NVidia are SCARED! 

Lol! I was wondering what was going on. It's okay man, I made a mistake once.

I was just kidding with my comment. Great content. Some of your predictions for a few years ago are close to fruition I suspect.

Is there going to be a part 2 video because you only touched on Tenstorrent. Will the consumer eventually benefit from RISC-V or what??

At least we now know Tenstorrent processors are chips on Tren

It’s not a mispronunciation, you said a completely different word. Which means you haven’t read the company name in articles/docs more than a handful of times. Which means you’re talking with a hell of a lot of self-assumed authority for someone who basically knows nothing

It'll be a pipe dream so long as the OS and software don't support it. Apple has transitioned to custom ARM chips because they've put it in the work for supporting it in software, but we don't quite see that on the PC side.

@@Slavolko As far as I understand, as long as all vendors implement the same standardized instruction set this should work fine. Like with graphics API's where each vendor implements DirectX or Vulkan instructions for its hardware so the software developers can use the same code for all the supported GPUs.

@@Einygmar I know, but my point is that you'll need to convince OS and software developers to support your new hardware standard. That's all.

@@Einygmarissue is most software isn’t written for RISC-V, so there needs a lot of work to make it work on RISC-V (like having a translation layer like Apple has done from x86 to ARM to ease the usage before being properly ported).

The thing is, with their approach it also requires that the customers are capable of building their own custom models that are better than the box solution Nvidia ships - and this is the major caveat here. The highlighted companies like Google, Amazon, Tesla, etc - they are all big tech companies with massive resource pools and existing highly skilled software teams that can take on such jobs. But that isn't the case for the majority of the industry's needs as a whole. Most companies that actually benefit from these products, don't have fully stacked teams of google/microsoft level technicians and developers at their disposal, and they don't have the time nor expertise to scout the market for people to perform those tasks through 2rd party services. With Nvidia you get something that works out of the gate, has reliable support, and a major community of other players using the exact same systems - trouble shooting the exact same problems, and reaching solutions and knowledge gain that is very hard to replicate with bespoke in-house software. It's also one of the reasons Apple's OS and Windows are so popular -only here at a far lower economic scale for the end user, but the concept is the same. Nvidia isn't looking just at the big established corpos - they're looking at all of the up-and-coming enterprises that are looking to build their systems off of modern AI solutions and computing systems. These companies will gobble up Nvidia's product stack like hot bread. Said in another way, it's far easier to build a product stack that allows for full end user customization, than it is to create a full system lineup of hardware and software that works out of the box and has worldwide use and experience behind it. Nvidia can always make the switch when they need to - but RISCV based system manufacturers can't do the opposite. They're already locked - similar to how AMD will never reach the software suite integration and support that Nvidia has in enterprise. It would require decades of effort to just get on the same playing field, and even then you still have to convince customers to stop using what they've been using for years. I'd much rather be in Nvidia's shoes here, they have more options - which is a major benefit in a rapidly shifting industry.

Who has had his company renamed hahaha I kid but I'm sure the second letter in kellers company isn't an 'R'. I used riscV microcontrollers alot and it'll be good to see better fp performance trickle down hopefully. Drawing simple graphics with dual core esp32 ic to a tiny screen is painful if you want to make menus. It's why I use teensy4.1 for my silly builds. I've been excited for tenstorrent for a while.

And Raja is legendarily fucking useless.

Without keller AMD would likely go bankrupt now.

Makes no sense. Keller stopped working at amd years ago... he does short contract jobs. He comes in, designs/organizes a masterpiece, gets boreed and leaves onto the next company/project. That's what he does...

@@ctsd623 he does it out of passion and works quick but results are not seen for atleast 3 to 4 years when it comes to silicon development. Plus he gets shares and I bet a small percentage at the other end like some actors do. At this point though I suspect he'd do it for free if he believes in it. In fact I bet at tt he hasn't made any roi yet. Yet haha He deserves it though. He looks at chips like I do at guitar but a better analog would be to use a player like Paul Masvidal or Roger Patterson haha

Indeed, he does.

Nvidia cant run cysis either 😅😅😅😅😅

Sadly nvidia didn't make my gpus driver open source for some reason (GTX770) 😭

​@@offline__The open source Nvidia Linux driver has come a long way in a short time. It's still rough, but it'll get there. I'm with ya though, I think it was a dick move to open source ONLY the newer architectures. The 700 series seems like the perfect target for open source optimizations, because regardless of how old they are, a lot of people still use 'em, along with the 900 & DEFINITELY the 1000 series.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that Pascal is still the most popular Nvidia architecture at the moment, when it comes to the number of active users (1060 & 1070 are the most popular I think)

YAY!

@@jacksonsneed7689 couldn't have said it better

Good.

open source AI models are also a threat. a leaked google document says google and openai have no moat, and open source might crush them both.

