ROTOR IS ALIVE! The most powerful NA Engine in THE WORLD - 319hp. per LITER! 

From 2025, Euro 5+ emissions kicks in in Europe Good luck passing that.

@@martinandersson5278 fortunately, I don't live in Europe. 😎

​@@JustSomeExpatgot em

'not intended for road use' probably means it isn't road legal in majority of places

@@junk3996 nooooooo, really? I never would have thought. Thank for enlightening all of us as we'd never had know had you not said.

Who is Gay Martin?

@@pasjakola I can't tell if you're joking or not.

​@pasjakola if you have to ask, you don't need to know

​@@pasjakolafamous British bike racer and record breaker 😅

@@pasjakola Isle of man survivor like 20x over

Haha it really does. Second one is stereotypical nerd voice

We need to really stop this AI voice BS !!!

@@Krasher247 I can't stand it either. Especially that weird nasal one kinda makes me wonder what the person posting sounds like

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

we should start a classic wIErdbike memes.

you are mistaken about units of torque or you are just funny.^^

😂

3:39

hes still busy with restoring the norton nemesis v8 currently..

Milyard’s will be a 5 liter singe rotor…. R

Milards done some amazing work !

That is a crazy amount of horsepower for 2 wheels

@@phillippitts6294 early 2000's gp bikes where 2 strokes insanity

Even the Suter mmx 500 has 329hp/liter with it’s 576cc 190 hp 2 stroke v4… the smaller the engine the higher the HP/cc

@@justinjheijnen the more rpm a engine runs the more hp it has en the bigger a and the more ccs

In Theoretical numbers you are right. The sun that you quoted is an extrapolation of the designed output for the 125. Run that figure on a 250, yz450f, cbr 650…..you will end up with some very strange numbers. If my memory serves, it was either the first gen R1 or the second where they managed, very nearly, a true 1:1. That is 1hp per cubic inch. Engine tech has not moved much since then. In 03 the V&M Yamaha Mann TT bike spent 100,000 hrs on the dyno trying to find more power…..they got 5 by adjusting fuel delivery…….. The only exact numbers in engines is the physical size that you measure right then and there.

Unmanageable

@Matthew-wn8oq True. Most oems aim for smooth linear power delivery to maintain traction when pushing the limits of the machine. But if they were truly aiming for practical, I think a rotary just from a reliability, emissions and fuel consumption standpoint sort of negate that. I understand the technology has come a long way on the sealing front. But still. They started with a challenging platform. Definitely unique though.

Turbos don't run on egt

@josue_kay Turbines literally convert temperature and pressure into rotational kinetic energy. So, I'm not sure what your saying

Forced induction and rotary = amazing power + blown motor. Everyone has learned this from the failure of the RX-7.

That’s effectively what they are. No valves

That's why i always called them 3-strokes right between the 2-stroke and 4-stroke engines

it is 2t

@@KristianKG No, the rotor makes 3 "cycles" in one revolution. Intake, compression, exhaust. So I'm also saying they're 3 "strokes".

@@Henrik.Yngvesson i dont know english, but you are not in right. Rotation engine have 1 explosion in one revolution, and that make the same "powerhouse" like 2t engine, absolutely the same. But, i understand you, you are in right. 3 takts... But i look just in the power abilities, same like 2t. And you name is very precise! 3t - agree.

its ai

When Ducatti makes the same thing its not weird?

truck absorbers..

More mano than you'll ever be.

@@DrewWithington is this a come back to a rhetorical questioned not aimed at you? Or just trolling for lols? Edit: I'm a little dull and just thought you had a typo. Lol I get it now. More Man-o than I'll ever be? 😆 I don't even think this hypothetical character exist tho brah? It was a piss take at the narrator getting the incriment units of measurement incorrect; he said nanometres of torque which is incorrect and isn't something to be boasting about, so easy to assume that he meant Newton metres of torque (which is the correct unit of measurement) and the hint is in the name, right? Newtonmetres of torque named after Sir Isaac Newton. He existed and that's a correct measurement of torque. Nanometres of torque maybe unit of measurement that etymologists use to describe the the amount of torque a grasshoppers legs produce or something like that?

​@@DrewWithingtonDingleberry 😮

It's ai

it is gayi

Absolutely.. Such a shame it's not at the TT this year. Needs someone like Jim Ratcliffe to sponsor to achieve first Brit bike win for 30 years.

Whats that got to do with this video?

@@posniknelb6114 This video states that it is the most powerful NA engine in the world, and it's not. It is the NSR500.

Yamaha's 125cc 2T v4 had 80 ponies, so: no NSR500 isn't most powerful hp/l combo either.

@@laimonasmusauskas1153 Hehe my bad! If we include RC car nitro race-engines (3,5") I think we have even higher power there. I read something about 600-700hp/l

​@@laimonasmusauskas1153What engine is that? What year?

Nope.

Tell me if I’m wrong, aren’t Most race engines rebuilt after every race anyway

Per 1 liter

is that priced 100k as well?

So funny that every time a combustion engine has huge claims it falls short of a 2 strokes real potential. When the oil burning stops, there will not be a blind eye to be seen.

@@nj2352 bann every sport, in that way it safes ships full of fuel and oil. a couple of gallons of oil in moto gp does noet matter a thing, 4 strokes use oil and making all those parts is way more energy(fuel) and parts(polution)' no two stroke is politics i gues, a commercial thing, almost all road bikes a 4 stroke. no expert here, but 2 stroke is the way to go for compitition , light, less parts, more cheap, watch moto gp 1990ish . that sound is unforgettable, before big bang :) and way more agile than the modernn, indeed many hp 1000 4stroke

@@fendermarshallbluesbox3407 Next gen 2 strokes will have a closed crank and no smoke will been scene.

@@nj2352 with valves in the head you mean ? or a blower off some sort on the scavenge ports with normal two stroke port ? i wonder how it works

@@fendermarshallbluesbox3407 There is or was a v twin development with an extra set of piston and ring with the transfer sandwiched in between the 2 halfs and it uses that arrangement in conjunction with the intake to throw the mixture into the opposite cylinder. It is funny you mention a blower, that is what the Detroit diesel 2 stroke used and thats where we got the 6-71 blowers from.

Thank you for bringing this up, I was hoping someone would mention this, and I'm surprised the narrator didn't.

This is true but not totally accurate. The 1.3l stated for the Mazda engine is the engine's swept volume, but because a rotary uses all 3 sides of the rotor simultaneously (albeit at different stages of the 4 stroke cycle). This is similar to how a 2 stroke uses both sides of the piston, also making one power stroke per rotation of the eccentric shaft.

it's for Race only ! They mentioned it in the Video 😀

You wont own a car in 2030 if you let these regulations do as they please.

F c k euro codes

@@annakquinn7084 Yeah! Bring back ACID RAIN!

English engineer here.. No.. 😂 We love nuts machines

not to mention sutter mmx 500,you can buy one new alco 500cc and 200hp

Power of 2 stroke.