Nadia Comaneci - 1976 - Montréal 

Concordo com todos que falam bem da Nádia, ela é perfeita em tudo e tem graça. Se pudesse daria mil beijos nela " Com respeito ".

Concordo com tudo que falam bem da Nádia❤❤❤

Tudo perfeita nela.

Vraiment ! "Indétrônable" , c'est le parfait qualificatif.

@@lancinetamikalletraore Parfaitement une belle personne

Idem pour moi...!!!

pareil j'y connais rien mais ça me fait chialer, la grâce et la beauté a un tel point de perfection

@@Alix777. Exactement! idem pour moi...

I saw Nadia, on TeeVee, at the 1976 Olympics, 10 years old. We didn't talk about Bruce Jenner.....

@@hansemannluchter643 mulțumesc de mesaz, doar românește vorbesc, nu știu sa vorbesc limbi străine, de cind ma m născut am crescut la orfelinat, nimeni nu ma învățat carte, sint o femeie serviciu, dacă aveam părinți care să mă iubească ași fi știut carte multă, la orfelinat nu ne învață carte, sint o inculta fără carte, asa am crescut la orfelinat, sa fiu inculta fără carte multă, Dumnezeu să vă ocrotească,

Ah oui lui il fallait vraiment le supporter. Un élephant dans un magasin de porcelaine

Yes

Google has a problem with gendered languages...

Stick to your darts lol

@@leightonsteven7059 The annoucer is a clow who admitted on air that he was totally ignorant about this sport so stick to your ignorance.

Y antes las gimnastas no eran tan musculosas, tenian un cuerpo mas.delicado sin tanta musculatura.

Pentru că la școală, noi românii am învățat și limbi străine. Franceză,engleză, germană și rusă. Dar cel mai frecvent ,franceză și engleză.

!??

@@gabrielamaramures289 Numele Lui „Te slăvim, Românie”.

medalia de aur nu se capătă uşor, doamnă. Nu ajunge toată lumea pe timbrul național.

De ce bieții, d-na... Au avut un vis și "dictatorul" patriot , ca un tată bun, le-a oferit tuturor , absolut tot necesarul (gratis) pentru a le realiza! Compătimiți-i mai bine pe cei din epoca umilitoare și distructivă post lovitură de stat!

FIRST TEN : Věra Čáslavská

Нелли Ким лучше была !

♥️🍀🇦🇩 Nadia Comăneci & Olga Korbut !

Nadia comaneci est Coumane (comane-ci) Elle a été formé par un hongrois Bela karolyi 👍

Hello, in fact she is Cuman, (coman-ci) nationality Romanian but More exactly ... Couman trained by a Hungarian, the Romanian people are multiethnic It is a mixture of peoples that were grouped under the Romanian name invented by the French government in the 19th century The Romanian people are a mixture of Cumans (Turkic), Saxons (Germanic), Hungarian, Slavic and descendants of Latinized Illyrians Genetics spoke, and confirmed Contrary to what many Romanians thought they are not the descendants of a specific ethnic group called Dacian ... The Dacians were described as tall blond with blue eyes, which does not correspond to the description of the majority of Romanians today, moreover the Dacians did not speak a Latin language. The Bassarabic dynasty (Couman Turkic people) created Wallachia there, after the Mongol invasions of the 13th century The Cuman lords needed labor, so they brought in people from the Balkan regions such as Slavs and Latinized populations These peoples were settled in the territories of Wallachia and were mixed with the local populations So there is no pure Romanian ethnicity As for Transylvania for almost a thousand years it was Hungarian, Transylvania was never a Romanian territory. Before 1920! Romania does not appear on any map in the past, its creation began in the 19th century with the encouragement of the Western powers and especially France which needed a vassal state in Central Europe Present-day Romania was created by the Western states, with the Treaty of Trianon I can expand if you want👍

@@magyarhungarianchannel5555 Ești cu pluta grav!

