POV Driving Scania S520 - Øvre Årdal Fv. 53 Serpentine 

😂😂😂

This will lower his score from "Excellent" to "Very Good".

@@JehanKateli 😂 for sure

Can u tell me the name of this game?

@@rupam5118 ahahahaha

Что?

Omak шоу да кто его знает, ртиксы какие-то

@@vazonpulemetov4205 есть видеокарты с RTX например Nvidia 2080RTX

lol

😅

hahahahaha :D

Хаха😂😂👍

And also SAMP

10%

I'm sure your right. I'd like to see this in ETS2

xDDDDDDDDDDDD

I knew it!

Wow the VR was gone too far

ahahahha :D

хе хе хе)

@27.6M views - 6 days ago it is man

Why does that have to do with god

@@tarraynegee5984 because God told him to pull over lmfao i mean what else. It isn't like that was his very own decision to do.

@Default Profile Picture yep

@@tarraynegee5984 What's your problem?

On the other hand, what's the problem with the car driver? He already started to take over while there were less than 50m sight. There are easier way for sucides.

Yeah in a 400k uhd vr set

Hahahahaha 2020 rec ban

this is not ets this is real

@@parthlaturkar8212 That's the joke

@@parthlaturkar8212 Wait really! Thanks man didn't realise

@@he.lena21 top de mais migão, setadoido

O Ebute Gamer da vida real...

ser caminhoneiro no Brasil não deve ser fácil maninho

@@welzerafps6842 tuuuudibao pruceis

Es muy buena la descripción que haces del video, con pocas palabras y con metáforas , genial 👍

Muito bom mesmo

WHAT DO YOU MEAN ITS A GAME ?

@我好鍾意插浩嵐屎忽 thats not a game xD

Chefkoch LP umm, yeah it is 😂

@@stefanernst5977 Yes it is, it's Euro Truck Simulator 2.

Reyhan Frederick r/wooosh

in europe lol

@Pie lol dude wtf

@@maisaalencar7933 silent hill se passa na Europa latina

His render distance is low, that's all

Была в Сайлент Хилл?

TQA - Aykut ets15 in 120-150 years.

Yok be türküz videolarıma bakarsan anlarsın

isim yetiyor zaten :D

Is real Life ,je suis français donc you are stupid

@@tqa-aykut7731 ias.Das:DASd.ASd

Can you tell me how to unlock car? best i can do for now is scooter

you forgot to mention that the spawning point is totally random, and together with that, comes the difficulty

