Real Lawyer Reacts: Murdaugh Motion Reveals MORE Becky Hill Problems And MORE Shots At Eric Bland 

That's what makes this so egregious...her selfish act has affected many - it's infuriating!

Stupidity? I'd say greed.

In Ms. Becky’s case it was also for clout and financial gain.

Stupidity? Money actually since she put a book out

This seems to be a theme when people are re-elected over and over and over again. They begin taking little liberties, getting away with it, and eventually it becomes a bridge too far and their undoing. 💁🏻‍♀️

BH is on her first term though. Can you imagine how she’d be in future years?

I agree 100% my first thoughts.

in the Audible "read by yours truly" seriously? it's read by the author...

Don't you mean "delusions of adequacy?"

You shouldn't be 😊...but, she definitely should be. It's absolutely egregious what she's done!

Oh don't be - SC and the residents are wonderful! We are there at least a couple weeks a year visiting and love it

It seems to me that SC legal system need to be overhauled, at least in the county in question

@@starofairdrie Not judging SC, just devious behaviour of this court clerk, who broke the law, and should be in jail

Me too!

This was pre-recorded so no live chat which is why.

100%

Agreed 🤗

Oh lots of people are above the law. It's just how it is. It's not supposed to be that way but until people stop pretending otherwise nothing is going to change.

Also, we all justify our actions in our minds so we can believe we are doing the right thing. It takes a magnifying glass for us to see just how flimsy our personal justifications are for our actions. Both Alec Murdaugh and Miss Becky believe themselves to be good people who are just smarter than everyone else because they can finagle thru issues to get what they want. Outsiders see them as criminals…..but who among us could actually take that kind of scrutiny? Do we really believe these two people are not the norm?

Wow once the human crosses the line they don’t seem to come back much to Often, instead they go further and farther. I realize They do come back I know generally they do, but sometimes they don’t. imo

@@edwardscott3262 Everybody stop! Stop this stupid song of "he is guilty but he needs a fair retrial where he will be found guilty again." If Alex Murdaugh ("AM") was found guilty by a tainted jury, then that jury verdict is NULL and VOID and the man stands presumed innocent again. That jury was tainted, not only by Becky "Boo" Hill, but also by the internet and by the money ("thousands of dollars" according to Boo's book pages 58-60) the male guilty-voting, interview-giving juror received from "three friends" to stay on the jury instead of returning to work and being replaced by an alternate. All the so-called evidence against AM was a whole lot of nothing which is now mislabeled "overwhelming" ONLY BECAUSE that tainted and ill-informed jury bought it. SLED's own independent interview has two jurors saying they witnessed Becky Hill talk to (one or two?) juror(s) about financial difficulty. Did someone arrange for the "financial difficulty" of the juror(s) to be solved? Who? And in return for what? THAT is the more important question. That male guilty-voting, money-receiving juror said in his day-after-sentencing interview in New York that he knew AM was guilty because there is a two-inch threshold under the door of the feed room; therefore, continued that juror, AM tripped back HOLDING THE GUN and shot Paul the second time from a flat position, hence the angle. HUGE PROBLEMS WITH THAT. First, that was EXACTLY what some prior convict RU-vidr from Australia put on a video DURING the trial using cardboard cut-outs. Second, live human beings do not fall like cardboard cut-outs. Human beings have reflexes. Someone tripping backwards would have REFLEXLY extentded the arms to the nearest wall or to break the fall and dropped the gun. It also appears "Boo" had seen that video and discussed it with one or more jurors and, when at Moselled seeing the two-inch threshold, "communicated with [their] eyes" that AM "was guilty." That is MUCH bigger than "watch his body language." Someone, possibly the real killer(s) or one who loves them very much, hired "Boo" to ensure the guilty verdict. Why else would "Boo" be destroying her phones now? REMEMBER: the Prosecution's time of death is MEDICALLY WRONG. When viewed in that light, there is NO evidence of AM's guilt; and all the evidence is of jury taints.

SO disappointing!!!

She was elected to this role in 2020

Wow. She started this BS right from the get go, didn’t she?

