My Indian DNA Test Results: Ancestry, Haplogroup & Health! 

Pure awesomeness! :D

@Keen Rays so it means he has the n word pass

Amadey and what’s so funny about that? Or are u just racist,it all started from Africa....lol nice try.

@Amadey wow man very nice.

Lame

@Menal Sheikh nah..it was in maurya and gupta time.

@@Messaya961 the Sangam period and the time of the Cholas too. Then the Brits came and took everything💀

Same but I thought I was North Indian and everyone around me told me I look North Indian but my ancestry is mostly from Kerala, pakistan, Tamil, Sri lankan Maldivian Bengali Bhutan/ Nepal (I did an ancestry test)

I’m also guyanese, my parents are from canal.

We were America over 5000 years ago till British and other invasions...... We are the oldest and oldest living civilization ... We started as indus vally civilization.... We are one of the first agriculture society.... We have the oldest Living languages(Tamil &Sanskrit ) We had complex, richest Empires Mostly devoted to Art and crafts (Mahajanpad, mauryan, chola, pandya, gupta, kushan, lalitadiya, rashtakoot, maratha).. We were the first to stabilise universities (Takshsheeta, nalanda, vikramsheela, shardapeeth etc)..

Also odisha

Yeah I believe the Sinhalese originally came to SL from Midnapore and Balasore along the West Bengal- Odisha border.

DNA මේකෙන් ඔයා ටෙස්ට් කරලද ඔයා ඔය කියන්නෙ. නැත්නම් පොදුවේ සිංහල අයගේ තත්වෙද ?

Yes average bengalis are happened to be of australoid-melanese,dravidian,caucasoid,mongoloid race.as per dna diversity,if we move towards bangladesh various mixrures of mongolid,dravidas,caucasoid are there but moving northeast it gets all like mongolian-australoid appearence.but in north bengal the people looked like mongolid apperanece.if yu take averagely.like my family we are caucasoid-mongoloid mixture.

We are average bengalis.

Thanks mate!

Thanks!

@@RosinPatel Pass on this thanks to your parents and grand parents. That is where you got this awesome DNA from.

I agree, the location feature is pretty much completely useless for all South Asians right now. The only useful part is the haplogroup feature.

Because although there are many different cultural groups, the genetics of that region are largely the same. But I do agree that using geographic borders to show ethnicity doesn't really work considering how people move around alot.

@@Benanimate you're absolutely disillusioned. Indians are the most diverse group of racial mashup the world has seen.

@@RosinPatel They didn't give you a good explanation of your paternal haplogroup.

Open up google map, switch to satellite view, then look at south asia. The whole Indian tectonic plate, from Indus to Bangladesh is a complete plain. No big mountain ranges or deserts to stop movement. Also, having tropical weather year round increases the distances nomads could travel. no wonder Indian gene has such homogeneity.

Thanks!

Thanks man!

It is always possible they made a mistake 😆 or that I've mutated backwards into C

@@RosinPatel i dont think its possible to mutate backwards,human evolution has stopped in the 21st century because of the modern high tech society we created,evolution requires us to face harsh climatic conditions

@@RosinPatel I'm Senegalese. I've exported my 23andme and Ancestry DNA results to Wegene. From my 23andme export, it gave me sub-saharan african paternal and maternal haplogroups from my which was the same as 23andme. But from my Ancestry export, it gave me a South and Central Asian related maternal haplogroup. When I first got my results from 23andme last month, I got 0.1% Broadly Central & South Asian but it was changed 2 weeks later to unassigned. It seemed weird. My Wegene 23andme export showed 3.10% South Asian/Indian whereas my wegene Ancestry export showed 6.94% Middle Eastern/Egyptian and 0.66% Oceanian/Papuan instead of the Indian percentage. I've also exported my 23andme results to Gedmatch. According to the HarappaWorld Admixture, I have 0.13% South Indian and 0.86% Papuan. So I think some parts of my DNA are definitely from Central & South Asia. According to genetic studies, the majority of South Indians are related to Melanesians and Aboriginal Australians hence their dark skin.

@@user-fb9ds1vh1l No bruh. Evolution is a non-stop process. Take a simple handbook

@Sparta R1a was introduced into India.

Oh wow! So similar

where are you from adil ?

@@funnysungames546 Bangladesh.

If you bargain for price in Wallmart, you are 100% Indian.

