Overwatch 2 Tiktoks that burn your steak for dinner 

The downside to it that nobody says though is that it adds more sound to you, making it easier for the enemy team to hear you and because it has range, it allows the enemy team to see you coming around a corner sooner. Also, it clips through some objects which allows an enemy to see which direction you moving when in a one versus one situation. It’s gotten me killed four times now, which isn’t a lot, but it’s more than enough to make me change that habit.

Ninja Brig is scary

Wow you’re a regular Albert Epstein

If somebody actually ask me why I do it I would just say "Look at my ammo", the only thing you lose by hitting is your stealth

This is true I can't count the number of times I've gotten an elimination on a wild tracer while engaging zenyatta.

once had a game where it was just me a mercy and a symettra, our entire other team left one after another before the penalty had gone, so the other team let me get a 5k with mercy for the play of the game.

It feels bad when your team leaves, it feels great when the other team agrees to draw. Chill or Kill could never be that great

I just started playing overwatch and this happend a ton when i was in bronze/silver Lol

Same! And also asking if smn needs any achievements they wanna do in the meanwhile. It's always nice when a throw away game can still be turned into smth pleasant n fun :)

It's funnier the word you're looking for👍

More fun or funnier fyi

@@diogoferreira7427 Thx

@@kingkrispy5289 Thx

tf2 gamer yay

@@stupidsniper5216 You make it sound like I'm saying one game is better than the other.

It should be a full laser like in the greek pantheon event

@@aguyontheinternet8436 That is certainly also an option. I'm just suggesting one that I saw somewhat work elsewhere.

Widow and Sniper are actually really comparable in most discussions about 1 shots in their games. However something FishstickOnAStick made me realize is that map design is equally important as making balance changes for that character. Widow is much more manageable on maps with multiple routes to an objective, or having things that break LoS, I believe one of the biggest reasons Widow's balance is being called into question is because of our current map pool (shamabli, numbani, havana, junkertown, and circuit royal). These maps really point out the flaws of the map makers in my opinion, as these maps are in desperate need of a rework, OW1 maps deserve a bit of a pass as they were made for a different gameplay experience, however royal and shambali don't get that same sentiment in my opinion. One of Sniper's biggest issues is actually the exact same thing, such as with maps like Borneo and Wutville. One shots in gaming is a really big issue I don't think can really be perfectly solved, but things like map design is one of the most important things to help us get to that point. However I'd say Widow is a lot more balanced than Sniper from personal experience.

There is one specific quote from Jayne that I always bring up when discussing shot calling: A call should ALWAYS entail action. It should not entail thinking. With notable exceptions being calling out a piece of information that holds high value purely from the point of being acknowledged - such as seeing Reaper tp behind your team, or a Tracer flanking, etc. But a bad call is saying "Ana no nade" if there is nobody who is actively capable of contesting her without risking their own positioning for example. A call should always have the goal of actively changing a team mate's play, and there should be as little info as possible up for debate/thinking, rather than acting. If you call "Ana no nade" it should mean that Ana should be focused in that very instant - or pressure should be applied specifically where a Nade would otherwise keep pressure from happening (like a Rein v Rein duel). Calls need to be specific, and demand an action. If there is no specific demand for action, and your call is just relaying general information, then in 9/10 cases it's only crowding the comms and leading to potential misunderstandings about what you actually want to happen when you made the call in the first place. So always be specific, direct, and don't rely on interpretation to achieve your desired results. At least not until you're high GM and can somewhat expect people to know what's sensible to do on their own.

​@@Real_MisterSir yos!

Yeah flats really dropped the ball on that one, didn’t even hear him out

I think it’s funny that he goes “this sounds like just talking to make content” while making a reaction video…

yeah pretty bad take from flats. I get that comp players take qp as a chill time but some people just play qp, doesn't mean they don't want to win or have a good experience.

Big thing isn't winning as much as the bad experience bit. For example, the start of OW2 where you'd be put in lobbies with masters players despite being in gold was completely awful, and should've have been a regular thing where it's just who's masters player is better. However, if you get curb-stomped because the people on your team are just playing for fun when the other team is sweating, you're just gonna have to deal with it. Big thing is minimizing the amount of things like that, because there's no real prevention for that kind of stuff instead of just shutting down games and increasing queue times, both of which made the game suffer before.

Yea.. Try having a leaver in Push and you most likely lost that game unless you already had a major advantage. And pray to god it wasn't a duo stack that left the game lol. Also those ending fights where one guy just leaves while the 4 others are fighting in overtime - and you lose because you were in a 4v5 and the backfill has zero motivation to give it their all (plus the odd 20 ish seconds it takes for a backfill to get into the fight). I've lost so many last fights due to a rando leaving at the end and the backfill coming too late and too unmotivated. And I've been that backfil myself more times than I care to cound - always just a case of insta locking Tracer and rushing to point for no reason other than to throw more bodies to contest it cus I have no insight in what comps are used or how dire the situation is etc. It always sucks no matter what side of the team you're on. And then there's the fights where half your team leaves after 1 lost fight, and now you get 3 fresh players with zero ult economy and the enemy team rolling their snowball for the majority of the game, while you just try to stabilize the fights which is already hard in qp as it is, even without leavers.