Right, I was opposed at first. But all this stuff that keeps coming out shows he deserves a new trial.

Agreed. Can't stand Murdaugh but...

Agreed. It's maddening that she put this verdict in jeopardy with this behaviour.

Besides the clerks' issues, why was bank fraud brought up during a murder trial? That, to me, is preciducial and should not have been allowed. Bank fraud was not litigated in court yet. The claim that he killed his wife over bank fraud was ridiculous. I think his wife and son withheld his drugs, and he lost it. That is the more likely motive.

@@bugsea54The judge let everything in. Disrespectful of the jury’s time. It was supposed to be a three week trial. Turned it into 6 weeks.

Yes!!! Busybody!! Perfect

Yup. I think that everything she did was just business as usual for her. She may have done worse with other, less notorious cases. She’s Queen of Roost so normal rules don’t apply. 😡

It was wildly inappropriate. Should’ve gone straight to the judge.

I would think so.

Can’t they still get your text messages from your cell phone carrier? Even if the phone is destroyed?

@@mshoopdedoop I don’t think so

If the state decides to press charges, yes. But they don’t seem to be in any hurry to investigate. And there’s a way to permanently delete your messages. No idea how, though I’d love to learn.

That’s the scary part

Agree 100%!!!

Juror #1 needs to take notes if he was tryna ruin Mayas 😂😂 JK that’s just JHACH being cray.

THIS. Utterly unbelievable and infuriating. She doesn’t even realize SHE is part of the problem, the exact same corruption and abuse of power as AM

@@MEshaoWords😂😂😂

@@k.rose7 💥💥💥BOOM!💥💥💥

I’m just a regular mom doing regular things and I even side eyed her when she published that book and went on interviews. It was weird !! I immediately thought something was fishy.

100% but why wasn’t she warned off doing such a thing?

@@keithbertschin1213 i remember hearing something about her lawyer giving her the go ahead to write the book, I can’t remember the details. I think she sent a request to do it and they told her it was ok as long as it was after the trial. I’m not sure they read it entirely before it was published. The whole thing is so strange and screams “I want attention”. Well she got it 🤦🏼‍♀️

@@michele36618 it’s awful that one person can interfere with justice in this way. Imagine the millions of dollars to do it over again. I’m sure she’s not a bad person but the system should prevent this. The absolute last person to write such a book is anyone involved. If I wrote a book about the inner workings of of the business I work for I’d be fired and rightly so

Worst part is it’s not even her own work! She plagiarized that garbage!

That would be fair!

Thank you for your Service, and also your opinion by obvious experience!!

I agree

Oh! And for Standing so long! I could Never!

Thank you for your service❣️ Agreed!!!

I feel the same way. Thanks for the kind words ❤

You and me both 😊😊😊😊😊

Completely agree!! Great educational and entertaining content.

Great Question!!

I have the same question!!! She shouldn’t have forwarded that email to him. But doesn’t he bear some responsibility? Maybe he deleted it and moved on. He may not have even had the headspace to deal with it. But it’s still highly inappropriate. Unless, like Peter said, she also sent that to the defense. But I definitely don’t think she did.

Excellent question!

This is exactly what I’ve been wondering!

@@BlueDauntlessapparently she didn’t. Another channel, Lawyer Live, I think, went through them all and didn’t see anything forwarded to the defense.

Prosecutors are prob’ly pissed!

