Origin and Genetics of the Vietnamese, Cambodians and Other Austroasiatics 

he didn't do it on purpose.

Why the hell people call it "Khmer" if its "Khmai" actually?

I think one is a sub-set of the other and western reporters( back in the beginning of our dumbass escapade in South East Asia) were going on OLD info from western academia instead of getting the endonym from the actual people. Ask they’ll tell you, silly western media...

@@Nista357 I think the spelling is based on French (who colonised them).

when i was im cambodia i asked the people there how they pronounce it in their language and it sounded more like khmea than khmai.

There're 25 Vietic (not just Vietnamese) ethnolinguistic groups and 24 of them are 90-99% original Austroasiatic (some of them are Indian-influenced like the Khmer).

For example, the Kaluen in Laos numbered 1,000 are a Vietic group that practice Theravada Buddhism and Indian mixed indigenous social norms.

Việt Nam chẳng có cái gì liên quan đến Khmer, có mỗi cái hệ ngữ, chưa gì làm to hết lên! Chẳng ai quan tâm

I are a beutiful white man can I meet u 1 day

I'm awhite pieces of trash like oat meak mommi

@@charlieread2097 world should accept Tamil

@@charlieread2097 i watch his videos to and i like how he talks about proto indo european history it is very intresting if you think about it becuse in his video he talks about why greek norse slavic and celtic mythology are all similar to hindu and vedic mythology and he goes into detail about how the proto indo european society worked he should do a colab with masaman

Jade Fields I think he’s kinda racist towards blacks

Charlie Read first of all you must not peep the slick jokes when it comes to blacks. Second... anything that has something to do with black or African he shoots it down. I’m not mad at him speaking on genetics of his own people. But don’t denounce the facts because your trying to prove the I’m pure white theory. I’m African American yes I’ve done anestry. It’s no surprise that African Americans have European dna in them. I have 27% European dna and from what I can remember all my family has been black. The 19th century is when I found k first mixed or pure white ancestor. But you’ll never accept us as a distant cousin or relative. Even though I pump the same blood as Irishmen British and Norwegian.... I have no clue how Norway slipped up in there. See the thing is survive the jive acts like no outside influences help shape the European race. Like you all was dropped in Europe from the heavens and that was that. Every couture has outside influences who shaped a certain race. Wether a 100 to 6000 years ago. It’s a known fact south East Asians was negrito thousands of years ago. It’s a known fact 2000 years ago and beyond the Middle East and Levantine was darker than what they are now. Europe has had different races come in and out of there for thousands of years. Middle eastern African and Asian component had affect Europe. Maybe not at the same time but it has. Western Europe is not untouchable ya know. Europeans look quite a bit different in 4000bc. But hey I guess acting like a white supremicist makes you guys gods

Kingvanga Infinite talking about survive the jive not Masaman. Even though I think Masaman gives to much credit to anything besides Africans when it cornes to ethnicities. It’s like he’s scared he’s going to loose his white fan base if he tells the truth.

Soo’r s’dey(Hello!)! I’m glad you got a chance to visit Srok Khmer(Cambodia). I have read some articles about Khasi and other Austro-Asiatic peoples in Meghalaya and Assam-Nagaland! We are far in term of distance but we are close in many things!

@@SteppeNomad585 there are meaning almost same between khasi to Palaung language , Khmer language ...

khasi people look like fillipinos,indonesian

@@bansara7421 shu ong da lade, kumba sngew khyllew, ne...

@@bansara7421 lada phi tip shaphang ki native South America , kum ki native Colombia, native brazil, native of panama... kine ruh ki long kum ki typical khasi hi..

Vietnamese are the original ancient Luoyue people mentioned in Shiji and Shui Jing Shu. There are no race called Han Chinese because chinese are the mixtures of Baiyue, Vietnamese, Di, Quiang, Tangut, Khitan, Gorturk, Xianbei, Xiongnu, Tufan, bai, Zhuang, Mongolian, Manchu,... Han is a cultural ethnic not a racial ethnic that were created in early 20th century by the Kuomingtang.

That why the Han chinese race genetically are so diverse because the "Han" ethnic was created by political tension of the KMT and the CCP, try to create a single homogenously state.

@@yeluabaoji7222 You are wrong, we have genes from Neolithic China that confirms that all Han Chinese have substantial admixture from the Neolithic Yellow Valley and also some Southern adxmiture since millennia.

@@g-rexsaurus794 Han Chinese have different mtDNA lineages.

@@g-rexsaurus794 Genetics have confirmed that genes of Neolithic Yellow River people occur at varying frequencies among different Han sub-populations, with the highest one being either Shandong or Shanxi if I'm not mistaken, and the lowest one being Guangxi.

Me too. Weird how they are the only people who actually live in houses.

Yes PLEASEE DO A IN DEPTH VIDEO OF CAMBODIANS

AOE2 reference. The Khmer are the only civ which can garrison units in their houses.

Eye opening! As a Cambodian, I would love one about Cambodians!