...no checkpoints, no SAVE :(

What fps this real life is running on yours? Mine is about 3000

@@vxo- If we wanted to get technical about it, the theoretical limit on FPS is 1.855 x 10^43 Hz… which is basically just 1 / the Planck time. However, that’s not a very meaningful figure in context. Planck Time is basically the smallest possible length of time for a relationship of causality to actually be detectable, so reality itself effectively operates there. There are some points here which aren’t plainly obvious, but there are some misconceptions you are belaboring upon here. First of all, it’s not that the eye cannot “see” above 24 fps, it’s that the brain cannot inherently distinguish 24 FPS from continuous motion. And actually, this happens at even lower levels than 24 FPS. What this is corresponds to the latency of the visual information processing of the brain. For most human brains, this latency is pretty large. It’s at least 1/10th of a second on average. This is why the standard for animation set by Disney is actually only 12 FPS, but it’s not uncommon for bursts of animation in TV to drop down all the way to 7 FPS (this is usually reserved for things like conversations where nobody really cares about smooth motion so much as synchronization with the dialogue). Your brain still pieces all this together as motion. So when it’s said that the “eye can’t see more than xx FPS”, that’s just bull. What it means is that “you don’t need to render more than xx FPS in order to register as motion.” The way your eye-brain connection actually works is not like a digital camera where a sensor just gets exposed to light and you get a straight up image. A better analogy … think of the way CCD cameras can have a global shutter that exposes the entire sensor at once and CMOS sensors have a rolling shutter where a few lines at a time are exposed and it “rolls” down the space of the sensor… well, your eye has a stochastic shutter. A random scattering of few pixels (approximately 1% of the sensor) at any given moment are exposed, but a tiny interval later, a different random selection of pixels are exposed, and so on, and so forth, and this is basically always going (e.g. you’re capturing video). Any given pixel, once exposed, cannot be used in another exposure until it “warms up” again, which in some cases could take as long as a full second, but there are still other pixels getting exposed while that delay occurs, so it’s not like your eyes stopped working in the gaps. Your brain collects all this together to make an image… but one thing you might notice is that your eye might take a while to get a reasonable image (which is why you have that latency in processing that causes persistence of vision). Each little random smattering of pixels is getting exposed at slightly different times, but still times that are very close together, you’re effectively still gathering information at a very fine time-slice. So even if said persistence of vision means you are thoroughly fooled into seeing still images 1/12th of a second apart as smooth movement, your brain is still gathering and piecing together visual information that was sensed in the gaps between those 1/12th second spacings. This extra information, btw, is what we perceive as motion blur. And this is why when playing an older game that did not exhibit any explicit motion blur, we can see the difference between say, 24 fps and 30 fps and 60 fps and 120 fps and so on. And even for more modern video games that do try to fake motion blur with directional convolutions, higher framerate still gets seen as smoother because the methods we have for doing motion blur are still a little artificial… honest-to-goodness high framerate is still going to give you a more believable result because your own brain will be piecing together some of that blur. Also, shuttering effects like what Zane brought up are due to your ability to focus your attention and what happens is your brain is basically filtering out part of the information it gathered. It’s actually not consistent because things can go in and out of focus if you lose your concentration, and also because the cones in the center of your eye vs. the rods in the periphery are simply used (i.e. processed differently). Nonetheless, you can do this consciously, too. This is also a stochastic process, though, so it’s not as “well-formed” and “regular” as it happens in a camera. This is akin to the “shutter angle” in film making. Most regular live action films are shot using what is called a “180-degree shutter”. This is a reference to the old days when motion picture camera shutters were cloth disks that spun to expose or cover the film. The cloth would have a cutout that was basically a certain number of degrees of arc on the disk, and the default is 180-degrees (or half the circle). What that actually means is that the film that was rolling at 24 fps was only really exposed for 1/2 of each 1/24th of a second (i.e. 1/48th sec), and not exposed for the other half. We replicate this on digital cameras by setting framerates to 24 Hz and setting shutter speed to 1/48 as a general rule of thumb. There have been some experiments lately with high framerate (e.g. 120 fps and up) cameras where we’ve found good results using 360-degree shutters (i.e. exposure is the entire time span of the frame). One of the things about that solution is that you can kind of pick and choose when you step it down to, say, 24 fps, you can say I want to sum all of the frames or I want to blend 25% or 60% and get more or less of the overall motion blur information into the frame. For film cameras, the core issue with 360 degree shutters is that you not only capture the motion blur of the scene, but you also capture the motion blur of the frame of film being moved out of the way. A 180 degree shutter allows the film to only be exposed during a period that you know the film frame is standing still (which is possible due to the “ratchet-stepping” (for lack of a better word) motion of the reel. One of the reasons why we don’t normally do 360 degree shutters even in the digital age (aside from legacy reasons and that people expect the look of film) is that the “end” of the blur from one frame is prone to extend partly into the “start” of the blur in the next, which can causes things to look a little too blurry. Though this is a very apparent problem with 24-30 fps recording, it’s not really so apparent when you get to 120 fps and up. This realization suggests that when you get much higher than 120-240 Hz (the latter being a 180-degree shutter for 120 Hz), you’re deep in the realm of diminishing returns when it comes to providing more visual information to the view. Not that there isn’t any to provide, but it doesn’t pay off so well in terms of “bang for the byte.”

v8

@Mzeil Raz why not?