@@rizzomatt Thank God, I solved everything; and the last pieces for me were Kenny Kinsey, Ph.D.'s talk at CrimeCon 2023 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OHH-FVztf34.html and my going back and reviewing Alex Murdaugh's ("AM") defense team's January 2023 Motion for Sanctions, basically to exclude the white T-shirt AM was wearing when he discovered Maggie's ("MKBM") and Paul's ("PTM") bodies and which he gave IMMEDIATELY to responding Law Enforcement Officers when they asked for it. Be careful what you wish for, you might get it. And boy, did AM's defense team get played big time by Creighton Waters and Kenny Kinsey, Ph.D.! Kenny Kinsey, Ph.D. ends that presentation with a report of his telling Creighton to put that shirt back in the closet. In other interviews, either Waters or Kenny reported that Waters wanted Kenny to be "the canari in the mine," meaning let Kenny say what he thinks and leave Creighton to spin it. I hope that Kenny reads this and has the integrity (better late than never) that Becky Hill's co-author showed by severing ties with "Boo" after initially defending her. And I do not know whether the photo of a shirt with stains on top is THE actual AM T-shirt or a dramatization of it. But assuming it is, Kenny says it LOOKS like spatter but he cannot say it was BLOOD spatter because the hemo-trace tested negative for HUMAN blood. That Tom Bevel charlatan from Oklahoma had first opined it was NOT spatter, then recanted and, for thousands of dollars, opined that it was spatter and the hemo-trace was a false negative. When Tom Bevel got exposed in AM's defense team's motion, and based on Kenny's advice, Creighton gave AM's defense a Trojan Horse: all right, the State will not introduce that shirt. Boy did that doom AM while his defense celebrated that pyrrhic victory! In the absence of the ACTUAL shirt, the Prosecution suggested to the jury (and to the internet world from which the jury took its "facts") that AM somehow buried his VERY bloody clothes AND the murder weapons behind his parents' house in Almeda and put a freshly laundered T-shirt which, according to one self-contradicting agent "smelled of laundry detergent." So, what is my solution which FINALLY exonerates AM and should convince ALL his haters who have any intelligence, self-respect, and/or conscience left? Read carefully: Bubba came in with his jaws clutching a bird that was flapping so hard MKBM thought it was "a Ginae" but PTM and AM corrected her "it's a chicken." Remember the saying: "like a chicken with its head cut off"? An injured or captured bird is NOT a still one but a flapping attempting-to escape one. Those tiny stains on top of AM's T-shirt are bird-blood. Proof? The LCV test for ANY blood was positive BUT the hemo-trace for HUMAN blood was negative. And when was the hemo-trace test done? Right after AM's August 2021 interview when it was clear that SLED had Paul's video with Bubba and the chicken. So, that shirt with TINY specks of NON-HUMAN blood around the neck and shoulders is THE one AM was wearing at the kennels when he extracted the bird from Bubba's jaws then hurried to Almeda before it got too dark and back to enjoy some time with MKBM and PTM. That means ALL AM's clothes that day are accounted for, nothing hidden, AND the T-shirt AM gave law enforcement was the one AM wore to AND out of the kennels in the evening of 7 June 2021. Since that T-shirt has no HUMAN blood spatter, AM could not have been the shooter. I have previously explained why the Prosecution's time of death is medically wrong; and a review of Kenny's opinions strengthens my inferences that the REAL killers were two or more females with experience hunting animals but no prior military or law-enforcement experience of aiming at human beings. Those females went to Moselle armed with PTM's previously-stolen guns and with the knowledge of PTM's whereabouts because he was being SECRETLY followed and videotaped by Sara Capelli. That is based on the sloppiness and the strange angles of the aiming. Who are those LIKELY females? I hope they don't shoot ME before I get to tell you because, by now, those females know how to shoot human beings and get away with it. Please pray for me, y'all.

I don’t think they need to be unaware, I just think they have to be open and unbiased so that they can make a decision based on evidence presented

Unbiased, not unaware, is the standard.

@@paulinaolsen2060Same question though. Between the public trial that was watched by millions, podcasts, and a docuseries on Netflix, who-in the area-doesn’t have a bias?

