"Good movie plot isn't it?" been done already, Leiji Matsumoto's works include the story of a planet that was ejected from it's system and to survive the people of that world transferred their consciousness into machine bodies. Eventually the planet gets captured by our Sun and it becomes our 10th planet (it was written in the 70s so Pluto was still the 9th planet) but it orbits the Sun every thousand years. The story detailing this is "Queen Millennia". It's good sci fi set in the "futuristic" year of 1999.
Imagine a civilization evolving on an incredibly isolated rogue planet in the void between galaxies. The only thing they ever know is pure darkness, and their own world. Given how much the Sun and other stars have shaped our civilization and it's cultures, religions etc... it's crazy to imagine what such a different people might be like.
Perhapse a rogue planet orbiting a black hole. The force of gravity on it could be enough to keep it warm like how the moons of jupiter are heated up by it's gravity. Then you could have the energy needed for life to begin growing and thriving. Life that has only known darkness and perhaps some light that comes from any magma that seeps from the core. I think I just got an idea for a cool short story.
@@MewPurPur Not necessarily, we have to be careful not to be biased thinking only of life as we know it. There's no reason that a silicon based lifeform couldn't exist that has a resistance to much more extreme temperature ranges. A lifeform that is chemosynthetic instead of photosynthetic, that could have an incredibly slow metabolism.
@@justinmcgough3958 i was just about to say something about blanets! i've wondered before what an intelligent civilization would be like on a black hole orbiting planet
Of all the science and physics youtubers, I don't think someone attractive just reacting to someone else's quality videos is "bringing information... to the masses"
Fun fact in 2012 a giant flair came Frome the sun. Powerful enough to cause all electronic system to shot down. Fortunately it happened on the other side of the sun ☀️
As a chemistry student I can only talk about phyics phenomenon so much. Ive always been asking myself how much of these things are actually scientific adequat. Bcs obv they have to break things down on very simple levels so that sometimes things are not factually wrong but maybe a bit too easy. So its interesting hearing other people deeper into that knowledge talking about it.
I think someone already pointed it out, but you should really watch "... And we'll do it again" from kurzgesagt. It is about how they simplify the topics to explain them
been really enjoying your videos. im a CS major and likes the ideas we used to talk about in my physics classes. its great seeing you dive in a little deeper into ideas in your videos. :)
Finally, someone that talks about atmospheric pressure in order to have liquid water. A planet doesn't only need to be in the goldilock zone of a star to harbor liquid water. You need suffcient atmospheric pressure to keep that water in a liquid state.
“Hopefully Jupiter does it’s damn job” needs to be a shirt lol just imagine a picture of earth and the planets all happy then theirs buff daddy Jupiter getting wrecked
Something I'm wondering now... what if a rogue star with just the right size passed through in just the right path. Could it capture Earth, so we orbit this new star instead of the sun? Maybe on a highly elliptical orbit, but we might be able to survive right?
Im no physicist, but I guess it would depends on the type of stars and mostly on wether their solar activity is high or not and if we are far enough while still having enough light to heat the planet (altho that could be somewhat dealt with by fusion as said Dylan).
So you have heard of the second law of thermodynamics right? Now ask yourself some questions about spacesuits and vacuums. Then if you still want to become an astrophysicist then do it, you have the profile.
Me too! Even as a kid Iwas always absolutely fascinated by the Cosmos. Thanks to Dr. Brian Cox, Dr. Michelle Thallar. I would love to make a great scientific contribution!
22:18 You know they did a video about that too? Heavy on the biology but still interesting. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4b33NTAuF5E.html Another must watch video of theirs is We Lied To You, and We'll Do It Again talking about the oversimplifications that are made to describe the various sciences/ "Don't confuse the description of a thing for the thing itself"
Kurzgesagt has another video called the "Stellar Drive". It's more upbeat and discusses a solution, how we could avoid such events like close-encounters and being hit by a supernova.