Hi All Fri i'm From Cambodia But I'm Bad In English Hard To Explain You About Cambodia Because Ancient Cambodia Mixed Alot of Indeginous

You never know: the Khmer and the northern Kinh (Vietnamese) people have some ancient rituals very same same together, from pork sticky rice (nom ansom and bánh chưng bánh tét), from family-centric oritented, to same festival such as Phchum Ben (or Sen Donta) x Lễ Vu Lan: is a festival to show respect and offering to the ancestors... to have many common words. My English is limited so I cannot transfer all for you. Greetings from Native Khmer in Prey Nokor HCM city - Mekong delta, Vietnam.

I definitely don’t, and I find it really insulting that most westerners think that way, and I’m a friggin westerner! Haha.

True, mostly Filipinos, Thais, and other Southeast Asians that migrated to the states are mostly people with Chinese descent. The real ones usually chose to stay in their homeland.

@@haritsdarwienm5886 lol that is BS.

@@ElCachorro97 I don't smoke but I'ma gotta take-a mad rip to process all this.

Austronesian migrate from Taiwan and some of us is from southern China..but we are not Han Chinese.

mix of bunch ethnic creat the modern vietnamese , just like now day chinese are result of tons of ethnic

nguồn gốc của chúng tôi là miền nam Trung Quốc

@@HaiLe-zf2uq All Southeast Asians have ancestry from Yangtze river farmers of southern China.

@@haruzanfuucha bạn sai

@@DungPhan-2002 Go educate yourself.

In the past, I could not distinguish Caucasian people, but now I can identify them without difficulty

Cambodian mixed with the Cham a lot in the past. Cham ethnic Vietnamese has a much darker skin than a typical Vietnamese Kinh (though I can't say that there is no dark-skined Vietnamese Kinh. After all ethnic is just to classify people with different cultures, not race or dna). The typical Vietnamese Kinh will commonly get mistake as Chinese

Người Kinh Bắc Việt Nam không có họ với người khmer

also, Khmer soldiers and football players will look a lot more similar to Indonesians than to neighboring Vietnam😂

That's probably because their ancestors were Austroasiatic speakers who were conquered/colonized/assimilated by Austronesian speakers.

​@@IrLokkgenerally speaking,compared to their Vietnamese neighbors i sense a bit more "exoticness" in the facial features of Khmers.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QJCc2ZiJK7c.html

It is

Why do you think my nation is fascinating ? And thank you for that

Kolan Samuels I think she find Khmer men to be irresistible. Which is a good thing.

@@trilli7914 I can only speak for myself, but the ancient cities/temples being so well preserved is absolutely fascinating to me.

@@Thor-Orion it was actually in ruins. It was the europeans who came and looked after the temples and forced the khmers to take better care of their temples as they neglected it. Overtime, the khmers now.recognize it as their nationalistic pride and symbol (although it was designed by the indians).The only reason why angkor wat is the national symbol of cambodia and so well kept is because the europeans were fascinated by it

Cambodian culture is actually Indian culture not khmer. They jsut borrowed from Indian.

@@lonelypeopleruglydeformedc8139 can you tell me the difference between cambodian and khmer culture? are they not the same by definition?

@@lonelypeopleruglydeformedc8139 not true. Is a mixed of Indian and Khmer cultures. We had a culture before the indian came and traded with us.

Javanese and Balinese in Indonesia is basically Austronesian people who speak Austroasiatic also has influence by Sanskrit like Cambodians

@Gold Shine What about Khmer, did they come from southern China or India?

@@jsmoov2156 tiếng Khmer đến từ ấn Độ , còn tiếng việt đến từ miền nam Trung Quốc từ vựng tiếng việt rất giống tiếng quảng đông còn tiếng ngô trung quốc còn vài từ giống tiếng việt còn lại vay mượn từ tiếng nhật bản

@@HaiLe-zf2uq 🤣🤣🤣

@@HaiLe-zf2uq Tiếng Việt cùng nhóm ngôn ngữ với tiếng Mon-Khmer, anh nên để ý đến số lượng từ vựng giống nhau giữa tiếng Việt và tiếng Khmer. Và đúng, tiếng Việt có những từ giống tiếng Quảng Đông, bởi vì họ thực sự được dạy tiếng Quảng Đông trong thời Bắc thuộc. Tuy nhiên, dù có số lượng từ mượn từ tiếng Quảng Đông, nhưng nó được xem là từ mượn bởi nó có một từ gốc Việt tương ứng trong ngôn ngữ bản địa.

@@jsmoov2156 modern Khmer DNA didn’t show any Indian at all it show Southeast Asia and East Asia. Khmer adopted the Indian Hindu religion and their writing system that doesn’t mean we’re Indian. We later created our own written language the earliest stone inscription was found dated 629 AD

It's southern China. Only self-hating Cantonese HK'rs refer to themselves as being from "South China" < British colonial name for it's occupied Chinese territory

@@peekaboopeekaboo1165 they’re not self-hating. They know they’re different from north chinese. Their look is totally different!

@@TrangNguyen-tn9pb Cantonese people are also in Macao, Guangdong & elsewhere. People in eastern mainland are also southern looking.