Everybody stop! Stop this stupid song of "he is guilty but he needs a fair retrial where he will be found guilty again." If Alex Murdaugh ("AM") was found guilty by a tainted jury, then that jury verdict is NULL and VOID and the man stands presumed innocent again. That jury was tainted, not only by Becky "Boo" Hill, but also by the internet and by the money ("thousands of dollars" according to Boo's book pages 58-60) the male guilty-voting, interview-giving juror received from "three friends" to stay on the jury instead of returning to work and being replaced by an alternate. All the so-called evidence against AM was a whole lot of nothing which is now mislabeled "overwhelming" ONLY BECAUSE that tainted and ill-informed jury bought it. SLED's own independent interview has two jurors saying they witnessed Becky Hill talk to (one or two?) juror(s) about financial difficulty. Did someone arrange for the "financial difficulty" of the juror(s) to be solved? Who? And in return for what? THAT is the more important question. That male guilty-voting, money-receiving juror said in his day-after-sentencing interview in New York that he knew AM was guilty because there is a two-inch threshold under the door of the feed room; therefore, continued that juror, AM tripped back HOLDING THE GUN and shot Paul the second time from a flat position, hence the angle. HUGE PROBLEMS WITH THAT. First, that was EXACTLY what some prior convict RU-vidr from Australia put on a video DURING the trial using cardboard cut-outs. Second, live human beings do not fall like cardboard cut-outs. Human beings have reflexes. Someone tripping backwards would have REFLEXLY extentded the arms to the nearest wall or to break the fall and dropped the gun. It also appears "Boo" had seen that video and discussed it with one or more jurors and, when at Moselled seeing the two-inch threshold, "communicated with [their] eyes" that AM "was guilty." That is MUCH bigger than "watch his body language." Someone, possibly the real killer(s) or one who loves them very much, hired "Boo" to ensure the guilty verdict. Why else would "Boo" be destroying her phones now? REMEMBER: the Prosecution's time of death is MEDICALLY WRONG. When viewed in that light, there is NO evidence of AM's guilt; and all the evidence is of jury taints.

@@BlueDauntless Everybody stop! Stop this stupid song of "he is guilty but he needs a fair retrial where he will be found guilty again." If Alex Murdaugh ("AM") was found guilty by a tainted jury, then that jury verdict is NULL and VOID and the man stands presumed innocent again. That jury was tainted, not only by Becky "Boo" Hill, but also by the internet and by the money ("thousands of dollars" according to Boo's book pages 58-60) the male guilty-voting, interview-giving juror received from "three friends" to stay on the jury instead of returning to work and being replaced by an alternate. All the so-called evidence against AM was a whole lot of nothing which is now mislabeled "overwhelming" ONLY BECAUSE that tainted and ill-informed jury bought it. SLED's own independent interview has two jurors saying they witnessed Becky Hill talk to (one or two?) juror(s) about financial difficulty. Did someone arrange for the "financial difficulty" of the juror(s) to be solved? Who? And in return for what? THAT is the more important question. That male guilty-voting, money-receiving juror said in his day-after-sentencing interview in New York that he knew AM was guilty because there is a two-inch threshold under the door of the feed room; therefore, continued that juror, AM tripped back HOLDING THE GUN and shot Paul the second time from a flat position, hence the angle. HUGE PROBLEMS WITH THAT. First, that was EXACTLY what some prior convict RU-vidr from Australia put on a video DURING the trial using cardboard cut-outs. Second, live human beings do not fall like cardboard cut-outs. Human beings have reflexes. Someone tripping backwards would have REFLEXLY extentded the arms to the nearest wall or to break the fall and dropped the gun. It also appears "Boo" had seen that video and discussed it with one or more jurors and, when at Moselled seeing the two-inch threshold, "communicated with [their] eyes" that AM "was guilty." That is MUCH bigger than "watch his body language." Someone, possibly the real killer(s) or one who loves them very much, hired "Boo" to ensure the guilty verdict. Why else would "Boo" be destroying her phones now? REMEMBER: the Prosecution's time of death is MEDICALLY WRONG. When viewed in that light, there is NO evidence of AM's guilt; and all the evidence is of jury taints.

It def doesn't make the prosecution look to good IMO.

If the prosecution actually received the emails they should have reported it to the judge. If what that motion details is factual a new trial will be granted and Becky Hill and others should be held accountable for the violations.

Judge Newman is dirty also .

The person who received that email may not have passed it on .

@@roberthopkins3621how is Judge Newman dirty? That’s not his court clerk.

Well said👍👍👍👍

It is just a big game where too many people bend or break the rules.

Faith shouldn’t be in the justice system.

