Poor Things - A Bonkers, Endearing Triumph | Awesome Anthony Reviews 

Wonderful review. Poor Things is my favorite movie for 2023 for all the reasons you mentioned. Emma Stone deserves an Oscar for her performance. Oscars should also go to Mark Ruffalo, best musical score, screenplay, production design, costumes, and cinematography.

👋😃🤗 ~ so’s, youz likey the Poor Things, eh? I think it turned out quite well myself. Bravo guys & ghouls! 🤭😄🫶🏻♥️🙌🏻 ~ Fantastic review! Love the ad-lib bits, good Luls!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 ~ ✨🍭🧚🏼‍♀️✨

It's a great movie and really enjoyed your review.

Good video, cant wait to see this movie!

Agree totally. Amazing movie, best of 2023. Even with Barbie and Oppie close behind.

You know..... you, John Magaro & David Dastmalchian could all be brothers...seriously. Great video too....

Lasted for 15 minutes and changed the channel. Too weird and boring.

PHILOS-AWFUL-CALLY Mindless! haha that's a PUN! I wasn't so offended by the content of FRANKENHOOKER but more so offended by the content not ever being fully explored, it's lack of justification, or depth in narrative, and inconsistent logic left it feeling meaningless. THAT IS WHAT primarily bothers people! But how do you make sense of a senseless film. The film’s unclear narrative was as clumsy as Bella Baxter's first steps, as loosely connected and non seamless as Godwin's face and as awkwardly put together as a Frankenstein's Monster. THE FACT THAT the DEFIANTLY INDEPENDENT BELLA ALLOWS A FEMALE MADAME DWARF TO RULE & ABUSE HER a lot for much of the film, negates all the heavy MISOGYNISTIC messaging that's being exploited! REMEMBER, no matter who knows it in the film, we know it's a child being exploited! Thanks GODwin! Then out of nowhere she meets her Father (not shock and awe but confusing), who she doesn't know, kills him & with the FEEBLE young man who she's NEVER really LOVED then operates on others in the same manner that CREATED HER. WTF?!!! Hypocritical!!! and the GOAT! WHY? Other than the goat, I left the theater unsympathetic to any of the characters nor the convoluted contradictory unresolved plot lines. Disappointing experience yet I am more upset with the poor things in the audience who say they enjoyed it. I suspect they enjoyed the pretty visuals & were overwhelmed by quirkiness with no interested in the details of the flawed story's narrative which was nonsensical and a non-cohesive mess! ! I view the mainstream praise as a reflection of our times where superficiality vs substance has become the norm. If there's enough surface glitter, lip filler, butt padding & marketing ferocity then there's a good chance of success. We live in a world where Taylor Swift is the greatest entertainer of all time YET no matter how cheerleader pretty, young, intelligent & sweet she is, she's far from being the most gifted innovative artist of a lifetime. Not on vocals, guitar playing, dancing or songwriting. But I digress, But that's my comparative analogy of what is accepted as art these days. Maybe many of your viewers are young or have few experiences seeing truly intelligent, philosophically surreal & visually imaginative films. Watch ANY Terry Gilliam film, Guillermo del Toro's recent "THE SHAPE of WATER" is a beautiful dark fairytale & even more so are Pierre Jeunet's "THE CITY of LOST CHILDREN" "Delicatessen" & especially "AMELIE". Even the scary "The Wizard of OZ" with it's old groundbreaking visual effects, b/w to color transition, fantastical scenery, strange characters, fairytale heroes and villains has more drama, intrigue, adventures, excitement and a complex seamless comprehendible story (SPOILER: without the sexual abuse) than Poor Things! If she is what's admired today or in the Victorian Age as some kind of role model then either you missed vital components of the uneven story or you have warped sense of liberation!