*Narrow

me too lol

Euro Truck simulator 2

SAME LMAO

It seems it is purposefully sharpened to resemble with game.

Rifqi Al Bantarest Channel っg

Dlc Sacandinavia

@Bogdanella, It would be also too much effort for the team to have every single road ingame. Also it would take too much space on the hard drive, so it isn't possible, sadly.

@Bogdanella it is not 1:1 scale. If yes, would be really good.

Thats not Route Advisor

это точно...

Que porra vocês estão falando em russo?

@Sev2030 Привет как дела? Я понял ваш комментарий, просто переведите...

@@ziel6626 Pan Nixto Obrigado pelo vídeo, muito lindo ... (p/s it s google translate )

@@dimak253 É isso mesmo, traduzi depois 👍

Je to hustý že jo :D

@@Michael-vq3cz ano

Thankyou so nuch

xD most of my czech friends love trucks somehow :D i'm from algeria

and directx 11

Directx 12. XD , .. ..

Vulkan :V

Nvidia's RTX

AMD r5000 60GB VRAM INTEL CORE I9 12TH GENERATION UP TO 10000GHZ

Mine too

where u livin? a trash can? lol

Midhun #007 and a 10000 watt psu

I love it. I'm using I7 7700K, 16GB, RTX 2060.

Wow im jealous

I only have a i5 6200U with a gtx 950M

No just you need a big big truck and one trailer

Add promod also if you haven't tried it yet :)

@A true petrol-head woosh

@A true petrol-head You say that under every comment please genius how can you be so smart?!

@SOUP SOLID its a joke dummy

What! You uninstalled it?

that's Norway my friend, when you get out of the cities on the mountains where there is no people they dont give a fuck about the roads (politicians), it is very dangerous especially if you have small cars and trucks going 60kmh in this weather visibility of 20meter

@@Kevin.BTCChina Well in Spain, they dont even care about city roads 😂😂.

If the Skyrim audience would play ETS.

hola soy de copiapo ya hablamos en español a mi parece que tenia cero preocupación de usar luces según lo que yo vi en el video el tablero se notaba apagado y eso me daba entender que tenia las luces apagadas con una niebla bien densa

Hola, soy de Bogota Colombia y me parece a ver visto que en Noruega hay que tener siempre las luces prendidas hací sea de dia

Esa una pena que no lleve las luces prendidas, ya que no se nota la velocidad ni las RPM. Gran vídeo. El scania, supremo, hermosa la ruta para manejar... Saludos desde argentina

i think his mirror is hit that stick !

i think stick is hit that truck

i think his stick is hit that mirror

i think his mirror is hit the truck

i mirror his stick hit that think

Видио вахах

Что за страна?

@@user-xu5yq4mi7o Я из Укр, хз от куда он

@@user-xu5yq4mi7o возможно стоит посмотреть в описание и там есть такое слово "Route" и ссылка на карты,хммммъ.

@@Monfy_music Он из Эстонии походу а на видео какая то скандинавская страна, может Швеция а может Норвегия!

Understand you, it's very relaxing)

l told the truth what stuck in my heart

what is wrong with you? @@deenhag1

This comment is so pure

i can see that...@@deenhag1

@@deenhag1 Fuck you

Reversing

JΞΛΜ alllll the way down :)

its a waterfall...

Oh yes, it is an Alien Drake! Look at this funny adventure here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZkuIlivk5PY.html I´ d seen the same^^ greetings from germany

it's water fukin fall :v

water?

@@naruftw3235 a ghost of a waterfall?!?

LOL

Hi, thanks! 1080p60fps Shutter: Auto EV: -1 (I change it depending of the weather) ISO: 100-800 FOV: Wide WB: Native Sharpness: Medium Color: GoPro (I add some colors in Adobe Premiere Pro)