@@elimccain1728 damn 😂☠️☠️

@CarryTheTruth you’re using terms created by people from the early 18th century- haplogroups prove very close relation between all human groups -

@CarryTheTruth yes Finally someone I have seen indians who will not identity as white or black race but will say they are white or black in sense of skin tone but will not clarify they were talking of skin tone. I have seen white race black race, mis labelling indians as of white or black race, by hypocritical logic of skin tone decides race. I have even seen nazis or black race supremcist saying indians with white or black skin are of white or black race even when it was against the principal of nazis and black race supremacy.

@@elimccain1728 damn paddy got words! But true nonetheless.

but you look african

@@techsamraat6171 it's not my profile photo 😂 it is the photo of fictional actor from gta game

@@techsamraat6171 LMFAO you better be sarcastic

@Blue Boi But I did in surat I live in surat but i am kutchi

@Blue Boi yes

Thank you! Glad you enjoyed

Thanks!

Thanks for watching! 😃

@@XY-jw6hu investigates, haplogroup c is present in natives of the South American Orinoco, the region that today corresponds to Venezuela and that would be genetically related to the South Asian and Australian aboriginal

5000 yrs ago indians coquered eurashia there was also indian gene flow to native australians around 12% still. so there is good chance we reached americas too.

North south all have harappan ancestry which is main gene pool of all south Asians.

​@@prafful_sahubut there's no indian dna in Europeans and East Asians

they’re indigenous! America took their land!

@@Bingycat I am a (Yaqui O’odham) & (Hopi Paiute Aztec) from Arizona 🇺🇸

@@HarlynReynald cool 😳

They're Native Americans / Indigenous

The Olmecs (The Great Bering Strait Cross;) thither to become The First (Native-Americans.) Identic Chromosomal (varied in percentile.) We thus are One: East-Asian & Native-American. :)

Research published in 2016 suggested that Genghis Khan may belong to haplogroup R-M343 (R1b). Five bodies dating from 1130 to 1250 were found in the Tolgoi tomb in Tawan, Mongolia. They were members of the golden family, and the bodies were either R-M73 (not uncommon in the area) or parallel line R-M343.

It would seem so 😄

@Hare Krishna Yeah

@Amadey That's not in dispute here.

@Chitragupta He is not descended from Huns. Huna didn’t even invade Gujarat. They invaded Rajasthan and Punjab. Also even if he had Huna, it would have showed him as Central Asian.

True!

No it doesn't. You all look exactly the same. You guys are a new race

@@mattc236 well no, North Indians are lighter in colour, the South Indians are usually Dusky or Dark skinned and the North Easterners have a East Asian tone. Indeed, there are multiple races in India alone.

@m1ten yea, I do know that

Nayan Nimishakavi Seems like aryans are dark

23andMe

Possibly back migration from Asia.

@@bebejemzy1090 Yes I’ve considered that. M23 is present in the Malagasy of Madagascar, so that’s a possibility as well.

@Jitendra Singh yea lol we decided to do that for both my parents, and it kinda matches up. so now we are officially east asians, but from nepal. i don't really get it, so imma do some more research, I mean this could be because we have some sort of Mongolian descent, and from I heard, the genotype for mongolians and koreans are not all that different, so there could have been a mix up with that... idk we'll see

@@sorryjimingottauseuremailf7077 Buddhism could explain it. What are your haplogroups?

@@sorryjimingottauseuremailf7077 genetic and national identities are two separate things. You are 100% Nepali don't worry.

Thanks!

During kingdom squabble.. and spreading Hinduism to Southeast Asia..Indonesia was the last place to build Temple, Java Island.. Temples build by Indian, not Indonesiaan...65% dna Indonesian are Indian and Chinese ...

Native Indonesia eastern part, Sahul land mass is African, they call Papuan, Irian Barat.. curly hair, wide nose, dark skin...

yea definitely but what if someone wants to contact you?

@@abbad707 shift to another country and ask a friend to let you borrow his name and address. Thats weird but that what genetic test is. You can know a persons race by seeing his features but still you want certificate and theres also risk of genetic tests be used against you

@@justinmalik6977 u can catch them if they are lying by sending them to india Many people have their ancestors names and history written from more than 500years.

@@user-ux3qt4sx3e not as much as Arabs! They literally have names going back to 20+ generations!

@@Sheen023 Most Arabs can only trace their ancestry 5-7 generations at best.

i think it costs about 7000 rupees excluding the shipping $100

my maternal is U paternal is R1

Neither. Indians evolved separately but got some genes coming in through mating

No

Thank you sir!

fr

Who's the first

@@SL-my4fg m.ru-vid.com/group/PLM32CLm26SnhFKchJIWB0IuLHNcA6iHZn

@@SL-my4fg the youtuber has the most comprehensive and detailed dna videos I ever watched. She makes you want to do all of the dna tests lol

$100 - your can google it

It's common among gujaratis,patels and brahmins

Indian AASI people had H and L not C.

