We need you to write down both of the graphic card brand. Is it made by custom brand or founder edition, cause the sapphire 5700xt will outperform any 2060s nvidia
@ actually the other way around. At 4k most AA doesn't much besides eating VRAM and GPU performance, particle fx also are WAY more demanding at 4k compared to 1080p so you just tune them down and you're good to go
@@shamaafrin4031 Very true. Can probably get most games up to or above 60 fps, which in my opinion is more than playable for most games that aren't competitive.
@@TheLtGo Stop the nonsense. Yes 60 is preferable, some of these games like horizon 4 were hitting 70fps on these cards at 4k. Not one dipped below 30. Actually amazing 4k performance from these cards for the price. 1440p on these would be the sweet spot. Totally playable.
RTX 2060 best choice for having rt & dlss, current nvidia drivers are very good, remember that a short time ago the rx 5700xt was very close to the rtx 2080s, today the rtx 2060 better than the rx 5700xt in most games, congratulations NVIDIA great job
DLSS yes. RT - well i don't think so, 3000 cards should be the true RT cards... 5700XT is close to 2070S and both are away from 2080S sorry about that. and all of them are 1440p cards. Only 2080Ti could be considered a solid 60 fps 4K Ultra card (excluding RDR2 & AC:Odyssey & Cyberpunk ofc :D). 2060S is 100 fps 1080p/60 fps 1440p card more like.
@@yosifvidelov are you blind? I see the 2060s are like 5% slower of 5700xt. But 5700xt can't handle a 2070s! You talk because you read reviews right? I think you haven't a pc for gaming. "2060s 100fps in 1080p?"??? LoL this card do 150fps+ in cod MW in full hd. Play, not only read dude
aww look whos malding, the gpus without rt and dlss. you know that the 5700xt was near in-line performance with the 2070s and now its in-line with the 2060s, right?
its funny that fanboys on both sides don't understand that there is no war. 5600 xt = 2060, 5700xt = 2060 super. both by price and performance, they are actually same lol...
@Rohan Rathour because these cards can handle it if u don't play on 4k or 1440p then it's better to buy a low-end card like the 1660 super or rx 5600xt those "low-end cards" can handle any game on 1080p without a sweat!
This pc benchmark is pretty terrible if you look at any other benchmarking the rx5700xt blows the 2060s out of the water usually being 20 to 60 fps higher than it
Atleast amd listens and gives feedback from consumers, but they need to step up their GPU game... they have nothing to compete with 2080 cards, barely even competing with 2070s
@@wallacesousuke1433 Why not? Competition is great for us. I'd personally love to see AMD produce something high end. With no rival on high end, Nvidia is free to ramp up prices as they like. AMD making cards to compete with 2080's power would ensure lower prices for us in the future. And what do you mean by "they need to provide better cards at affordable prices"? That's what they've been doing.
This is something i don't understand, why the fuck people defending product that's release with half asses driver only to fix it like years later and called it "fine wine"
@@justme8675 I don't own one so I can't say for myself but a RU-vidr I watch (can't remember which one... I watch a lot of tech channels) said that the drivers are still crap. But I do see that the performance in this video is sporadic and that it clearly has a lot of potential as some of the benchmarks were noticeably higher than the 2060 Super.
Jordan Brown dude it’s like 5 frames higher. That’s not noticeable what’s so ever. You’d choose 5 frames in a few games over DLSS and Raytracing? You’d just stick with a GPU with shitty drivers.
@@themooingtree5163 at this point ray tracing is useless, just a marketing gimmick. Hopefully the 3000 series will be able to run ray trace without killing performance. Will be nice to get better than 30fps with ray trace on and more than medium settings
Gaming Made Simple with a 2080 ti I get well over 100 frames in every game I’ve tried raytracing on. All max settings. Sure I don’t preform as well but why are you expecting otherwise?
this is a prime example of how gimped AMD cards are out of the box just lowering the voltage alone would increase performance so much and the memory can easily OC up to 1800, sometimes much further the 5700 xt is way more powerful than the 2060
True. I have a Sapphire Nitro RX 5700 XT and im on the same lvl with slightly overclock like a 2080 on my WorkPC. Compares like this here are not rly good.
@@blidibliblubla what are ur temps like just sitting in windows looking at wattman? im a miner and i also have a sapphire nitro xt when i have the nitro plugged into my 1440p monitor just looking at wattman the temps go up to 50C if i run it without the monitor i get normal idle temps around high 30s low 40s, even full load mining normal temps i have a feeling that i need to re-seat the heatsink and put better paste was playing mortal shell with it the other day and the fans were going insane while it was running 68C
@@cidsapient7154 Well in the past days we had hot days here in Germany. When im playing on max load, my Temps are between 65 and 75 @1440p and well thats rly ok for the Temps in my Room.
