Тёмный

Not fun enough for the minifigs! LEGO City Ocean Exploration Base review! 60265 

JANGBRiCKS
Подписаться 1,4 млн
Просмотров 150 тыс.
50% 1

Independent fan overview & discussion about the modular main base structure set of the 2020 LEGO City ocean exploration sub-theme featuring the new Hammerhead Shark and Stingray plus five figures.
🟠 Become a supporter on Patreon! / jangbricks
Join the community for exclusive chat streams, get your minifig added to New Jang City, & more!
⏩ LEGO speed builds: / jangbuilds
▶️ Chill real-time builds: / purebuilds
🏙 My LEGO city: youtube.be/cha...
My preferred online shop is Amazon: amzn.to/2qllzg5
If you use my affiliate links I may get a tiny commission to help keep the channels going!
More places I shop: jangbricks.com/...
LEGO news & set research: www.Brickset.com
All comments are moderated to maintain a safe, positive environment. Bad behavior is rejected, abusers are reported & blocked. jangbricks.com/...
✔️ Answers to Frequently Asked Questions: jangbricks.com/FAQ
🌐 Web: JANGBRiCKS.com
📷 Instagram: jangbricks4real
🐤 Twitter: JangBricks
👤 Facebook: jangbricks
All of my verified media accounts: jangbricks.com/...
(Assume anything else is fake!)
The opinions I express are mine and mine alone and not for sale for any price. Ads, when shown, are selected & placed by RU-vid itself.

Опубликовано:

 

1 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 353   
@JANGBRiCKS
@JANGBRiCKS 4 года назад
5:45 LEGO has made "jellyfish" in the past from other parts. I want to see some purpose-designed modern ones like they've been doing so many other animals... and to include them in modern underwater themed sets where they'd be perfect. Dual-molded and/or marbled trans-_____ with trans-clear & everything.
@justanotherboyo3610
@justanotherboyo3610 4 года назад
I’d love to see a squid, specifically in the orange colour from the front of the recent landspeeders, if the mold was made well it could use existing parts as tentacles as well, considering how many sea creatures we’ve gotten the squid is becoming more and more plainly absent.
@DZstudios.
@DZstudios. 4 года назад
I imagine Marlin saying JELLYFISH
@marion86399
@marion86399 4 года назад
View of the Brick AHM 05 me too
@MrGollysnake
@MrGollysnake 4 года назад
JANGBRiCKS there was the single jellyfish piece in the spongebob sets, I don’t think it was used in other sets.
@danielunderwood5217
@danielunderwood5217 4 года назад
Jang, this looks like a remake of the underwater set that brought you out of your dark ages
@evo_is_confused
@evo_is_confused 4 года назад
Anything closer to an Atlantis reboot makes me happy
@bloodywankerwhoateahotdog3628
@bloodywankerwhoateahotdog3628 4 года назад
Why must you hurt me so
@yourmom283
@yourmom283 4 года назад
I faintly remember Atlantis
@stealthisaccount433
@stealthisaccount433 4 года назад
The only atlantis set I had was the giant black and yellow shark, but I loved it. I want a reboot, too.
@gugutroll2358
@gugutroll2358 4 года назад
Or Aquazone with it's fancy designs
@Sheldon1985
@Sheldon1985 4 года назад
I loved the Atlantis theme, but I only ever managed to get one of the sets. Would absolutely love a reboot of it.
@jkb2016
@jkb2016 4 года назад
Once looked closely at it, it is a suprisingly disappointing set. Especially in comparison to the space station.
@gregorjefferson6610
@gregorjefferson6610 4 года назад
ikr
@legobrickabrac
@legobrickabrac 4 года назад
This theme is so basic and is missing the fun of the 90s under water theme.
@dgray3771
@dgray3771 4 года назад
Compared to the 1997 underwater base which I own(6441). Which has a small boat with crane, an entire base and a large submarine which is also sold as a single set. Much more play value. For about the same price. I really loved the underwater exploration theme back in the day, and actually bought the 3 smallest sets of this year. The 2 subs are okay and the pollybag is descent. Don't know if I get this base. The ship yes.
@ThatRedPlumber
@ThatRedPlumber 4 года назад
I think this would be more successful if it had a back wall. Without it the set isn't very displayable from the back
@kingwolf9447
@kingwolf9447 4 года назад
And if the submarine wasn't part of the base.