The 2012 prophecy was highly misunderstood:) the Mayans were actually referring to a new age and planetary alignment, beginning that year, not destruction. There is a new age in vernal equinox every 26,000 years. That was my understanding…I enjoy your breakdown of the video thank you!
There was a Twilight Zone episode about that. The Earth was being flung close to the sun and things were getting very hot on Earth, and then then at the end it is revealed that it was all a dream, but the reality is that the Earth is being flung OUT of the solar system and everyone is going to freeze to death. They didn't specifically SAY it, but obviously the explanation was that a black hole entered the solar system and did exactly what was described in that kurzgesagt video. I think the episode was called midnight sun. I consider that episode to be very ahead of its time because it seems to be the first time anyone had considered that to be an actual possibility.
I love physics, I like reading, watching and probably the most, thinking about it. Sadly I don't have a degree or even an allowance to study. But I don't need that, all that I need is curisioty and the fact that I will listen more instead of talking. Thank you for your videos, much greeting from germany.
And are they saying in 1 million years from now we would even exist still or not have the technology to obliterate any asteroid or object that comes near us?
yeah.... I remember it to.. The 2012 phenomenon was a range of eschatological beliefs that cataclysmic or transformative events would occur on or around 21 December 2012...the end of the world....
the 2012 movie plot is actually not a conspiracy so far fetched. but indeed very many things have to align for it to happen, but than again, many things had to align properly for us to exist and here we are. Also remember that the solid ground we live on is just a fraction of Earth, we are floating practically... Grim!
I sometimes think about how much of a nightmare would be to be caught in the middle of boöties void in a spacesuit alone thousands of light years all around of just nothing. That would be freaking terrifying.
@@valebliz You could see close stars and objects. Bööties everything is so far you would get mere pen drops of light, barely preceptible to the naked eye, if it's even perceptible at all without powerful telescopes.
Maybe not on the topic of rouge plantes, but your description of the book at the end got me thinking. What is happening to planets when their star goes supernova? Would rocky planets be striped away of atmosphere and their surface got melted? Or just would they got completely vaporized? Would gas giants get their gases blown away, their rings disintegrated, moons melted? What about asteroids and comets? What is happening to whole system and what would be left after it? Would building any kind of sanctuary on any planet of that star be even sensible as supernova could melt its surface and destroy any sign of existence of life, or even vaporize whole planet?
In theory, an advanced enough civilization on on Earth could, in such a scenario keep the Earth in orbit with the moon or other planet, using it as a rocket to drag earth back
Yeh the movie idea needs to be done. Would be highly unrealistic but it would have to be set already in some very high tech future. And of course an Ex cop which still lives by the old ways and hates everything electronic
the gravity explained as a force is "true" within the Newton Theory approximation. The space-time distortion is within the Relativity Theory. One can talk about it in bath way, you just need to explicitly say in which model you are. the relativity is more precise, but Newton works in lot of situation.
What kind of physicists says 17:00 that ocean evaporating is inevitable. Give humans a little more credit! We could strip mine sun with starlifting in future and prevent sun from going BIG CHUNGUS! Looks what we did in last 100 years in terms of technology, you think we'll do nothing in next 1 000 000 years? I can't even imagine what possible futures there are. Techno utopia? Dystopian wasteland? Same thing forever? Just imagining future makes my head spin of how many choices and outcomes there are.
We should not worry too much since 1.3 million years is a lot of time. If humans are still alive on Earth, they would have the technology to protect the planet by that time.
Maybe humanity should invest in making something that can detect freezing cold signatures just like how the police can use that tech that shows heat signatures in the helicopter, then maybe we might be able too see more in the universe.
Little question that I haven’t managed to find an answer to: Why when we represent our solar system does every planet asteroid etc are on the same « plane » and why do they all orbit the sun in the same direction ( clockwise or counterclokwise). Shouldn’t we see planet orbiting « vertically » around the sun relative to us who are apparently orbiting horizontally ( what I mean by that is like we all seem to orbit the sun equator). I’m not a physicist so I suppose there must be a reason for it but it has always seem strange to see everything that orbit the sun so orderly, all going in the same direction around the sun. In my mind the solar system should be more like a molecule with electron orbiting like a sphere around it
All objects in the solar system dont orbit the same plane exactly, but mostly do. Also: Angular Momentum. The suns rotation effects most orbiting objects and get forced into generally the same plane.
