Prosecutor Withholding Evidence Favorable To Your Defense? File Brady Motion Compelling Discovery. 

U r truly the best❤

The very case Im involved in RIGHT NOW, which is headed to The Supreme Court, emanated from an incompetent, feminist prosecutor who disregarded video evidence against my false-accusing attacker, disregarded police arrest reports, disregarded sworn police affidavits on my behalf, and then refused to prosecute the female attacker... who now tried and failed to censor me about her crimes and criminal motives for harassing me AFTER I divorced her (with the court's corrupt, gender-biased assistance). They tried to censor me, Im fighting it... now Im ALL IN on the great Writ of Certiorari to The Supreme Court. With clean hands and the First Amendment on my side, I "testify" here and now that our district courts (and even appellate courts) are especially infested now with corruption that the pro se MUST be prepared to fight to the end. Im thoroughly, TEN DOES DOWN in a fight. Fear not, pro se! Im a man with clean hands that got to see my false-accuser taken to jail instead of me... and the witch now uses fellow witches throughout the courts to get revenge and to censor me. Not happening. May the facts, clean hands, karma, The First Amendment, and God always be on your side, pro se.

Hey mum, always you flattered me with your deep insight knowledge of law.

Prosecutor has violated brady law on behalf of my case by withholding witnesses statement on my behalf stating that i was not apart of the crime with nothing illegal found in my possession

Hello and thanks for so much immensly helpful information. Wanted to ask if Brady /1983 would be applicable if it was the Public Defender who refused my many many biut 12 documented requests to subpoena the security from some of the 11 cameras throughout the residince. For six months he refused until I decided to bypass and ask a judge directly to which he immediatly responded by email directing me not to and even falsely cited case law as reasoning to justify why I would'nt be allowed to subpoena evidence which was exonerating, exculpatory, and actually incrimanting against the alledged victim. Also I was refused twice by police despite my addament insistance to look at the camera footage for it holds the truth regarding competing victim claims. Is that applicable to Brady? The statute couldn't be clearer stating every effort must be taken to gather video evidence in such a situation? This is all post conviction with a guilty verdict for the lesser charge of simple assault (making her afraid) and not. guilty for battery. So even though my lawyer was given ability to refute almost everything claimed by my ex he was so worthless I am convinced he spent 12 months working against me. Especially when I include the many civil rights violations also documented and even his continued withholding of evidence ordered to be given to me. Sorry this is as short as I can make it. It's been so incredible and widespread that this will likely be national news one day. Thank you again.

Have you seen Father in Exile where prosecutors have been loosing immunity what about napue v illinois in my friends case the prosecutor and police are witholding evidence and he is denied certain discovery. A woman nailed a prosecutor for witholding evidence to be given after a trial she filed a Napue Violation against the prosecutor in many past court cases even FBI agents spent years in prison witholding evidence. Good video.

That’ s common tactics in criminal trial for the prosecution to secure conviction where defendant were withheld evidence important to him/her at trial.

Where are you located?

I wasn't

Is there a similar case in civil matters?

ITS LIFE, OR DEATH, BUT WE DONT KNOW THE EVIDENCE EXISTS, BECAUSE THE PROSECUTION HAS HIDDEN OR DESTROYED IT, AND THEY HAVE IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION. SOUNDS LIKE A LOOSE / LOOSE DEAL. WELCOME TO USSA.