New BRITISH Drone Will Change Battlefield FOREVER! 

the designers would have surely thought about that

It's okay, the Turks already have everything they need about it and you'll soon see it sold to all of Turkey's 'friends'!

Yep we need the person operating to be able to dispose???..built in explosive that wrecks the evidence

Or the Chinese copy it and put it on Temu…

Havent sen Rusia or China doing this???...seen Russia using drones to drop Grenades on unsuspecting Ukrainian soldiers??

It could be armed with AT rounds that can penetrate and disable vehicles far more effectively than a small explosive charge as well as larger static or mobile targets. It also has semi autonomous abilities so it wouldn't need an operator for certain applications.

You said exactly the point. Its faster, more accurate, better stealth and most importantly It can carry better weapons, to take tanks out and bigger targets etc, it obviously depends on the objective but this drone gives them another option.

@@darren6076 War is about have the most, not necessarily the best. Nobody doubts the performance of the modern technology but it's expensive stuff that takes a lot of time to make. It takes little more than a bike workshop and some kitchen chemicals to make a hollow charge.Any amateur with some basic electronics skills can assemble a FPV drone.

@@paulc176Can we please stop all this backward nonsense we read from you uneducated people today, anyone would think you're American, reading you, It's embarrassing, well unless of course you'd care to explain for us just how we can detect any of Russia's missiles, or any of their own stealth multirole aircraft, like the SU-57? You know, that Russian rubbish, we all hear from the clueless Americans? I mean we see and read so many Americans endlessly claiming the F-22 & F-35 are so much better than the Russian SU-57 rubbish, (that relies on washing machine, chip technology), with the RCS of a Jumbo jet? LOL. Regardless that they could not possibly know what the RCS is of any military aircraft, as they're always kept secret, but when you ask any of them, what they've ever seen the F-22, actually do, (that would allow them to hold that opinion), you'll find that none of them can answer that, (as they've never seen the F-22 ever do anything), well, other than flying over a beach on a RU-vid Video. So, all they actually prove is, their own opinions, are all based on absolutely nothing at all, right?. So, really, what is it all about? And even worse, just like we read from you, they never even ask themselves the obvious questions, questions like, how can the F-22 or F-35's (for that matter) detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, (beyond visual range)? The truth is, you'll come to find, they have no idea, whatsoever, LOL! Yet, if they had just asked themselves that one question, then they might start to understand that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think! And seemingly none of them even understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar). So regardless of the aircraft's RCS (radar cross-section) they all comically believe means so much, when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and stand out, like a beacon in the night. To detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes. Only what we find is, that neither the APG-77 radar in the F-22, or the APG-81 radar in the F-35, have no kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR)! - This is an obvious fact, the US Air force will be fully aware of. Only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there weren't any other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat! So, you must surely ask, just what do the F-22 & F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? They have AWACS, (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 & F-35's in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding your enemies real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact. Because, on the other hand this (Russian rubbish, they all claim), does have a new 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR very easily today. Russia have designed, and they've developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR. This new Russian technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types. But according to all the Americans, it's just Russian rubbish, right?. Idiocy on full display. They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters, long before they even enter Russian airspace, (from much greater distances today), with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system. Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57. We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35. As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR. Seeing the all-important, huge Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky). The truth you all seem oblivious too, is this new Russian 5th generation radar design, has very clear, and very real potentials, to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including... Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges. High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters. High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas. High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges. High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection]. The Tikhomirov NIIP L-band AESA radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars. But, but, but-- It's just Russian crap?, indeed it is! LMAO! A Russian SU-57, flying well behind the front lines in Russian airspace, detected a Ukrainian SU-27, deep in Ukrainian airspace (heading toward Kiev), about 300 km's away, the SU-57 tracked, then fired a Russian (very long range) Vympel R-37 (NATO "Axehead") hypersonic air-to-air BVR missile at the Ukrainian SU-27, from a range of well over 250 km's, blowing it out of the sky, and smashing the previous BVR missile kill range world record, to utter smithereens! The USA has had the F-22 in service for 19 years, and it finally made its first air-to-air kill in 2023, when it shot down a Chinese weather balloon. LMFAO.

Exactly my first thought, the West loves their gadgets, but if a single shot costs more than a whole kamikaze drone it's simply not worth it. It's like comparing American and Chinese tanks, yes they might be better armored and armed but if you can get 3-4 of those other ones for the price of 1 of them... Just get the bigger number. Every fight, battle and war come down to attrition, who is losing more material faster than they can replenish compared to the other side. If your stuff is more advanced/better, you might make the other side lose more, but if your stuff is cheap and easy to produce you might replenish faster. The difference in technology needs to be massive in order to be relevant... For example stones are easy to come by in great numbers, yet their ability to diminish the enemy's numbers is so low that math decides against them, but a gun from 1940 gets the job done just as fine as one from 2020. If your Anti-Tank rockets cost more than the enemies tanks you lose a little in the battle of attrition every time you destroy an enemy tank.

