in the way you think it does. This demo was built in UE4 with UE4's feature set in mind and then simply ported to UE5. The baked lighting is replaced by Lumen which results in a more realistic behaviour of light and shadow but the scene also loses the artistic vision of the original. Also it doesn't efficiently utilize UE5's other advanced technologies like nanite or virtual shadow maps. This demo is a nice look at the compatibilities between UE4 and UE5. But is is NOT a competetive comparison. UE5 is basically running on training wheels while UE4 is fully utilized.

@swolloch 11 дней назад

similar,like rtx vs path tracing and thats all

@luizfelipe7392 10 дней назад

Its all about light

@Monstacheeks 10 дней назад

I wish I knew how to do 3D renderings.

@francistein8409 4 дня назад

If unreal engine 4 can still look that good to this day, what the fck are we doing with unreal engine 5? 😂

@Cycu1 4 дня назад

I guess you should play Hellblade 2 ;)

@salutsalutsalut69 13 дней назад

UE 4.26/4.27 : "reasonable guideline for developing games with Unreal Engine 4" 4 cores cpu 8gb ram gtx 970 "we recommend compiling with a machine having 12 to 16 cores" . UE 5 : "Recommended Hardware" 4 cores cpu 8gb ram, "Requirements for UE5 Rendering Features"rtx2000/rx6000 serie or newer , UE 5 "typical system" rtx 3080 128GB ram 32 Cores / 64 Threads. Source official website. Gtx 970 vs 3080 281percents speed difference source userbenchmark. Ebay price 970 30/50, rtx 3080 350/450, rtx2060/rx6600 100/180. What's your choice ? :)

@jhonnyx161 14 дней назад

Deberian poner el rendimiento fps vs los graficos ganados

@YOEL_44 13 дней назад

No es una carrera, este ejemplo no esta diseñado para un videojuego, es como el corto que se usaba de benchmark en Blender, la intencion es demostrar unica y exclusivamente las mejoras graficas, aunque se tire 10mins generando cada fotograma.

@Coverpage2568 11 дней назад

So basically they added HDR in it.

@rrrrexx 11 дней назад

2:18 wut? eye blaster?

@Yokitolakaka 7 дней назад

it's the convolution bloom.

@KelGhu 13 дней назад

We will always think that glowing colors and more brightness are more beautiful. But they are artificial in UE4.

@artefaktartefakt 11 дней назад

in UE 4 more interesting light, in UE 5 shadows are dirty and no reflexes

@MehdenMax 12 дней назад

Much more ambiant occlusion. The only difference I notice

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

Where? I see less ambient occlusion. Or are you meaning less bounce light ? (The opposite kind of ambient occlusion)

@user-cd6yy2pe5x 11 дней назад

Stop cutting the graphics, the graphics in all games are already excellent when you make a physical impact on the world around you, everything is beautiful everywhere, but you can’t get enough of the graphics alone, you want the stones and sand in the world around you to be physically changed just like in reality, otherwise there’s no point in all of it this beauty that it's worth everything Dead like scenery

@superhuber 11 дней назад

Maybe you don't see any differences but you get -50% of FPS in packet.

@anthonyortiz4254 13 дней назад

Assets look the same. It looks like only a difference in lighting

@Joeeye123 8 дней назад

Shadows are popping in on 5.4 at 2:11, not too impressive there.

@gurujoe75 10 дней назад

UE5 no secondary colour light bounce ..

@khalifa1942 14 дней назад

performance compartison plz

@Cycu1 14 дней назад

I didn't put that in video as it's super messy, and since this is not a commercial project I don't see much of use to showcase unoptimized demo. It is after all straight "out of the box" default experience, which you may see right after opening the project in UE editor. I mean if you guys really want to see the performance I can ofcourse prepare one for you.

@kpo1233 14 дней назад

@@Cycu1which one was running better?

@aterikasedi 13 дней назад

Global Illumination removed on UE5.

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

@@YOEL_44does not global illumination include indirect light? I mean if you don’t have any indirect light you don’t have a global illumination right

@TurboLight 7 дней назад

This demo was made with UE4's limitations (lighting, anti-aliasing, textures etc.) in mind, so it doesn't transfer too well into UE5. As result it looks better and more natural in UE4, as the post-processing settings and shading were also adjusted to UE4's version to fit the scene better. The demo in UE5 doesn't use any new tech like lumen. And the RT won't work well with materials that aren't made with RT in mind.

@lucascordoba6020 11 дней назад

The graphics card FullHD not prepared for unreal engine 5 for now, at least two more generations and surely yes. Unless you have much money for expensive cards of course.

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

Yes but what has that to do with tre video

@lucascordoba6020 9 дней назад

@@litjellyfish It has a little to do with it, that engine is very demanding and in terms of image quality and fluidity I'll stick with unreal engine 4 for now.

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

@@lucascordoba6020 have you benchmarked it. Basically depending on what light setup you have it’s same performance or better than unreal engine 4 from videos I checked.

@lucascordoba6020 9 дней назад

@@litjellyfish I will only say that when games in Unreal Engine 5 can be played as fluidly as, for example, Atomic Hearth, then I will agree with you, of course with a graphical improvement.

