Its so strange, in peacetime we look at these beautiful engineering marvels with aw and say "how cool are these" but how easily we could look at them with terror.
This is absolutely amazing. The amount of work you've put into editing and searching for high quality clips is clearly evident, and the outcome is fantastic. You've become one of my favorite channels with your videos. Keep up the good work!
MiG-31, a plane developed in the 70s, went into service in the 80s and is still the fastest (in service) interceptor in the World. Now, that's some engineering!
Kanwer Vikram the F-35 was such a poor example it’s all a mix of Government corruption, bureaucracy and over dependence ya could have used the F-117 something that was successful
@Jeff Clark Well, don't want to argue about who has better equipment, but i disagree that america owned or owns aviation business. Maybe, it did in 90-00s, because Soviet Union died. Whatever. I'm writing this comment, because you underestimate soviet intelligence services. As West, as East would know about each others top secret stuff, from the moment that stuff left the engineering section and went to production. Even if we are talking about building small serial prototypes. So f117 wasn't such shoking discovery. Now, you can't even imagine how many perspective, i dare to say, revolutionary projects were buried when Soviet Union was killed. Killed by that famous reformer,Gorbachev, and his team. So his words 'we lost' was de-facto his plan.
@Jeff Clark Surely, I understand that goverment won't tell me the truth through mass media. But again, my family has a huge military experience. Inside Army, Air Force and military industrial complex. And from their experience, from all info available to me ( like enthernet, books, reports and etc.) I'm judging that americans didn't dominate in avionics, so did the soviets. I know that there were some directions, where one country was better than other. But if we look overall we can't say that USA or USSR was leader. It's like compare planes, without counting the doctrine they were build under. Like key on speed and usefull thrust-weight ratio or key on supermaneuverability. Maybe i didn't understand your words proparly? I wrote you, because you said that USA owned the business. That was the first reason. Second, F-117 shock and Gorbachev theme. Talking about F-117 again, from what i, or more correctly, my relatives, inside the miitary, know, F-117 didn't make such crazy terror as you said. Yeah, it was something new and unseen, yeah, there were dozens of rumors about it, but still it wasn't something sudden for everyone. Ooh, you shouldn't have mentioned T-95. My father worked for Uralvagonzavod. He worked in crew, that was testing gun - 2A83 and fire controll systems. As he regarded, project was raw, but it was 100 % a step forward. And as he used to say, they would put him in service, 7-10 years from start of the program, if goverment would have invested properly and had intrest in it. P.S. Sorry for my bad english and punctuation, I used it, as we use it in russian.
@Jeff Clark Hello, 1) where is t 95? In the same place where USSR is... in history. Country was destroyed, new born Russia didn't need costly projects. People inside the goverment didn't need Russia to have perspective stuff. T-14 has gained some details from t 95, so we can say that its his inheritor. 2) Ok, my fault. By using words like 'terror' and etc. I wanted to emphasize how huge the surprise was for soviets, as you say. 3) Well, russians aren't so soft. But it's easy to get in anger when you know the truth. But whatever you do, you can't pass it to anyone. Especially americans. 4) Nice photos. Greatgrand. imgur.com/gallery/c4ctVPA Relative. imgur.com/gallery/NAW9dl7 Platoon imgur.com/gallery/ZtgqXzK My only relative that served in Air Force. My grandad. Strategic Bomber Pilot. Aviation imgur.com/a/3RSbx0M
@@jukebox_heroperson3994 Yeah, some, but that doesnt shed some light about russia's ability to maintain all those ka 52's let alone maintain all those military, as we have seen more and more about russia not being able to maintain their military.
How long is it gonna “maintain” those Leopards and Bradleys bro? How about those MRAPs and Ukrainian manpower? Never mind I forgot, deep down you don’t give a flying fuck about some slav dying for your “noble crusade”
In my opinion, russian vehicles are many separate amazing designs crammed into a messy whole while western designs are a mixture of mediocre components (besides the engines) put together in an ideal manner.