@@TrangNguyen-tn9pb Its not at all, they may be more tan because of the climate but genetically they are the same as Han Chinese in the North.

@@alexzhangdragonn3438 两广人和越南同文同种，长相是欺骗不了人的

I think dini is still Austronesian cause it's also use in Philippines Ilocano- ditoy Tagalog Urban- dito Tagalog rural- dine Cebuano- diri/dinhi

@@AsianSP Yes, because we have adopted the Austronesian language so that it is mixed with the Austroasiatic language which was originally our language Balinese this: neh Cambodian this: nih Balinese that: to Cambodian that: noh Balinese: pig: celeng Cambodian: pig: chrouk Balinese dog: cicing Cambodian dog: chkee it seems like we have a strong past connection I believe the early Balinese came from mainland Southeast Asia

It's probably for monetization

If you wanna get the hoobie doobie you cannot show the boobie

RU-vid can demonetize for any reason without any warning these days. That's why creators are forced to take these protective measures.

@@constabret it is anchint history man grow up some pepole😡

Jade Fields um u think he understands that. What he’s saying is you tubers have to take cautious measures or RU-vid will crack down on them.

Those are simple. Their traces goes back to Nimrod son of Cush, grandson of Ham, who build Babylons Cultures, than the Khaldeans Cultures are from Arphacsad son of Shem, Assyrians are from Asshur son of Shem. The Levant are the Laban descendants, he is descendants from the House of the Nahor. And more. Madai he created the Medes Civilizations, son of Japhet, another is Elam son of the Shem, comes the Elamites cultures. Their genetics are Semitic-Hamitic-Japhetitic. All three nations is concentrated in Mesopotamia. We have 1 Race: Human in 3 Nations: Semitic, Hamitic and Japhetitic.

Norlof Thor the current people in the Levant and Mesopotamia are very far from being relating to Ham/Cush. Most of the populations in those areas now are very white-skinned- could pass fro Europeans and populations in the Caucasus’s. They’re no longer brown and black skinned which is what Nimrod would have been.

@@Midnight-og3rk True, very true. From many years, now the geography has been changed to massive conquests and wars, until the ruleshas been changed. Most likely through Japheth descendants have conquered most. He was blessed to enlarge his lands. So, he did. Togarmah through Turks, and Kazakhs have ruled those lands by ruling over Kush, and more likely the Slavic people who have comes from Ashkhenazi kinship. At this moment Europe, America, the Orient is ruled by Aschenazi, Torgarmah and Ishmael descendants. In the Southern it is Joktan ruling Yemen and Oman, it has his children there, who fights against his great-great-great more - uncle Ishmael son of Abraham. Kush, Elam, Asshur, and more people from this region lost to them.

@Norlof Thor although they Indians were also conquered by white Slavic and Iranic populations in the north which is the origin of the caste system. But I believe the original Indians would have also had their connections to ancient Babylon or ancient Middle East in general. Their religions definitely do.

@@Midnight-og3rk I am afraid to say yes. Kush is most dominate, because it has all target from Ham, because he tries to show that he can do it. The reason we can not find the trace, is because our memories have changed through another system. The only way to understand is the map. The map represent people who have named the cities and nations after there ancestors, Some are visible. There two people who tries to get from Indians from behind to show their power: Joktan and Medes. Those two are more possible to be allies. In a document there is a text fragment which says, that Madai ask his uncles Arphacsad and Elam to stay in area so called Mesopotamia. Alexander the Great from Javan he also played a role in this area of Mesopotamia. All in the Eastern and Southern Asia is rules by Kush and his descendants.

@@parisan9985 My bad, I was talking about the Austroasiatic languages becoming extinct in Indonesia. It seems that Sumatra, Borneo and Java are completely Austronesian now and completely displaced Austroasiatic. I guess it is the Austroasiatic ancestry that mainly distinguishes most Indonesian/Malaysian from Filipinos who are mostly Austronesian and lacks Austroasiatic. In Malaysia, it is the Orang Asli who preserved Austroasiatic languages and in the islands north of Sumatra, the people are Austroasiatic speaking.

Alot of proto-aslian languages share maybe over 50% of their cognates with other proto-austroasiatic languages including khmer and vietnamese. Its interesting that the cognates that I do not find between khmer and aslian languages, I can find in vietnamese and vice versa. The semai people of Malaysia strongly resemble khmer and some of their cognates are either similar or identical to khmer. Possibly an off-shoot of proto-khmer.

Thai and Vietnamese in Austrosetic languages come from the same source: Southern China, Guangxi Province. No Khmer language. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vVAql84_s10.html

@@JcDizon Eastern Indonesians,East Timorese as well dont have Austro Asiatic like Western Indonesia.We are a mix of Austronesian and Melanesian.

@@gpl992 Oh hey, I know you, I've seen your forum posts from Eastbound and some anthropology forum and one of those guys who were fighting with Ejay/Javen/countless names. Do you know where he is now? I can't find him in the internet anymore

Suốt ngày mơ mộng.u mê về cái thời đế chế khmer.lúc mạnh mang quân đi gây chiến với xiêm và việt.đánh không lại bị mấy đất còn gào khóc như những đứa trẻ.