I said this years ago, when everybody thought Intel had completely crushed AMD, and I first heard that Jim Keller had come back to AMD to help them design their Ryzen CPU. He's the Luke Skywalker of chip design. He can do it. Darth Huang and the nGreedia empire can and will be defeated by Luke Keller. :)

Nvidia’s CUDA is why it’s succeeding now & why it will lose in the future. CUDA is GPU specific. It doesn’t work with a hybrid APU architecture.

@@Moshe_Dayan44 and there probably tens if not hundreds of people like Jim Keller inside nvidia.

@@tringuyen7519 the issue is that making a hybrid APU arch framework is really really hard. OpenCL was meant to be an example, SYCL a more recent thing (and that also has limitations). We need a bigger idea, I think.

@@arenzricodexd4409 This is exactly what people said about Intel in 2016: "There are literally hundreds of engineers like Jim Keller at Intel! How can one guy beat hundreds of people! It's impossible!" Yet critical aspects of the Ryzen core, as well as the chiplet concept and the interconnect design were all Keller's. One man DID undo Intel's iron, monopoly grip on x86 big iron CPUs. If you think Keller can't do it again, you're betting against a man who has never designed a dud chip. He also was the main architect of the DEC 21164 Alpha CPU, AMD's Athlon, the author of AMD's x86-64 64 bit instructions, as well as Apple's A4 and A5 chips. Do you really want to bet against him?

100 exaflops? In 14 months?? Ain't no way.

@@ireallyreallyreallylikethisimg Agreed. I don't believe it. Just another marketing promise by Elon. "Self driving"? A trademark, not a feature.

@@YolandaPlayne Self driving is a thing no one has accomplished before and is inherently unpredictable. If they are planning to build this in the next fourteen months, it means they've already lined up the production with TSMC. It's not the kind of thing you can place a last minute order for. Since there's already tesla designed silicon in the cars I think it's safe to assume they know how to process works.

@@YolandaPlayne seems believable. All they have to do is order fab capacity from TSMC. It's also 7nm which should have plenty affordable capacity. Their solution seems incredibly scalable too, with 25 chips in one tile.

@@daniel_960_ capacity is tight, this is known.

Intel tried acquiring SiFive but acquisition failed

Keller kinda offsets Koduri imo

​@@Unicorn-CoinPat Gelsinger does. Look at the 180 with arc since Raja was removed from overseeing it.

@sersou my bad

Unbelievable that we hear a voice and assume they’re an expert and meanwhile they don’t even know the company name. It’s so shameful. How could I ever think “oh hey that guy over there said so and so, I’ll take that opinion on board” after this. Hillarious shit man

No it’s Transtorrent, the opposite of Cistorrent

Make GPU chip's swappable like you do with your CPU when it's time to change it.

@@gregandark8571Would certainly improve longevity ownership of the card.

you could pitch-in the idea to investors, go with it

Guy who doesn’t know company’s real name impresses you eh. Nice.

@@HikarusVibrator yes

Brute-force the $150-300 market

Gene editing, Healthcare prediction, individualized drug creation (protein folding), robotics symbiosis, robotics in general.. there is no market that will not get disrupted by AI

Yeah, I swear his track record seems to be constantly ignored.

@e2rqey my bad

It’s TRANCETORRENT not tensOrent didn’t you listen?

@@HikarusVibrator Thats my problem, i didnt see it spelled

@@denvera1g1 i was joking with you because the guy who made the video got it so horribly wrong

@@HikarusVibrator Hey man, i got it wrong too tenstorrent and i'm not going to remember that after hearing tensorrent so many times (Edit, come to think of it, i dont think i can recall hearing it ever pronounced correctly except for maybe a Dr Ian Cutress video)

@@denvera1g1 this guy is talking about the intricacies of GPUs and giving very weighty opinions of companies/products in an industry full of very very smart people. He acts as an expert and convinces the fools who watch his channel that TRANStorrent are going to beat up Nvidia. Come oooon dude this is like the video game “journalist” that couldn’t get past the Cuphead demo. People who know tech never do this

Valve uses it pretty heavily for the Steamdeck.

Blender in 3D spaces

Star citizen is moving over to vulkan as well. When that gets going it will pull the rest of the games industry with it when they outsource their code to build huge interconnected worlds

Not according to Intel. I am unaware of any internal dialog at Intel indicating displeasure with actually getting products to market. He did leave.

It looks like AMD can't see past the next quarter. They want to imitate Nvidia in any way possible.

RISC-V cannot be bought out by anyone, so that's not even an issue.

Chiplet saved amd money, but then GPUs are not selling and amd losing money after all , lol

AMD eventually create superior hardware only to lose again with inferior software. No one is replacing CUDA at this stage.

Both AMD & NVIDIA had record breaking unsold last gen backstock to sell thru, that & all the unfounded fears of recession is why prices were so high. It worked, both companies have vastly cleared the backlog, & both are bringing down prices. I suspect they wont bring prices too much lower though, because the silicon is more profitable as ai chips.