Yea a lot of these golden nugget lines have come from- or filtered through Jayne at one point or another. He was such a key to OW's old sense of competitive mindset and the grind for improvement. Wish we could have him back with regular streams

he literally stopped watching when he didnt like what he said without hearing his explanation. you were that's what's the guy said and also push away older heroes in favour of the new ones which is more understandable.

@@commandogaming7853 yeah and here's the thing i get what he means I play apex and literally hal etc pro players kinda got mad that catalyst released when it was around a tournament was happening and they didn't you know like extend the date whatever like here's the thing I'll listen to them first then if there fully speaking nonsense then I'll roast or go next like

its really similar to what league is doing with champs and what destiny 2 does with its guns

@@ajm0208 yeah idk how the content is going over there but thats what he might be saying where there going to well fast with dropping heroes while also being able to balance the game and give other content maybe

@@ajm0208 destiny 2 is iffy with that, the first time they did it was artificially sunsetting the weapons giving a cap on the power of older weapons. now sure yeah they abandoning older sets but that's only legendaries and even then they change the archetypes of weapons so that old ones get buffed or nerfs.

And people say they want 2cp back. People are only understanding now how oppressive a sniper can be and map design definitely matters. This is why I always hated Wutville.

It's been a sec since I've played TF2, but snipers in that game are 100% worse and the ways they balance him (red dot) are only there because there can be more than 1 sniper at a time. There's almost always multiple of them, they don't have to charge their headshots and they can stand in spawn and have insane LOS from there for most maps. Honestly, Widow is nothing compared to Sniper. All the dot tells you is to go a different way, only to run into another corner a different red dot and sniper are holding. One Widow keeps things from really going bad, at least. Like, if you're a Tracer, you don't have to worry about a 2nd Widow watching the Widow you're afters back like Scout does. It's just too different of a set up for it to be comparable, imo. The only thing from TF2 that I'd add is her scope shaking when she gets hit.

Paladins has that problem lol

Exactly what he meant

so talking about non existant problem

Having widow be kinda like vantage from apex could be a way to change her. I personally haven’t even decided if I like this idea that much or not, but widow can have it so that her first shot places a marker like you said and amplifies the damage of her next shot to make it a one hit kill from full health. Again idek if I like this but it is a way to change her and find some sort of middle ground that adds more counterplay to one shots while still rewarding said skill shots.

The thing is, nerfing her would be like Nerfing Soljourn all over again. What is stopping mercy from Pocketing her, and having a Mercy Pocket makes her immortal with no weakness given that Sombra can’t kill, Mercy is a direct counter to Winston since her healing out heals his damage and Dva is not a viable Tank in High Ranks (as far as I’m aware). Like you are unironically made Widow more broken with 0 counter.

​@@chronenojysk5107 simple nerf her to the ground the she's like roadhog the game is better when she's not viable

@@chronenojysk5107 yeah that's actually true, I didn't really think about how a change like that would be crazy strong

Why not make it gradual damage like Ana's? Obviously it's gonna tick down faster but it might be survivable sometimes

Right? The idea that QP is just the place you go to "fuck around" is ridiculous. Ranked or not, you should play the game the way it is intended. Sure you don't need to go all hard out and shit in QP, but just because it's QP doesn't mean you should be able to just dick around and ruin the fun for everybody else.

Well the reason it is so dumb is because with the new hero coming every other season that won't be a problem. Also I don't think r6 suffers from it as they recognized a bit of realism had to go as they added some sci-fi. I think they can reach it though but hopefully they will then start making more maps.

​@@lesliejacoby9137theres a bit of realism then theres fucking hologram bs

@@sm0ky12 well I could see humans reaching that point in technology but what I don't see is a man based off pure strength alone breaking through wooden walls, support beams, and jumping with like a 60 inch vertical then pulling himself up (maybe you could do one but one person can't do all especially with figure needed). At the same time though its not straight up unbelievable (except orxy).

Sure if they were talking about league. Overwatch doesn't even have 40 characters

fr, if they dont have any genuine new ideas they shouldn't be making new heroes. sojourn is the biggest offender though, she's a direct copy of soldier and has wreaked havoc on the game since release

​@intorsion and kiriko is the definition of power creep

​@@intorsion sojourn wreaking havoc has nothing to do with her soldier similarities, it's a little odd to even make that point

@@ItsJustKoyaMan the point is that it’s clear blizzard finds it hard to make original characters nowadays, and either way they’re busted

That can happen?

that kind of just sounds like a worse ashe tbh. without widow one shot, there is no reason to choose her over ashe, since ashe has better abilities, fire rate, and survivability.

@@mentarium didn’t think of it like that. I suppose you are right.

@@mentarium ashe has massive dmg fall off and I wouldn't say survivability because grapple takes you further.

@@skullkid9830 grapple is slower, takes more time to activate, and has a much longer cd. grapple is a 12 second cd that takes you as far as a winston leap, which means it doesn't help much for most cases

Thank you for clarifying he's gay.

Lol. A lot of people don't like it bc of that, personally I think it's a game where the best counterpick wins, but if you gonna rage against why play it?

Cedar, redwood, birch, what kind of stake we talking about?