Very nice review. I originally fell for the Omega but not so much anymore. It is just to loud for me. I like the Pelagos but will probably go with the Tudor Heritage....
I own a 1973 Omega DeVille 1012. It is a 23 jewel 28800 automatic. It is 49 years old . In beautiful condition. It has a gorgeous blue dial. It is stainless steel. It is extremely quiet and accurate. I set to atomic time. It is Chronograph accurate. I would match it against any Rolex on any day
Little tip for the owners of this version of the Seamaster... mine runs slow when laid crown down. Alternating crown down and any other position has kept it almost running perfect for the last couple of months
Both amazing watches which are in my collection all be it the SM is a early 2003 model. My LHD peli gets the most wrist time though. Just an amazing every day watch
Omega might be more luxurious apart from bracelet made in China. Tudor purely Swiss Made even tiny screws. Omega only makes it’s price because of James Bond. The first appearance of Omega was in Golden Eye and since then in every Bond film. That’s why prices went up. Without that Omega could costs the same as Tudor.
Excellent review and very thorough! I've owned the Tudor Pelagos, 5 line and truly enjoyed it. I did upgrade to the Sea Dweller, but I do miss the Tudor. The 70 hour power reserve, titanium case and Ceramic bezel made it a great value proposition. I also had the Omega PO 600m gmt, Oreo bezel. A great looking watch, very functional with a great movement. I think the problem most of us "watch geeks/collectors" have, is the search, purchase then flip and then ultimately, some regrets along the way. i will say that i will re-purchase both some day. Great review again, please keep them coming!
I think they are not even in the same division. Not even in the same realm. The Tudor is a garbage 'grade 2' titanium (in terms of hardness 'grade 5' and above are the equivalent to 316L ssteel) toy watch for rich kids in Cali, who wear shorts and slippers all day and like surfing. You can't wear the Tudor with a slightly more formal outfit either. Spending that amount on a hobby watch is a huge waste of money for most people. The Seamaster is the watch one should choose. Who are serious about spending on a piece to wear for decades.
It’s definitely a more polarizing design and I agree on the titanium point. These are all reasons why you see more Seamasters out in the wild versus the Pelagos. Thanks for tuning in!
I completely disagree, I own the Pelagos and its an incredible original design that keeps perfect time and super comfortable to wear. I find the Omega Seamasters to be ugly with terrible design cues that belong back in the late 90's.. kinda like a turbo Fossil watch!
@@watchyourstyle I prefer the timeless style of Rolex / Tudor. In addition, I am very picky about bracelets. From my perspective, the Seamaster is a design disaster.
Yeah I’m the same- a couple of tweaks to the sm300 would make it incredible (tapering the bracelet being the most notable - the scalloped bezel, skeleton hands and pointless helium valve are not to my liking but I get they are part of the watches dna.)
Looks wise i think the Tudor will age better. It’s more classic. In 10 years time the Omega will look dated, but the Tudor won’t. However it’s not perfect - the Pelagos needs to be 1-2mm smaller and with METAS certification
With everything being made now with the sole intention of being “timeless” and in smaller cases I actually prefer the more modern and contemporary look of the sea-master. In 10 years I think it will be cool to look at it because it is of this time. Not something that is trying to be like every other watch in the past
I think if you’re giving it as a gift it’s impressive, or thinking of selling it on at some point,but personally I don’t store my watches in the boxes, once I’ve taken it out it stays out. I’ve a few nondescript boxes cluttering up the wardrobe, but I’d rather they reduced the price by £100 instead 😀
I have the white dial Seamaster and blue Pelagos. I love both equally for very different reasons. I do find that the Seamaster is a bit more wearable. It wears a quite bit smaller. The Pelagos is far superior to the Black Bay which I have also. Recently picked up a DSSD. When I get tired of the weight, I usually throw on one of these or my explorer.
I bought an omega Seamaster and had to return it because of imperfections on the dial. Plus I found the bracelet to be very uncomfortable, scratchy and sharp. The Pelagos will be my next purchase.
For me Omega is my choice. Tudor is just a homage wannabe, it wants to look like a Submariner but not quite, the dull finishing all around just look old, it doesn't has a personality of its own, it is bulky and just look cheap and there is nothing special about it. Omega is in its own style and it can be a dress watch as well as the sport watch. If anyone need to dive close to 300m they wouldn't choose neither of these two watches, they would go with a Sea Dweller. Despite they are dive watches they are more everyday wearers. Tudor's in house movement is nothing more than an improved version of the ETA's, Omega's 8800 is a brand new designed movement and is far better than the Tudor movement. If you are going to spend over $4000 on a watch why would you spend it on a wannabe instead of a watch with its own unique characters and world recognized.