@Lordodragonss
@Lordodragonss 4 года назад
No it actualy needs LESS walls to be more accesible. Those tiny rooms are horrible.
@legobrickabrac
@legobrickabrac 4 года назад
The 90s under water theme was far better then this imo. This is not to bad but it's a bit basic.
@skyborne80
@skyborne80 4 года назад
This isn't a display piece it's a toy. A back wall would make play impossible. Not to say there's much play value in this dud to begin with...
@agentv1240
@agentv1240 4 года назад
Why does it seem like LEGO keeps innovating with these new designs and styles of peices, but then squander opportunities to use them? Its the same story regarding play space...
@Lordodragonss
@Lordodragonss 4 года назад
I dont understand why they stopped using those amazing panels with bubble window. They look way more Underwater themed than these
@legobrickabrac
@legobrickabrac 4 года назад
@@Lordodragonss Yes and the parts from those 90s sets were full of great parts. If you put these new sets side by side with the 90s stuff I think the kids would choose the 90s stuff.
@dgray3771
@dgray3771 4 года назад
@@Lordodragonss Popping out 3 underpieces 3 top lids and 3 transparent window bowls and they are basically done constructing the core of this set. While the bubble window pieces cover only 4x4 top, still needing the bottom pieces and each window piece is 1 plastic piece + a transparent window. It costs money to make. This is more cost-efficient.
@mercaptan097
@mercaptan097 4 года назад
I personally don't like this set. It really doesn't feel like LEGO, instead more of a doll house. I also think this is just a way to get new pieces like the stingray or the helmet.
@legobrickabrac
@legobrickabrac 4 года назад
The 90s under water themes beat this hands down.
@frank.8823
@frank.8823 4 года назад
@@legobrickabrac Aggree
@doc_mchiefvods8078
@doc_mchiefvods8078 4 года назад
This line of sets reminds me of subnautica especially the coral it looks like blood kelp
@bobbysk8456
@bobbysk8456 4 года назад
And the base looking like the modular base building in subnautica
@16Vessel
@16Vessel 4 года назад
Lego subnautica pls
@weezingargonian6523
@weezingargonian6523 4 года назад
Lego subnautica would be awesome!! An £80 Reaper (giant red and white big thing) £50 sea base And a £25 battle-pack thing with peepers and Gary-Fish
@NightBeWheat
@NightBeWheat 4 года назад
I agree.
@TheBranchan
@TheBranchan 4 года назад
@@weezingargonian6523 I'm sold on that
@DJ.KyloRen
@DJ.KyloRen 4 года назад
The poblem is that Lego seems to have put a lot focus on the "technical" aspects of the set, it's a quality build and looks good on display. But where it's lacking is its core play aspect. It's not thought out or set up for kids (or adults) to interact and play with fully. I mean you'd want to be able to walk the figs around the set, play out different scenarios, etc...But it's not possible in this case because each segment is done as an independant module, the "connecting" aspect fails because it's merely replacing modules for the sake of switching up the "look", it doesn't however aid or add anything for the sake play. Another thing is the intricacy, building quality, and inclusion of details in the set are supposed to work FOR play, it needs to have a basis in a possible story for kids to go off of on, and mot merely just for looks. Like something simple as adding a skeleton or a hidden trap or object to be revealed in the cave would add to the play aspect whereby you could make up your own scenarios for the divers, but an empty space gives you nothing to go off of.
@你的亲亲小宝贝
@你的亲亲小宝贝 4 года назад
This is true, I find that lego isnt a very big fan when it comes to making fleshed out interiors. It seems most of their sets do not have much room to play in in terms of posing minifigures within a build. Maybe with the exception of the creator city sets.
@DathanNaniel
@DathanNaniel 4 года назад
Yeah. And sets like this are so expensive. I'm surprised about this one, since it's not a Licensed Property (like Star Wars). It's Lego's own thing. No need for inflated prices.
@LouieFromPikmin
@LouieFromPikmin 4 года назад
I never thought of it that way before, but you’re absolutely right!
@g.williams2047
@g.williams2047 4 года назад
The big pieces that they reused need to be replaced with regular parts. The set needs to be expanded.