@@cristinabalanescu6485 hi, you can argue please unfortunately for you everything I mentioned is proven, I am not inventing anything, I invite you to check the historical sources for yourself, look for a map proving the existence of Romania in the Middle Ages, good luck 😂 study the migratory movements of Transylvania, you will see the Romanian settlers arrived recently that from 1920, before that there were very few Romanian-speaking people in Transylvania, the majority of the population of Transylvania was Hungarian and Saxon Transylvania was never a territory belonging to Romania the Romanian people are multiethnic, genetics have shown that the Romanian people do not have specific DNA belonging to a specific people So conclusion the Romanian people are therefore a fictitious people resulting from a mixed race Slavic (29%) which were mentioned upon the arrival of the Magyars and also by neighboring kingdoms and powers. 21% Finno-Ugric (Which corresponds to one of the main components of the Hungarian genes) 20% Germanic (which corresponds to the Saxons of Transylvania) 18% Celts And .... 12% Illyrians only 12% this means that they were not in the majority in the creation of the recent ethnic composition of the current Romanian people this corresponds to a minority Moreover this part of Illyrian ancestry confirms their Balkan origin and therefore "non-Dacian" ... It is therefore the proof that the current Romanian speakers were never originally from this region as it has been explained by many neutral historians around the world. And especially This confirms that Romanians are much more Slavic, Hungarian and Germanic (Saxon) than Illyrian. without forgetting a significant "rom" presence Wallachia was created by the dynasty of the "Bassarabes" (the Bassarabes were Cumans 😂) it is they who after the Mongol invasions (13th century) brought in servants from the Balkan regions, from the Slavic or Latin speaking peoples (descendants of Latinized Illyrians). Indeed, the Couman lords needed manpower, servants, so the Romanian speakers were not from this region, no reliable archaeological discovery (the tablets of tartaria being artefact, apocryphal) attest the presence of a Latin-speaking people in these regions before these periods, no place names have Latin ancestry ... for Transylvania for example the Romanians call "ardeal" which means absolutely nothing in Romanian, this is normal since ardeal comes from the Hungarian word "erdély" which means the place of the forest in Hungarian (erdö hely) I have nothing against the Romanian people, I have a lot of Romanian friends, but we must re-establish the truth, your whole history was created by the propaganda of corrupt governments created from nothing by the Western powers the Romanian word was coined in the 19th century in France, the French government wanted to create a fictitious vassal state in central and eastern Europe, check for yourself I can provide you with maps, charts and demographic, ethnographic, historical accounts that confirm everything I have just written

@@cristinabalanescu6485 TAKE THE TIME TO READ hello, I greet all Hungarians and Romanians, below is the presentation of undeniable historical facts I hope you will take the time to read, because it is a very complex subject, it is an ethnic and geographical journey which has been very difficult to trace by historians and archaeologists Today, we are finally able to trace "the" origins of the present Romanian people. Dear Romanian friends, dear Hungarian friends, here is what it is today😉 So, yes today Transylvania belongs to the "fictitious" Romania created by the French state with the trianon treaty in 1920 But before this treaty, many historians, archaeologists, ethnologists and linguistic experts can guarantee and prove to you that Transylvania has NEVER belonged to the "fictitious" state of Romania. Besides, Romania never appeared on any map of the Middle Ages, except from the 19th century, so you would be surprised to learn that the word Roumain was invented in France in the 19th century, with the aim of creating a future vassal state of France, to counter the central powers (political, military strategy, etc.) To come back to Transylvania, no there Transylvania was never before the Treaty of Trianon, a territory of Romania, let's be honest, there is no point in lying. That's a fact ! even though I love my Romanian friends Moreover, no toponymy, no archaeological discovery and especially no testimony of the kingdoms and population living near this region has ever mentioned the presence of a Latin-speaking people, even already at the time of the Hungarian invasions. . check for yourself, I challenge you to send us a proof So if you are Romanian speakers you should know that the name "Romanians" gives to Transylvania is "ardeal" however this word does not mean anything in Romanian, because it is of Hungarian origin from the word "erdely" (Erdö hely) which means the place of the forest in Hungarian! then the origins of the Romanian people First of all, Romanians cannot be descendants of Dacians because Dacians were described as tall blond with blue eyes, while the majority of Romanians do not correspond to this profile, moreover Dacians did not speak Latin. Without forgetting that the Dacians disappeared long before the future Hungarian invasions, it is another time! The last speakers of a Latin language in the vicinity of these regions were Roman settlers, unfortunately they fled the arrival of the Huns to take refuge further south. However, the Illyrians who were Latinized and lived in the south of the Balkans, are more likely candidates as to some of the origins of the Romanian people Indeed after the Mongol invasions, the Bassarabic lords (Cumans) creators of Wallachia needed agricultural labor, servants. So they brought in some enslaved populations, some of whom came from the Balkans (such as the descendants of the Latinized Illyrians) Later these populations were integrated among the local populations, that is to say Cunans, Saxons, Slavs and Hungarians. This is how the story of the future "Romanian" identity began. But Transylvania was mostly populated by Hungarians and Székely and Saxons Demographic studies have shown that it was only after the Treaty of Trianon (1920) that a recent mass (Romanian) colonization took place, the new ROMANIAN governments sent en masse populations of Wallachia and Roma settle in Transylvania after deporting some natives such as the Saxons The evidence is undeniable besides you just have to look at the demographic and ethnic developments that are accessible. And finally, the GENETICS ... And yes genetics spoke conclusion the Romanian people are therefore a fictitious people resulting from a of Slavic (29%) which were mentioned upon the arrival of the Hungarians and also by the neighboring kingdoms and powers of the time 21% Finno-Ugric, therefore Hungarian (Which corresponds to one of the main components of the Hungarian genes) 20% Germanic (which corresponds to the Saxons of Transylvania) 18% Celts And .... 12% Illyrians (Latinized people) only 12% this means that he was not in the majority in the ethnic composition this corresponds to a minority In addition, this part of Illyrian ancestry confirms their Balkan origin and therefore not Dacian ... This is therefore proof that the current Romanian speakers have never been from this region. Added to this is an undeniable "Roma" genetic heritage in certain individuals. This confirms that Romanians are in reality mostly Slavs, Hungarians and Germans, Illyrians. So we are cousins Without forgetting that the whole history, the past that we teach to Romanian students in history textbooks in Romania, were written by "the Romanian student society in Paris" ALL Romanian historians who have written the history of Romania studied in Paris and were all driven by a deliberately mistaken Romanian identity vision Most of these students became the politicians of young Romania which says a lot about the non-neutral position and unobjective view of the legitimacy of the creation of the future Romanian nation. Without forgetting that Alexandre Jean Cuza was perfectly French-speaking and was the little protegé of Napoleon 3 who supported him in his project of union of the principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia. Basically the influence of French political upstarts is undeniable, Transylvania, a region rich in natural gas and mineral resources was very coveted by the Western powers who saw by the creation of the fictitious romania the means of being able to access these riches via their new vassal state romania, this is why Romania was in exchange under French military protectorate (General Berthelot) The West did the same to the Ottoman Empire with the "Treaty of Sèvres" by imputting these oil regions ... And the same with the colonies in Africa It's geopolitics, everything is lies, propaganda ... In short, the advent of a dictator like this did not help matters, you have suffered so much from identity propaganda in a hundred years that you have forgotten your true "multiple" origins Regarding the Magyars from Central Asia and further afield, I agree that they are not originally from the current regions of Hungary, Transylvania, just like the Romanians elsewhere. So Hungarians or Romanians, peace on everyone ... let's live together in love But the most important is to restore the TRUTH

