@@yuvrajsinghvirk5063 kaunse year me hi beta tum. Jao jaakar CBD ki definition padho pehle. Tum toh gadhe ho. Kya ram kya nuc kuch maalum hai tumko. Ram kabhi bhi if necessary can stop her work and manoeuvre as required by these rules. You don't jump anywhere where don't know shit kid. And yes if she has enough sea room then it's not a CBD itself.
Even I'm confused how can a cbd alter her course. As per definition, it is severely restricted in her ability to deviate from the course she is following.
My thoughts exactly, it makes no sense. A CBD is only a CBD when she is restricted in her ability to deviate from her course. So how could she alter to keep out of the way?
Bro Restricted visibility In narrow channel can a pdvessel overtake another vessel ?? Surveyor asked me this question so what answer a candidate should give which rule ??
I think should avoid overtaking in this case, because sound signals in rule 34 should use when in sight of one another, so the overtaking v/l how can indicates her intention for overtaking??? So overtaking in restricted visibility is not allowed Am I right?
Ecdis came as an alternative for paper navigation, thus basic requirements of equipment, which is also the IMO performance standard is GPS, GYRO and Log. However many other equipment are now interfaced including Echo Sounder, but they are more like a secondary display, not affecting the basic requirement of navigation, for ex. If the echo sounder or radar fails, a navigator would still know where he is and where he is going. Thus, it not required as main input. Coming to the second part of your question, anticollision aid is about avoid collision with available targets in the vicinity. Ecidis doesn't provide any new or direct information other than what you are already receiving from Ais or Radar. However when taking action as per ROR, it is pertinent for a navigator to know the available sea room to avoid grounding. Thus, Ecdis is more of antigrounding aid than a collision avoidance. I must add that, nevertheless, a navigator must use all available means including ECDIS to avoid collision.
Sir May I please what is the difference between following:- 9b “… which can safely navigate only within a narrow channel or fairway” and 9c “…any other vessel navigating within a narrow channel or fairway”
Take two examples. Depth around a 10m deep channel is 2m, vessel draft 9m, another vessel 1m. Both can navigate but 9m draft vessel can only navigate safely within the channel.
@@oralexammmdprep8110 - A mariner's guide to preventing collision - 3rd edition - 2018 - Capt. Yashwant "Two different terms 'safe passage' and 'passage' have been used at different places within this Rule. To my mind any 'passage' has to be safe as such both may mean the same from 'ordinary practice of seamen's approach. Courts may interpret these terms differently though, have been unable find any clear ruling on these two terms so leave their interpretation open to debate. While 'passage' simply indicates 'passage', the prefix 'safe' may indicate some sort of navigational restrictions on availability of sufficient sea-room..." Or - The collision Regulation - A straightforward Guide - Barry Sadler (Page: 38) "there is no difference between Passage & Safe passage when dealing with impeding" 1- Passage & Safe passage are used in the same sentence to explain the requirement .... (8fi) 2- We can not expect a small vessel to be able differentiate what is safe passage or passage WhaT you think?