No profit in that😞

I suppose there will be a day when we can politely ask the Russians to go home or the North Korean dictator to get treatment for his mental health requirements but until then we stick to the status quo.

We do but the tech is locked away from us

tell that to the terrorists.

Hahahaha what a silly ... Oh dear, the very idea! Next you'll be saying we should try to make sure nobody starves or gets sick needlessly! What a notion!

small is beautiful.

too interdependent. also: small = small payload = not very powerful.

Yrrrr name is Jaaaahn Khonner ... Lead us, O Leader, and we shall faaallloh.

@@mikerodent3164 I mean sprinkle a bit-o-AI in and make about a million more...and I can't spot the difference lol

The thing is, James Cameron did an insane amount of obsessive research on what future tech warfare might look like. It is scary how accurate that research is proving to be!

@@gregsoddworld agreed. Cameron is a time Traveler. I mean the rest of the world is just fabricating crap on tv to choke down as fact. What's to say we don't? This settles it James Cameron is from the future. 🧐

there honestly is a point where weapons designers look at sci-fi productions, look over at each other and say in union "wouldn't that be fun?"

Hi, could always design and build your own! Loved making RC plane. You could make it 2 part and hover take off and then transition to linear flight and separate. (That is what the rocket is doing though and I bet that costs more than a whole bunch of Iranian drones!) Take care M.

Haha I love those little pens tho

I wonder how much each unit will cost (seriously)

Im guessing traditional armor is going obsolete.

The future battle winners will have effective drone defence, capture and repurpose capability - financially asymmetric warfare e.g. a $20000 drone can take out a tank, a fighter or hold down the advance of a whole column will not last long in my view. The next step will be hooking these drones into automated AI-based decision support systems so you will, in theory, be able to achieve a military outcome without committing troops or treasure. All of a sudden the super-power system will be broken and small state/religious/ideological actors will have as much military capability as the larger countries or confederations. I’m not sure people really see where this will be in 10 years.

In what world is 99mph fast for a flying craft??? Even an old Cessna can do 170. Most 7 inch quads can go faster, and they're shaped like BRICKS.

@@MaxSMoke777 I think it’s 99mph, with the payload using current motor technology that’s meant here, don’t mean to speak for another - happy to be put right. The speed considerations become important when entering and exiting the point of surveillance / engagement and one would expect to have the drone assets deployed near enough to that point for the speed delta to not matter. Once in theatre the important thing is agility and accuracy not straight-line velocity. So fast in, engage with overwhelming agility and faster out?

@@MaxSMoke777 are those 7 inch quads capable of carrying 2 guided missiles at the same time thought?

I'm not sure I'd want to be Medi-vacced on the end of a drone...

@@allaboutkalergi5012 Seems like it could get a lot of places that you couldn't get a heli. I live in Alaska and we have lots of places like that that people get wrecked in all the time and a lot of them die because there is no other way to get to them. Maybe not ideal, but if it gets the job done...

Nowhere did the demo ever say anything about Medi-Vac capabilities. @@allaboutkalergi5012

Der Westen hat schon immer kriegsentscheidende Waffen gebaut die dann Null-Nummern waren. Auch diese Drohne ist mit elektromagnetischer Bekämpfung zu neutralisieren !

Amazon? (Deliveries OR Jungle medevac) :)

finally!

Only to appease the French. They generally throw a hissy fit when only imperial measurements are used.

Jackal dron is made in Turkiye,we sell them to england,

Yeah, that's one big issue. U can have all this technology but other side has a weaponed emp or electrical disruption device n they are useless. I'm not too knowledgeable on what we have n don't have but a naval carrier or fleet with some sort or weaponized emp or electrical self defense system would be very smart

not really. Anything that flies can be easily shot down. Ships have good radars and autocannons for that. the threat from sea drones is different: The waves create a lot of radar noise in a circular area around the ship. When the drones are far away, they could be visible. But once wihtin this "blind" area they are almost impossible to spot and the autocannons cannot aim at them correctly. Still, helicopters could help. But Russia doesn't seem to have enough choppers and they would be exposed to Ukrainian S300

anti drone drones that shoot down bigger drones carrying expensive missiles using mini missiles from micro drones :)

@@magnoman1231High-powered microwave devices exist for that, which are mounted on vehicles, have huge area of effect and can neutralise thousands of drones in one go. Also, relatively basic jammers. No need for primitive World War 1-style dogfights.

