Ray Tracing with AMD’s Weakest GPU… Cyberpunk 2077 vs RX 6300 

That motherboard is dangerously close to the pond

@@lordbezzington8435 YEP THAT GPU ISNT HUGE IN SIZE

Computer hardware enthusiasts may as well be some of the last remaining natural wildlife in the greener areas of our urban population centers.

he's touching grass so we don't have to

Got me wonder if my spare gtx950 would outperform this one in non-RT...

I would rock on my 9 years old laptop too for 1 month if my PC being RMA

My laptop appreciates it, gtx 940m needs a pick-me-up

@@andyshtroymish4997 Nope, performance is somewhere around a 1650 or just below a 1060. I bought one for my server, they idle under a watt and only pull 24 watts under full load. Paid 25 bucks for it too. If ultimate power efficiency is the goal, this is the best card on the market to make displays and use the least electricity.

I still keep my old dying Radeon RX 460 2GB, huge respect to that card, I've finished so many games with it.

Haha thanks for watching :)

Leave RX 6300 man there are better options.

​@@HanSolo__truth. And this channel is proof of that! Go check one of his vids revisiting older high end cards, they're basically *always* a better choice at a better price point.

@@HanSolo__ For ultra low power there is no better option. Notice it's using 24 watts at full load. Lots of stuff a super low power gpu is very useful for, either as a display adapter, DIY arcade cabinet or a lot more. Also, in this segment, there literally is no other choice that is using a latest node and recent architecture. The closest other option is the gtx 1030 on 14nm that uses 30w vs 24, idles under 1w vs 2-3w and is 3x the speed.

​@@PineyJusticeat this wattage you honestly should start looking at integrated gpus. There is no benefit of using dedicated gpu over integrated one, and they would put up similar-ish ppw.

🙂 yes i recently tested some RX cards, the slowest card that u can get 720p low 30fps is the RX550, 2GB is good for 720p, and 3GB is good for 1366 resolution

You can play Cyberpunk on Vega 7 graphics but I wouldn't recommend that. Even an A380 is a substantially better performer than the RX6300. you can get an A380 for $110. Probably spent more getting a RX6300 since it isn't really built with consumer sales in mind. They go to SIs for building workstations.

I'm just amazed at how good the game still looks in low settings.

😂😂

I agree. Always fun to see what weaker cards can do when pushed

😊 im rebuilding my older pc's and just for fun im testing them all out with my older bus powered radeon cards, my favorites are the Dell HD 7570 1GB DDR5 and the DELL or HP R7 450 4GB DDR5, I think the 450 is kinda like the baby brother of the RX 550, i tested out cyberpunk 2077 and the 450 is still too weak for 720p Low 30fps so for cyberpunk i recommending the lowest u can go would be an RX 550, now that being said I also always install GTAV for all my ancient pc's because its strangely well optimized and on GTAV u can get the little HD7570 720p Low 40fps. Also to note, over on the amernimezone website if u want to use their drivers the oldest cards that still get support is HD 7000 series and R7 and R9 cards. I just tested it on my 450 and the amernimezone driver works. Oh and also please keep in mind that for older stuff you need a display port cable and a monitor that has displayport input because HDMI does not work on alot of older stuff especially if its Radeon.

G'day @Fadingfool I love my old GPUs too, now it is winter weather down here I just put together a i5-680/H55M-D2H/8GB DDR3-1600 Combo to play some of my retro games with my older GPUs, some of my collection are HIS HD5770 ICEQ5, GTX260 192-1.8GB, Gigabyte GTX260SOC & 275SOC, Sapphire HD 7770Vapor-X, Gainward GTX460GS-GLH

You can have my FX8320 and Radeon HD 7950 3GB Twin Frozr iii GPU. 😂

"Could I please have your car? 🥺👉👈"

it was really meant only for lower tier laptops and netbooks.

Well...32 bit GDDR5 is going to be even worse, so I guess we should be somewhat glad it's got GDDR6. Though in any case I'd prefer the 6400 (yes, really). It fills the same LP single slot niche while being quite a lot faster

@@SterkeYerke5555 😊🐢 yes i like all the cute little radeon cards, i have a few of the cheaper cards: HD 7570, R7 450, RX 550

Haha yep I’m guessing they expect you to get it from the oem site instead

Honestly, I'm sure it could at least handle Complementary Shaders at lower settings.

Yeah there are better/cheaper choices out there

for older oem systems your better off looking at older HD R7 R9 RX GT GTX

Buy a used 6400 or 1650, better all around

just bought a 2080 TI for 240 dollars, that is insane

Nice for you 😮 ​@@truthdoesnotexist

Actually, it is useful for people rendering static pictures.

Nah it does do ok without rt to be fair haha

sure, the cpu and motherboard and system ram carry lower tier cards, you won't get that performance with first gen intel or FX AM3

Most modern RT effects on games which use it have to be subtle to the point of being a gimmick or have to rely on resolution scaling and frame generation to get playable frame rates.

It's completely GPU bottlenecked. The CPU doesn't matter all that much here. The worst enemy of this GPU is probably the low VRAM though.

Better push the voltage to 1.9. 😂

What CPU do you have?

@@BREEZYM6015 I have a Ryzen 5600G

it depends on your computer, if its an older oem pc these newer rx cards are alot slower

The lowest I've gone in terms of performance was the Radeon 7950 3GB but it was paired with an FX8320.

Yeah I used 6400 drivers

@@RandomGaminginHD Nice, thanks. Never made sense to me that it wouldn't just work because it's the same die as the 6400 just with less ram and lower clocks. I doubt there's very many of these out in the wild but it's nice to know that they'll actually work for people without having to hunt down an obscure OEM driver.

😂

thats a stronger card, close to a 1660 Super if its in a brand new computer, if its an old computer then the 1660 super is faster

@@MrSamadolfo like how much can i get in 1080p low settings

@@Gaming_TechBench It will be ok, really. Enough for at least 60fps in most things (1080p obviously) on medium-low (or medium-high for older stuff). Will not go well with starfield, but what does?

@@Gaming_TechBench about 60FPS

I tried that game with my i7 8700k and GTX 1060 6GB. It didn't go well. 😂

Upsamplers like FSR offer similar performance to those resolutions while looking a lot better.

@@dualpapayas While true, those lower native resolutions are still easier for a GPU to process. I regularly play games at lower resolutions to get better performance.

Yeah for a non gaming choice it’s fine :)

😁

It probably doesn't got enough VRAM to properly use it

@@PixelatedWolf2077 IDK, i tried it on friends PC with intel HD 630 iGPU (didnt try Cyberpunk though), and it worked, doubled his FPS in Skyrim. AFAIK, LSFG should work on any GPU.

@@Zola_RSN Oh! I might give it a try then! Thanks for the recommendation.