Robbie & Rory Jennings CLASH picking Arsenal's Invincibles OR Chelsea 04/05 😡 | Saturday Social 

Yeah and we have Rory Jennings 😩👍

But he's so biased with his team, i've seen many but not like him

@@jakeberry8882 Arsenal fan, and I like Rory. He's an entertaining guy.

@@abhidhoundiyal everyone is biased abt their team mark goldbridge Adam mckola Rory jennings expressions literally everyone is biased

@@TheRolf1793 nah he's irritating with his agenda's

🤣🤣🤣

Question with Haaland was always fitness, not his ability.

He put his hands up and admitted he was wrong about 2 months ago lad let it go lol

More football knowledge than everyone on the show put together

Thats exactly why hes back, brings the views.

That Saliba nutmeg 🔥

Invincible thanks to Bobby Pires diving, admit it.

Odegaard better than Mount 😂

@@hyywe240 facts

@@hyywe240 yeah in this season

FACTS!

Most obvious thing to happen wtf 💀💀💀

Yeah he was sacked :D

We loved it too

No worries

Always good watching your videos lad! Invincibles are better but still very entertaining

we probably disagree on most things except for the social politics of football but i love the fact that you wear your heart on your sleeve with everything you say1

How's Haaland doing?

I've always said this. That team is a combination of the 1998 double team and 2004 invincibles.

Yh man definitely. That was a very underrated team.

01/02 was my fav team. Unbeaten away from home, won the FA cup too. Freddie, Pires, Wiltord, Bergkamp all got double digits for goals whilst Henry got 32... Parlour, Keown, Seaman were still quality, Adams and Dixon still there. Edu, Van Bronkhorst, Luzhny, Grimandi, Kanu, Upson were hardly awful backups. Backup goalies cost us a few points if I remember rightly though.

@@T0AD0FT0ADHALL Quality squad alright.

The invincibles focused on winning at all costs

he's actually an actor. easily one of the best out right now

@@audiobookschill5888 didnt he do an acting degree legit?

@@permaskunked fully trained actor, was in Doctor Who and Eastenders

@@hayden1421 yeah I thought so, acting and football punditry goes well together I guess lmao

yeah u are as dum as him to find absolute BS entraining lmao!!

Lolz picking 04/05 chelsea over the Invincibles what happened to shame

04-05 Chelsea Conceded FIFTEEN Goals in 38 Games..this is not supposed to be possible

@@micahkiyimba8641 yeah Park the buss mentality

@@shebeshimillion7250 lmao the invincibles scored 73 goals during the invincible season. Guess how many goals the 04/05 "park the bus" Chelsea side scored? 72.

@@shebeshimillion7250 parked the bus yet scores 1 less goals than invincibles, least conceded goals, most point at the time, more wins.

Rory was the one who got rattled?

@@cowboycerrone2348 did you watch the video? Robbie saying he was going to hit him at the end of the video 😂😂😂

@@Matt-fe6wu you’re stupid, Rory was having a melt down. Robbie king of wind ups

Yeah true but conceding 15 goals in 38 games is nuts

Can someone explain how five more points is "so many more, so many more" please?

@@shuuushrete665 Bias is the only answer

The Invincibles scored 1 more goal than Chelsea 04/05 and conceded 11 more.

@@davidtawse6765 I'm not arguing anything just stating that he lied

He's our star 🌟

Durban boi

3.40 your dad looks rattled by waving her flag

Should’ve seen Robbie then, almost slammed Rory’s head on the table

@@Matt-fe6wu he was laughing the whole video, did you actually watch it?😂

@@cardamundo295 yeah Rory was laughing the whole time, argued with Robbie then as Robbie is moaning he turns to the presenters and sniggered to himself because Robbie bit hard 😂😂

@@Matt-fe6wu send me the link to the video you're describing please mate, can't find it anywhere?!😉😂

Liverpool lost one game and got 97 points, I believe they also got 99 with one loss. Not invincible but still far more impressive.

