Тёмный

Puget Sound Blackmouth closed again!?! What's the future of this fishery? 

PNW Best Life
Подписаться 11 тыс.
Просмотров 2,3 тыс.
50% 1

As many of you know the winter chinook fishery aka blackmouth has been closed again to preserve some of the quota for a later opener once the massive amounts of out-migrating sub-legals are no longer present.
In this video, I show footage of our successful blackmouth fishing trip before it closed down, but I also try to deep dive on what's going on with this fishery, why it aways closes so fast and question what the future should look like.
I take us back into the history of Puget Sound blackmouth a little bit, looking at the yearling chinook program and why we are where we are with this fishery.
Does it make sense to continue to advocate for this season to open in January or even in February? Perhaps, it should only open in the future after the sub-legals largely leave the area?
This video is on the shorter side and walks through graphs and data along with footage of our fishing trip to try and get to the bottom of this issue.
If you like this content, hit that like button and subscribe to the channel. And if you want to support the channel and what I'm doing on PNWBestLife.com to help you with digital trip planning and research, head over to the shop and buy some merch from PNWBestLife.com/shop

Хобби

Опубликовано:

 

12 фев 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 74   
@WAFishQuest
@WAFishQuest Год назад
Good call on the bigger spoons! Great question on whether to open or not. Maybe just a late February opener to keep the boats active. (I don't really fish blackmouth no more, so personally I'd be fine with no fishery to save the quota... but I know a lot of people look forward to it). Thanks for your service on the committee! I agree with your closing point.
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
Thank you! Yeah, I think late Feb, Mar 1 or maybe use test fishing to figure it out and just do an emergency opening whenever the ratio is low enoughz
@scott1837
@scott1837 Год назад
Back in the late 80's Blackmouth fishing was open from October thru February. During that time I became aware of how many small fish were caught before a legal was landed. Many did not survive the hook. Iwrote to Fisheries managers and asked that they Close the fishery . They did for for a number of years, but it was reopened due to recreation dependent fishing business pressures.
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
Yeah, also, the PS has become much more hostile to residualized fish. So you have lots of small out migrators and few adult fish around
@forcedtosignup007
@forcedtosignup007 4 месяца назад
Wow you sound like a hero.
@billmacaras4146
@billmacaras4146 Год назад
You present some interesting information. The graph depicting fishing days vs years is very telling and points toward the much larger issue, with this black mouth fishing issue the most recent attack on public fishing. The graph is rather confusing and/or misleading. First, my assumption is the Y-axis is a sum of the fishing days for all areas in Puget Sound. Second, it is All salmon fishing and not only chinook, which has taken the biggest hit. Third, it does not include the data for 2022, which would be near, if not below the bottom line. Fourth, I assume it includes MA-13, which is open 365 days a year (well almost) because the numbers of salmon in that area is relatively very low. Bottom line, once something is lost or taken, it is never regained. This graph clearly shows this. And fifth, is there a similar graph for the non public angler?
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
I don't have the non-public graph as the context for the graph is the group that's working to provide more opportunity for as you call it the "public angler." I'm having a hard time characterizing this as simply an "attack on public fishing." There are so many factors at play from competing interests of commercial and tribal to anti-consumption groups to low abundance of the resource just to name a few. The result has been the reduced open fishing days and reduced angler trips, but trying to blame one thing or assign some kind of nefarious intent behind the outcome we don't like is just hard for me to do. I see some paths forward, I see reasons for optimism and I'm working with people who have plenty of the same who have been at it for far longer than me.
@jodydurant8315
@jodydurant8315 11 месяцев назад
Area 11 was closed after mid-July. We never even fished our local fall stocks which don’t even show up until the end of July. All of this was because of too many early summer sub-legal encounters. We gave up our percentage of fall chinook and pinks to the tribe and the Puyallup snag fishery. It’s ridiculous.
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife 11 месяцев назад
You’re right, it’s not acceptable!
@jodydurant8315
@jodydurant8315 11 месяцев назад
@@PNWBestLife I think they should close the Puyallup if they need more escapement
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife 11 месяцев назад
The issue isn't with Puyallup escapement, but the reality that juvenile salmon from all over spend time in MA11, which like all mixed stock fisheries has quotas based on impacts / fish caught. The Puyallup River would be shut down just like the Skykomish was if there was an escapement concern. But the Puyallup won't be shut down to limit impact on Stillaguamish stocks like MA11 will because it's a mixed stock fishery. The real issue is the small sample size test fishing numbers used to close MA11...I don't have a great response to that...