Gotta love all the bozos in comments who came to act like they know something because they've seen few tweets. To all the other people to came to enjoy some sexy flying beasts and Major's supreme taste in music. Best day i wish and keep on keeping on. (;
Recent events show what happens when almost every first-world country on the planet all fund and arm an Army. Even morons can pull a trigger, they would have been swallowing Ivan's load long ago otherwise Remember kids, war is only bad if it's not NATO or the US doing it.
Probably because the ideal thing is to use drones which can do most of the important test while minimizing the cost of losing a SU 30. after the drones do their part then the heavier equipment will probably come in and do the heavy lifting
Eh, they have been doing well enough for what they are. Look at NATO performance in the Balkans and then compare the air defense of Serbia to Ukraine and its foreign aid. Iraq was an anomaly.
@MajorSamm , just discovered your channel and bingewatching , especially due to the phenomenal good taste of music you have , I am a dj and have discovered some crazy shit that became imprinted in my brain
@@beltempest4448 lmao go over to ukraine right now, you guys are being fed what is known as the 'fog of war' coming from a military family, they know it
I discovered your channel a few days ago. This is some great content you're putting up man. I get a war aesthetics vibe from it, but I personally like it better. Keep up the great work
Those "Frogfoots" look even better and way more unique in real life. Video games dont do them ANY justice at all. Sidenote: Isn't the "Frogfoot" supposed to be Russian version of the American's "Warthog" tank killer?
@@Jupiter__001_ can break the sound barrier when it isn't loaded with arms and ammo, so if this thing puts its payload and rounds on target it can zoom right on back to base
@@jephthaholt Yeah, that's what I thought. I wasn't sure whether it was always supersonic or just unloaded; thanks for the info. Pretty good thinking by Sukhoi, as the extra speed on RTB effectively increases time over target and sortie rate.
Neutral. He made edits on all sides and this edit and he probably feel no remorse or anything. By the way guy literally have Imperial Russian Monarchy as his YT pfp
@@mr.axolotl7727 Not great. Many of us said that it wouldn't be that simple. However it is going much better than what's been going on over in Russia with the Wagner schizolympic episode.
@@alexanderstenmark8838bros will really watch a PMC take over major population centers during an open revolt against the government and think stuff is going to plan
@@SJ23982398 aye, hit me up when Ukraine "wins". After all Russia is so incompetent right ? I don't see how Ukraine can't win due to Russia's incompetence to such extent. Hell they should've already won since Russia has no air support, fighting with rifles and tanks from WW2. Right ? Don't worry I'll be waiting for Ukraine to win.
@@greggo7371 to feel better just imagine a certain Ukrainian mig 29 screaming through the skyline cleaving through Russian aircraft with missiles and guns blazing while listening to this. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dZBoiW460nU.html
what do you mean? Any flagship piece of equipment is vulnerable depending on the circumstances, bunch of damaged and shot down KA-52s and SU-25s was an expected outcome, they still achieved their goal of air supremacy and destroyed the capacities of the Ukrainian air force. Ffs Yugoslav army during the Kosovo war managed to snatch a few shots on the 2 apache helicopters and crippled their usage during that war, during Bosnian war Serbs shot down F16s and Harriers with stingers and scored the kill on F117 in 99 with the obsolete S-125 which in no means discredited the NATO's air supremacy and air domination just like this shit happening there is no way to discredit the Russian air force, but I guess to each their own holds a higher value.
@@mightymo897 while they did succeed in that area of "crippling down Ukraine's Air Force", they still lacked air supremacy because of the Western-supplied Ukrainian air defense that managed to secure most Ukrainian regions from Russian aircraft. I mean if the Russians did manage to hold on their supremacy then we would have seen many videos about their aircraft flying above Ukraine and destroying the Ukrainians yet these days we never saw any if not they were shot down by Ukrainians.
