Tbh i dont even use ray tracing with the 4080 super lol. Well sometimes I do. It shouldnt even be a standard of benchmarking it should always be secondary. Im shocked at the false narestive out there as if ray tracing means its a 4k device or not. Yet 1080p and 1440p arent based on maxed ray tracing. I think its the medias way of convincing people they need the best. But many of these gpus play 4k so so well without ray tracing my 4080 super blew my mind on 4k gaming even natively. Im a sim racer so nvidia plays my games better even natively. Like acc. But nvidias proprietary hardware technology was def a bonus selling point for me. Regardless all of these gpus do one hell of a job now. Just sad to see the way mainstream media has swayed performance judgement. Im sry but a 4k device shoulsnt be based on how well it plays the only 2 games that go below 60fps with everything maxed lol
I totally agree hence why I done 4K natively first but I added ray tracing because there will always be people moaning if I don't include it as it's AMDs top tier card even though we know AMD cards don't handle it well. I'm also prefer Sim racing over most games. ACC/AMS2
@reviewforthetube6485 yeah nah I knew that and agree with you totally was just also explaining as to why I put it in even though I don't feel it should be.
Why bother with raytracing we all know AMD and RT is a no go. A 470TI will possibly do better. LOL They need to make a FPS with raytracing they might sell more 5090s.
I know AMD struggles with ray tracing, but considering it's AMDs top GPU, people would moan if I didn't try to use ray tracing even though it struggles.
Oh, I know it is and totally agree. Even on my NVIDIA card, I don't use it when I play myself personally, but for benchmarks, if I didn't, I would get people commenting and moaning its AMD's top tier card and they want to know how it handles it.