@legobrickabrac
@legobrickabrac 4 года назад
Long story short, it's missing the fun and imagination of the 90s sub theme.
@dazblue5515
@dazblue5515 4 года назад
The Central Hub would have been better if they had put a hole in the floor to simulate the entrance/exit for divers or maybe an opening hatch
@dalek2564
@dalek2564 4 года назад
It kinda looks and builds like juniors set
@g.williams2047
@g.williams2047 4 года назад
It's only big pieces, not good.
@skyborne80
@skyborne80 4 года назад
It's 5+ which is only one step up from what used to be known as the Juniors theme. Hence the big pieces as JANG stated in the vid.
@amafangames
@amafangames 4 года назад
For me this whole sub theme is worse than the 2015 one
@henryhill7932
@henryhill7932 4 года назад
Pardon the pun
@amafangames
@amafangames 4 года назад
@@henryhill7932 ?
@Lordodragonss
@Lordodragonss 4 года назад
It REALLY is. The new one lacks realistic details.
@amafangames
@amafangames 4 года назад
@@raff63.89 aaaaaaa nice one?
@mujahidali2o905
@mujahidali2o905 4 года назад
-Yep
@4.O.4.
@4.O.4. 4 года назад
Yeah this is a down grade from the space station from last year
@dunno2434
@dunno2434 4 года назад
they are completely different things
@lbricks7631
@lbricks7631 4 года назад
This new Ocean Exploration theme is a letdown for me. It had so much potential. Lego used to make a set for everyone. Now they make city for younger kids, because the 18+ line caters for adults. They don't add that extra level of LEGONESS, that these newer sets need.
@Lordodragonss
@Lordodragonss 4 года назад
Just go buy older ones.
@PoppySis
@PoppySis 4 года назад
Lego needs to reconsider using those enormous specialized pieces so much. I feel like we're rapidly reverting back to the dark days of lego where almost all they made were vehicles consisting entirely of just 5 or 7 massive parts.
@LouieFromPikmin
@LouieFromPikmin 4 года назад
When did that happen?
@g.williams2047
@g.williams2047 4 года назад
Those were terrible. The 80s and 90s had that one theme I ant think of where all the buildings were about 30 pieces.
@fluffnose3386
@fluffnose3386 4 года назад
Ever since the stupid LEGO city show, the ages for building city sets has gone down. Making everything very VERY simple. City is really going downhill
@Mandalore569
@Mandalore569 4 года назад
Fluffnose338 the show is actually good but the sets aren't really that good
@mickys8065
@mickys8065 4 года назад
Basically they making main Lego into Duplo
@WhiskeyShred
@WhiskeyShred 4 года назад
This and the big ocean ship are insanely cheap in Australia, this was $89 and the big ship was $139!
@dunno2434
@dunno2434 4 года назад
that’s not that cheap
@nvl2691
@nvl2691 4 года назад
The big ocean ship is about 190 australian dollars in Switzerland...
@WhiskeyShred
@WhiskeyShred 4 года назад
Yeh it’s pretty cheap..the US price for the big one is $150, that converts to about $179 Australian, which is the rrp at the LEGO shop.. but we have a Kmart here and they have great prices..some cheaper than U.S. somehow..Star Wars prices here are a pretty steep hike though, for sure 👍
@lbricks7631
@lbricks7631 4 года назад
If you convert U.S. prices into Aus prices , we do get ot cheap is Australia!
@WhiskeyShred
@WhiskeyShred 4 года назад
Kmart just added new stock online, AT AT nearly 20% off, Assembly Square 25% off! Technic Volvo nearly 25% off!
@idiotstreams6608
@idiotstreams6608 4 года назад
Jang I just wanna say I love your videos and I’ve been watching since you started reviewing hero factory and I just wanna say thank you for being you and shaping my childhood
@eggo5643
@eggo5643 4 года назад
"Slightly happy clone"... Jang, I noticed that you finaly admitted that you have indeed been cloning yourself. I for one am *very* proud of you for coming clean! I wish you the best in your future cloning endeavours! 😊
@Crackalacking_Z
@Crackalacking_Z 4 года назад
The set gives me major Subnautica base-building flashbacks. That's a good thing.