I agree. Regardless how good a Tudor is, it will forever be under the shadows of a Rolex. It has no character of it's own. An owner of a Pelagos will always leave a place in their heart for a Submariner or Sea Dweller. I've always wanted a GMT Master when I was back in school. I eventually got myself a 16710 pepsi. I would never settle for a Tudor GMT. Sorry to burst some people's bubble but it's just the truth. With that said, the single watch that gets most of my wrist time is my 25 year old SMP 2531.80.
I have the blue Tudor date. It’s my Smurf because I can’t afford the white Gold Rolex submariner. Lol. I have the Aqua Terra blue dial and it’s too high. I changed the bracelet with a Artem sailcloth strap and wears much lighter and better.
Tip for future videos. Showing a watch with a sweeping seconds hand shows your edits. Next time, split the audio and video so the video is continuous, and cut/edit your audio before readding it to the video.
Unpopular opinion but I like the fact that the Seamaster pops and has presence. personally love the bracelet and it fits my wrist well. I unfortunately find the pelagos a little boring, plain Jane, unattractive in contrast to the striking waves and reflection of the seamaster under sunlight which is just gorgeous to look at, It just has the wow factor. I use it daily and even with short pants.
I was going to buy the omega until I tried the Tudor. Both are really nice but Tudor connected with me. If you’ve after something flashy Omega is the one for you.
Pelagos is a pretty awesome tool watch, but a bit too slab-cased and stark. Seamaster is a quite a bit more blingy, but much more visually interesting! The design can be divisive, but I love mine! BB58 is a good option for anyone that things Pelagos is a bit too stark. The lume falling out issues are really worrying as well, considering the number of people reporting those. Much nicer clasp mechanism on the Pelagos too.
Like yourself own both and for me it’s the pelagos all day long . It’s beauty is in its simplicity everything is done so well and very comfortable . Omega is a great watch but feel it’s ruined somewhat by the bracelet . I feel non tapering makes it look clunky . It also adds a lot of weight to the watch , feels heavy on the wrist and I also find that there are sharp edges on clasp and link edges which rubs uncomfortably against my wrist .. This for me ruins the experience I’m afraid ..
I don't like Rolex but I have soft spot for Tudor, hence why I got the 42 Pelagos - their best model IMHO. My friends poke fun at me that I will soon have a Rolex in my collection to my annoyance. I would love a Seamaster but at the current offerings I think he is sllliiiightly overpriced. I would go for the white or blue SMP. I have 7" wrist and it does not overhangs, gets really comfortable when my wrist swells during the day and I can adjust it on the go.
I am very pleased to find your video as I'm In the great position of deciding which of these two desirable watches I want in my collection. The price difference between them cannot be discounted. Omega has increased their prices twice in under 12 months. As a piece of jewellery, of art, I'm finding it difficult to justify the extra cost of the Omega.
Neither is a dress watch and anyone who thinks they are , are delussional . In todays world where the rules arnt followed both are versatile and can be worn in all situations my prlagos lhd certainly had been , but when i need to be formal it has to be my nomos and then its obvious that the rolex, omegas , tudors arent in their element. The aqua terra can just about pass as a everything /dress watch.
Left hand pelagos for me! The hands of the omega never spoke to me. I do wish they would limit the amount the text on the pelagos though. Other than that, it’s gaining traction on next to buy list. Great review, keep up the great work! Subscribed!
Thanks so much for the support! The Pelagos would be my choice as well - just much cleaner and simpler design. I don’t mind the text, but the watch could certainly benefit from a mm or two reduction in thickness, much like its ETA twin.
Clearly you have never tried a Titanium watch on, the Tudor isn't much thicker than the omega, but lighter due to the materials it is made of, plus the Omega has a massive nipple on both sides.
I've owned both and the Tudor for me is the better watch. Looks better on the wrist and keeps more accuracy in terms of time keeping its why its remained within my collection.
The Tudor Pelagos is everything a dive, casual and dress watch should be. Maybe one day the that ridiculous overpriced Rolex Sub will be made just as good and as useful as a Pelagos.
Oh dear! I just got word from the streets that the Lume on the Pelagos has a ‘lifting’ problem in everyday use. Im back to square one, Pelagos is off the menu for now, unless someone can convince me otherwise.