Everybody stop! Stop this stupid song of "he is guilty but he needs a fair retrial where he will be found guilty again." If Alex Murdaugh ("AM") was found guilty by a tainted jury, then that jury verdict is NULL and VOID and the man stands presumed innocent again. That jury was tainted, not only by Becky "Boo" Hill, but also by the internet and by the money ("thousands of dollars" according to Boo's book pages 58-60) the male guilty-voting, interview-giving juror received from "three friends" to stay on the jury instead of returning to work and being replaced by an alternate. All the so-called evidence against AM was a whole lot of nothing which is now mislabeled "overwhelming" ONLY BECAUSE that tainted and ill-informed jury bought it. SLED's own independent interview has two jurors saying they witnessed Becky Hill talk to (one or two?) juror(s) about financial difficulty. Did someone arrange for the "financial difficulty" of the juror(s) to be solved? Who? And in return for what? THAT is the more important question. That male guilty-voting, money-receiving juror said in his day-after-sentencing interview in New York that he knew AM was guilty because there is a two-inch threshold under the door of the feed room; therefore, continued that juror, AM tripped back HOLDING THE GUN and shot Paul the second time from a flat position, hence the angle. HUGE PROBLEMS WITH THAT. First, that was EXACTLY what some prior convict RU-vidr from Australia put on a video DURING the trial using cardboard cut-outs. Second, live human beings do not fall like cardboard cut-outs. Human beings have reflexes. Someone tripping backwards would have REFLEXLY extentded the arms to the nearest wall or to break the fall and dropped the gun. It also appears "Boo" had seen that video and discussed it with one or more jurors and, when at Moselled seeing the two-inch threshold, "communicated with [their] eyes" that AM "was guilty." That is MUCH bigger than "watch his body language." Someone, possibly the real killer(s) or one who loves them very much, hired "Boo" to ensure the guilty verdict. Why else would "Boo" be destroying her phones now? REMEMBER: the Prosecution's time of death is MEDICALLY WRONG. When viewed in that light, there is NO evidence of AM's guilt; and all the evidence is of jury taints.

@@christking85 Everybody stop! Stop this stupid song of "he is guilty but he needs a fair retrial where he will be found guilty again." If Alex Murdaugh ("AM") was found guilty by a tainted jury, then that jury verdict is NULL and VOID and the man stands presumed innocent again. That jury was tainted, not only by Becky "Boo" Hill, but also by the internet and by the money ("thousands of dollars" according to Boo's book pages 58-60) the male guilty-voting, interview-giving juror received from "three friends" to stay on the jury instead of returning to work and being replaced by an alternate. All the so-called evidence against AM was a whole lot of nothing which is now mislabeled "overwhelming" ONLY BECAUSE that tainted and ill-informed jury bought it. SLED's own independent interview has two jurors saying they witnessed Becky Hill talk to (one or two?) juror(s) about financial difficulty. Did someone arrange for the "financial difficulty" of the juror(s) to be solved? Who? And in return for what? THAT is the more important question. That male guilty-voting, money-receiving juror said in his day-after-sentencing interview in New York that he knew AM was guilty because there is a two-inch threshold under the door of the feed room; therefore, continued that juror, AM tripped back HOLDING THE GUN and shot Paul the second time from a flat position, hence the angle. HUGE PROBLEMS WITH THAT. First, that was EXACTLY what some prior convict RU-vidr from Australia put on a video DURING the trial using cardboard cut-outs. Second, live human beings do not fall like cardboard cut-outs. Human beings have reflexes. Someone tripping backwards would have REFLEXLY extentded the arms to the nearest wall or to break the fall and dropped the gun. It also appears "Boo" had seen that video and discussed it with one or more jurors and, when at Moselled seeing the two-inch threshold, "communicated with [their] eyes" that AM "was guilty." That is MUCH bigger than "watch his body language." Someone, possibly the real killer(s) or one who loves them very much, hired "Boo" to ensure the guilty verdict. Why else would "Boo" be destroying her phones now? REMEMBER: the Prosecution's time of death is MEDICALLY WRONG. When viewed in that light, there is NO evidence of AM's guilt; and all the evidence is of jury taints.

