im so sorry for you. remeber a pretty face with a ugly heart is nothing. dont love someone whos not worth for it. i know its hard to get over someone you really love. but youll have to find a way to get over it. hope u get better. @@ansiemarais2886
There is always time to scroll away and forget you've ever seen this. Click on the X. Go. Note: Even though my hope is lost, please do not go down this path by searching for the source. I promise, if you do, you won't come back. Warning: This following article may influence mental health negatively. There is always time to scroll away and forget you've ever seen this. Read at your own expense. You have been warned. - Mainstream suic1de prevention Suic*de preventionists like to hide their paternalism under the guise of protecting a suicidal person’s (or, in many cases, a suspected suic*dal person’s) “real, future self” from their “mentally ill and pathologically out of touch with reality current self." As I addressed in the previous part of my post, the view that suic*dal people are pathologically out of touch with reality is unsubstantiated. Perhaps the most vile method of suic*dal prevention is forcible psychiatric detention. In essence, this involves subjecting a suic*dal person to what would otherwise be considered abuse, violence, and kidnapping if not committed against a suic*dal person by medical authorities. Despite the 'good' intentions of medical authorities, the phenomenological experience of the detained person is that of kidnapping and bodily violation. The voice of the suic*dal person does not matter. If they try to resist, they will be violently forced into submission through either brute physical force, being tied down, or being drugged. Any other values that a suic*dal person may hold, such as bodily inviolability or autonomy, are rendered null. The indignity of being forcibly detained is considered worth it by others if it saves a life, regardless of whether the person who is being subjected to forcible detention values their life more than dignity, autonomy, and bodily inviolability. This line of thought insinuates a deep lack of respect as respect entails allowing someone to act in their own best interests in accordance with their own values and not forcing them into following their “best interests” as defined by others. This also applies to many people who are mentally ill, as mental illness does not necessarily render someone globally irrational and all of their values (besides life) null. As much as the mental health movement likes to talk about destigmatizing suic*de, there is very little that is more stigmatizing than taking away someone’s voice and violently forcing them into submission. Medical authorities have their hearts in the right place, yet they are subjecting another human being to cruel treatment on the chance that they will be grateful for it some day. Without a doubt some people are grateful, but it comes at the cost of making the dignity, autonomy, and peace of mind of a suic*dal person disposable. This is less of a suic*de prevention tactic and more of an attitude. We all know this attitude well; it is the idea that suic*dal people ought to keep living, and anything that is not prolife content is encouraging suic*de. While suicidal people are often implored to choose life, there is no true choice unless one is allowed to do the opposite. By not allowing one to opt-out of life, pro-lifers see life not as a choice but as an obligation. If an adult cannot make an autonomous decision about what to do with their own body and life, then they do not own their body or life. This is an odious conclusion. I have had friends on this site who I deeply wish were still here, yet it was their life to take and do with it what they please, not mine to keep. The zeal in which society wants to prevent suic*de is fascinating because one is allowed to do many things that are analogous to suic*de, such as cutting off all contact with loved ones or making life-altering irreversible decisions. This incongruence is once again caused by seeing life as inherently valuable and worthwhile. I have written this post hoping that it will explain the "why" behind many of the ideas often expressed. For anyone who has gotten this far, thank you for reading. - Postscript It should be noted that I am not against suicide prevention - only the coercive means of doing so, such as throttling information and denying access to peaceful methods of suicide and locking someone up on the chance that they will end their life. These tactics cause someone to stay alive not because they voluntarily choose to live but because they have to. I am not pro suicide, I am pro voluntary life. Source: Meretlein
i hope she is doing great and finds someone better 😅😅.i was the one to mess up, I dont care about love anymore i just want to finish my purpose in life.
i wish i wasnt existing, seeing how every teen girls getting a happy life with their friends and family and siblings, i wish i was have a brother or sister or a real friend, i always try my best to be extrovert and make friends but i always Failed cuz im too shy and embarrassed and think theres no one at school will like me, i always sit in the corner of the school and look at everyone how they happy eating and talking and laugh with their friends, i look at my friend who used to be my childhood friend but then she leave me and ignore me and hate me without a reason just for another girl, no one will like me.
