More Exercises To Hit Every Body Part? - Starting Strength Radio Clips 

Dude your comment was 10/10 pure gold 😂😂

Yeah, unfortunately something similar happened to me. Just got done installing my muscle-neutral bathroom.

Muscle dysphoria

Dennis Smith now soreness is not a factor in producing strength. Does strength increase have a better result in hypertrophy than exercises that produce soreness?

CWBush73 General strength increases thru lower rep ranges such as 1-5 reps will allow an increase in weight for higher rep ranges as well but focusing on strictly pushing low rep ranges below 5s will just plateau as bad as pushing hi rep sets. So use hi rep sets and increased set volumes of 5 or more reps/sets to create hypertrophic results and return to low rep ranges to train strength again and keep the cycle going but there is no reason to argue that one is better than another. This is a false dichotomy

@@CWBush73 volume = hypertrophy. soreness and strength increases are somewhat irrelevant, as some people can acquire a lot of muscle chasing strength while others need to do a lot more volume than the typical strength athlete. generally speaking, progressive overload via more (effective) volume means + food = more hypertrophy.

byRoyalty true, sometimes Rip (God love the little curmudgeon) thinks SS is all you ever need. I know about the end of linear progression. There are more ways to skin a cat than just one.

Arnold´s Golden Six fullbody was my first workout, It was truly golden :D

Full Body Joe I scrapped the bro splits a few months ago, and started a PPL. Great results so far.

Preach

@@SaturdayNightSlamMaster1980 Good man, Even though I feel full body brings the gains faster. Stopping the Bro Split is a good thing. They work but the gains are slower.

@@72Dexter72Manley72 everything works for beginners frankly...

@@fabioq6916 Yes everything works. But the fastest gains come from the more frequency. That is why 5x5 works the fastest. 3 times a week. I only said it works the fastest. 👍🏽

Haha, quality 😅👍

made me laugh. Hard to transcend bro knowledge but the CrossFitters have.

Eloquent LOL. That's one way of describing him.

Star jumps will help with that

Oh so crossfit

WHAM!

The program is called "Starting Strength" for a reason. You can progress for several months and your entire body will get bigger and stronger. Eventually you may need to use additional assistance exercises to shore up your weak points, and this will depend on your individual goals, but in your first 9-12 months (or more) of lifting you don't really have weak points yet because you don't really have strong points yet.

chin and pull ups are in the SS routine and the barbell row has been noted for when someone gets into the advanced stage. for the 100th time starting strength is for people who are starting to train for increasing their strength output and nothing else, if you want a more aesthetic look then your in the wrong space.

Mike A this is the funniest thing I’ve read in a while. Best mental image. Good work 🤜

Jump rope. You’ll get big calves

Although getting a heavy power clean is fantastic calf work. Coupled with squats and deadlifts. Cleaning up a bar in the Ohp position and doing standing barbell calf raises is good no extra equipment and cycling is amazing. Similar to prowler but advantages of course

remember the goal here is strength, not aesthetics

Its not isometric tho. Ur right, not full rom but the plantaextensors get a partial rom

RIP always fails to confine his claims to beginners only. Good luck being an advanced bodybuilder without variations or isolations. And NO ONE past beginner makes new maxes every week

@Frank Burjan good for you Frank. Not sure what that has to do with the discussion but yeah, sounds about right to me. Solid intermediate.

RIPs starting strength programs focus on strength, not bodybuilding. The goal of bodybuilding is to create a certain appearance for competition. Of course in the process you will get stronger. Starting strength is about creating functional strength and the best way to do that is to move lots of weight with the large muscles of the body (i.e. squats, deadlifts, bench, press and cleans).

@@chiefnakoma and if Rip routinely made his claims in a reasonable way and always allowed for different people's aims and objectives what you say would be perfectly valid. However, Rip does NOT say "we focus on strength but other stuff is valid, just not what we do". On the contrary: bodybuilding is shit, having abs is shit, running is shit, trap bar is shit, doctors are shit, liberals(!?!?) are shit, volume and high rep range are shit and so on. Does that strike you as the view of a reasonable person confining himself solely to his field of expertise? Qualifying all his claims by saying "for strength?". Nah. Which is why he is known in the industry as a grouchy curmudgeon and the brightest and best in SS left the cult.