@cryinbryan
@cryinbryan 4 года назад
Here’s my issues. They use these huge un-lego like pieces and that makes the price go up. But if they used actual pieces and bricks and built up those same structures it would also make the price go up. So if they insist on raising the price year after year after year the least they can do is give us actual useful parts, not huge specialized pieces that aren’t even playable to begin with. Literally no holes to access into the main hub or into the submarine. To me the set looks incredible and reminds me a lot of Atlantis or Aquanauts but just fails to capture the same play value.
@skyborne80
@skyborne80 4 года назад
I agree with some of the things you said, but your not taking into account that this is a 5+ set. It has to be easy to build for the lowest end of the target market range.
@AkinduDasanayake
@AkinduDasanayake 4 года назад
Love the "!?" and "!" after the US and UK prices.
@demijne9
@demijne9 4 года назад
Looks like the atlantis sets
@jacobbrowning3804
@jacobbrowning3804 4 года назад
Those new stingrays make me smile, they are my favorite animals!
@benthebookboy1068
@benthebookboy1068 4 года назад
DOLPHINS ARE WAY BETTER!!!!!!!! ( sry i just like dolphins more than stingrays.)
@aidengardiner2268
@aidengardiner2268 3 года назад
@@benthebookboy1068 stingrays have poison tho!
@SittingDucklord
@SittingDucklord 4 года назад
The fact that it’s 80 quid in the US and £55 here in the uk is hilarious 😂
@jacksonbrickmedia939
@jacksonbrickmedia939 4 года назад
This set is not that expensive compared to something such as Grevious’s star-fighter.
@benthebookboy1068
@benthebookboy1068 4 года назад
oh god let's not talk about that.
@MythicBricks
@MythicBricks 4 года назад
80 seems fine to me
@omarbaba9892
@omarbaba9892 4 года назад
Mythic Bricks what are you on I want some!
@Hippienolic2
@Hippienolic2 4 года назад
Build idea: have the space station set crash into the ocean and connect it to this one
@jasonmcgrody9472
@jasonmcgrody9472 4 года назад
The US price makes me sad. Lego saving me lots of money with the high prices.
@thenotoriousjoey9956
@thenotoriousjoey9956 4 года назад
I’m paying those prices else where I’d rather spend 80 bucks on a retired set tbh
@dylanwhite7881
@dylanwhite7881 4 года назад
I would prefer a Lego city sub marine than a pretty bad base
@dunno2434
@dunno2434 4 года назад
same
@MartenFerret
@MartenFerret 4 года назад
So this set was only SUBpar?
@DZstudios.
@DZstudios. 4 года назад
I am adding a Underwater scene to my city... But won’t be building this set! Too expensive
@jacobtamisari8570
@jacobtamisari8570 4 года назад
those divers be heading down to the depths of the ocean to get those infinity stones XD great review, as always jang.
@benthebookboy1068
@benthebookboy1068 4 года назад
LOL xD
@kevinm5940
@kevinm5940 4 года назад
The Avengers series would be a lot shorter if they just found them all in a chest somewhere.
@kevinwood3527
@kevinwood3527 4 года назад
It would have been nice to have a baseplate with this one. Miss that about Lego.
@goldenburrito6083
@goldenburrito6083 4 года назад
Same
@ChrisFoley0803
@ChrisFoley0803 4 года назад
I guess you´re right. All these Modules are much to small to play. And the fact that these modules are all just one peace gives you no chance to make them bigger. At least the hub should be big, like double or tripple of it´s size and there schould be the central, the T.O.C. as it were.
@Mr_G_Daddy
@Mr_G_Daddy 4 года назад
I really like this new wave of sea exploration but I really want a dinosaurs series of this where you get to find prehistoric sharks and underwater monsters
@colonelhammerhead3025
@colonelhammerhead3025 3 года назад
We need the 2000 dinosaur sets again. There is so much potential and multiple prehistoric species to be sold.
@rickrollerdude
@rickrollerdude 4 года назад
It kinda feels more like a glorified parts pack that you need to buy at least twice in order to build something usable.