@@lawrencebaker1811 lost to us and Watford I think

@@lawrencebaker1811 correction Liverpool 2018-19 30 wins 7 draws 1 loss 97 points Liverpool 2019-20 32 wins 3 draws 3 losses 99 points

@matthewbotha7845 I can't believe people still try to use that one every time every year you're not going to get a different answer from me. It is NOT a priority to go a PL season unbeaten, the priority is to WIN as many TROPHIES in a season as possible. Saying no one has repeated the treble since ManUtd 24 years ago & counting is & will always be a more significant sentence than saying no one has fluked a season in a PL unbeaten since 19 years ago & counting lol no one cares. Plus ManUtd couldn't have handpicked a harder FAcup route in 99 and also won the hardest format of the CL in invincible style & were 35 out of 38 PL games unbeaten so on the whole it was an absolutely miles better season than Arsenal 03/04. And ManUtd's unbeaten CL run 2007 to 2009 still hasn't been equalled either abd that was just as good as Arsenal 03/04. Had ManUtd won a 50/50 final vs Barca that could've gone either way it would've obliterated Arsenal's 49 PL game unbeaten run with back-to-back invincible CL's I mean Arsenal have no CL's in their history & only 2 semi-finals.

And then Sir Alex got Mad and won 5 of the next 7 titles

To be fair though, United were kinda replacing key players, transitioning some young players and developing Rooney/Ronaldo, when they did, they dethroned Chelsea. Arsenal were in their prime.

Destroy invincibles? lol nonsense. It would of been close.

@@AzAkh60 most point won at the time, least goals conceded at the time, more goals than invincibles, more wins. 2004 kicked invincibles out of UCL

Chelsea fan

Remember when Arsenal was bigger than Chelsea? Me neither. Only club Assna is bigger than is Spursy. Go chat to them man

@@midsizesedan7620 Arsenal have won more trophies than Chelsea overall. Fulham are a bigger club than Chelsea

Nah. He's definitely better than Thogden

@@daljeethansra Arsenal haven't won a league title in their new stadium and they moved in in 2006, straight up embarrassing for such a big club.

@@danielrobertson3155 and Arsenal are still the bigger club. What does that say about Chelsea

But lost games. Liverpool and City have finished with more points. Whereas nobody else has gone undefeated.

@@guneytopal1713 Preston North End have......

@@guneytopal1713 they lost one league game. If you're saying outside the league then so did arsenal (including to Chelsea)

@@guneytopal1713 they lost once to man. City

@@avikarsewpersad9856 there was 12 teams then . And was about 100 years ago ahahaha . Nice try tho

Same goes with Ivory coast.

Look at how many Finals he has scored in, very few players in history have

He made a few mistakes but he still has the most goals in fa cup finals and has over 10 goals in finals. Was also man of the match in 2012 CL final, Henry bottled it in the UEFA Cup 2000 against galatasary and CL final 2006 he missed four big chances and he didn’t score much knockout stage goals in UCL for a player of his quality

What do you mean by that? We are just enthusiastic about the game. Same can be said by United and Spurs fans.

@@simplyNuzi exactly lets not act like they also don't say some hilarious stuff

robbie came off worse here, made a bunch of baseless claims. rory at least came with facts.

@@deanoss777 calling Henry a bottlejob your a bit slow I guess unlucky

@@deanoss777 like what? That mount is better then odegaard? Please stop it

@@comasali2963 but still he can argue

@@deanoss777 baseless 😂😂

It will never happen again because of var and it would of never have happened with it in

Try breaking that record of least goals conceded ever . Chelsea 04/05 score 1 less than Invincibles, most point at the time, more wins

You could get relegated being invincible What's so special about it?🤣

@@aliasaad6393 it's only been done once. I might add that anyone who makes the 38 draws arguement is a complete moron. Congrats mate

@@aliasaad6393 What's so special about it?? Lol maybe because it contributed to the longest unbeaten run in English footballing history. FACTS. Chelsea are not even close to that record in their best years with all that money spent. Talk about that!

Rangers done it 2 seasons ago.

Just because you prefer their style of play (and I do too) does NOT make them a better team...The reality is that Chelsea team only lost ONE game and scored ONE less goal...so for all the flair the invincibles had they still didn't score that much and Chelsea had more points...Chelsea was the better team!