Interesting isn't it - the 'advance' of warfare. WW1 was the first TANK war. Horses become obsolete. News by dispatch rider / intervals of weeks WW2 was the first major AIR WAR: News by filmed-cine-newsreel / intervals of days VIETNAM the first major HELICOPTER WAR: News by Time & Newsweek / periodic TV reports GULF WAR 1 the first TELEVISION WAR: CableNewsNetwork cameras filmed incoming allied attacks on Bagdhad. Nightly TV news UKRAINE WAR the first DRONE & CELLPHONE war: Drones wreck major warships/ soldiers themselves filming / streaming from battlezones.. WW3/4 ? The MASSED DRONES WAR - whole fleets of craft slicing each other up while also live-streaming the battles Oh dear god .... we're turning it into a video game...

I think a lot of people will assume this, until we start to get armoured columns with laser defence vehicles mixed in to provide a point defence against drones and munitions.

It's called "marketing".

silly mind

War is what drives it. The need to out war your enemy has always driven tech.

Because this thing will never be used in a war. Terrible design.

It forces others to use their resources on silly things as well instead of just taking care of their people.

Well of you go and be as peaceful as you wish. Maybe an enemy will go round you rather than over you, maybe you will have a huge effect (In your own mind) More likely you'll be as dead and just as quickly as the bloke who's decided his world is worth fighting for over the alternatives. People lay peaceably abed at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf - Possibly from the pen of Orwell. Wars can also change lives for the better would be a good enough counterpoint. I don't see bedwetting as an option if someone wants to change their lives.

Yes, in Europe we thought we had peace. Then Putin came with his crazy 'Russia without borders' stuff. Now we need to be able to defend. Sorry.

There is a British military satellite system called Skynet.

@@user-nw8ee8yx9m Well, we really are screwed then aren't we? Time to start digging the bunker I guess.

I personally welcome our robot overlords, because we have proved we don't deserve this life.

No. It's good for silly movie, to impress the kids, but not for real war. I think so. Disposable fpv mutch better than this flying seal, witch you can hit by regular small arms. However, you can send it to Ukraine and see what happens. So, what you waiting for? When Putler come to you?

Great, simple, Greek pronunciation lesson. Sadly, it's an AI channel, where other than the AI commenting bots, few real people will read it. It's still commendable to remain hopeful and try to bring knowledge in some way or other to your fellows. Have a good one mate.

LOL...I was just about to add this to the post so well done sir for already picking this up!

There could also be a future in logistics for this or a maybe a cheaper derivative of it. Supplying the needs of forward positions for example.

Another thing is - being smallish AND modular, these things can be built (assembled from kits) in-theatre - which means the materiel-supply for these can simply be truckloads of crated kits. Mass produced elsewhere / could even be parachute-air dropped a dozen at a time to a field unit that needs them. 30mins to assemble / batteries PRE-charged at the factory -- ready to fly & fire 30mins after airdrop. Pretty damn flexible compared to what's gone before.

AND - if you think about it - a modified conventional bomber / transporter - even the likes of a chinook -- could *air-launch* these from the back hatch - so a whole assault could be planned / transporter full of drones flown near to region / launch teams launch maybe 50 such and then piss off / control team on the ground / or in the air - takes over control and flies the swarm on to it's target.

And finally - post - mission -- on the latter bit of battery capacity a swarm of these to fly to a clear ground zone / land and park awaiting a "collector Chinook" -- which descends / pops the hatch and the swarm *self load* by flying into the back of the chopper loading bay. 3 mins to pick up all 50 / up and away while they are reacharged, and inspected/ tested for faults / repaired on-board ready for next deploy. Next major conflict is going to be dominated by drone swarm assaults I think. So adaptable / at short notice.

If you can hit this past 1000 feet then bravo. Ceiling is 13,000 feet 67mph Good luck

@@Jafmanz hihg enough for not being visible to a human and low enough (and slow enough) as to avoid air defence radars, who may just filter it out as a bird.

Compared to ... what is it -- $90M or something for an F35B ? This thing can be mass-produced for $8000 and you can have 10,000 of them for every one 5th-Gen fighter

@@mikehvirdis It's a pretty affordable price tag for top-notch military equipment, IMHO. And if this fellow can kill a few tanks and aircraft and avoid yourself losses, it's a pretty good investment

@@mikehvirdis The cost is not only for the unit.... operators are required, logistics are required.... the cost is much greater than you imagine... Not to take away from the cost disparity of course...

yep , loiter over a city , you see the true target , the farmers

Maybe Russia can give money if you care so much .

Always has been . Shame humans can’t live in peace😢

If the money for weapon’s was spent on homeless, homeless would be dead when we loose the war. Let the homeless work by joining the forces or getting a job. I have been in fights with homeless when I pointed out to them that the store they were standing in front of begging had a sign up indicating job openings.

You will probably also want the shoot more combo 🙂

@@fr3238 do you get loads of rockets with that one,,sounds great ,,my son wants to practice on his school

yep,because thıs is Turkısh made:))

Because this dron is Turkish made:)))

because thıs is Turkish made dron ,we sell them to englang

Turkiye has one. 😂

Oh and your occupied mother?