Mobbin' Up With Meeting of the Five in Standard | Against the Odds 

Same.

You are not alone

It’s morbin time!

I read it as moblin up and was like "I've been playing too much botw, again"

This deck will win a morbillion times

god you're so right

I liked the part where he played lands and spells. Such a deck thing to do

This is certainly one of the decks of all time

Definitely one of the decks that’s ever been played.

I hate this copypasta

loooool

I feel like they were actually trying to play around removal, because Seth couldn't kill both halls with ward if he had removal in hand, but didn't realize how copying cards works. Still a major punt, but if you look at it in the way the opponent THOUGHT it works, it makes sense to do.

Please drop a decklist, this sounds too good to pass up

Perfect

What are you talking about it was literally the only reason Seth won 2 games at all

What card would you use instead as the other half of that combo? In place of Meeting of the Five, I mean.

@@malcomchase9777 In Standard not sure, but in Pioneer and other formats the answer is clear: Niv-Mizzet, Reborn

I agree, although meeting might be good enough to throw into a widespread deck.

@@malcomchase9777 Expressive Iteration! :p

@@LadyMapi So, the answer is nothing then. That's the funny part about strategies. If a single card is too powerful, it's not a fun game. But when you support your main card, it does cool stuff. Widespread Thieving is clearly needed for the deck, but that's good. It means Meeting of the Five is a fair card.

Good god they had to have been salty after that match... That punt actually cost them everything

Put those hands together. What this deck needs is some singleton ultimatums

He also played hammer time before it became meta.

I think it was "meme or dream" and he actually went undefeated with it. I miss that series.

Widespread thievery is the star of this deck. Ironically I think Pioneer gives you the tools to actually cut Meeting of the Five from the deck altogether.

@@alwaysplaythegame hate it when I'm trying to build a deck around a card, and the deck just ends up better without the card that card in it- Sometimes find myself playing 61 cards for 1 copy of said card

Do it seth! No ballllls!

Wrong set. Lol

I'd legit love to see him pull off the Spy Kit combo in Legacy. ... For anyone who isn't familiar: Spy Kit is a weird equipment from one of the Conspiracy sets that gives the equipped creature the names of EVERY non-legendary creature in Magic. As a result, you can target a token with a Spy Kit on it with a March for X=1 and tutor out ANY non-legendary creature in your deck.

Goldspan would make the deck better but I think xorn would make more sense, but then you kind of have too many pieces

One of the best targets in my invoke justice deck.

Arbiter is a pretty messed up Kikki target, your creatures will never have power ever again

I vote for Jodah

Jodah seems like the pick. Meeting of the Five for five mana is damn solid, then you'd be guaranteed to cast at least two spells off the Meeting. Which doesn't sound great, sure... unless those two spells are two Ultimatums. Ramos would let you storm off, quote unquote, a bit more reliably, and a colourless commander in a five colour deck is always a good idea, but if you can make a reliable enough mana base I think Jodah is just slightly more powerful. The one problem, of course, is that it's hard to make an actual Meeting of the Five commander deck, as you can only include one copy in the 99. Still, you can make 5 colour 3-colour goodstuff (if that makes sense) and just have Meeting of the 5 as an end game bomb. I think Jodah would be the best commander for that deck, as well - casting Ultimatums or family leaders for 5 mana is just good Magic.

Jodah is probably stronger, Ramos is more in-flavor, real men play Cromat.

Obviously niv mizzet reborn would be the best commander

just needs a greenscreen i think

The mere comparison is an insult to rowdy crew lol