Тёмный

Reflecting on the state of South Africa 30 years after the transition to democracy | Day 2 

University of Limpopo
Подписаться 15 тыс.
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.
50% 1

Reflecting on the state of South Africa 30 years after the transition
to Democracy
South African Humanities and Social Sciences are a by-product of the colonial conquest of
the indigenous populations who occupied the territory from time immemorial in the unjust
wars of colonisation. Consequently, Social science teaching and philosophy served as
tools to justify and solidify the conquest and ensure settler futurity through a legitimation of
colonialism. An example can be easily given from the origins of the Study of Anthropology,
as the study of the 'other', and the fabrication of history to justify the injustice of
colonialism. South Africa is a colonial creation through the conquest of the indigenous
peoples in the unjust wars of colonisation by both the Dutch and the English. The
colonisers named South Africa in 1910 and divided into segments controlled by either
English or Dutch. Moreover, this political situation also translated into the building of
institutions of Higher learning along colonial lines wherein the knower is the coloniser, and
the subject is the colonised. The supposed transition to democratic rule in 1994 left this
situation undisturbed, in that South Africa remains a colony in terms of the continuity of the
colonial paradigm and practice except for the demand for the inclusion of the previously
excluded. Although there was a significant shift in terms of the demographic makeup of the
institutions, there was nonetheless epistemological continuity with the supposed past until
the events of protest in 2015 with the demand for the decolonisation of the curriculum and
society.
With respect to contemporary movements, the conference aims to attract papers surveying
the changes that have taken place in the South African academy since the student
protests that began with #Rhodes Must Fall in 2015/16. Here papers are invited that will
deal with theoretical reflections on curriculum changes and studies since the advent of
"decolonisation" in South Africa and elsewhere. One theme in this regard that could be
addressed is the development of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusivity (DEi) as a discourse and
corporate mechanism in universities around the world. Submissions may interrogate the
meaning, effects, and functions of this development. The conference's theme arises from
this context and a desire to reflect on South Africa's 30 years of democracy. This
conference is necessary and provides context to the upcoming national elections planned
for 29 May 2024. Students must be allowed to reflect on these 30 years as they will be
voting. Further, the history of our institution as a historically Black university birthed at the
height of apartheid separationist ideologies provides further motivation for the need for
such a conference. Amongst others, the conference reflects on these 30 years from the
specs of these themes:
Assessing the anti-imperialist struggle legacy of Pan-African ism and African Nationalism,
Relevance of African Nationalism/Pan-Africanism for contemporary African challenges:
postcolonial imperialism, education, multicultural citizenship, governance, nationalisation,
privatization, inequality, migration, racial prejudice, xenophobia, etc. Differences in
philosophical outlooks between African Nationalism and Pan-Africanism, Continentalism vs
Sub-saharanism, identity and philosophy in the Magreb and East Africa in relation to
Africa. Marxism vs Pan-Africanism, class vs race, liberalism and its discontents, the
philosophical assessment of conquest and constitutionalism. Decolonising the curriculum:
Theories, challenges, and experiences of teaching. The intellectual biographical
examination of any major contributor to the struggle for liberation of African-descended
peoples. Economic perspectives assessing income inequality and general inequality in
society. The Constitution (Act 108 of 1996): Its promises and failures. Gender and Race
Inequality. Crime and corruption.

Опубликовано:

 

12 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 17   
@LesibanaRafapa-xy5rh
@LesibanaRafapa-xy5rh 5 месяцев назад
This is in the same way a lecturer of Linguistics is not ipso facto a Linguist, a teacher of History is not necessarily a Historian or Historiiographer and a lecturer of Mathematics is not necessarily a Mathematician.
@LesibanaRafapa-xy5rh
@LesibanaRafapa-xy5rh 5 месяцев назад
A lecturer of philosophy is not a philosopher. That distinction is crucial please. I hear our youthful Lecturers disingenously referring to themselves as philosophers just because they teach something named philosophy in the current paradigm.
@thabangdladla7047
@thabangdladla7047 5 месяцев назад
What is a philosopher kanti?
@lesibanarafapa9106
@lesibanarafapa9106 5 месяцев назад
@@thabangdladla7047 A good question to interrogate jointly, my esteemed colleague. I cannot, in our kind of collaborative scholarly enterprise, alone give a difinitive/absolute answer. Just to galvanise a close, nuanced look at the matter I would only stop at saying one at some stage is an udergraduate to Masters student in a discipline. If actually developing as required or expected, such a brother or sister might acquire a PhD, after which serious research in the field could be reflected in impactful research presentations, research publications, mentorship, seminal influence on peers, etc. After quite a journey, such a brother or sister is expected to have added a good volume of new knowledge and independent conceptualisation and theorisation in the discipline. After quite a trajectory on this plane, a long productive journey impacting on peers globally, I guess that one could fairly be called a philosopher in whatever field and not just philosophy as a taught subject. Yet we still admit that this is the formal sense of a philosopher. Isn't it there will always be casual uses of the term, which in my view have to be avoid in as formal a platform as a colloquium, seminar, sypmposium, conference, research supervision, research publication, etc. Yet hey, how can unilaterally claim that my take is the take each affected researcher should have --- no one is the arbiter. One more little thing that left me worried was to hear a colleague say a certain department has adopted a certain philosophy or research perspective. My understanding is that an academic department cannot adopt a certain philoshopy or approach and not welcome for applicaiton to research different ones. But if one were to establish, say, a Pan African Institute or Centre (not an academic department), there work could be dedicated to Pan Africanism alone. Yet still not with blindness to and banishment of engagement with other theories/approaches -- for the obvious reason that knowledge in holistic and not compartmentalised on marooned in atomic components having nothing to do with ambience. One should conclude by appreciating the capable researchers and colleagues we have in all those who were actively contributing in this great conference💪💪💪👏!
@thabangdladla7047
@thabangdladla7047 5 месяцев назад
While we await your elucidation of what qualifies one to be a philosopher , is there a commonly accepted definition of what is a philosopher let alone what constitutes a philosophy?
@thabangdladla7047
@thabangdladla7047 5 месяцев назад
ru-vid.com15oqx8TITGo?si=1WdpFBFX4FuVU3gx
@LesibanaRafapa-xy5rh
@LesibanaRafapa-xy5rh 5 месяцев назад
Not sure if you sure my response because I did attempt to respond before your present message.
Далее
What is the Welfare State? A Sociological Restatement
1:27:06
Democracy 30 | Reflecting on 30 years of democracy
33:31
Women's Defending + Men's 😮‍💨❌
00:20
Просмотров 2 млн
TEDxFlanders - Olivia U. Rutazibwa - Decoloniser
18:17
Toward the African Renaissance: A New Africa
1:20:49
Просмотров 80 тыс.
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20
James Scott: The Art of Not Being Governed
18:10
Просмотров 78 тыс.
Capitalism vs. Socialism: A Soho Forum Debate
1:38:45