@jodydurant8315
@jodydurant8315 11 месяцев назад
@@PNWBestLife juvenile encounters were never an issue before. I suspect it has to do with the timing of the smolt release, but we could do this all day. I mistakenly used the term escapement for the Puyallup- I know that isn’t the issue. What I meant to say was the tribe wants our percentage of area 11 chinook and everything in the salt has been a compromise. Close the Puyallup and give those fish to the tribe. I was suggesting a negotiation tactic or even a solution. No reply necessary. Love your channel and thanks for keeping up the good fight.
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife 11 месяцев назад
Got it, yeah, the whole thing is quite convoluted. I talk regularly with "insiders" who are closer to these topics than myself...I'm more of the behind the scenes data guy in helping the cause. It's all very challenging, and worse because it's not helpful to discuss all of it publicly...The effects of what's going on are felt quite strongly, but the reasons why don't really resonate. Thanks for being a fan of the channel!
@ShenpaiWasTaken
@ShenpaiWasTaken Год назад
Wow those recreational costs per fish caught is insane.
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
Yeah! I think it’s largely because PS is extremely unfriendly for salmon now. I suspect that’s largely because of pinnipeds…we really need to deal with that!
@CatchGrowPickCook
@CatchGrowPickCook Год назад
good points ! agree! hopefully the season callers take up ur suggestion
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
Well, we all have a chance to make our voice heard during the North of Falcon process coming up soon.
@bertalter5811
@bertalter5811 Год назад
WDFW need to add encounters to the Puget Sound creel reports so folks can see what's really going on..... They need to put all the cards on the table...... Area 10 opening to fishing Thursday thru Saturday...... There's lots of things they can do......
@bertalter5811
@bertalter5811 Год назад
Tuesday - Thursday - Saturday
@WAFishQuest
@WAFishQuest Год назад
That's a great idea Bert!
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
Good idea. However, people tend to lie to creel checkers about encounters because they think it will extend the season 😂 honestly I don’t want the season open at all with the sub legals present at these levels
@bertalter5811
@bertalter5811 Год назад
@@PNWBestLife encounters shut down fishing period no matter what season or area that's open. Area 10 blackmouth and I think but I might be wrong but area 11 was shut down some last summer for a while. (ENCOUNTERS) The Columbia River was shut down last August but that was a little different reason but was based on encounters..... So if encounters is the problem then just closing down an area shouldn't be the answer.... I would rather see a few days a week than 11 days its shut down period that just happen in Area 10. If they asked about encounter they should report them, no one likes being a mushroom....
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
So I think you make a good point here, but I also think there’s a unique situation going on with MA10 in Jan - Feb because of the huge numbers of sub yearling chinook that are raised now and predominantly in the south sound in response to the Orca situation…
@speedbird1598
@speedbird1598 Год назад
I am a strong proponent that the state should look into creating more runs of Spring Chinook. Enough stocks still exist of Puget Sound Springers to sustain a hatchery population I believe. These fish are generally bigger than blackmouth, were historically critical prey for the SRKW, and just might offer better bang for buck
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
Yeah, that’s a good point. Why don’t we emphasize more hatchery springers? That’s a question I will be asking for sure. Why not just replace yearlings with springers?
@captainconnorsadventures6357
Whose gonna pay for those fish?
@speedbird1598
@speedbird1598 Год назад
@@captainconnorsadventures6357 The same people paying for Blackmouth if we switch the fisheries over
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
PSRFE likely could shift from raising seal food (blackmouth yearling chinook) to sub yearling springers
@speedbird1598
@speedbird1598 Год назад
@@PNWBestLife I may be mistaken but I believe Springs are what are known as “stream type” Chinook that spend a year in freshwater, but I am not sure what the process of raising them is
@samwalton1229
@samwalton1229 Год назад
How do they count the smaller fish against the quota?
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
There are quotas for these categories: total encounters, total legal encounters, total unmarked encounters, total sub legal encounters. The issue was that the encounters with sub legal unmarked fish was really high which threatened the total unmarked quota
@samwalton1229
@samwalton1229 Год назад
@@PNWBestLife I know this state doesn’t know how to rightfully count, so that is why I asked. I wouldn’t offer any count to those boats when they come by, inflated numbers and smaller seasons is what we get
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
So that’s not at all how this works. Because of that sentiment our license fees now pays test fisherman who get paid to fish the way we do and after that it’s just math. If they encountered 10 sub legals that day and there were 20 boats: 20*10 = 200 sub legals, even if one of those 10 boats hooked nothing. So in fact our seasons are likely shorter then what they could be BECAUSE the creel checker is not a trusted source anymore.