@ValosiTiamata
@ValosiTiamata 4 года назад
LEGO has come a long way in designing modular buildings, but they still haven't caught on to the idea that people are more likely to buy a set like this in 3-4 pieces with each having higher play value than a combined set with minimal play value. Take for example the crew quarters. Use the parts from the other three modules to create one large module with four bunks (maybe using slabs and hinges to retract the lower bunks against the wall and reveal storage underneath). The module comes with its support struts, some personal effects, a bit of seabed, and 1-2 figures. Sell it for around $30. Do the same sort of size increase for the lab and command centre. For the hub, increase its size to make it octagonal and include "airlock" walls where you can attach up to eight modules and have a wet bay for the mini sub and skip the crane. Give the hub one diver and 1-2 sea creatures and market it for about $50. Fans of this series can purchase multiple modules and link them to create larger rooms or even add additional hubs to create a sprawling base. Best of all, the ability to sequence the modules means a financially strapped family can buy modules and link them without the hub to provide their children with the best possible play value for their budget. Seriously, LEGO, you're dropping the ball on some very easy profits by sacrificing quality and quantity when you could get both for roughly the same price! I would rather buy three modules for $90 total than this one barely playable set for $80.
@dgray3771
@dgray3771 4 года назад
I would have been Ok with these parts, IF they were wider and more like "baseplates" to create a module in, with more decoration and options on the inside. This is way more miniaturized. Also, the "detachable" sub is laziness. The white base back in the day had its own designated sub + a small boat. And came with 5 mini figs & 5 fish! This base is smaller, comes with no real sub unless you pull off that part of the base, 5 mini figs only 2 fish. And basically no real underwater world. The boat and the sub gave the old set way more play value, also the way it folds open giving you access and play value inside is much better, compared to this where it is simply a bunch of enlarged cockpits.
@dgray3771
@dgray3771 4 года назад
Also if you have to detach stuff and have huge arrows on the art work to "enlarge" the set for its value you are doing something wrong. Compared to that old set where they have to crop it all together to fit it in an image...
@notacompleteidiot...1285
@notacompleteidiot...1285 4 года назад
Blech. This is one of those sets that feels like I'd need to get 3-4 of them to put together something decent. 🤷‍♂️
@jackotherstar
@jackotherstar 3 года назад
I literally guessed that only one minifig would be able to fit into the crew quarters. Lego never fails to be lazy.
@luisemoralesfalcon4716
@luisemoralesfalcon4716 4 года назад
Good morning Jang, thanks for this wonderful review.
@wenix4934
@wenix4934 4 года назад
This remades me of Subnautica game :DDdd.
@K41-g6p
@K41-g6p 4 года назад
with the stud placement on the stingray and those bars on the rear, do you think we will get a plain non printed or alternate printed version of that piece as part of a hoverboard or something in a more sci-fi set?
@danielunderwood5217
@danielunderwood5217 4 года назад
Visually it looks good, but it seems like all of the interior spaces are too small. You can't play inside this thing. You can barely place minifigures inside, let alone play in it. Like a troop transport that doesn't carry troops, a base you cannot play inside of, doesn't make any sense
@abarekilla
@abarekilla 4 года назад
Nice set but I still rank the Atlantis series as one of the top underwater themes.
@yokpok85
@yokpok85 4 года назад
It's like they designed this in 2007, the designs looks so sad compared to 2015. Even the mini figures are somewhat disappointing, it could be the color combination but still sad design
@Badbhoys
@Badbhoys 4 года назад
T-60 power armour helmets 😁
@NightBeWheat
@NightBeWheat 4 года назад
I call this: the sea downgrade base. The space station was way better.
@hairlesscat6458
@hairlesscat6458 3 года назад
I never realized that Legos had such a big adult following. Its such a cool and interesting hobby to have. Sadly legos are kinda expensive so I’m gonna stick to bowling.
@LegoMowgli
@LegoMowgli 3 года назад
Hey Jang,I bought 4 of these sets and customised one of the base plates so that there is now a hatch in the bottom with several modules attached, allowing for an office, crew quarters, lab, WC and shower, sickbay, storage and a docking bay for a mini sub. I’ve also ordered set 60096 and intend to create a sub pen for my 60092 sub. still work in progress. I love your video reviews of Lego sets as an AFOL in the UK.
@lordpreclik7451
@lordpreclik7451 3 года назад
I planing get this set (+lego Ninjago legacy Destiny Bounty) for myself on christmas :-D
@maxtyler8993
@maxtyler8993 4 года назад
They could bring back the jellyfish from the spongebob theme.