There is always time to scroll away and forget you've ever seen this. Click on the X. Go. Note: Even though my hope is lost, please do not go down this path by searching for the source. I promise, if you do, you won't come back. Warning: This following article may influence mental health negatively. There is always time to scroll away and forget you've ever seen this. Read at your own expense. You have been warned. - Mainstream suic1de prevention Suic*de preventionists like to hide their paternalism under the guise of protecting a suicidal person’s (or, in many cases, a suspected suic*dal person’s) “real, future self” from their “mentally ill and pathologically out of touch with reality current self." As I addressed in the previous part of my post, the view that suic*dal people are pathologically out of touch with reality is unsubstantiated. Perhaps the most vile method of suic*dal prevention is forcible psychiatric detention. In essence, this involves subjecting a suic*dal person to what would otherwise be considered abuse, violence, and kidnapping if not committed against a suic*dal person by medical authorities. Despite the 'good' intentions of medical authorities, the phenomenological experience of the detained person is that of kidnapping and bodily violation. The voice of the suic*dal person does not matter. If they try to resist, they will be violently forced into submission through either brute physical force, being tied down, or being drugged. Any other values that a suic*dal person may hold, such as bodily inviolability or autonomy, are rendered null. The indignity of being forcibly detained is considered worth it by others if it saves a life, regardless of whether the person who is being subjected to forcible detention values their life more than dignity, autonomy, and bodily inviolability. This line of thought insinuates a deep lack of respect as respect entails allowing someone to act in their own best interests in accordance with their own values and not forcing them into following their “best interests” as defined by others. This also applies to many people who are mentally ill, as mental illness does not necessarily render someone globally irrational and all of their values (besides life) null. As much as the mental health movement likes to talk about destigmatizing suic*de, there is very little that is more stigmatizing than taking away someone’s voice and violently forcing them into submission. Medical authorities have their hearts in the right place, yet they are subjecting another human being to cruel treatment on the chance that they will be grateful for it some day. Without a doubt some people are grateful, but it comes at the cost of making the dignity, autonomy, and peace of mind of a suic*dal person disposable. This is less of a suic*de prevention tactic and more of an attitude. We all know this attitude well; it is the idea that suic*dal people ought to keep living, and anything that is not prolife content is encouraging suic*de. While suicidal people are often implored to choose life, there is no true choice unless one is allowed to do the opposite. By not allowing one to opt-out of life, pro-lifers see life not as a choice but as an obligation. If an adult cannot make an autonomous decision about what to do with their own body and life, then they do not own their body or life. This is an odious conclusion. I have had friends on this site who I deeply wish were still here, yet it was their life to take and do with it what they please, not mine to keep. The zeal in which society wants to prevent suic*de is fascinating because one is allowed to do many things that are analogous to suic*de, such as cutting off all contact with loved ones or making life-altering irreversible decisions. This incongruence is once again caused by seeing life as inherently valuable and worthwhile. I have written this post hoping that it will explain the "why" behind many of the ideas often expressed. For anyone who has gotten this far, thank you for reading. - Postscript It should be noted that I am not against suicide prevention - only the coercive means of doing so, such as throttling information and denying access to peaceful methods of suicide and locking someone up on the chance that they will end their life. These tactics cause someone to stay alive not because they voluntarily choose to live but because they have to. I am not pro suicide, I am pro voluntary life. Source: Meretlein
There is always time to scroll away and forget you've ever seen this. Click on the X. Go. Note: Even though my hope is lost, please do not go down this path by searching for the source. I promise, if you do, you won't come back. Warning: This following article may influence mental health negatively. There is always time to scroll away and forget that you've ever seen this. Read at your own expense. You have been warned. - Mainstream suic1de prevention Suic*de preventionists like to hide their paternalism under the guise of protecting a suicidal person’s (or, in many cases, a suspected suic*dal person’s) “real, future self” from their “mentally ill and pathologically out of touch with reality current self." As I addressed in the previous part of my post, the view that suic*dal people are pathologically out of touch with reality is unsubstantiated. Perhaps the most vile method of suic*dal prevention is forcible psychiatric detention. In essence, this involves subjecting a suic*dal person to what would otherwise be considered abuse, violence, and kidnapping if not committed against a suic*dal person by medical authorities. Despite the 'good' intentions of medical authorities, the phenomenological experience of the detained person is that of kidnapping and bodily violation. The voice of the suic*dal person does not matter. If they try to resist, they will be violently forced into submission through either brute physical force, being tied down, or being drugged. Any other values that a suic*dal person may hold, such as bodily inviolability or autonomy, are rendered null. The indignity of being forcibly detained is considered worth it by others if it saves a life, regardless of whether the person who is being subjected to forcible detention values their life more than dignity, autonomy, and bodily inviolability. This line of thought insinuates a deep lack of respect as respect entails allowing someone to act in their own best interests in accordance with their own values and not forcing them into following their “best interests” as defined by others. This also applies to many people who are mentally ill, as mental illness does not necessarily render someone globally irrational and all of their values (besides life) null. As much as the mental health movement likes to talk about destigmatizing suic*de, there is very little that is more stigmatizing than taking away someone’s voice and violently forcing them into submission. Medical authorities have their hearts in the right place, yet they are subjecting another human being to cruel treatment on the chance that they will be grateful for it some day. Without a doubt some people are grateful, but it comes at the cost of making the dignity, autonomy, and peace of mind of a suic*dal person disposable. This is less of a suic*de prevention tactic and more of an attitude. We all know this attitude well; it is the idea that suic*dal people ought to keep living, and anything that is not prolife content is encouraging suic*de. While suicidal people are often implored to choose life, there is no true choice unless one is allowed to do the opposite. By not allowing one to opt-out of life, pro-lifers see life not as a choice but as an obligation. If an adult cannot make an autonomous decision about what to do with their own body and life, then they do not own their body or life. This is an odious conclusion. I have had friends on this site who I deeply wish were still here, yet it was their life to take and do with it what they please, not mine to keep. The zeal in which society wants to prevent suic*de is fascinating because one is allowed to do many things that are analogous to suic*de, such as cutting off all contact with loved ones or making life-altering irreversible decisions. This incongruence is once again caused by seeing life as inherently valuable and worthwhile. I have written this post hoping that it will explain the "why" behind many of the ideas often expressed. For anyone who has gotten this far, thank you for reading. - Postscript It should be noted that I am not against suicide prevention - only the coercive means of doing so, such as throttling information and denying access to peaceful methods of suicide and locking someone up on the chance that they will end their life. These tactics cause someone to stay alive not because they voluntarily choose to live but because they have to. I am not pro suicide, I am pro voluntary life. Source: Meretlein