He already made a video about native Caucasians

Tochinoshin is the fount of the Georgian ppl.

Or the origins of the Native Abkhaz people's of Abkhazia

You should submit your data to GEDMatch for a more detailed analysis, would recommend.

@Anthony Your dad's ancesters might be the Cham workers and dancers brought by Ly Emperors from Champa to Thăng Long citadel. Outside Hanoi, there is a village which originally was a village of Cham ship builders brought by Ly Emperors in order to build ships for Dai Viet. Even hundreds years later, they have been mixed with Viets (Kinh people), they still have many Cham features on their faces.

My father in law is from CaMau. Somewhat darker skinned. Cham? Khmer? Or Austronesian? I should test my son. He’s also very tall in Vietnam, over 6’.

@@npgibson69 Maybe your father in law's skin has been exposed to much to the sunlight so it got darker. I have a male friend who has a darker skin than most of us due to playing football out in the sunlight without apply skin protection like sunscreen in many years. You may mistake him from Indonesia or Philippines though.

Anthony this, most of my friend do the test have this results, always larger percentage Vietnamese and Chinese never see a friend have that much Cambodian and Thai tho. Just saying.

But you guys have some very thiccc jungles

Literally everyone defeated the Mongols at one point or another. What would be impressive is to defeat them in a head on battle on terrain favourable to them, which I can't recall any settled society doing.

@Dark PePe That was during the fall of the Yuan, not the same as beating the Mongols on an open field at their height. Even Jalal ad-Din used terrain to defeat a rookie Mongol general at Parwan.

Meanwhile:japan gets trollls

Right? I noticed when look for stuff related to vietnam war like veteran interviews I mostly saw stuff from the american side. There were very little stuff about vietnamese soldiers and the stuff that exists wasnt on par with the american stuff.

Perséntase DNA Austroasiatic yg tinggi hanya Sunda, Jawa Bali kita serumpun dengan orang Viet, Siam, Khmer, Burma etc

@@srisusantiwinoto2551 secara genetik yg paling dekat dng org jawa org khmer, thai beda, vietnam dan burma lebih beda lagi

Ya karna mungkin nenek moyang nya dari Yunan china

@@srisusantiwinoto2551 Are you javanese?

@@anomalianomali5080 Secara genetic jawa tdk sama dg kmher jika yg kau maksut austroasiatic atau O1b hiplogroup maka jawa juga serupa dengan jepang dan korea krna mereka juga punya DNA O1b bnyk sebanyak milik jawa, jawa serupa dg bnyk daerah di asia sprti dlm wikipedia hiplogroup O Jawa punya sekitar 40% O1b hiplogroup (austroasiatic), 22% O2 (Sinotibetan), 22% O1a (austronesian).

Yes brother 😍😍🥰

Vietnam is more like an East Asia country culturally

@@kubertultd1198 culture not genes

@@kubertultd1198 NO.

@@kubertultd1198 no

yep that follows as well to tribes of chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha and Bengal. basically my community is a lot influenced from there's culture

The first time betelnut chewing recorded in Chinese history is from an imperial history book of 659AD, this book mentioned that this habit was popular among southern Chinese and some northern royalties. And this habit is still popular in southern China till this day. (And it causes horrible oral cancer) Didn’t know if they adopted this habit from the Austronesian people thousands of years ago.

i think betelnut chewing is generally an ancient southern china culture that austroasiatics, austronesians, kra-dai, southern chinese, japanese jomon are observed to practice. today, this is also still done by indigenous groups or rural country folk of philippines, taiwan, southern china, japan, vietnam, cambodia, thailand, myanmar, northeast india

I know it it has been common with Khmers & Thais throughout history and is still common mainly with some older folks I grew up around & always saw them do it. It's also common in Papua New Guinea.

@@nx2067 then why you people don't look Chinese you look like Indians only go back to China

Perhaps that means the original austroasiatic population of Nicobar is closely related to Indonesia.

@Gold Shine OK, please do not generalize substantially! Just because SOME Vietnamese deny Chinese origin does not mean ALL Vietnamese don't accept this view. Anyone with some foundation knowledge about genetics and history know that no ethnic group is pure. My point of view is that this should be open for discussion and more research is needed. Also a correction for you: Chinese dynasties ruled northern Vietnam for over 1000 years, not 100 as you typed.

Preaching to the choir lol. Considering this channel is all about educating about race and genetics most of the peoplee here would be very well versed.

There is possible to have a language root. If to connect or to put together all languages, we would know the real language.

The R1a and R1b haplogroup, means that indo euroepeans (Milan, Islamabad) will share a similar ancestral origin unlike other language groups.

@@SaadKhan-yw3dg R1b are the Greece. R1a are the I don't know which nation set there. Which is place are you talking about it?

@@norlofthor7088 R1a is the most common haplogroup in India and Pakistan. And also the most common in Eastern Europe. R1b is mutation from R1a. This R1 haplogroup that is seen in Europe and south Asia links these indo euroepeans language groups by a common ancestral group.