All this talk about alien life makes me want to suggest MelodySheep’s 3-part series about alien life called “Life Beyond”. It’s extremely well made, just like his video “Timelapse of the Future”. Give it a look sometime!!
well jupiter did fling things in and out i wonder if earth was actually further out and brought in during jupiters first inwards travel looking at pluto and how much ice id had made me think of this.
What if there is another planet between mars, earth and venus. And somehow it was tugged out of orbit by a rouge star and jupiter catched that planet. Isn't it a possible reason why a moon would have a liquid water beneath icy surface?
There's a lot of things further out that has more water than earth does, mainly because of how the solar system formed. The outer objects formed with ice/water already on them, while the inner planets got water after they had already formed. Solar winds stripped any of the water away from the inner planets while they were still forming, and it got here later from comets and asteroids
Not sure if the 2012 question was referring to the movie, but the "science" that causes the catastrophy in it actually is a lot more dumb and only briefly touched upon (the movie focuses more about how a survivor group manages to get through and governments prepared or it). Because of an unexplained reason (magic?), the neutrinos from the sun that normally interact rarely with matter start interacting a lot more, causing the earth's mantle to heat up, causing lots of earth-quakes, vulcanism, and in the end tsumanies the size of large mountain ranges all over the planet.
Since the moon has the pulling power to affect the tides, wouldn’t a passing star cause some serious destruction as it goes by? Earthquakes, volcanoes and tidal waves…
I'd be curious to see something on the late heavy bombardment. I take issue with this theory, I'm curious what evidence water excluded that there is for this. It seems like a far-fetched way to get water on this planet and as we have looked at many exoplanets that are orbiting VERY close to their stars who have water, also very incorrect.
Society needs to evolve to the point where we can create artificial sun's and moons and give rogue planets the rotation of earth with technology. That way we can simulate the properties of earth sun and moon, to preserve humanity and make live on rogue planets habitable with day and night cycle, gravity, and seasons. Preferably a planet with with ice, so our artificial sun could provide the warmth and light are artificial rotationg would provide day night cycle and seasons and moon would contribute to gravity and ocean. We don't always have to look for habital planets, I'm pretty sure there billions considering how many galaxies and universes there are but it would take more than a life time to reach. So unless we can create a starship that can create water and we can farm on that ship and creat artificial oxygen and travel at speed way faster than speed of light, I don't see it happening. But, if we could create habbital planets and by giving that planet a sun and moon and rotate it at the same speed of earth. That would be next level power. Also we need to invent something to deter and or destroy asteroids.
everyone think universe is flat but maybe in the future we would look at our self and see no difference in ourselves them what we see from the flat earthers
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if humans are still here in 1.3 million years, repelling asteroids and comments is not going to be a major challenge.
Life won't arise there and if it did then that is the best place, since for billions of years there are no risks from anything, since they really do not need anything given that they arose in that frozen wasteland between galaxies.
i'm wondering why it isn't talked about the event itself where the star is changing the orbit of the earth? would the change in momentum be strong and fast enough to already destroy most buildings and create massive flooding and tsunami as the water is shifting around. would be the moon affected? would he either fly away from us or would he crash down depending on where he is while the star comes close? and would the speed of rotation change and thus change the water system too? the question is not if we could survive the long lasting aftereffects of the event but the event itself and as far as i know nobody is giving "clear" answers to that.
@@niox1920 the thing i'm wondering about is that it is always a situation where that what you say is the case even if it should be highly unlikely that the other planet is affecting us in exactly that way and strength. it is like talking about the optimal cenario that is so unlikely to happen that you wouldn't even consider to make plans for that outcome if a planet would come close.