@olegkrot1345
@olegkrot1345 Год назад
Great video with explanation. Do you think you can do a video on halibut fishing and how to fish for them ? Or you do not fish for halibut
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
I will do that this season hopefully!
@bryaneffie
@bryaneffie Год назад
Maybe this is a dumb question, if there are so many Shakers, why do they need to be counted into the quota in the first place? The point of quota is to protect a limited resource, it seems right now the small ones are quite abundant and it does not seem the sport fisherman will make a dent on them.
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
It’s a good question. A certain % of those shakers will be non-clipped, and there’s a calculated mortality of I believe 15% that’s used in the modeling to project how many ESA listed chinook are killed by running the fishery.
@nascarrich57
@nascarrich57 Год назад
Estimates of landed catch to date indicate that we have reached 54% of the total encounters (7,152), 55% of sublegal encounters (6,295) and 77% of unmarked encounters (1,089) agreed to in this year’s List of Agreed Fisheries (LOAF). Feedback from Puget Sound recreational anglers indicated a priority for preserving fishing opportunity for the month of March. Therefore, WDFW will suspend the fishery now to preserve opportunity for later in the winter season. In the meantime, WDFW Staff will continue analyzing the fishery data collected via test fishing.
@nascarrich57
@nascarrich57 Год назад
2018 all areas had a Winter Chinook fishery. What do we have now?
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
Richard, This is one of the points I was trying to make in the video...one of the big changes between 2018 and now is: We are raising even fewer yearling chinook. And we are raising MANY more sub-yearlings in response to the orca recovery issue. If you think about it...blackmouth in Puget sound is already largely dead. The primary reason for that being lack of survivability of yearling chinook that want to stay in Puget Sound. The question we should be asking is: Why is Puget Sound so hostile to salmon? I think many of us already know that answer...
@phillipschwabe2085
@phillipschwabe2085 Год назад
There have been some good size blackmouth this year! I love blackmouth. We need this winter fishery.
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
For sure! But if we open it later, those good sized blackmouth will be the primary target and we will get to fish for them longer. We got some nice quality fish last year in late feb, but the season didn’t make it that far this year because it opened too early in my opinion
@phillipschwabe2085
@phillipschwabe2085 Год назад
@@PNWBestLife I live in the San juans and have been fishing sidney because they do stay open, thank God. They catch our hatchery fish and they are abundant to say the least! Caught our limit every day and have only released a couple unders...
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
Yeah, that’s an awesome place to fish for them! That reminds me I need to plan my trip up in that area 😎
@phillipschwabe2085
@phillipschwabe2085 Год назад
@@PNWBestLife sidney channel is full of nice fish right bow! Saw a guy land a 15lber! We had our limits in a hr!
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
That’s great man!
@billmacaras4146
@billmacaras4146 Год назад
I like your video, but find the overall premise to be disturbing. So, let’s say I have 50 marbles in a basket. 20 are blue and 30 are red. I have a 40% chance to pull a blue marble out. Now, let’s add 50 more marbles, but they are all red. I now have only a 20% chance of pulling out a blue marble, because I have added more red marbles and no more blue marbles. Then I will assign an arbitrary number of red marbles that can be drawn before I have to stop pulling marbles, let’s say 3. After pulling my 3 red marbles I must stop, even though I only pulled one blue marble. My point is this: The more sublegal size and unmarked fish we add to the Puget Sound (let’s say for the Orca), the larger the percentage of sublegal and unmarked there are in Puget Sound. Thus a much larger percentage of those will be caught as compared with the legal size fish. To compound the issue, we are assigned an unreasonably and arbitrarily low unmarked encounter number. There wouldn’t be such a high percentage of unmarked encounters if the fish weren’t there in large numbers in the first place. If I wanted to close fishing for the public angler, I would certainly come up with limits such as those and convince everyone it was the right thing to do.
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
So far what I’ve learned for more of the “inside”, it’s not as simple as characterizing it as you’ve laid out…but I understand why it seems that way
@billmacaras4146
@billmacaras4146 Год назад
@@PNWBestLife Unfortunately is really is made much more difficult than it needs to be. I also have a bit of "inside" information and know there is much more behind the scenes than what is made public. The "encounter" parameters are there for one reason only.
@scotsman771
@scotsman771 Год назад
This is a created fish, When I was a kid many years ago the state was trying to get people out to fish them for more revenue during the winter months of the year. Either create more for the fisherman or stop raising them and let them all migrate out of Puget sound like they used to before the state had the idea to keep some fish here for the fisherman. Stop the program and save the money and have no salmon in the sound from Nov to June or raise more fish. They are a put and take fish anyway. They used to call them BBQ fish when I was a kid and begged people to go catch them..They are all hatchery no wilds so what does it matter...
