Removing a failed Cue system for repair on a 2014 Cadillac XTS 

Just curious, why the clown comment?

@@bradtaylor1766 Best part is how Scott pinned it...lmao

It is 7/8 years old. It has 30k miles on it. The touch screen broke because it was bored.

I just call it as I see it.

Thank you! 😊

@@upfixauto I checked out your website. You repair lots of auto and industrial control boards, Man you fix appliance circuit boards too! I am in Canada, and I sent one from our clothes washer to the USA for repair a few years ago.. it was still cheaper than a new board, even with the shipping.

I did this last year. Works better than the original screen and waaaay easier than taking the whole system out. Also the new screen doesn’t have the gel in it so it should be less prone to failure.

$35 for the screen 1 hour labor

Hey from the same techs at gm that gave us the v 8 6 4

Having to tear half the dash apart also prevents thieves from breaking open cars and stripping all the expensive bits from the interior in 5-10 minutes while the car is on the driveway, like what happens with BMWs and Audis where it's much easier to take em apart (at least here in Europe there's actual gangs that do that)

2nd that!

As a result of seeing this video I sent my dishwasher circuit board to you for a repair on 3-8-22, just checked, FedEX has delayed it getting to you until 3-14-22, I hope it isn't lost. That's on a 2-day ship. I'm a little concerned as the board is no longer available.

The "experimental" GM division *was* Oldsmobile. Now it's Cadillac.

it's so the grandkids can't see them when Granny is driving. can't have the little ones see anything nekkid

Interesting. So you're saying they didn't test their "fix" the first time? That's not right. Although how does a firm like this "test" electronics like automotive engine computers, ABS modules, and radios without having the exact car to put them back into? How do they really know what they are "repairing" has been done correctly?

@@Guillotines_For_Globalists They can test voltages to see if the circuits are repaired, and can test if correct voltage is flowing through the board. Usually High voltage will be what comes into the item, 110 or 220v, and low voltages range from 12v, 5v and 3.3v, depending what part they are working on, and I was told my the voltages were reading correctly, upon the second return. I don't see how. After the part was returned the first time, it still had no low voltage. My cooktop has a fan that comes on only when a built in heat sensor detects and hits a set temp, usually when the enclosed cabinet gets warm. The second time it was returned, the item allowed a voltage leak which caused the fan to spin at an extremely slow rpm, which should not have taken place. If the board's eeprom had not lost it's programming, their repair service would likely have worked for me...but just know with electronics, sometimes the type of repair services out there will not always be able to repair a part, depending what components have failed. The issue I had, is their communication was not adequate and when I sent the board back in, it took them 3 days to find it, after they told me that it was lost...which was concerning. I had taken pics of both sides of my controller board, before sending it to them, each time. A manager, Anthony, told me the board had severe damage. I asked him to send me a picture of the damage, because the board I sent in did NOT have any apparent damage which he was claiming mine had, when I sent it in. Turns out the board he sent me the pic of, which was supposed to be my board, was an entirely different controller board - not even the same model as mine. I sent him my pics, to prove to him he was not accurate. His reply a few days later was that the tech had sent him a pic of a different board by accident, that they have found my board, and that they could not repair it and they eventually returned it back to me. Like I said in the prior post, I ended up finding another working board off of ebay. In no way am I knocking the service UpFix offers, as illustrated, Scott had a great outcome with getting his part repaired, and he seems to use them with no issues. I happen to be the one example where there was not a favorable outcome.

@@nealnaz Makes sense, sounds complicated due to how complex these electronics are. I would be wary sending in electronics due to loss in transit OR at the facility. I had a hell of a time sending in an iRobot Roomba last year for warranty repair. I was told turnaround time would be 7-10 days and then it morphed into 2 months at the snap of the finger. I think they lied to me just to get me to send it in. But 2 months later I had a newer model refurbished iRobot, and I have no idea if that was done by mistake or what, but I didn't complain any further, lol. Also strangely enough were 2 loose batteries flopping around in the box. The iRobot already had a battery in it, and then an identical "spare" battery was in the box in addition to another Roomba battery that was for an entirely different model. I have no idea what the hell was happening there.

Because setting up a camera and making sure filming conditions are good takes time and detracts from his real income.

Nah - they were great up until 1997.

@@matthewtaylor3308 Yea, because everyone talks about the super reliable 8-6-4 engine and the awesome 4100 HT engine, and lets not forget the Northstar engine.

TRUE👍 and I think that gel screen was ‘13 thru ‘15 🤔