That’s actually the same word in tai kadai languages

Yeah, Tay (aka Tay) is also the second most popular ethnic group after the Kinh in Vietnam. My Mom is a Tay and my Dad is a Nung (also an ethnic minority that has the same root with the Zhuang in south China)

Tai-kadai groups exist in substantial numbers both in northern Vietnam and southern China in fact. Tai-kadai groups are second in number only behind the Kinh (in Vietnam) and Han (in China).

Indians all over India look like this.

@@Midnight-og3rk ??？？？how？ even the kashmiri , idk ,how u say that？ please explain me clearly

@Black pink Kashmiri language has a lot of Old Sanskrit affinities but they are actually more closely related to Iranic and European languages. Groups like Kashmiris and other white skinned populations living in Northern India actually have their origins with Iranians and groups living in Eastern Europe and the Caucuses. And then they split of and migrated elsewhere. With some arriving in Northwestern India. It’s because of groups like Kashmiris/Baloch/Afghan etc how most of the Indian languages/language family currently, became to be known as ‘Indo-Aryan/european’. These groups add the ‘Aryan/european’ component to Indian languages since they have their origins in the caucuses and parts of Europe but migrated to India approximately 3,400 years ago.

You’re really reaching. Most people in India would think they’re Northeast Indians or foreigners

What I’m saying is not everyone that speaks a Dravidian Language (although these language are believed to predate the arrival of old Sanskrit in the subcontinent) is dark skinned and not everyone that speaks an Indo-aryan language is light skinned. I have seen this for myself and I know plenty of Indians that don’t believe it and also argue against it, but that’s due to the North vs South divide and the caste system in the region- praising white skin. If you go to New Delhi which is a city in Northern India, 99% of the Indians you will see on the streets are brown or Black skinned, not white like those they advertise in their movies. They are in denial themselves and suffer from self-hatred and colourism since they assimilated with groups(white skinned) arriving from Europe and the Caucuses.

Is not complicated, their names can be found on map or even in our last names.

Still complicated

Homo Sapiens do not exist. There is one race: Human into 3 Nations: Hamitic, Semitic, Japhetitic. Our memories have been changed with false history. We are humans, those technologies, show that we have been intelligent to create more tools. In order to understand you must go to the first humans created and from them every humans comes from there.

@@norlofthor7088 How is that useful, even if true? Once a branch is set/has developed into a separate entity, it says nothing about what went before (it does genetically, but not for "folklore"/history of man purposes). Must stick with DNA haplogroups and language as indicators of how the earth was peopled by humans.

@@ownpetard8379 Yes it has a sense. Yes they got separated, because they couldn't understand their language. They formed own nations by putting the names to be remembered their ancestors. Today we have information about Dna and language, but we do not know who formed those nations. Every nation has a founder. A countries and languages, can not be made without having a founder. Look at Sejong of Korea, he created own alphabeth and own language, that is a founder for Joseon Dynasty for Korea. or do you think is just comes suddently? Everything has a beginning. Our societies were made based by people who created us. Without them we would not exist.

You mean Garden Grove, Santa Ana and Westminster?

@@MinhNguyen-ff6xf yes, specifically Westminster

Hey bro my cousin is in Fountain Valley( very near Santa Ana)

Idk about being more austroasiatic by long shot, they are all mix austroasiatic and austronesian thats true, and everyone has different levels of mix.

Tai kadai (thai,lao) (myanmar), zhuang(china) dai (china) is mix austronesian or is entirely austronesian but we speak our own language family, but our native ancient culture was very similar to the austronesians and language wise, austronesians originated in southern China same as tai kadai

Borneo and land dayak languages share many lexical similarities with orang aslian languages. And, unsurprisingly, they share 1/2 of their dna with austroasiatic.

@@remhk6672 There are many Austroasiatic words I have found in Malay as well. maybe twenty so far, and they are in-line with khmer, or austroasiatic groups or from thai into malay.

Because, at that time migration is pretty normal?

@@gimyuwon Was it more common at that time? There seem to be certain time periods when humans migrated more than others. -There was Genghis Khan and the Mongol/Turkic invasions that displaced indo-Europeans from parts of Central Asia around 1200 AD and significantly decimated populations in Persia and India. Prior to that Austronesians displaced Australo-Melanesians in SE Asia starting about 5,000 years ago. -500 Years ago, Western Europeans began conquering the Americas, Australia and South Africa. -I believe Bantus invaded lands traditionally occupied by the SanKhois 2-3000 years ago. So the Bantu and Austronesian expansion sort of overlap.

@@carlinthomas9482 Well, 5,000 years ago. Civilization are pretty much just developing at that time.

@@gimyuwon Some civilizations such as the Sumerians and those in the Indus Valley were thriving at the time. Also the migration began 5,000 years ago and continued in spurts until at least 700 AD. Even today Papuans and Indonesians clash.