yes but during 80's

@@kreul8736 no in the 70´s

@@Galimah you're right

Și eu, și cred că toată România și nu numai noi ,nu ??

Et nous en parlerons toujours !😍❤

@@jobouchableGimnasta completă! Superbă! Autentică! Unică! 14.08.2024

Très belle présentation de Nadia. Je l'ai vu à l'epoque, tout ce vous dites transcendait à l'ecran de façon électrique, via toute l'admiration du public silencieux bouche bée 😮 ayant conscience d'assister à une forme de miracle sportif. 1 milliard de Bravo Nadia. 😃😃👏👏👏👏👏👏

Și totuși, unde și ce s-a greșit ....de ce din Gimnastica Artistică Feminină, a rămas doar numele? Trist.

Yep she was on the cover of Newsweek, Time magazine, Sports illustrated, Life MAGAZINE Headlines stating: "She's Perfect" .

Nadia a obtenu une note de 10 dans sept épreuves. Kim seulement sur deux. Petite GROSSE différence.

Indeed! She's there as the world's #1 gymnast & Olympic champion, not his cute niece or sweet grand•daughter! He should've approached her with the honor & respect she earned during the games.

Agreed; and it`s not a gentle pat either. Nadia took it with grace and class.

I felt the same outrage, who the fkc he thinks he is to touch in such a disrespectful way one of the most radiant champions ever made ?? It's as if he slapped the Queen of England. I hope he got some punishment for that.

That would be Elena Mukhina...

Abus sexuels et violents de son entraîneur ? Vous devez confondre avec quelqu'un d'autre. Vos sources SVP ?

​@@12345fowler.... Effectivement, il ne semble pas y avoir eu d'abus sexuel, mais la violence physique, les humiliations et la torture sont documentées... Notamment par un livre roumain de l'historien S. Olaru " Nadia et la Securitate", on en trouve de larges extraits lors d'interviews à l'AFP et dans un article du Figaro... Ce livre est écrit par un historien car il est basé sur des milliers de notes déclassifiées de la Securitate roumaine. De plus les méthodes ultra violentes de M. Karolyi, son entraineur ont été dénoncées ensuite lorsqu'il les a mises en œuvre aux USA où il s'est enfui avec son épouse en 1981. Nadia a confirmé les informations lors de rencontres avec l'historien avant publication. Tout cela est fort bien documenté sur le net. Ça vous suffit comme références ?

Abuz violent da ,dar nu abuz sexual.

Ești în gravă eroare, d-le... Păstrează- ți sărutul vicios și viclean și retrageți acuzațiile calomnioase! Încearcă să-ți folosești inteligent timpul și internetul, "nu bea tot ce ți se toarnă"! Fă din gândirea critică, prietenul tau cel mai bun! Asta dacă nu ești plătit să arunci cu noroi în cariere de tot respectul, caz în care să -ți fie rușine, trolule!

Lo erano per davvero!

Doar prostul și mortul nu-și schimbă părerea! Am fost o națiune puternică, înfloritoare și demnă! N-am știut, când am aflat ce-am pierdut ca popor și țară, a fost prea târziu! Tu faci bullyng .