@@blidibliblubla maybe it was just too hot here too ill have to give it a try again this weekend when its not so hot i just notice my gaming x 5700 holds temps much better at same frequencies and voltages and they should both be on par for cooling with the 5700 being slightly cooler but its like a 10C difference and the sound difference is quite a lot
@@cidsapient7154 But as i know the Temp. diff. between the 5700 and the 5700 xt is like 8 up to 12 C. but it depends what kinda Case u have and and and. U can use a low Voltage Profile, it helps alot on the Temps. There are alot of guides how easy it is to switch the bios for the Nitro Version :)
@@BoostedMK6 well there's a difference in benchmarks and actual gameplay, if benchmarks were anything to go by then ryzen would have been better than intel because even in single core they outperform intel counter parts or match them at least, but that doesn't translate to gaming, we all know intel CPUs are still better for gaming
@@lucwallace4308 Yes it will, its additional things to process and more load on the entire system. Theres more detail and information to handle, the benchmark is unfair.
The Memory clock represents real memory speed, not DDR (Double Data Rate) or QDR (Quad Data Rate or Quad-pumped). The effective speed of a DDR memory is: DDR_effective_speed = real_speed x 2, and the effective speed of a QDR memory is: QDR_effective_speed = real_speed x 4. For example, NVIDIA GTX 970 has GDDR5 memory (QDR memory) with real memory speed of 1750 MHz. Therefore, its effective speed is 7000 MHz
peter smith You know these cards cost the same, right? Actually Amd tends to be a little cheaper. And Amd does not have a high end lineup at the moment.
MrMister 26 whattt? In my county the AMD card is 65$ more than the OC 2060S. Now tell me which is the best 😲. I think 2060S is having more value at least in my case.
@@kennyyuliandrika7162 The 2060 super is simply an inferior card, that's a fact. It's not fanboyism. The 5700 XT is supposed to compete with the 2070/2070S.
The answer to this fact is the 2060 clock, stock it runs arround 1650 - 1700 mhz on boost, this test shows a overclocked 2060 performance against a stock 5700xt...
I appreciate what AMD does but I'd prefer not to use their card because of the issues it has, plus those CUDA cores on the NVIDIA cards do come in handy!
As an AI student, NVIDIA delivers Tensor Cores for a very optimized machine learning, plus it has more features than AMD in gaming, so for me NVIDIA is the only way to go
1 year later and people are still returning their navi gpus or complaining of drivers. How long should we wait, another year maybe? In a few months RDNA2 will come out, if RDNA1 drivers are like this, what about the newer ones?
Looks like the 5700xt is better for gaming, (on non 4k resolutions especially), whereas the 2060 super would be better if someone wanted to stream (due to the NVENC encoders). However, if your CPU is a Ryzen 7/core i7, i don't imagine cpu encoding would be much of an issue. I do think the 5700xt provides more fps per dollar though. Tough decision!
Why? The 5700xt won in 7/10, tied in two of the remaining 3 and only lost once technically. You picked the worse of the two. No driver issues since February (I have 5600xt)
@@chaywarburton3488 lol amd gpus will give you stress on troubleshooting drivers, way hotter and pay more electric bill. fps is not the only reference on who wins, dumb. however amd processors are good.
@@patrickdaave My 5600xt runs under 70c in every circumstance I've ever tested xD The 5600xt is the cream of the crop in quality in their gen. Electric bills aren't much of a concern for the community in the USA, these sort of commodities are very, very cheap. I wanted the 2060s, but could't get the $$, took the chance on AMD and I'm glad I did. Enjoyed them very much.
I'll go with RTX 2060super, it's cooler and probably more stable and durable not to mention higher re-sale value, AMD units not friendly & cheap anymore
it's not cooler. they're literally the same. please explain what 'more durable' means on a GPU lol. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-45Q8TVmzHI8.html the 5700 xt has much better performance.
@Our Fear is Their Power I heat my house with 4 crossfire 5700xt rog strix... Yea like I can afford that money for that headache. 1 5700xt can cause a headache add 4 of them then the 4way crossfire, no thanks. Not a big fan of intel cause of some of the blatant bullshit they done previous but there GPUs are typically better, just way more expensive
From what I can tell, the RTX 2000 series is optimized to handle DirectX Raytracing, but inferior in general rendering to the 5700XT as a result. If you want gorgeous lighting effects, go for Nvidia. If you want tip-top smoothness, go with AMD.
