More Contradictions in the New Testament - 2 Guys Exploring Christianity with Greg McBride - 1638 

The person you had on the other time, Mr. McLache, he was just talking spew without listening to you. I had to turn it off after a while. I really like Tenak Talk show, thank you William and Mr McBride.

I call that religious coercion The preachers receive indoctrination not knowledge

I have a comment I just thought of. If Christian’s say we are so sinful and unworthy of going to G-d directly and need JC to be our mediator then that tells me that Jc is NOT G-d or as holy as G-d.

God bless 2 of you for good things you are doing.

I appreciate your work its incredible! Thank you to the show!

@Greg McBride I was born and raised over 50yrs in the COGOP= church of god of prophecy. I have been a lets just say Noahide" My wife and family are still members. So sad!

Thank you, great show!

Thank you

The problem with Greg mentioning for someone to take a verse to his/her pastor to explain, is not a good idea. To keep this person in the church all the pastor is going to do is put his spin on that verse. Now the credibility lies between Greg and the pastor. It's a tough deal for sure. I'm so sorry for the indivdual who is believing in new testament lies. Shalom. You guys are doing a great job! Praise HaShem!

And this is why you don't debate the the Hebrew Scriptures. They are clear and don't contradict each other. Debates only happened in new testament. No one debated God's word in the Hebrew Scriptures.

Does that mean.."There is enuff in NT to speak truth, but enuff to deceive? thank you for addressing my questions!!

Contradictions seem to be the key word these days..The Muslims point to many contradictions in the Tanakh. Oh BTW, the Talmud other books are spoken about by God through Jeremiah. Jeremiah 8:8 "“’How can you say, “We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD,” when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?"

Yet Ezekiel 44 speaks specifically of Levi- with no uncircumcised entering in. Even today not everyone sees Jesus- if he was risen then he would appear to everyone- which he doesn’t

what about the SUN of Righteousness from Malachi? will it be revealed in Isaiah ?

Can you do a show on the word echad in Deuteronomy 6:4

Its a mystery....just believe....and err...dont forget to pay your monthly contribution to the Church.....pay on time please or the HolyGhost will take a hike.....

What about Hebrews 5:8, : a "son" (the G_D ) has to learn obedience?

Because the old testament uas nothing to do with the new. Period.

You should start with that the Timothy 1 and 2 were not written by Paul.

So what manuscripts are the "good Hebrew bibles" based on? The Masoretic text? From the approx 9th century? The Dead sea scrolls? There are credible bible scholars that claim that the Masoretic text has been changed by the Jews. While I certainly believe that Christian translators have changed some of the Hebrew verses to reflect what they want them to as far as the Messiah, it seems that there are questions also about the veracity of the "Hebrew bible".

Much better show when it's just you two guys. You guys give proof, and the Christian guests can't and are not going to listen anyway.

Don't you know that Moses allowed divorce - therefore is divorce a sin?

Abraham was blessed because of his faith in God and his promises NOT BY THE LAW obviously since the law was given much later so you cannot anull the true basis of righteousness imputed by God to Abraham for his faith and therefore was NOT through the law this is where you have fundamentally denied Gods work not only to bless Abrahams seed Issac and Jacob by ongoing faith in Gods righteosness but by choosing to falsely believe the true basis of being made righteous have failed totally to understand how all nations would also be blessed through the singular seed foretold by Abraham to Isaac that God would provide himself a lamb to civer son by giving his only begotten and beloved son Jesus as the sin covering by hanging on a tree ( the cross) and destroying sin and death open up the way of salvation as shown in Isaiah chapter 53 and Daniel chapter 9

It’s only OCD if you are borderline, for true OCD it’s CDO 😂😂😂

All of Greg’s episodes are the same, take NT script and Tanach and show how Christ did not fulfill the end game scenario. There is a great Rabbi In Israel today, a leader of chassidut; Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh of Innerorg He writes regarding the ancients prophesies of how the Messiah has a twofold emanation, of suffering then returning as warrior; Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh Apex of the messianic Era “We have already discussed why Mashiach ben Yosef must die. How he will die is not exactly clear. What will bring him to his death? It appears that Mashiach ben Yosef will be sold out by his own people. This is what happened to one of the earliest prototypes of Mashiach ben Yosef: the Biblical judge Shimshon (Samson). Peretz would go on to be a forefather of King David, and thus a forefather of Mashiach. As is known, there are actual two messianic figures (or two aspects to Mashiach): Mashiach ben David, and Mashiach ben Yosef”

I think it would have been more informative if either one of you noted that Ephesians, Colossians, the two Timothies, Titus, and Hebrews were not written by Paul but by his acolytes or by forgers in the case of the Timothies and Titus.

To me, Mr. McLache, Seemed rather Narcissistic and annoying . I could not finish watching the video with him. Other comments seem to be speaking in that direction. This whole thing about the pregnant wife sounds like a gaslighting trick.