@overclocker4life
@overclocker4life 4 года назад
Well, grass will always be greener in the past, but I have a feeling that Aquazone back in the 90s was way better.
@jeffersonfan393
@jeffersonfan393 4 года назад
Watching LEGO make all these new parts makes me worry that they will repeat their history.
@dynamosaurusimperious6341
@dynamosaurusimperious6341 4 года назад
Cool,yet sad for my minfigures,if I would to put them inside the ocean exploration base.
@marlevr
@marlevr 4 года назад
Definitely felt disappointing. Same with the Submarine set, very plain and blah. Almost lazy design.
@dgray3771
@dgray3771 4 года назад
Sure miss the old sets with base plates and lots of fish. They opt for click it snap it and action gimicks. Like the falling boat part in the ship set...
@stairmasternem
@stairmasternem 4 года назад
Neat set, but definitely too expensive. I’m used to the non licensed sets being adequately priced. I wonder if this is Covid related, or knock offs cutting into profits related.
@roygo10
@roygo10 4 года назад
This is one of the most boring sets LEGO has ever produced.
@Cheesehead_Caleb
@Cheesehead_Caleb 4 года назад
10:47 Jang you never told us you were a Lego city diver!😄
@lingqintu8098
@lingqintu8098 3 года назад
oh yeah
@pjatkins568
@pjatkins568 4 года назад
I remember when we could get a decent LEGO set for $15
@Jcc2224
@Jcc2224 4 года назад
What's the point of LEGO making these large pieces in sets that end up throwing the Price-per-part ratio way off just to "use less parts" and "save cost"? It makes no sense! I'm sure this would have been the same price or less if they brick built those hulls instead of use big pieces! I don't get it.
@tanialarik79
@tanialarik79 4 года назад
Lego are getting worse and worse
@outsider238
@outsider238 4 года назад
I think you're spot on with your review. There's nothing to play with in the interiors. They need to be bigger with things like a lab, a kitchen and bigger sleeping quarters. That middle section is a complete waste of what could have been a recreational area. I wanted this when I first saw pictures of it but now it's a definite pass. Too bad.
@ricoparadiso
@ricoparadiso 3 года назад
it looks cool but too expensive
@milanamin36
@milanamin36 4 года назад
This is actually one of my favourites from this wave, it just looks cool and just works, also, if you get multiple of these you can make a your base bigger and bigger.
@Rinesmyth
@Rinesmyth 4 года назад
Aqua raiders had a better base than this, and that was 13 years ago!
@DL-en8vy
@DL-en8vy 4 года назад
Reminds me of the old Lego Town Divers sets
@charleslittleba
@charleslittleba 4 года назад
Was t this in space a year ago how did it get to the bottom of the ocean?
@Thatdistantmirage
@Thatdistantmirage 4 года назад
This reminds me of subnautica
@theshockerpit7274
@theshockerpit7274 4 года назад
In my personal opinion I think megablocks is superior than Lego but hey that’s just my opinion and I’m saying this on the Internet a social platform made to bring people together
@kylebookout1789
@kylebookout1789 4 года назад
Great comment.
@revolverocelot6334
@revolverocelot6334 4 года назад
In *depth* review hehe
@australianlegofan
@australianlegofan 3 года назад
I agree jang not enough fun for mini figures
@frank.8823
@frank.8823 4 года назад
Guess Lego is lazy to put more details and interiors plus that dissapoints me a lot
@atomic...
@atomic... 4 года назад
the way the base is built reminds me of subnautica, kinda wish there were more to the set.
@enzofernandez4670
@enzofernandez4670 4 года назад
I love it when jang goes off
@Unemportant
@Unemportant 4 года назад
Kinda looks like Atlantis but isn't
@WW2BRICKS
@WW2BRICKS 4 года назад
I have the Moon Station from last Years City Space Line and also thought i`d like it, but when i startes building it it bored me a lot and its is now halfbuild in the box. I think the main problem is the modular station with both sets. It looks good from outside, but has not so much possiblities to do something inside and not so much access for it. I once had the Big Station from the AquaRaiders and i liked it so much, cause u have the whole backside left open, which gives u great access. Your opinion?