Every time I rewatch one of your vids I instantly want to give a thumbs up only to see that I already did 😂 wish I could do it over and over again! Great job Majorsamm. EDIT: Whoops third comment without noticing 😑
@@LiteralCrimeRave Yeah another American boomer fantasy, doesn’t know jackshit about 4th gen aircraft and worships the flying garbage that is the f35. Make sure you leave more of your own tax money for Israel.
you know i used to be impressed by these sorts of videos .. still love the music and the visuals ... but now it just makes me sad because i know what these machines are for and the pain they cause and it just takes all the fun out of it... stupid little humans...
lol who wouldve thought it was easier to fly over Syrian fighters with nothing to shoot back instead of anywhere not just north of crimea in Ukraine. Mostly missing in action now
@@z............ You guys should have done that while ago before 30,000 of Russian soldiers have died. But no, not even single Tupolev bomber is being used because you can't.
@@z............ dude the Google translate "Russian" act isn't fooling anyone, half of the shit you've written is lost in translation from the way you worded it on the English side. Just speak English for Christ sake.
@@z............ And I don't get why are you talking about the oil price. I'm just asking where is your country's amazing Tupolev bombers? Where are T-14 Armatas that you guys always brag about? Where is Slava class battleship Moscow that Russians feel proud of? Those can be used before Russian forces lost "30,000"of their personnels
I didn't want to be one of those RU-vid people that flaunted their patreon on their videos or in the description but my patreon link has been quietly sitting on my channel info for a couple weeks now.
@@BlackWolf9988 They're in a much better state considering the pullout was after 20 years of successful occupation. I'd love to see the Russian ground forces occupy something other than a washing machine.
@@BlackWolf9988 we (the US) are really good at invading. COIN sucks ass though, we essentially got tired and left cus it was too costly and annoying. russians cant even invade tho lmao
@@gato815 when was the last time the US had a conventional war? Early iraq maybe. Other than that the korea war which was at first a success but when the chinese came they started to lose. The US definitely lost in the middle east no matter how you put it. Not only that but they wasted like 5 trillion dollars and 20 years to lose in just a few weeks. And now the US is throwing the EU under the bus and cripples its economy for some corrupt eastern european country most americans couldn't even find on a map before the war. (im german)
@@gato815 Compare Afghanistan and Ukraine, mmm ... The Russian leadership is idiots, it was impossible to occupy the entire territory of Ukraine in a short time, given the defamatory doctrine of the Russian army, poor funding, unmotivated personnel, corruption and idiocy of the generals on the one hand, and the powerful support of Ukraine by the bloc NATO and the EU, timely mobilization measures on the other hand. Yes, even without the support of NATO, it would be quite difficult. Senseless bloodshed
Calling Russias military "modern" is kind of an oxymoron since much of their equipment is cold war era stuff that sometimes hasn't even been modernized. They're still using AK-74s aas and other stuff that dates back to the 70s and 80s, their mavy is horrendously outdated, and many of their ships and tanks arent even serviceable, they're mothballed and rusting. They have extremely limited cutting edge peices of equipment brought out for parades but most of it is older then the soldier using it since it wasmt even the best when it was built in the 70s
Very true. I bet you could invade Ukraine with those equipment if they could fund it, even when old. But it seems Russia is not aiming or can't win the war inside an acceptable amount of loss. But since all the equipment is old and rusty, you can not win a decisive victory war. You can only acquire a stalemate as we are seeing.
@@adamhebert504 There was one of those uploaded 4 days before this one, I haven't stopped making them, I've just switched to making a mix or short videos and longer videos to keep a 'consistent' upload schedule
@@MajorSamm sorry if i sounded cunty but im actually really interested in that if there is any new footage from the russians peoples in southwestern russia (east ukraine). I know there has been a cease fire for a while now, but still, if you can find any footage that would be cool but otherwise keep up the amazing work
@@DogeickBateman Mexican? Are you mentally diseased or what? There's no such thing as the letter "ç" in Spanish. And yeah the strikes carried out that day were indeed successful, want it or not. Why is it always the dumb people that end up defending the banderite scum?