The displacement happened within the last 1000 years as Chinese migrants moved out of China, followed by European colonization. If you look at the walls of ancient Khmer and Champa temples they documented many of the wars that were going on. The Chinese had been fighting wars against indigenous Vietnamese for over 1000 years when the French arrived. Northern Vietnam was defacto an extension of China and practiced Chinese culture. Southern Vietnam had all the ancient temples of the indigenous Khmer and Champa empires. Taiwan was also colonized by the Japanese and Chinese and both groups decimated the aboriginal inhabitants. So no, this displacement is recent not ancient. And of course we know the Europeans in the Philippines and Dutch East Indies had their own policies that promoted displacement.

What do you mean by “aslian of peninsular"? And is this related to Austroasiatic languages?

Dayaks land*

Interesting. Will you share some more?

Sorry but where did you learn about "Austroasiatic DNA also found in Indus Valley around Rakhigarhi, Haryana"?

​@@zhreyazThe Mundas people were present there before the Aryan colonialists and Tibet-borma

miền nam có nguồn gốc từ quảng nam

tôi là người việt là người gốc quảng nam đà nẵng lãnh thổ từng của người chăm

lãnh thổ của người chăm từ quảng bình xuống tới bình thuận đó bạn tham chí trong lịch sử khi chúa Nguyễn kêu gọi vào miền nam khai hoang lập nghiệp lúc đó việt nam đang bị chia cắt đất nước những người từ quảng bình đến bình thuận đã vào miền nam ở và đã kết hôn với một số ít người Khmer lúc đó người Khmer ở rất ít

@@HaiLe-zf2uq once the china reclaim it territory in Vietnam then there will be a very few Vietnamese .

@@kdamprae4236 việt nam mà đòi lại lãnh thổ Campuchia là Campuchia chỉ toàn người việt ở thôi , nói cho mà biết người miền nam việt nam sẽ không cho Campuchia đòi lại đất sau , mặc dù việt nam hết chiến tranh rồi là người kinh gốc quảng nam đà nẵng thật là kỳ khi ước mong của tôi là đi nhập để bảo vệ đất nước của mình và bảo vệ hoàng sa và trường sa của việt nam 🇻🇳 Campuchia hãy nhớ một điều chúng tôi sẽ lấy lại lãnh thổ Campuchia

lol its because of Indian traders coming to the areas.

@Kush Kunte i dont think so. Pakistan maybe, but India due to its dominant Hindu-Buddhist culture looks very Asian to me. I dont know how India looks middle eastern and central asian to you. By your logic Malaysia and Indonesia would be middle eastern and Philippines will be European lol.

@@amlans5314 lol why so many indians like to link them with the orientals?¡ culturally southeast asia except north vietnam was heavily influence by indic culture that associated with Hindu-Buddhist But racially No, here's the clip of the oriental dna ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0HcV177LXQM.html also Philippines before it became hispanitized it was culturally indic, some loan words derived from Sanskrit, majority of kingdoms are ruled by Rajah, 2 are sinified(buddhist) kingdom and 2 muslim state kingdom

@@javidol4150 pretty sure the imp parameter here is culture not racial. Why are you bringing the DNA argument, its irrelevant

@@amlans5314 1st of all this vid is all about khmer-viet genetics. yes in every social media platform indians always want to associate theirselves to the orientals even racially, just because they have minority of northeast indian population but actually modern north east indian are now 80% mongoloid(haplo O) probably some of them admixture of the the mainlanders. Modern Indians majority indoaryan-dravidian and more related to middle eastern, central asia and Egyptians images.app.goo.gl/nJ2Npw3uqZnitgjf7 The first commentor didn't mention culture, infact modern southeast asia is now more connected to east asia with lil mix western influence due to European expansion in the 1600's just like malaysia, Indonesia and Philippine old script was brhamic script replaced by english script en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baybayin and vietnam were using chinese script before replaced by French inspired script

kalo di liat dari banyaik Indonesian dna di youtube,, org Jawa dan sunda punya gen Austroasiatic Yg dilabel " thai/cambdian " sgt tinggi, sedangkan melayu dan sumatera kebanayakan Austronesia ketimbang Austroasitic dan 23andme Indonesia malah satu grup dgn thai,cambodian, laos dan myamnar sementara kita tahu idnonesia adalah Austronesia dan malahan Austronesia adalah Filipina dan org2 Kepualauan Pasifik

@@kireinadesune2607 bener kalo nggak salah jawa,sunda,bali persentasi austroasiaticnya sekitar 55% sedangkan austronesianya 35%, pernah baca gitu kalo orang austroasiatic migrasi ke indo jauh sebelum austronesian. Terus ketika austronesia datang & bercampur orang orang di pulau jawa mulai menggunakan bahasa austronesia. Kasusnya mirip sama kyk orang fiji sih, DNA austronesianya lebih dikit dr pd Melanesia tapi mereka pake bahasa austronesia sekarang.

@@vianized5248 yups, ibarat nya jawa,bali dan sunda masuk austronesia agak lucu karena budaya dan baju tradiisonal cenderung mirip bgt sama thai dan kamboja .. mungkin para ahli setuju kalau dimasukin ke Austronesia karena bahasa, makanya tidak bisa bohong DNA hampir smua austroasiatic diatas rata2 .Austroasitic tuh org orang2 suku asli yunan.. yg migrasi ke vietnam, kamboja , thailand, myanmar ..