@@christking85 Everybody stop! Stop this stupid song of "he is guilty but he needs a fair retrial where he will be found guilty again." If Alex Murdaugh ("AM") was found guilty by a tainted jury, then that jury verdict is NULL and VOID and the man stands presumed innocent again. That jury was tainted, not only by Becky "Boo" Hill, but also by the internet and by the money ("thousands of dollars" according to Boo's book pages 58-60) the male guilty-voting, interview-giving juror received from "three friends" to stay on the jury instead of returning to work and being replaced by an alternate. All the so-called evidence against AM was a whole lot of nothing which is now mislabeled "overwhelming" ONLY BECAUSE that tainted and ill-informed jury bought it. SLED's own independent interview has two jurors saying they witnessed Becky Hill talk to (one or two?) juror(s) about financial difficulty. Did someone arrange for the "financial difficulty" of the juror(s) to be solved? Who? And in return for what? THAT is the more important question. That male guilty-voting, money-receiving juror said in his day-after-sentencing interview in New York that he knew AM was guilty because there is a two-inch threshold under the door of the feed room; therefore, continued that juror, AM tripped back HOLDING THE GUN and shot Paul the second time from a flat position, hence the angle. HUGE PROBLEMS WITH THAT. First, that was EXACTLY what some prior convict RU-vidr from Australia put on a video DURING the trial using cardboard cut-outs. Second, live human beings do not fall like cardboard cut-outs. Human beings have reflexes. Someone tripping backwards would have REFLEXLY extentded the arms to the nearest wall or to break the fall and dropped the gun. It also appears "Boo" had seen that video and discussed it with one or more jurors and, when at Moselled seeing the two-inch threshold, "communicated with [their] eyes" that AM "was guilty." That is MUCH bigger than "watch his body language." Someone, possibly the real killer(s) or one who loves them very much, hired "Boo" to ensure the guilty verdict. Why else would "Boo" be destroying her phones now? REMEMBER: the Prosecution's time of death is MEDICALLY WRONG. When viewed in that light, there is NO evidence of AM's guilt; and all the evidence is of jury taints.

Well put

It would not surprise me if jurors came forward and said something. But they’d have to come forward before other trials she worked on would be looked at.

She may not have spoken in other cases which were not as prominent. I wonder if she had been put down by Alex or his family ?

They should have, yes. But the testimony of some of the jurors was they were afraid to say anything because of how close Hill was to the judge.

Yes a juror should report any violations

They do, but it is understandable that they don't think the Judge's right hand person is included in that, how would they know it is inappropriate

Wow. Hadn’t seen this. Total corruption, because the state didn’t have a strong case.

Wow. That’s sketchy.

Totally agree, were the “donations” to influence a guilty verdict. Sketchy indeed.

@@kathleenkiser7524oh yeah, then as a way to egg juror off a random email came in. The name on the email , is the sister of someone who was paid a BONUS on one of the emails Becky wrote.

@@Shelby_Erilynwait what is this about?

If she’s charged with a crime, yes. But the state seems really reluctant to look into it, much less charge her.

No schedule, best option is the alert and make sure it’s set for all episodes.

I was in the rewatch crew, it premiered at 6am my time on a Saturday! I love this family but that’s too early. 😂😂😂

I’m with you! It would be good to have it explained

He is dirty and so is Judge Newman . Both should face sanctions.

He likely did. He only received 1. The first 1. One of his staff received the others. He likely had no idea they were accepting them.

Miss Becky obviously and stupidly didn’t think she was going to get caught and exposed

that would make it your only live then

🙋 Hello from a very chilly Ohio

Same! I just checked

@someonesgranny5387 Yes, the press never holds Poot accountable to his assertions or prior statements.

But it was from the court of clerk, who was really close to the judge. They weren’t sure if it needed to be reported.

That judge was extremely biased. Watching the murder trial was like watching a trial for all his financial crimes.

@jodyparkman75 looks like he did. He only received 1. After that she sent them to another person in the ag office. That person failed to refuse the emails.