Modern Islam with Muhammad Hassan Ilyas | Mooroo Podcast 

I was thinking too, but with Ghamidi sb

Vote for ducky bhai

Says who?

​@@prowest6715only ignorant liberals

​@@prowest6715 Every sane person who has a mind. @ 5 April 2024

@@comparativereligiondailynews Unfortunately by saying that you display the same propensity for gross generalisations that afflicts most desis, and the secular liberals in particular. Allow me to express why I asked the question. Islam exists beyond the borders of Pakistan, and you will see that elsewhere scholars, in general from the mainstream, from different fiqh schools have a mutual respect as they recognise the calibre and respect the others point of view. You will see this if you go and sit with scholars from other countries, and even in the west. However, of these who I have mentioned Ghamdi to and know him, on learning of his opinions have been bluntly scathing of his methodology and his flawed opinions. So even outside of the peculiarities of the Pakistani circles, Ghamdiyat does not have the respect of the wider body of scholars. As a general rule, in life, one will view a person's calibre in their work by what their peers say about them. Ghamdi does not have that level of endorsement from his peers. These peers would be people who have studied the scared texts as well. If Ghamdi cannot convince them, in my mind that means he should be viewed with suspicion. It amazes me then to find people who have no qualifications other than what they have inclinations and whims towards judge anyone like Ghamdi to a 'true great scholar'. I do not find the reason for following him that people give in of themselves convincing at all.

lol man your so called ghamidi sir should go back to school and only just learn about the basic islamic knowledge cuz that guy says false things wo har haram cheez ko halal kr deta legit that guy he selling quranic ayats for fame and money, he should not be called a scholar he is a guy talking on his made up false and ill beliefs and ignorant people are literally worshiping it. period!

Kya aap depressed ho Mazhab ki wajah se ? Mazhabi activities ki wajah se ? @ 5 April 2024

We have to submit But before we have to understand what are the rulings and on what bases they are given. Then we follow and submit our will to them in true ways according to the will of God, with faith and trust. Otherwise, if we go blindly there are high chances of going against God’s will.

Yes he should have because then we would have a clash of viewpoints - desi liberal vs strong western Muslim who deals with hostile questioning a lot.

Ghamdi khud ahadees Ka munkir ha

Mufti Kamran is a good person.

Please don't invite that clown

No one..

He has no place in the world of intellectuals . He’s a clown

Who said clown?

Sahil Adeem apni podcast pe hi rahay thanks bye

بغض سے بالاتر ہو کر بتائیں کس بات سے اختلاف ہے، شائد کوئی رہنمائی کر سکے وگرنہ بغض کا علاج بہت مشکل ہے

Aameen

​@@Uninformed2.0pehley ap search kren k Ghamdi k khilaf kya kha gya ha because he is a munkir of Shab e Mairaj

@@secretsecret8551 منکریت کے سرٹیفکیٹ بانٹنے سے پہلے اگلے کی پوری بات سن لینی چاہئے جو کہ یقیناً آپ نے نہیں سنی ہوگی۔ آپ براہ کرم انکی 3 گھنٹے کی مکمل بات سن لیں، پھر سرٹیفکیٹ بانٹ لیجیئے گا

@mooroo podcast

then thats the same as any gf-bf relation, whats the point of the institute of marriage?

@@abdulrafay1384 Islam has no GF BF relationship. Equality is when anyone can give talaaq. You Muslim will not understand.

​@@vermasattu apart from you negating every aspect of my intellectual abilities just like that, the point i wanted to make was that in a gf-bf relation both parties have the authority to enter and exit the *contract* on free will. They are not bound by any certain set of rules. Whilst the institution of marriage imposes a lot of responsibilities on both parties especially the on the man such as providing and protecting etc. for both the wife and children even if he has to work without resting at all cuz thats his *fardh*. And any sane man would do that actually cuz thats how the chemistry of a high testosterone dependent person works. Another aspect of his chemistry/psychology is critical decision making and hence he has provided the ultimate responsibility of that matter of household as explained by the scholar in the pod that eventually they would be required to have a singular decision maker in critical matters(that doesnt mean no to consulting). And the woman can ask for talaaq for the minutest of reasons which are against that certain contract of marriage(shari'i reasons) and would have to be granted. But if after all the back breaking faraidh imposed on the man if a woman is allowed to walk out just when she feels like it *like an bf-gf relationship* then that won't be a balanced contract(of marriage) and the benefits she'll get from the man as established in the most modern cultures is just a cherry on top. And trust me if i were an avg man after all these impositions, i'd prefer having gfs over marrying ever.

Just a simple answer for your long long long comment. If Both parties are happy, its ok. But if One person is not happy, he have complete right to do anything which he wants. There is no point of carrying dead man on your shoulder while walking. So, Quraan and his 1400 years old teachings are useless in modern day world. If you want to adapt, its your choice. But, don't comment over my comment. I was telling my point to Host and Guest. You can walk away with your 1400 years old rule book.@@abdulrafay1384

If someone's not happy, then talk to someone first, if no one can convince you to stay, walk away. But women don't just "walk away", they turn into very selfish beings before walking away, wanting to make an example of the man before "walking away", taking everything from him , they don't even want the man's children to think good of their father. I am thankful for the 1400 year old rules because they prevent women from doing that to men. Today's women are just grown up unhappy irresponsible babies. If you think about it , babies lack empathy and sympathy, cuz they only understand what they want, not what their caretakers want.

Ramchand daankins

@@heisenbergkhan7951 what do you mean ?

@@heisenbergkhan7951 what do you mean by this?

​@@Amberian115 Richard dawkins

@@DwindlingLamp My name is Weinberg Dawkins and not Richard dawkins please. Though it resemble with it.

Freedom that goes with false choices is not freedom. Someone has to correct you. For example 2 + 2 makes 4. If you belive it 5, you'll be called fool. First prove it 5 and then belive it for sure. Islam has the answers to the very fundamental questions of human like purpose of birth and death. Science or theories can't answer this.

Or maybe you didn’t understand.!

@@oye214 can be the case! But again it's my opinion, if you are satisfied with the answers good for you ❤️

Maybe you don't want to understand...

@@meerhussainalimoosvi1171 Thank you for telling me what's in my heart 🌝 and What i do or don't WANT to do👍

Nah bro atheism me b andhi taqleed hai zayada honest position agnosticism hai

@@Amberian115 what do you mean I don’t understand can you say it in a simpler form

@@Amberian115 what do you mean I don’t understand can you say it in a simpler form