@@vianized5248 kasusnya sama seperti orang-orang austroasiatic dan austronesian yang berbahasa "ana, antum, afwan, na'am"

@@failedindonesianpainter6539 aduh bro, kalo austronesia-austroasiatic masih mending masih ada DNAnya bener", nah kalo yang pake ana antum, kebanyakan bahkan ga ada darah arab.

Vietnam's destiny has never depended on Cambodia. On the contrary, for hundreds of years of history, Vietnam intervened in Cambodia's internal situation, helped Cambodia fight against Thailand, and even ruled Cambodia from 1834 to 1841.

We are the Baiyue people, and how have you helped us survive? you lie

Very interesting. Thanks

Yes, balinese javanese is half austroasiatic. But i think kuy not sound similiar o them

8:37 Batak toba, Malay, bidayuh, Dayak ,malay(sumatra), Sundanese, Javanese ....don't Fitght. if doing a DNA test, they have autrosiatic balanced (thaicombodia) between autronesia (indonesia, malaysia, filipino) or more autrosiatic (Thaicombodia)

@Kardus Susu not all kradia

@Kardus Susu Plus, thinking about intermixing amongst Kradai and Austroasiatic people will make it easier to understand why there is Thai/ Cambodian DNA in many Indonesians and Malaysians.

@@nowyouhaha7011 Javanese, Sundanese, and Balinese are actually like 70% Austroasiatic and 30% Austronesian. Sumatrans (Batak, Indonesian Malays, and other people native to Sumatra) tho are still like 70% Austronesian and 30% Austroasiatic on average. Dayak Indonesians are like 60% Austronesian and 40% Austroasiatic. Mentawai and Nias (two of ethnic groups living in small islands west the island of Sumatra) are almost pure Austronesian, so the argument about all western Indonesian tribes are 50-50 Austronesian and Austroasiatic is wrong, most people/tribes living in Sumatra (the most western island in Indonesia) are actually dominant in Austronesian genes.

Listen intermarriage between Kinh and other ethnics group didn't exist in ancient time. If you think the Dai Viet just march down south only to marry or assimilate them then you are really innocent. The mixture only happend in this mordern time, to know more you should study about history not a conclusion of a youtuber explaination about your own people.

Northern Vietnamese and Southern Vietnamese didn't have much differences. The only identical difference is the color of skin of Southern people might be darker due to the hot and many hours of sunlight weather.

Trà Ảo Tưởng true but they have some different in racial dual to different diets. My mom is southern my dad is northern. Everyone think my mom some what Thai or Laos.

@@gonkong5638 There are many Northern Viets look like Thais or Philippines too. Remember that Vietnam's location is a mixed pot so we will surely have different appearances.

@Gon Kong I'm north vietnamese 100%. All of my family are living in the north. And I used to had light skin. But when I come to live in Saigon, I become darker. It is just about weather. Even my family also have brown people. Kinh and Khmer people are not only different by their skins but also their faces. You should come to Sóc Trăng, Bạc Liêu..., west south provinces, you will see the diffence of Kinh and Khmer people even if Kinh people don't have light skin.

I saw that too. Never expected to hear his name on a MatPat video.

Different case with Indonesian and Malaysian. In the western world (US, UK), most of us live in Muslim Neighborhood and interacting more with Middle Eastern, Bangladeshi or Pakistani. While the Christian Indonesian or Malaysian (e.g: Rich Chigga) is more attached to other Asian in the US or other western countries. You should note that both Indonesian and Malaysian are genetically Asian as other Southeast Asian like Filipinos and Cambodian. We are not Middle Eastern or South Asian although majority of us are Muslim. Fyi this is based on my own experiences as Indonesian in Overseas. I'd been studied in UK for 4 years, and yeah i lived in Muslim Neighborhood and i interacted more with Malaysian (of course), Pakistani, Indian, and Middle Eastern than let say Black British or even other Asian like Filipino, Chinese, Thai, Japanese or Korean

sounds more like an american culture of colorism

xXxSkyViperxXx yes, the creator of the video and I are both Americans so I didn’t feel the need to mention the country

That's not entirely accurate. According to Pew Research Center, 73% of Asian American adults today are immigrants. We can divide these immigrants into 2 groups: 1) Those who came to America as students/professionals from stable conditions back home 2) Those who came to America as refugees from war-torn countries. Dark skinned Asian Americans like Indians and Filipinos generally come from STABLE circumstances and families back home. They immigrated to the U.S. for the same reason light skinned Asian do -- to study or work. In fact, Filipino and Indian Americans earn some of the highest median incomes in the country. They generally have no problem assimilating in white society. By contrast, Asian Americans who DO have a hard time assimilating are usually poor refugees such as Hmongs, Cambodians, Burmese, Lao, and some Vietnamese, most of whom escaped war or genocide in their mother countries. Their difficulty in assimilation stems primarily from their poor socioeconomic status upon arrival, not their skin color (although I'm sure they probably faced discrimination, too). In recent years, their median incomes have increased dramatically relative to the national median income, nearly matching it. As expected, Asian refugees who immigrated to America more RECENTLY, such as Mongolians and Burmese, earn a lower median income that Asian refugees who arrived earlier. With time, they will probably catch up, as well.

