I did this Q&A with Ubisoft Annecy. Even though the answers are what they are, I still thought it would be worthwhile to upload this video. Gameplay is from IGN.
Andy Andrummer Hahahahaha Tbh I wasn't even laughing at coop, I was laughing at the answers realising there was no substance in them. The laugh was just well timed :p
Elaborate? OK! Why not one day. Can't talk about it. Don't know Can't tell Don't know It is better to ask Montreal. ... but they won't talk about or as they said ''disclose any information about their future games ... what does that ''future games'' exactly mean? 😆
I still dont understand why the ezio collection didnt remastered the multiplayer aswell. It was done, they just needed to enable some servers for it, acb and acr are finished multiplayers, just copy everything like they did with the singleplayer
Nacho__06 Servers aren't cheap to run. It isn't worth spending that extra money to run those servers when the number of players actively using them would be very small.
Uranium Fever Not really. Many players would have returned if Ezio Collection got Multiplayer. Plus, the servers wouldn't be that expensive. The Multiplayer is based on peer to peer connection, which basically means Ubi is a dick and wants to save up money.
+Uranium Fever I know why they didnt include it but my point still the same, its content, extra content already created, it could have reached more people and kept that game alive
(Can't tell) one of the stupidest answers ever, cracked me up. i do feel that ubisoft employees are not allowed to talk about MP so they don't disappoint us and make us resent the company
Kinda disappointing how poorly answered some of these questions were. Those answers could've been written by anyone. It makes it even more annoying when they say they "always listen" to "enrich their way of making games". If they care at least a tiny bit about it, then give some decent answers to these simple questions at least.
Armin00 They aren't allowed to share information about future games. They have to be vague. They listen to the majority since that's where they are going to make the most money and earn the most praise.
Uranium Fever I get that they have to be vague, but these answers were not simply vague, they were retarded lmfao. What kind of team answer "Don't know"? Looks like a 5yo answering it
Armin00 Annecy is working on different things now. Damien Kieken is working on For Honor for example. Did it ever cross your mind that perhaps they really don't know? It was most likely a social media manager who answered these questions, not the whole team or a developer. On top of that they're probably French and when they receive a large message written in English they're going to have simple and vague response.
Uranium Fever Being French is not an excuse. If you're part of a gaming group, selling games internationally, then you should speak English FLUENTLY. For Honor is not really such a success either, is it? I think you need to realise they do know, they just don't care.
Armin00 Annecy isn't a main team nor is the social media team inclined to speak about such things. I never said it was a good excuse, but it is simply another *possible* reason as to why they responded the way they did. For Honor's success is not relevant at all and is debatable. There really isn't any point debating this seeing as you're just going back to belittling Ubisoft. I don't understand the point in wanting multiplayer to return and then insult the company that produces it at the same time. But hey that's cool, whatever...