@ThatGuyNamedJoe
@ThatGuyNamedJoe 4 года назад
its really interesting to me that they released a bike mold without the wheels in an official set.
@sigurursigmundsson9306
@sigurursigmundsson9306 3 года назад
i actually like this set😀
@kyleknight9686
@kyleknight9686 4 года назад
SpongeBob had some jellyfish figures, but I guess they were a little simple and arguably not true figures.
@BertLiu
@BertLiu 4 года назад
Glad to see that the comment section is back! Has anyone considered price-to-mass ratio? Seems more convenient and precise than price-to-volume.
@legobrickabrac
@legobrickabrac 4 года назад
I think the set has some nice ideas but it feels rushed or unfinished but for 55£ It's Ok. The 90s under water theme is the best in My oppion.
@OmegaBrickProductions
@OmegaBrickProductions 4 года назад
I am really disappointed this whole sub theme is super over priced. I think this theme is great 👍🏻
@fernandoruiz8109
@fernandoruiz8109 4 года назад
This is an attractive set that can overcome its play value deficiencies with some creative customization.
@StarScapesOG
@StarScapesOG 4 года назад
You know... everyone digs on BURPs (big ugly rock peices) but i think (especially the newest one) are just fine in quick and dirty builds and play-sets.players. They are just very... lego looking. Other than the fact they are large single peices.
@grizzly._.
@grizzly._. 4 года назад
There's no reason to buy this over the 60264 Ocean Exploration Submarine. It comes with a MUCH better submarine, a small drone sub (not as nice as the one in this, admittedly). 4 minifigs vs. 5 (no big deal considering the price), AND a truly exclusive sea creature. Heck, it even comes with 2 crabs vs. this one's 1, and just as many of those nice coral pieces! The only thing this set has going for it vs. that one are the red-suited divers. That's genuinely it, unless you really, really, really want to have a underwater base type set.
@ToaKoran
@ToaKoran 3 года назад
Man... Seeing this review makes me glad I watched it, because this set.. This is just beyond disappointing when compared to past offerings, my childhood example being Aqua Raiders. I was lucky enough to get EVERY. SINGLE. SET. From Aqua Raiders, and that theme was by far one of my favorites. The opportunities for fun with those sets were limitless, and I stand by that given I only had those sets to play with as we moved from hotel to hotel during a cross-state move. Unfortunately, I was perhaps spoiled, but I would like to think that LEGO's underwater themes are just becoming more... Lackluster. I'm not even talking about the giant crab, lobster, or squid from Aqua Raiders' sets adding action, I mean lackluster in the sense that there's just so little to offer for playability compared to any one set from my childhood aquatic theme. Even just remove the giant sea creatures, just the vehicles, and scenery, any set from that theme is a timeless classic. I might just be rambling in nostalgia here, but underwater themes hold a special place in my heart after my experience with the previously mentioned line, and this just.. It misses the mark so hard... If I had been given this as a kid, I would have gotten bored with in VERY quickly, meanwhile Aqua Raiders, just one of the smaller sets, entertained me plenty by itself. I can't do anything but shake my head in disappointment when I see this. The Ocean Exploration Submarine set is much better than this for half the price, even if I'm not as into the more realistic theme of it, it's still much better than this. I don't get how LEGO can be so hit or miss with this when there's plenty of their own examples of success to use as a basis.
@Dornpunzel
@Dornpunzel 2 года назад
I do agree. This set is overrated. Lacking so many nice details and charme. Just compare it to the 31118 Beach house. I bought it for 36€ and love all the details and colors and the possib. to unfold it.
@defenderprime8046
@defenderprime8046 4 года назад
The play value of this set is almost non-existent, how can the minifigs cross through the sections? It doesn't work! And the sections are too small for the number of minifigs included. This set needs a major mod to make it more playable, it really does look good, but improvements would be seriously needed, and with those improvements, 80$ would be acceptable, but as is, no way! 65$ at most, I agree with you Jang.