That's a good observation. I'm Cambodian & Thai & grew up in black neighborhoods with other Cambodians. We mostly got along & were harmonious. That was 40 years ago. We're still friends with everyone from the neighborhood. Anyone who was a refugee had no money & were poor. It took a long time for us to get out of poverty. Education helped but some are still in poverty/working class. In my own experience, there have been opportunities where I have been able to assimilate well but at the same time, I have faced discrimination at work even til this day. I have medium/light skin now but I used to be dark as a child.

Yup.. a quarter munda here. Would love to know more about em.

@@DraykeSax-Mac bro why Munda people in india look like Indians only but they should look like Chinese

@@songoku-jj2to Probably because the East Eurasian component in their DNA ranges from about 15 - 35 ish percent depending on the tribe? The rest of it is either AASI or West Eurasian.

@@DraykeSax-Mac so only Munda tribe came from outside or all adivasis came from outside and what is the religion of adivasis and if they are hindu then which category they are pandit thakur or dalit I am very confused it means they are outsiders

@@songoku-jj2to Well, depends on how far back you look. Technically everyone has come from outside. The only difference is when. Austro Asiatic migrations took place about 4000 - 5000 years ago from Southeast Asia. Since then, these tribes have been in South Asia. As for being hindu, depends again on how you define 'hindu' and 'hinduism'. If you mean any religious practice that is 'native' to South Asia, then yes, Adivasis are 'hindu'. But a lot of tribes are followers of animistic faiths. Munda tribes are known to follow Sarnaism. They are traditionally not part of mainstream Hinduism or the Caste System. As far as my understanding goes, post independence they were classified as Scheduled Tribe which is another term for Adivasi instead of being part of the Scheduled Caste, Other Backward Castes or General Caste categories.

really? turkey tv show sound like korean and japanese although they have difference meaning.

không có của ấn Độ

Lai Ấn Độ da đen mà mày bảo tốt?

We Vietnamese have our own national anniversary. It is the death anniversary of Hung Vuong. we are one of the 100 tribes baiyue . We do not share a common ancestor with the Chinese or the Khmer. Please do not misrepresent

@@vanthanhnguyen9184 🤣,da đen châu phi,mà tốt,bó tay🤣

việt nam là người có gen đông á,qua 1 video,nó biến dân mình thành người châu phi,😂

To know more about Cossack, you need to know first about the Tatars, Nogai and Crimean Khaganate

@Existentialist Guy Not all but majority of them.

Javanese Balinese Sundanese you mean? yeah, I am Balinese and we are basically Austroasiatic people who speak Austronesian but influence by Sanskrit like Cambodia while Vietnamese influence by Chinese, interestingly still has similar words Balinese come:mai Cambodian come: makoi Balinese morning: tengai Cambodian morning: tenghay Balinese here: dini Cambodian here: thi'ni

Yes you are brother!! Welcome to the family.

@@Adam-nu9gu Civilization started in Warm Climates such as Egypt, India and Mesopotamia. Europeans adopted Farming after Neolithic peoples migrated and spread it to Europe. Scandinavia was one of the last places to adopt Farming, due to it being too Cold and too far from the Middle East.

If you lived in such a fertile landscape, then you wouldn't be a hunter gatherer (unless you're Negrito or Aboriginal). You would be erecting cities and civilization with the help of agriculture. That's exactly what Southeast Asians did after they displaced the Aboriginals about 4000 to 5000 years ago and introduced rice agriculture to the region, facilitating the development of more complex societies. That's where you get the Ban Chiang culture of Thailand and the Dong Son culture of Vietnam. That's where you get cities like Angkor in Cambodia, Bagan in Myanmar, and Sukhothai in Thailand. That's where you get great engineering projects like Angkor Wat and the West Baray reservoir in Cambodia, Borobudur Temple in Java, and Thatbyinnyu Temple and the Schwedagon Pagoda in Myanmar. That's where you get huge and mysterious megalithic works like Gunung Padang in Indonesia and the Plain of Jars in Laos. Not coincidentally, these things appeared in Southeast Asia after rice agriculture was introduced by the ancestors of modern day Southeast Asians.

@@jcdenton1635 They weren’t “displaced” they were absorbed into the migrators as you can see by their genetics the same thing happened all over the world to the hunter gatherer of southern Africa, Europe, and obviously south east asia.

@@lif3andthings763 You're not wrong, but geographic displacement certainly took place. Negritos still exist, after all. In any case, hunter-gatherer DNA only comprises the minority of the DNA of modern Southeast Asians and Europeans. Most of the DNA of modern Southeast Asians and Europeans originates from ancient Chinese and Anatolian farmers, respectively, although they weren't Han or Turkish at the time.

Ah yes bcs all for southeast Asian are hunter gatherers

Thank you. I am Mon from Burma.

I’m mon but I look a bit south asian with more facial hair