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
I just read the chinook management plan and I was surprised to read that wild stocks exhibit the same divide between downstream migration as sub-yearling vs yearling. It’s the yearling chinook, either natural or hatchery that stick around Puget Sound longer.
@scotsman771
@scotsman771 Год назад
@@PNWBestLife Yes the sub-yearling and yearling do stick around before they migrate but the Chinooks that they hold in the hatchery for a year that stops there migration drive and they stay in the sound to create a fishery throughout the year. Hopefully something gets figured and the fishery will continue..
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
A few things: the fish they hold back at the hatchery are the yearlings, which mimics what some portion of Skykomish natural origin chinook do as well. Most of the fish people catch during blackout season are sub yearling out migrators, which is the entire issue. Puget Sound is no longer a place where enough yearling residualzed adult fish survive to provide a fishery when it’s timed with the sub yearling out migration. So what’s been changed for 2024 is that these seasons are going to be timed to start on Mar 1st across the board to spread out anglers. This will result in less fish caught, which also means less sub legal impact, and the fish we catch should be bigger and allow the season to run longer
@scotsman771
@scotsman771 Год назад
@@PNWBestLife If the state would open all the areas instead of confining everyone to only or two areas that could help to keep some pressure off certain areas too.
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
@@scotsman771 Yeah, I think MA5, 10 and 11 are all gonna be open at once. Sadly, the other areas have too much impact on depressed fish stocks to open more. If we did open more, we would lose summer opportunity.
@nascarrich57
@nascarrich57 Год назад
I keep hearing the fishing pundits on the Saturday radio show, use the term OPPURTUNITY all the time. Sounds more like EQUITY.
@nascarrich57
@nascarrich57 Год назад
Area 10 to remain closed for Winter Chinook in 2023! Only 10 days open out of 2 months, half the days the weather was not good for smaller craft to get out. Guaranteed, we lose Winter Chinook fishing, it will never come back and summer Chinook will be next to be closed for good, never to return!
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife Год назад
Yeah, we can’t lose winter chinook, but can we move it back to late Feb? Having this fishery during the big outmigration is problematic
@AtomicBoyscout
@AtomicBoyscout 9 месяцев назад
The future is this: 1) Let the natives gill net everything they want 2) Complain about low numbers 3) Close seasons to non-natives 4) Continue to charge us for seasons we can't fish 5) Slowly phase out all fishing in Puget Sound (except for the tribes) VOTE REPUBLICAN!
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife 9 месяцев назад
1. Tribe is an important user group and ally to sportsman against the anti hunting, anti fishing, anti hatchery group. 2. Low numbers are frustrating, but there are plenty of viable fisheries and opportunities to keep us on the water too. This summer season was one of the absolute best in recent years. 3. Typically (not always) seasons are closed or open to all user groups. The examples when this is not the case make it sound like only sport anglers are kept off the water all the time. Just not true. 4. I fished just as much this year as previous years. 5. That’s not the trajectory yet. Overall there’s lots of justifiable frustration, but it’s not as simple as “blame the tribe” or even “blame the dept”
@AtomicBoyscout
@AtomicBoyscout 9 месяцев назад
@@PNWBestLife @PNWBestLife the tribes get 50% of the salmon. Closures and emergency rule changes were popping up this whole year. Also, we CAN blame WDFW and the commission/administration for closure on both fishing and hunting, it IS a top down issue and they are strangling our rights. Also, BIA allows natives to fish outside of adopted regulations so no, they aren't affected by closures the same way non tribal sport fisherman are. Your whole reply sounded like some people pleasing bullsh*t like you don't want to offend anybody and it's that type of "well I fished in the same area all season and did good so it's not my problem" attitude that will continue to be the bane of those fighting back against the oppression of the fisheries management and the gill netting pocket stuffing tribes. 👎
@PNWBestLife
@PNWBestLife 9 месяцев назад
I fish all over the place and my favorite puget sound areas( MA11 and MA10) were hit the hardest with the closures. And I'm working far more than most to advocate for sport anglers throughout the entire process of North of Falcon, Puget Sound, steelhead rivers, education and other areas. But it sounds like you already know everything about what's really going on behind the scenes.
Далее
Puget Sound King Salmon Jigging
15:10
Просмотров 28 тыс.
What is going on? 😂 (via haechii_br/IG) #shorts
00:15
Point No Point Coho Fishing
6:51
Просмотров 4 тыс.
Winter Blackmouth Fishing 2021
10:07
Просмотров 3,5 тыс.
Puget Sound Winter Blackmouth
22:31
Просмотров 16 тыс.
Tulalip Bubble Puget Sound - Extended Cut
19:13
Просмотров 2 тыс.
How to catch Puget Sound Resident Coho - 2023
6:50
Просмотров 8 тыс.