@@aduad it’s a matter of opinions. Arsenal went unbeaten and they were fun to watch. Chelsea lost a game and were boring to watch. I can remember more games from their invincible run than Chelsea a year later because the games had highlights worth remembering. More points doesn’t necessarily mean they were better as both teams weren’t up against the exact same opposition either

@@305Solo I don't remember how many players left the invincibles the year after but they were in the same league with the Chelsea team that won the league so they technically played the exact same opposition...again stating they were more fun to watch is not a metric of who the better team is...that's a personal taste that I also agree with but but if more points doesn't mean you are better than I don't know what metric to use cause "pretty style of play" doesn't mean you are a great team either....I mean Brighton and Leeds play some pretty stuff and are average teams.

@@aduad there’s a reason why the 2008-2011 Barca dynasty is considered the best ever. Beautiful style of play with possession, controlling games. That makes you better than a side that parks the bus and counterattacks.

Not though is it?

Chelsea 05 side was very good, but worth remembering that the Arsenal squad was practically dismantled the following season and they still finished 2nd on 83 points. If Arsenal had maintained the invincibles squad and had room to invest the way that Chelsea did, it might have been a very different story. It's hard to say definitively either side was better as a result. But what cannot be argued is that the Invincibles left a greater legacy on both the aesthetics of football and in the unprecedented achievement.

L

@@EMINTUBER Have you won the Champions League?

@@EMINTUBERchampions of Europe you’ll never sing that

@@tasospontian7319 you just lost your 6th final in a row in Wembley. Pipe down😂

Robbie is a paid actor

The only difference was anelka scored his pen and van nistelroy hit the bar with his

the problem of drawing 12 was that we won the league with 4 or 5 games to spare. The draws of the last few weeks were what amounted to 12. Also we were more slightly defensive because we conceded too many goals in the 02-03 previous season.

@T G It’s not a big difference lol, it’s 1 game as you said. It’s the difference of achieving a nice little tag line to put with winning the league though. Chelsea got 5 more points the following season, that’s more of a difference

Was 2004/05 when they lost in the semis of the champions league to the ghost goal?

😂😂😂

@@coasters4life388 dominated ur invincibles team btw

@@shkafity6418 ok 👍is yours gold?

@@shkafity6418 The Invincibles literally did the double over chelsea and smacked chelsea around

@@mrmaestro1896 how’s your champions league trophy?

Henry bottled the CL, disappeared in big AWAY games and had a horrible final record

for Arsenal, Henry played in 5 finals, losing 3 while scoring 0 goals and assisting 1. Henry will easily go down as one of the greatest ever premier league players, but it is absolutely fair to say he bottled it when it came to big knockout games.

@@danielrobertson3155 Henry was embarrassing in that barcw final

People need to realize finals aren’t the only BIG GAMES a game in a sim finals can also be very important, derby’s, important games in the league were a 3 points are a must what about those games? Also he made it out like he was referring to his whole career which’s ludicrous to me

@@Uncheckedgamingtroop Lool Hemry ain't just bottled finale but big AWAY games as well

I'd say the 08 united team would beat them. There were absolute monsters in that team. Rooney, Ronaldo tevez

The invincibles is debatable but the 04/05 chelsea squad was seriously scary. They'd definetly be capable of defeating Uniteds treble squad.

@@devineaaron in a one off game you're right, they would probably beat the 98/99 team.

@@omarbiro4398 In a one off game, they probably would beat them but who knows?

That Chelsea team would dismantle that stupid ass 90th minute lucky OVERRATED 99 team easily. Bayern blew it in 1 minute and that's the only reason they get talked about. Nothing to do with their brilliance but someone else's mistake.

🤣🤣🤣

Much better than the invincibles lol

Man bottled finals

Statistics and fact also agree.