Dude .what a great review.. I'm in this same perdicammet, looking at the pentagos LHD though and the same omega seamaster .I'm actually leaning towards the Tudor.. also someone finnaly shows us a correct wrist shot! were the watch is not just in the picture ..full body and arm are important on a wrist shot ! Great review . I Just subscribed 👍
I went for the Pelagos39 because there was a 1700 usd difference here in my local AD's , 5900 usd for the Omega and 4200 usd with 24 payment cuotes on the tudor.
@@Unam469 titanium is much less heavy also it's much less affect by heat and cold, meaning in summer it won't get hot and won't feel too cold in winter when you are outside... I agree with the initial comment though ... I don't want a high-end watch to be titanium.
Currently deciding between these 2 what I should trade my bb58 in for. Not connecting with the bb58 the way I should be and both these 2 are the 2 in consideration for trade at the moment. Perfect video for me 👍, much appreciated
I'm in the same boat ..I'm actually leaning towards the pelagos LHD ...it's amazing piece that has great wrist presence without all the flash and looks bad ass , like nothing else
I ended up trading in my OG black bay 58 for the black omega smp 300. The second I got the omega in hand, I knew I made a mistake. I called back the company I was working with and undid the trade. My black bay was back to me in 72 hours. The omega was beautiful. A slightly nicer watch imo. But the Tudor is perfection on the wrist. Plus the design is a lot more timeless imo.
For my own style of watch collecting I like to try out different brands. If you have never owned an Omega try going for that rather than going back to back Tudor. Nothing wrong with that if you went that way though. You need to go with your heart
For me, I'd like a little more aesthetics in a watch if I'm paying $5K. The Peli is bit subdued for me. I have the Seamaster Pro and looking to get the Seamster 300.
Tudor is the bad version of the very outdated sub. The only reason people mention tudor is because it’s the ugly little brother from Rolex. And the hour hand from the Tudor is so ugly! The watch overall just looks very cheap. Omega on the other hand, amazing finishing and the co-axial calibers are outstanding. I’ve serviced a lot of brands in my years as a watchmaker but Omega took watchmaking definetly to a higher level with the co-axial movements. Omega watches are briliant in every single way.
As someone who is not a collector/enthusiast.....what would matter to me is comfortt and how easy is it to read the time in the darkness. No point in spending $8k if you struggle to read the time dring home at night...where seonds matter.. o even when walking down the street at night. The difference in th movments used....I really wonder how different they could possibly be. Is it even noticeable?? no one's really made a video talking about the various movments used between brands on watches that sell for $1k or 410k...IS there actually "enough' of a differene really? Being thata he space in a case is moreless "the same" vs a product like a sports car where the engine bay can vary so much allowing for so many variastions of gine desgin...clearly different visually and in use. Build qulity ...between these wtches I'm guessing is too mintue to notie. Or matter. If you haven't ...please do a "cheap watch" vs "expensive watch" head to head....what makes in your mind the $10k watch worth an extra $9k over a $1k Seiko tuna?? :)
The "flashiness" of the Omega reminds the consumer that they've bought a luxury tool product. We've moved away from the days when people actually dove with mechanical watches. Not many people would be brave enough to jump into the water with a >$5000 watch. I've tried on the Pelagos and like some other commenters are saying, it does indeed feel "off" the fact that it's so light. My opinion is that at some point, the Pelagos will look and feel like any other regular watch whereas the Omega with its ceramic dial and bezel will continue to shine and remind you that you bought something truly special.
Pelagos does what it should. It's perfect. The Omega is nice but trying to be two different watches at the same time and thus fails a little in both categories. The helium valve extension on the Omega is unnecessary and looks bad.
I think you were pretty balanced in your comparison. I have an older SMP. I have worn it on dressy occasions. I have also worn it diving down to 120 feet. All reviewers talk about the scalloped bezel being difficult to grip. I have dipped it into sea water and have no trouble gripping it with wet hands. In fresh water, I do have trouble gripping it. Since I would never dive in fresh water, that is a non issue. Yes, I could see both of these in my collection, if I had the funds for both. I will stick with my SMP and PO. I think Omega does a little better job than Rolex and Tudor for people who actually dive with their watches. That is just my opinion, and I realize I am probably in the minority.
i have 2 rolex and just brought the tudor here. love it. brought a 2 month old 42mm one for 3 grand. i hate the fussy strap links on the Omega, its just not a nice looking strap, and ive owned both a seamaster and a planet ocean., love the clean Tudor look and amazing strap, deffo the better buy.