@Ken MacDonald I mentioned the clue was in the name several times. But in a post about trap bars, did he at any point in his rant make even the slightest concession that it might be valuable to ANYONE? Nope. So yes, every time Rip makes a controversial claim he makes it very clear his pronouncement is for everyone. The starting Strength label gets wheeled out only when he is challenged. And what on earth are you saying about bodybuilding? Today, for the vast majority of people, especially younger people, rightly or wrongly, they would choose aesthetics over strength, especially if it is at the margin. Bodybuilders are strong, make no mistake, and most people would rather be quite strong and look jacked than be stronger but not looked jacked. That's just the way it is. And ridiculing those people is not a valid position. Especially since to be able to deadlift 600 pounds is scarcely more useful than the social capital of looking ripped and aesthetic. Horses for courses and an open mind. Rip doesnt care for the aesthetic, good for him. Others do and his opinion, on that value judgement, is no more valid than a 14 year old boy who wants to impress girls. This without even talking about cardio, which RIP equally ridicules for no good reason. Like a hammer who only sees nails, anyone who isn't particularly bothered what their 1rm in the deadlift is ridiculed by RIP. Ergo he is increasingly marginalised among the more discerning, evidence based practitioners.

@Frank Burjan I know, isn't it great? Plain and simple.

Evolution of Macdonald and KFC i think hehe ahha

Just cause something works doesn't necessarily imply that it is optimal. Simple shit.

@@rahulchangmai3123 then educate us on what's optimal.

Plenty of youtube content and research available for people who actually want to find out what's optimal.

Bryon Lape and with strength and conditioning. I believe Rip wants novices to get strong first then add accessories later.

After the basic program there are accessories. For example, he recommends some combination front squats, dips, incline press, close-grip bench, rows, and deadlift variations in the HLM program in PPST. But "accessories" are just that. You use them to fix your weak points. A novice lifter doesn't have weak points yet because they dont have strong points yet.

Rip also says most people are gonna do their curls anyway, that's why no need for him to program them.

@Jerry Thomas Lifting heavy all the time gets boring. Boring turns into skipping. So once in a while I change program for a few weeks to keep it interesting.

Getting “bored” is a you problem not a programming problem

Doing the program correctly means you don't start with five pounds from day one. The scenario you present works itself out in the first two weeks with bigger weight jumps.

@@startingstrength what I'm asking is do you work out each individuals one rep max first, in each movement pattern; before programming based on a percentage of that maximum? Obviously starting nice and low and concentrating on technique as the weight and volume builds up over time?

@@andrewgrayson5964 I believe you start with a load that's somewhat challenging. Its probably a really bad idea to attempt a 1RM in the beginning where you are not used to the motion

Detraining happens pretty quickly I suppose

If you haven't done any running in a long time and you went for a jog, your glutes would be sore as hell tomorrow. Doesn't mean jogging is an efective way of adding muscle mass to your glutes. Just food for thought.

Exactly, I was thinking in response to the video - Which is a more objective measure of progress; being really sore or going up 5lbs every time?

Rewatch the 1:00 section

If you calves are gettin sore you might be shifting your weight on the balls of your feet too much. Not saying that definitely what your doing but it’s something to think about

The argument can be that doing sets of 5 alone won’t get you to advanced numbers, especially those. At some point you’ll plateau, namely due to weak points. But yes, for starting out it’s a simple effective way to get your “noob” gains

The bah seps you hear!

Body building is pointless. Get strong.

Robert Saladino No I won’t !

This is generally true, but for beginners it is more practical to do compound lifts and add size and weight to their cores first; there's a clear correlation between core size/weight and limb size. Most people shouldn't worry about arm and leg size/shape until they're at the intermediate stage imo, unless there's a significant muscular imbalance affecting their ability to lift.

Training arms when you should be squatting tho is what happens when you let a beginner chose what to do. After 6 months of squats presses and pulls then ok do some curls. I realize this is dogmatic and judgemental but I also think it’s good sense. FWIW my arms could use work so you got me!

Focusing on arms rather than legs and back is typical Dago vanity.

@@ML-nj8fq Form follows function. There are tons of skinny kids at my gym working up a sweat with tricep extensions and cable crossovers and they are still skinny kids. The guys who can bench 300 and squat 400 LOOK LIKE they can bench 300 and squat 400. That doesn't mean they are ready for a bodybuilding show, but if you asked someone on the street which group lifted, the answer would not be surprising.