Winning at all costs? They settled for draws towards the end so that they could stay unbeaten. Compare that to City's Centurions for example, who risked defeat in every game they played by trying to win. Even at Anfield. If the recent City teams cared about invincibility as much as Arsenal did, they would easily have done it. But they would rather push to win every single game and risk a defeat than accept a draw. That's why they finished with 10 more points than Arsenal 03/04. Points don't lie, which is why Chelsea 04/05 were also better

@@nib4626 "City could easily do it" then why have they not done it surely they won't to be known as invicbles aswell

@@itshurtt395 leicester only lost 3 games in their title winning season, winning back to back titles is a better achievement 100 points is a better achievement as you cant afford to draw any games, you would have to win majority of your games

@@nabylad2194 it's not a better achievement since more then 1 team has done it, arsenal has an achievement no one else has ever

@@itshurtt395 Of course anyone would like to be known as invincibles, but elite teams care more about how many wins they can achieve. My point was that City had the title sewn up in 17/18 and could have parked the bus in their remaining games. But no, they prefer wins to draws. Same goes for Liverpool who had won the title very early in 19/20 but still attacked each game. Arsenal were happy to draw against relegation fodder at home to preserve some meaningless record, meanwhile teams like City and Liverpool strive for 100 points

The Arsenal invincible side did the double over chelsea in the league and knocked chelsea out of the Fa Cup. Chelsea 04/05 couldn't even beat Arsenal once. The chelsea 04/05 was the most expensively assembled squad in premier league history ( thanks to Roman Abramovich's money)

All the money u did and still couldn’t finish a league unbeaten

@@celtiiberico1776 and they still lost in the season not unbeaten going park the bus tatic🤣🤣🤣

They weren't Invincible for us either. Chelsea 04/05 over them all day.

@@celtiiberico1776 Dont matter what players cost, we're talking about quality, who's better. The Chelsea team was better. Like Rory said the Chelsea team got more points, more goals, less conceded (still a PL record), and won more trophies. The invincibles got knocked out the UCL by Chelsea, they could never do it in the Biggest club competition in the world, the Chelsea players did it. The spine of 04/05 won the UCL in 2012, the invincibles spine couldn't. On the money aspect, never once did we break the world record, we bought smart with a plan in place. Theres nothing wrong with an owner investing heavily in his team, it's completely legal, we've done no cheating unlike Arsenal who got voted into the league after the war, never got into the first division on merit, never earned promotion on the pitch, cheated their way into the league by a vote, this is fact, just do your research or ask spurs fans, they'll tell you all about it. Robbie says Chelsea's trophies are tainted when it's actually Arsenal's trophies that are tainted, not Chelsea's. There are english teams who never been in the first division cause they weren't good enough to earn promotion, that could have been arsenal if they didn't cheat. Arsenal might never have made it to the first division if it weren't for that vote. These are all facts

I hate when people make the argument that a team "bought" a trophy, as if investing in the team is a bad team. Has city been "buying" the title over the years? Arsenal has invested massively into their team recently, if they go on to win the league would they has bought it?

Chelsea 04/05 score 1 less goal than Invincibles 04. In the league. Overall chelsea have more

While Chelselki their history started in 2005 never 4get that ,,u never be big club

@@Anon71256 yeah and ??

Pride of London 😭😭😭 London is all Arsenal mate wherever you go

16 year old club

Arsenal>Chelshit All Day and Twice in Ya Mums house My lad

Odegaard's nowhere near Mount. Had loads of talent at a young age and never showed it consistently until very recently. Mount's done far more since he made his debut than Odegaard has. And Arsenal fans are capitalising on a short goal drought at the start of the season to put him down. Even in games he doesn't score like our last Champions League game he was one of the best players on the pitch.

Rory is that you?

You don’t get a gold trophy for getting 100 points

@@luim3637 You don't get a gold trophy for being undefeated either smart ass.

@T G Oh get off the "excessive spending" high horse every top team has spent money over the years and at the end of the day spending excess money on average players doesn't get you anywhere, it's still about the quality of the scouting and coaching. What people "want" because it's cool is not the same as what is realistically more impressive.

they drew 12 and won 26 haha thats not even a third

Hence the word almost.

Because nobody can relate about being an invincible which is why you only hear it from arsenal fans themselves lol

@@Butlerboy you only hear it from arsenal because no one else cares. They’d rather win the treble or the champions league.

@@Butlerboy Yea cause almost nobody and probably nobody drew 12 times, but still bragged about it for almost 20 years.

Beckam was in la liga in 03/04

ARSENAL won the league at old Trafford. What do you mean you weren't scared of them?

stfu..u a chelsea fan for sure!! Rory is dum like like u are!!