@Setnja92
@Setnja92 4 года назад
I must say, i do acnowledge that this is not the best of "submarie" Lego set. You have said pretty much all, what is not great about this. On the other hand, i did not saw long time submarine base with the build terrain. The play value is in my opinion in the minifigures (so many of them, compared to the 3 or 4 ususaly), the animals (2 is more than usualy too) and the fact that you can combined it with the 60266 and "build" the submarine station. The hull pieces fit through the hole in the hull of the ship (without motors). I may be bias, becouse it reminds me Lego series from 90' that i could not afford to buy by myself. (Or better say, my parents could not afford it.) The realistcaly looking submarine sets are my absolute favorites.
@rudybernardino454
@rudybernardino454 4 года назад
Compared to Grievous ship, you get more bang for your buck, but then again, 480 something pieces for $80 is still absurd
@urshurakdieohnekanal9291
@urshurakdieohnekanal9291 4 года назад
Why is that set so expensive in the US? Usually prices in Switzerland are quite steep, not this time and that goes for several more sets, i.e. the Ocean Exploration Ship. I like this set, but I don't use it for play, only for an underwater display. For kids you are right, not very playable.
@nicolaslil2521
@nicolaslil2521 4 года назад
I got this in the uk for £55- for that price, it’s a great deal. But I think $80 is wayyyyy to much. The sent is amazing tho and has a lot of play value ( especially if u have other sets in this sub- theme).
@TheRichrocker
@TheRichrocker 4 года назад
If the 60 € pricetag in Europe seems more reasonable than the U.S. price, but I agree that it could and should be improved in many ways.
@minimanmax7193
@minimanmax7193 4 года назад
Love it
@privatewolfe4254
@privatewolfe4254 4 года назад
5:43 Lego did make jellyfish in the Spongebob sets (using a chef's hat in transparent pink and blue) also not to mention the builds for the Jellyfish in some of the Bionicle play sets in 2007( though I'm not sure if they are jellyfish or are a creature that resembles them). Edit: I forgot that they also used the chef's hate in clear to also represent a jellyfish.
@SuctionCat
@SuctionCat 4 года назад
Think I prefer the sub in 41378, which had a similar final look but didn't rely on a single large hull piece.
@metalltitan
@metalltitan 4 года назад
Tbh the Lego set 6441 "Deep Reef Refuge" was far more detailed, versatile and fun than this new shit they got going. Even the very old Blue Water Base stuff was better.
@nobblez
@nobblez 4 года назад
I bought this for the equivalent of $68 USD at Kmart. So I reckon I got good value for money based on your estimates.
@ThePrecipice66
@ThePrecipice66 4 года назад
Not a big fan of this universal docking ring system in its current form. It's a good idea but it's pretty clunky as is. Needs a bigger, more doorway like gap for mini figures. And it shouldn't have been used to frame windows either. That's a strange choice.
@tokaygecko8
@tokaygecko8 4 года назад
With lots of parts from the old ones from 2015 it would be fun to customise this set in particular the sea floor with lots more coral and plants
@MrDemonicDan
@MrDemonicDan 4 года назад
I feel like they should have used the trapdoor piece to create a moonpool access point in the open section. Being able to open the back of the modules (hinged up, perhaps) would have been far more fun/accessible for play. Bulkhead doors would have made for fun play options too, especially docking the submarine. Seems like a lot of missed opportunities :S Really curious what the fan on top is supposed to represent too.
@Angry_Squirrel555
@Angry_Squirrel555 4 года назад
The modular sections are ok for certain uses, but I wish that the living quarters and other room had been brick built instead to allow for more room inside. It wouldn’t be hard to MOC, just a bit of a pain to have to do. The central hub design is good to back up maybe two of them pretty easily for one larger room. I have to wait for a discount, but I’ll get this.
Далее
Лиса🦊 УЖЕ НА ВСЕХ ПЛОЩАДКАХ!
00:24
Вопрос Ребром - Серго
43:16
Просмотров 738 тыс.
КВН 2024 Встреча выпускников
2:00:41
LEGO Sets That Should Be 18+
11:28
Просмотров 75 тыс.
Your Life as a Snow Leopard
11:46
Просмотров 251 тыс.
LEGO Deep Sea Operation Base MOC
9:59
Просмотров 30 тыс.
Meet the New LEGO City Animals!
6:37
Просмотров 216 тыс.
LEGO City Coral Reef Ocean Exploration Diorama Moc
12:12
Лиса🦊 УЖЕ НА ВСЕХ ПЛОЩАДКАХ!
00:24