I just sold my Seamaster 300 with the White dial and got the Pelagos last week. I wanted to love the Seamaster but just couldn’t, the dial was too busy and I couldn’t get over the helium escape valve. The Pelagos I haven’t been able to take off my wrist. Has so much presence and is so comfortable on the wrist. I also don’t think its just a tool watch, it looks great with a lot of different outfits and when the light hits the titanium it looks absolutely gorgeous. Pelagos for the Win💪🏽
Heck yeah! #TeamPelagos 💪 It’s really a lot more versatile than its tooly vibe would suggest. Super comfortable on the wrist as well - one of the best. Thanks for tuning in and happy new year!
Just sold my seamaster and purchased the pelagos. Don’t get me wrong- loved the Sm. Spectacular piece. Far better finished than the Tudor but I am at a stage where I prefer the all brushed tool feel of the Tudor. I wanted a diver that was all business. I already have enough watches with a bit of flash. Can’t really go wrong either way. Funny enough, I think my favourite diver to date (and I’ve had a lot) is the omega planet ocean.
The Tudor looks like a tool I have the LHD and it can say that the fit and finish is amazing it has a purpose a mission nothing flashy nothing pretentious. The Omega is a capable dive watch but it looks like a dress watch at the end of the day . It is a matter of priorities if you want something for the office you can’t go wrong with the omega but for me the Tudor is the superior timepiece in this comparison.
I agree! Smp is 300 m. I have the PO 600 m which is comparable to the Pelagos. The Pelagos is SD class, superior watch and much lighter than the PO. A more accurate comparison? Bb58 vs Smp diver, and PO vs Pelagos
I sold my Blue SMP ceramic and picked up a Black Bay Chronograph. I am not a fan of the skeleton hands or the bond bracelet. I have the 2007 SMP just serviced with black wave dial and sword hands on speedy bracelet which I will not part with. I try to like the new Seamasters but I can't get passed those skeleton hands and useless helium escape valve.
Vids n pics of this watch do it no justice when I seen it I was like 😳😍 I went to buy the Tudor style 41mm plain bezel blue dial but left to save for this lol I can go buy cash now but just not sure yet since yesterday all Ali think of is this ❤️😭 I’m about to be out 5249 cdn 🤫 don’t tell my wife 😂🤣
They ruined the Seamaster. The 2017 was much better looking. I know technicially the new one is better but that dial. 🥴 Between these two the Omega is the better watch, but it also cost more. I would take t he Pelagos in steel. If it was in steel and not titanium.
Man..I'm having a hard time deciding between these 2. I'm also throwing in the white dial seamaster as well. I like how the Omega brings a little bit brand recognition when worn. Tudor flies under the radar, which is not always a bad thing, but sometimes a little showing off never hurts haha. Also, in my opinion, especially this day in age, I think the tudor can pull off paired with a suit. I mean how badass would it look when you are wearing an Armani suit, and a well worn Pelagos pokes out?
I was having the same dilemma, and ended up pulling the trigger on the Omega. I got it in black on the rubber strap. I really love it. In the sunshine that black ceramic dial is very reflective and really pops. To me the rubber strap is really the best way to go for the Omega too. I don't like the look of that bracelet. Overall it's a very premium looking watch in person. But I'm sure I'd have loved the Pelagos just as much if I'd have gone with that instead. It's a beautiful piece and has a lot of presence. The only thing I don't like is that it's too much like a Rolex. People who don't know anything about the brands might think it's trying to replicate the Submariner. But that's not really what made me pass on it. Honestly I was just taking too long trying to decide and made a snap decision for the Omega. One thing I will say, I find that the Omega wears a little more casually than I'd originally have thought, especially on the rubber strap. It's not something I'd generally wear with a suit, unless it was a more casual/sporty suit. I imagine the Pelagos does better in this regard because it's no-nonsense look can pretty much go with anything. I actually have a good dress watch anyway, so this doesn't bother me, but if the Omega was my only watch I'd probably be looking into bracelet options to try and dress it up a little for when I needed to wear it in a more formal setting.
I like the titanium case of the Pelagos but the dial puts me off. The numerals are too big and it looks clumsy. Like a poker chip I seem to recall people saying when it came out.
I have the Omega 300 M and have been thinking about actually buying a Pelagos was actually looking at one the other day at mayors and I love the weight of it but it's just so impractical but then honestly is that why you buy watches to be practical.
