Thank you mate! I was just about to purchase a Canon R8 but was hesitant as there aren't much lens options. Thanks for your help 👍 should I go with one of these lenses or a zoom lens or adapt EF Lenses?
I’ve used it a few times for sports photos and it performs good as long as it’s outdoors and fairly bright. If it’s indoors it won’t do the best especially for fast moving sports.
Very helpful video to me for sure, I'm looking to buy the Canon r8 and to adapt the rf 50mm 1.8 and the rf 100-400. Loved to see the pros and cons about these lenses, also how photos looks gorgeous with both of them. I would also love to see also a review about the Canon r8 paired with rf 35mm macro
It's cute how you only recommend gear that you just happened to purchase yourself, not stuff that is actually useful. You can't just buy something, then act like it's the best thing ever. The 16mm is a terrible lens when you compare it to other ultra-wide lenses, and the 100-400 is not as good as the original ef 400mm f5.6, which costs less used. There is no context behind the stuff that you are reviewing, which makes this video really unhelpful.
Rf16 is super cheap and light and have good centre sharpness. I took a lot of beautiful photos with it especially astrophotography. This is really a good budget friendly lens in many people's opinion.
@@wentan8978 I mean, it's not bad but it would have been helpful to compare different options at this price point. The Rokinon 14mm f2.8 is optically better and only costs $150
people that are new to camera like me would prefer native lens tbh, maybe thats what he wanted to focus on? I owned the rf100-400 too, and that's also one of my favourite - mainly because is so damn light and rediculously sharp
