Pro Se! You Need Determination and Empowernment In This Fight. Let This Video Encourage You. 

Thank you!

Thank you!

You are so welcome.

Glad it was helpful! Best!

This is true. Thank you for your comment.

🎯 WellDone‼️

Thank you!

StayStrong💪 StayFocused⚖️

I understand clearly what you are saying. What you are expressing is real. This channel and the community are here to support you. Hang in there!

Thank you too!

So glad that they help!

💪👍

Truth sometimes require harshness. Your comments are respectful, and they are appreciated. Best.

@@advocatelucindaI have addressed bias, lack of impartiality and prejudice of 1 judge whom I also asked to recuse himself. I felt that it would not have been fair to not to name this particular judge in my relevant submissions in a situation where all my previous judges in that same case were reasonable.

You know the facts of your case better than anyone. Rely on them and the law to support your claim.

@@advocatelucinda The nexus of failure is in the office of the state attorney, who of course claims absolute immunity. I can only plead with the appellate court.... "It is axiomatic that criminal conduct is private conduct." And that the child's constitutional immunity from gential cutting comes before any immunity for the Appellee; US Supreme Court case Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250 (1891) “As well said by Judge Cooley: "The right to one's person may be said to be a right of complete immunity; to be let alone." The lower court does not even begin to hide its lack of impariality. It steadfastly avoids mention of the contradiction between the newborn citizen having constitutional rights, and the Appellee ignoring those rights. What more can I do?

In light of judicial partiality, advocates must continue to call courts out on it. Great post!

You're welcome.

Welcome!

My contact information is adjunctlaw@gmail.com

The general knowledge that the code section sets forth a reviewing court's obligations when reviewing an agency action .

@@advocatelucinda but does it apply to state Administrative actions, federal Administrative actions or both? And is this used in federal courts to overrule state arbitrary and capricious rulings? And would all legislative Quasi Administrative actions be ministerial actions?

Other than general knowledge, I have not studied this statute. You would be able to get your answers through a google search. Best

Federal government agencies. See: uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title5/part1&edition=prelim. Regarding "arbitrary" and "capricious rulings", the following case is helpful: immigration.cornerlaw.com/d-c-federal-court-finds-uscis-s-decision-arbitrary-and-capriciou.html. Regarding whether a quasive legislative act is ministerial, the following read addresses it fully: www.sweethomeor.gov/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_and_economic_development/page/4161/landuselawhandbooklegislativevjudicial_201412151639538200.pdf Best.