The new testament says jesus will be coming back with a name only him and the father know. Wouldn't that be funny if that were the case but all he did was disprove the new testament. 😂

BELIEVETH ON THE LORD JESUS CHRIST AND YE SHALL BE SAVED 👑†🕊

I listened to the debate the two fellows had with McLatchie, and my initial impression was that it was a bit of a mess…on both sides. What I mean by that is that I felt (my impression) that McLatchie was talked over and interrupted (and I’m a William/Greg fan). There was no proper back and forth…and nothing on either side was accomplished...no one advancing the ball in any direction so to speak. Perhaps a moderator was needed…I don’t know. Listening to today’s broadcast, I understand that the segment was edited and why it had to be. I took McLatchie's silence at the end as being frustrated with being interrupted. I have an opinion that will positively support William, Greg, and McLatchie, but first I’d like to mention that there should be rules of order in a debate/conversation, which should still be adhered to even with time constraints. In the Clementine Literature, the Jewish Nazarene Apostle Peter was going to debate the “Gnostic, and I would say the originator of Pauline Christianity” Simon Magus, in a public forum. Peter tries to lay out the need for orderly debate and the importance of keeping decorum. These principles may be Jewish (as Peter was a Jew), so, have a read and see if it makes sense. These principles should be kept by anyone wanting to have a proper debate….letting the people/listeners be the judge. Peter is already in the previous chapter, laying the groundwork for a peaceful debate…and he continues; • Clementines Recognitions Book 2: Chapter 25: The Principles on Which the Discussion Should Be Conducted. Peter continued; “For some, in the contest of debates, when they see that their errors are confuted, immediately they begin to create a disturbance and to stir up strife for the sake of making good their retreat, so that it may not be obvious to all that they are defeated. Therefore, I ask that the subjects to be discussed are done so in their proper order, and with all patience and quietness, so that if by chance anything seems to have been misspoken, it may be allowed to be gone back over and explained more distinctly. For there are times when someone says something which is clear to themselves, but it is completely misheard by the other party, either because it was not stated clearly to begin with, or the statement was not properly explained. And it is on this account that I would like our conversation to be conducted carefully so that neither one of us can snatch it away from the other, nor should the unseasonable speech of the one contradicting interrupt the speech of the other, and that we should not cherish the desire of finding fault, but that we should be allowed, as I have said, to go over again that which may have not been spoken clearly, so that by the fairest examination, the knowledge of the truth may be ascertained. For we should know, that if anyone is conquered by the truth, it is not he that is conquered, but the ignorance which is in him, which is the worst of all demons, so that he who can drive it out receives the palm of salvation. For it is our purpose to benefit the hearers, not that we may conquer badly, but that we may be well conquered for the acknowledgment of the truth. For if our speech is actuated by the desire of seeking the truth, even though we should speak anything imperfectly through human frailty, God in His unspeakable goodness will fill up secretly in the understanding of the hearers those things that are lacking. For God is righteous, and according to the purpose of everyone, He enables some to easily find what they seek, while others He obscures that which is placed before their eyes. Since, then, the way of God is the way of peace, let us with peace seek the things which are God's. If anyone has anything to advance in answer to this, let him do so, but if no one wishes to answer, I will begin to speak and bring forward what another may object to me, and he will have his chance to refute it.” So, my advice….and it would be interesting to see, that the discussions with McLatchie (or any others), might be dedicated to one subject per segment….in that way, there is an “on point” main subject to be focused on…and no side tracks. Rabbit holes are what bog down the discussion…both sides should be given time to prepare and defend the subject to be discussed. This is not a knock on the show, but, I think it would make it run much more smoothly. Perhaps an uninterrupted point…for approx 3 mins, an uninterrupted counter point approx 3 min, and so on. Question asked… uninterrupted reply…. follow-up question…reply, etc. The next weeks…the same process. In my opinion worth a cup of beans.

A look at Isaiah 6:9,10 will explain why video charlatans cannot understand what they read in the scriptures.

There is no contradictions at all in the new testament, on the contrary, you who need to be baptized and by doing this you might receive a holy spirit then the holy spirit will reveal everything in the Bible verses.

The reason i am always put on a time out is because you refuse to hear the truth. It bothers you to hear that Yeshua is God the Son. That is to your shame...He is the only way to the Father. You are just like the Pharisees, they didnt go to heaven either...

It’s all well and good that the sacrifices in Eze 40-48 are found in Ezekiel, but, how does one square up that the Book of Ezekiel almost did not make it into the lineup of the Tanach? How does it square up that of ALL of the rabbinic scholars at the time, who were going to drop Ezekiel, that it took the herculean effort of ONE single dedicated Rabbi to keep the Book of Ezekiel in the lineup…Not my words….but as found in the Talmud…. - Shabbat 13b: …Rav Yehuda said that Rav said: Truly, that man is remembered for the good, and his name is Ḥananya ben Ḥizkiya, as if not for him, the book of Ezekiel would have been suppressed because its contents, in many details, contradict matters of Torah. The Sages sought to suppress the book and exclude it from the canon. What did he, Ḥananya ben Ḥizkiya, do? They brought him three hundred jugs of oil, for light and food, up to his upper story, and he sat isolated in the upper story and did not move from there until he homiletically interpreted all of those verses in the book of Ezekiel that seemed contradictory, and resolved the contradictions…. To me, the reference means that they (the sages) were going to Drop Ezekiel. Why? Because it had a lot of discrepancies. One lone Rabbi (R. Hananiah), burning 300 jugs of the midnight oil…with food brought to him so he could concentrate on his work…..by himself, resolved all of the issues the other Rabbi’s had with the discrepancies found in Ezekiel….One guy alone saved Ezekiel. If anyone has a list of all of the resolvences issued by R. Hananiah, I would like to see it, but I haven’t been able to find it. It’s like; R. Hananiah resolved the issues, but no one knows what the resolvences were….only that he did it…topic; closed. R. Hananiah on his own saved Ezekiel… It’s almost like the “sole” author of Christianity (Paul) wrote something that a lot of people accepted as being divinely inspired…..but perhaps wasn’t so much? I’m not picking on the total book of Ezekiel…only the chapters involving sacrifices (which really don’t square up with the list of Mosaic sacrifices). Was R. Hananiah the 10th man?