Dude all came from Harappa.

Because the land moved before the people got there.

It happened long before humans evolved

They don't - everyone is different regardless of race

@@RosinPatel Got it! Thanks.

Maternal haplogroup is more or less same throughout india.

So where is Adam and Eve....?

You made me 😂😂😂

Interesting indeed! Thanks for watching!

@Rosin Patel you're Welcome

Those are Turks

Majority Indian's and African's has almost same ancestors but in case of Indians there is also mix.

Haplogroups very, very rarely change. But the changes are why there are different haplogroups.

@Chitragupta If it don't change ,how do women get different ancestry on maternal line ?

@@Catlily5 Why and how does it change ?

@@tamjansan1154 I agree with Chitragupta. It happens through mutations. This type of DNA rarely mutates, though.

@Chitragupta I understand is described as mutation but I suspect scientis don't know how and why ? Other then having some theories ?

Yes they were

So where do you currently live?

​@@billa_ackerman.exe.South Africa.

interesting

😎 probably

Thanks

Lol that fake book

Bengalis have a good percentage of east asian ancestry as Bengal is very close to south east asia.

oh yes Scythian were culturally religiously indian idk their origin

@@lll2282 scythians were shaka clan who left india 7k yrs ago but re entered again 2k yrs ago kushan empire was shaka

@@prafful_sahu jai shree Ram 🙏🏽🕉

@@Bingus453 JAI SHREE RAM BHRATA

You like North Indian just change your hairstyle like them then yes 80% north Indian

Yea

@Abdul Rehman our community "patel" moved gujarat from punjab.our origin is punjab.

Yea according to literature

Jatta ka kya haal h?

abdul bhai if you look the people of South Pakistan and north Indian the Pakistani are more darker and Indian Punjabi and haryanvi and northern up and himachal jatt are more fairer than the punjabi Pakistani and sindhi pakistani.

At some point everyone was a foreigner 😄

What do you look like?

You are just flexing 😭

omg. i hope u find ur father or his family ❤️🙏🏽

What happened after you were 14? How do you lost contact??

Yo we all need an update.

HAHAH

It's worth it. Expands your mind.

What about real indians

He is a real Indian.

@@dontwastetimeyouarelosingr8172 wtf do u mean 😂😂

​@@dontwastetimeyouarelosingr8172 bruh🤣🤣🤣

Surnames are man made, genes are inherited. There is no pure surname, nor any pure caste.

@@RosinPatel Of course surnames are a man made as they are just words in a language. Patels are tight knit community and hence there is a lineage of people having passed down similar genes within the community. That's why they are able to say whether you're a Patel or another type of Gujarati (also, they must have had a large sample of Patels to work with). Similarly, Maheshwaris are a tight knit community (much smaller than the Patel community) as well and hence, I was wondering if there would be a time when this could determine the shared genes of Maheshwaris.

@Money-printers the middle East ancestry is just very minute to indian DNA , most of the indian DNA is same from almost 2000 years. You can see a lot of people with 100% indian DNA.

@Money-printers bramins invades India! ok ok. You say aryans they came in 2000-1000BC. That is 4000-3000 years before and though even harrapans have a little white complex in them. Aryans left there DNA mostly in north India. It's genetically proven. Even south India have people of white complex. If you disagree come and look at the people in streets. They are not Aryans. Punjabis have genetics from mughal DNA are you kidding me. There is very little mughal DNA presence in India. All white people which are present in India are there from almost 2000 years. Then you talk about kashmiri. They are not from middle east in any means. Read this article for genetics of kashmiri. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973929/ The gentics which say you 100% indian means from 2000 years there is no presence of any mixtrue from that year. That 1000 years of invation only left little presence mostly mugals with 2-3 that to mostly in Muslims. You think you really know about anything. Foolish. Read book 'Early indians' by Tony Joseph. All India today have original African DNA who reached Indian first 70000 years before, be him white black or Asian.(except northeast indians). For clear info whatch this vedio ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ORylLlh0lpo.html

@Money-printers Soo what I am telling is people like middle east are there in India before the invations. If it shows middle east then only it is middle east or else no there is no that Gene in them. There is nothing wrong with the companies which show they as indians. As of northeast indian will get south Asia because they(mixture of austruasic and tibeto burman) have been living in that place from almost 5000-4000 BC they didn't have any invations till British reached.(expect for thai king in Assam which didn't leave any DNA in them mostly). Ladhak people will have Tibet DNA.

:D

Haha yea

Thank you!

What do you mean by muscle genes? I too have Dravidian genes