New Super Advanced US Technologies to Destroy Drones

Подписаться 1,5 млн

Просмотров 331 тыс.

50% 1

Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel to witness how the United States forces combats hostile drones intruding on its territory.
Fluctus is a website and RU-vid channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our RU-vid channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Опубликовано:

13 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 58

@garymiller5937 Месяц назад

Very neat systems. This is what war is coming to so the nation that is best prepared should come out on top. Thank you for the insightful video. 😊😊😊❤❤❤

@adaomendonca6619 Месяц назад

Já se vai para quase 50 anos " meio século " entre os épicos de Ficções Científicas, com seus Raios, Campos de Forças e a atualidade, com seus Canhões, Tanques, Minas, Bombas, Granadas, Tiros, Armas Químicas, que extemina não só toda as espécies de vida como a vegetal, todas as formas de Armas existente até ontem deveria já estar extintas.

@Jacke7111 Месяц назад

Make peace, not war.

@Andre_XX Месяц назад

Then what do you do when the other guy attacks you?

@corvavw6447 Месяц назад

Lex talionis 😂

@user-fy5sz8ps2d Месяц назад

Us army should train some flying Eagle to hunt drones.

@marcovarago4509 Месяц назад

Sempre il meglio per poter fare fronte alle minacce ormai evidenti dei paesi totalitari 👌🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👌 👍 💪💪

@fredirecko Месяц назад

The fact that it's called "drone buster" and requires a human to operate it means it can't be taken seriously. 😂

@corvavw6447 Месяц назад

Nisi stulti resspondere ad omnem quaestionem 😂

@user-xt5ps5mg2z Месяц назад

very good

@banoid Месяц назад

It's the drone you don't see that gets you.

@corvavw6447 Месяц назад

Nisi stulti resspondere ad omnem quaestionem 😂

@johnslugger Месяц назад

*I built a drone killer that works from 10 to 999T htz. It's call a SPARK GAP generator!!!*

@drbendover7467 Месяц назад

So if you ever want an autonomous drone you're better off building your own:)

@british_772 Месяц назад

Thank you for protecting our country~!

@ursus9104 Месяц назад

But drones comes in swarms 10 to 100 or maybe 1000 in the future….

@ericlorre8771 Месяц назад

Not a problem for a laser+radar

@ursus9104 Месяц назад

Laser guideded Gatling Gun with .303 rifle ammo.

@jenuilmajulus5586 Месяц назад

👍👍👍

@kevinking330 Месяц назад

❤💙

@aubreysimpson4147 Месяц назад

Remember Redeyes

@gregsutton2400 Месяц назад

shooting down drowns designed to mimic aircraft is not really anti drone defense. It is just he same old anti aircraft defense.

@huytiepnguyenhuytiep8307 Месяц назад

Trông rất giống cái giỏ đựng giấy vệ sinh trong toa lét

@zenjiroumatsushima2086 Месяц назад

ドローンって厄介者。爆弾を抱えている時は爆弾も破壊しないと、被害が出ます。ドローン操縦不能だけでは相手の目的達成だから。！！！。

@membayarjanjicream2122 Месяц назад

SECANGGIH APAPUN SENJATA KALIAN, MUSTAHIL MENANG MELAWAN KEBENARAN,,... INGAT ITU.

@richardwittie5466 Месяц назад

We're spending billions on high tech drone killer devices. Yet s good shotgun does the job for a few dollars. We're reinventing the wheel when we already have weapons designed for aircraft like the duster. Just mount shotgun onto infanty rifles, and the phinex on vehicles. All this electronics crap is a waist of money. You still need to see your target inorder to use them. So why spend billions if a few dollars is just as if not more efficient?

@o.w.i.m Месяц назад

My opinion is that these sort of weapons only make sense, in battlefield application, when they are able to be fully automated mounted on vehicles or some futuristic battle-suit, when the tech is more matured and slimmed down. With automated computer level of speed in target acquisition and so on. Of course for civilian use it seems good enough. For military use, its more like a stopgap for places like trenches(nominally static situations) where humping an extra weapon is less of an issue and where logistics come into play long term... Depending on the use-wear metrics of the components this may be like the issue of the cost of cruise missiles versus cannon shells.

@forever67943 Месяц назад

USA ❤

@sreymeosaang4036 Месяц назад

🇺🇲🇺🇲👍👍❤️❤️

@user-kf5kq3bx2c Месяц назад

🇺🇸😇🙏🕊️👍🦅💪

@odlerthanspice Месяц назад

First

@user-tn8zx9hw6n Месяц назад

Kalau bisa pesawst prang itu di langkapi dron baru mampu menghancur musu fengan muda.. Taktik prang nya harus kuasai dlm prang bik di udara di daratan.. pesawat nya harus kecil kecapatan nya seperti kilat cara terbang nya 12_17 meter untuk penyerang dalam kota nya salah timbak mereka sendiri yg menembak bangunan nya sendiri. Byk cara2 lain nys taktik dlm prang nya