@litjellyfish 8 дней назад

@@lucascordoba6020 sure. I mean if we look at similar hardware. Is not unreal engine 5 games with same level of details etc running smoothly compared to it?

@Vartazian360 9 дней назад

Dont forget that UE4 runs 2x better than UE5

@hohohodrigues 6 дней назад

Don't forget that UE3 runs 8x better than UE5

@saculfed3798 11 дней назад

It's seems like unreal 5 are not computing indirect lightning.

@manfredmathis3667 8 дней назад

Ähm To Be Honest! For The Eye There Is No Diference!

@user-gs2xz2mk3t 9 дней назад

Как по мне Unreal Engine 4 в одну калитку разносит 5 версию. лучше свет и нет таких тормозов в 5

@shadowofthesupremo7898 8 дней назад

So they reduced the saturation and call it the day

@TurboLight 7 дней назад

This demo was made with UE4's limitations (lighting, anti-aliasing etc.) in mind, so it doesn't transfer too well into UE5. So it looks more natural in UE4. The demo in UE5 doesn't use any of the new tech like lumen.

@tazmangw 9 дней назад

This comparison is wrong because of many errors in ue5 example. Such as light occlusion or material transparency. Because of that it looks too simple and less realistic.

@Richdadful 11 дней назад

UE5 has better processing. But UE4 is good enough already

@rezanz3779 5 дней назад

Why does it look better UE 4 is more real

@capitanwinters4422 4 дня назад

Me gusta mas el 4, aunque mi ojo climico, hace que me de asco verlo, me da el mal del valle inquitante en las texturas jeje

@user-hn1qd5mc2j 9 дней назад

First of all, I haven't seen a game on UE4 that looks like this, and now UE5 is already out. I don't understand the excitement; UE4 and UE5 look almost identical except for the lighting, shadows, and maybe colors. Nothing new or groundbreaking...

@user-rg6kj3vx3o 11 дней назад

4я версия выглядит лучше, скорлупа у яйца просвечивается солнцем, и картинка менее плоская.

@bpcgos 8 дней назад

My 8GB 3060 Ti spit run out of memory error everytime I run this😂

@mttrashcan-bg1ro 8 дней назад

Great video and comparison, but this demo is such an awful comparison for the engines as it's quite obvious it's been made on UE4 and then updated for UE5, otherwise it'd look completely different on UE5. I think we're past the point of it mattering seeing as UE5's been around for about 4 years, but if people cared still and Epic did too then it would be cool to see a tech demo made on UE5 be downgraded to UE4 to show what's missing, this is more a comparison to show what's added if you port something over which isn't necessarily going to make full use of UE5 as it wasn't made from the ground up for it.

@nicko3151 6 дней назад

why the heck is ue4 better than ue5, or lets say cleaner, or I guess is this sharpness algorithm that i dont like

@ps4games164 13 дней назад

4 is better

@abhirupkundu2778 13 дней назад

So you mean you like fake lighting and unrealistic shadows? Great.

@ps4games164 13 дней назад

@@abhirupkundu2778 Shut up, bot.

@mixonium3134 11 дней назад

@@abhirupkundu2778 Dude, on the contrary, version 4 looks more realistic. Illumination Occlusion Reflex and something else

@abhirupkundu2778 11 дней назад

@@mixonium3134 dude that looks far worse than real life. Ue5 literally simulates real life with 98% accuracy

@mixonium3134 11 дней назад

@@abhirupkundu2778 Are you kidding? Бросай долбиться в глаза

@juancelzeg.mu.3555 14 дней назад

Unreal Engine 4 win! Flawless victory

@adampatriarch 10 дней назад

Overall improvement, beside shadows of the hollowed eggs interior, U4 dealt much better than U5 with that detail.

@nightshadowblade 7 дней назад

Not a good video to showcase the advantages of UE5 vs UE4 imho, at least add an FPS counter and give more context please.

@melxb 13 дней назад

people don't know what they are looking at/what to look for, unreal 5 looks way more realistic and grounded and bouncing light and colors correctly, unreal 4 just looks wrong, it's incorrectly bouncing light and colors in the open spaces vs tight enclosed spaces and incorrect shadowing

@litjellyfish 9 дней назад

Yes but in this version for sure the light bounce from the ground is not set up good. It’s actually less realistic looking. So most likely just due to settings in the scene they upgraded

@melxb 9 дней назад

@litjellyfish yeah of course it's just someone applying unreal 5 onto something old, kind of like RTX remix or people modding RT into older games, it's not all going to come out perfect and jive with all the assets and what have you

@davidhill8565 9 дней назад

Unreal Engine 5 uses HDR.

@alister4425 5 дней назад

В 5 просто все темнее в4 лучше смотрится

@spincut13 13 дней назад

Soooo older engine 4 looks better…thanks for showing me this..?

@abhirupkundu2778 13 дней назад

Looking better doesn't mean better as in terms of photo realism. Ue 4 simulates completely fake and rasterized lighting, makes me wanna puke because it doesn't follow even 1% of particle physics. Ue 5.4 looks hundred times better when lumen and nanites are turned on, which this video creator didn't