They will grow but not optimally

That's where the chins come in.

@@jd0879then do isolation

Ethos1231 I’d say they’re both right, but focussed on different goals and different people. MR is about building overall body strength, Louie builds powerlifters who are already strong.

lousie's philosophy is the same as this guy which is basically stick with deadlift squat and bench mainly

They are both correct....More than one way to skin a cat

Different strokes for different folks. You can have beginners do exactly the same 3 workouts a week for sometimes up to a year and still see progression, meanwhile very advanced lifters start regressing if they push a 3x5 for 3 weeks, end up needing to reset back and somehow can't reproduce the same performance as the first week. The beginner does not have the ability nor the need to push into their recovery limit, the elite can easily overreach after a few weeks of hard training, therefore needing rotation or simply put several blocks of linear periodized waves with a varried movement to make progress.

It is enough for lower body but upper body needs isolation if you want to have a good looking physique

You should tell this to NFL position players who do nothing but squats and cleans but look like they could walk on stage tomorrow and compete in physique competitions.

How much do you squat? Maybe the reason your calves don't grow is because by training them 3 times a a week you aren't recovering from it?

@@lg20a1 Are you really suggesting someone to put 200 lbs on his squat just to grow his calves instead of just doing calf raises and getting stronger at them?

@@tomjaap2933 no, I'm not suggesting it,the reason I asked how much he squats is because usually people who are strong at squatting don't have small calves. I agree, doing calf raises and getting stronger at it will grow your calves

What's your argument against it?

@@nordicwarrior5014none, which is why he resorts to this type of statement

@@thejdshipley True. God Bless.

Íf you want to be good at sprinting, just get strong and keep sprinting. And you get strong by squatting and deadlifting.

I agree you gotta be strong to sprint fast. But don’t you think it’s more advantageous to have type 2x fibre than being stronger to run faster? Otherwise all the strongest men would be Oly sprinters

Enlighten me. For me 100m sprinters have to have >90% type 2 fibre otherwise no matter how strong they they won’t be in Olympic 100m final.

I cant believe the amount of fallacies in your argument. To name few: I never said running marathon I said 100m- clear misleading. Strongest ppl don’t care abt being fastest. What a horror shyte. Speed is king in sport. Everyone loathes abt being the fastest. If strength was key to being fast then why aren’t the heavy strongest guys in the team the fastest players. In fact the opposite most of the time. SS cherrypicks things abt exercise science. Rippetoe doesn’t have a degree is ES hence he’s ripping the profession apart. If he thinks most phd and professors in ES are rubbish then that’s coz he’s jealous and he doesn’t have their qualifications. He’s just fat prick. He might be stronger than U Bolt but isn’t exactly faster is he now?

I love you man so I ll give you an advice. Don’t waste money on SS seminars. How much did you pay for it?

you novice

Imagine seriously listening to rippetoe and applying his advice, lmao

@@miso5968 do it you will get big boy drink that milk

@@WiecznieNieNasycony I stalled on the bench, guess I gotta double the gallons of milk I drink each day

@@miso5968 yes your bench will go up crazy fast and your weight to)

@Ken MacDonald did you actually think about that? go back to school yo

The guy with more muscle mass is likely to be injured because for the guy with less muscle mass to be lifting the same then invariably the muscle mass he does have is far more targetted at that specific lift, and he will not be as strong as the more muscular guy when required to perform a different movement. The more muscular guy is more muscular while lifting the same because his muscle mass is less specialized, so he can cope with an accidental change in the movement patter much more easily. Small lifters who lift a lot of weight always have highly efficient form, their bar path is down to a tee, for every rep of every set. If it weren't they couldn't lift heavy weights. Bigger guys can have less than perfect bar paths and still lift just as much. Elite powerlifters in lower weight classes can bench press 3xBW with their highly efficient tecnique, but ask them to perform an incline dumbbell press and they can only lift half as much as their competition bench. Two guys can both bench press 315, one is 200lbs and the other 160lbs. But have both of them go through a test of say, bench press + incline press + dumbbell bench press + dips and add it up, and the 200lbs guy has a higher total of those 100% guaranteed.

Good point. I think.

Sorry bro, i don't speak rice.

or dogs

Upgrade Iself Small attention span.

Totally agree. Some clients get sick of doing the same thing for a month.

It gets boring to have no reference point on which to base training goals on because of constant exercise change