The delusion on the part of people trying to justify their Nvidia purchases is hilarious. Fact is AMD is highly competitive at the price points where it is selling its RX 5000 gpu's, much more desirable than Nvidia. The arguments you people bring in Nvidia's favor are funny: - better encoder? Who cares? streamers, aka 0.005% of gamers out there. - RTX? completely useless on a 2060 card, unless you prefer to play at half the framerates you see here. - DLSS? Anti Aliasing techniques will never solve the underlying problem of aliasing without drawbacks, artefacts etc. Only higher resolution will. And DLSS has already been shown to be blurry. It will 100% have more artefacts once it gets to be thoroughly reviewed by 3rd parties. And don't forget: it has to be implemented on a game by game basis, by every developer. Good luck with that. - Better drivers? Unless you're playing some weird ass games on some weird ass resolutions, AMD works perfectly fine and their drivers get updated constantly. Still, it's fun reading delusional comments from people trying to justify their hardware purchases. Keep going xD.
What's funny is i bet you copy & paste this comment everywhere there is a "5700 xt vs rtx 2070 s" because you too insecure about people choosing Nvidia over crappy AMD. I rather have a video card that matured over the years, than AMD that has too many issues. Say what you like about ray tracing and DLSS but it's AMD who's copying off Nvidia here pal, just look at the "BIG Navi aka RNDA 2" cards it has ray tracing too, so for you to try and down talk it to make AMD look good is irrelevant and only make you look foolish. Your credibility is tarnish fanboy.
@@robertemerson1087 it halves your fps. the difference between the 2060s and 5700 xt is large. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-45Q8TVmzHI8.html
@@robertemerson1087 you're probably the few that actually test it and speaks from hard facts, not just some fanboy narrative. DLSS and RTX were underperforming at the begining, now in 2020 that more more games support these features it got better.
2060 Super is the winner. It has Ray Tracing, Nvenc encoder for streaming, Rtx Voice, Dlss 2.0, solid drivers What’s does the 5700Xt offer just 5-10 more FPS? Crappy drivers? Hmmm I’ll stick with 2060 Super all day.
@Grobex @Dominikatus LOL i use amd processor and nvidia gpu, amd processors are worth it, gpu are meh because of temps and power draw, and mostly drivers are terrible. you two are AMDumb fanboys HAHAHA
@@patrickdaave k, i think u are stuck in 2017 when nvidia was acctually better but when was 5000series release nvidias 20 serie is not worth your money, just look at the video, i dont care about temperature power draw i care about fps and money, in this case 5700xt is way better than 2060s. what else to say Nvidiot
@@dominiksabo9748 HAHAHA that power draw will take your money in the long run dumb. else you are not the one who are paying electric bills. i only speak on experience not on being brand bias lol. 5k series are great man, but still lack of stability. by buying card with that price, customers will expect nonhassle gaming experience.
I need help choosing a prebuilt pc, the one with 2060s or 5700xt. They are are close to price and I will play just 1080 or 1440 if I upgrade my monitor. What GPU would be best.
@@lad2987 sometimes I wonder What is the Point of being a fanboy The More competition these Rich companies have between them..the more profitable it is for us Consumers
At least with AMD, their issues were only software in the drivers, unlike Nvidia with their failing RTX2080 Ti cards initially, which almost all Nvidia fanbois forget about.
The RTX 2060 Super is more superior than RX 5700 XT because of the encoder, ray tracing, and lower temps. But obviously, it's your preference and you choose on what is more important to you and what is suited to your needs.
Ray tracing on a rtx 2060 super isn’t that good so not really an advantage when u won’t get stable fps doing it and dlss2 isn’t available on even 20 games so it’s at a disadvantage only the encoder I see as an advantage
Hey, iam not a nvidia fanboy, actually I have the rx5700xt, but nvidia 2060s is better, how? Well if your dumb you won't know, but I'll write the points down. 1- amd card run spicy, which means if you got a 400$ model you will get super high fan noise, yet the card is so spicy, unlike the rtx2060s; go with the 400$ founders edition and your good, while a good 5700xt fan design is at least 430$. 2- amds driver issues. 3- there is a video encoder built in the nvidia card, so you don't need a 6 or 8 core CPU. 4- get some nice raytraysing features in the nvidia card. And if you'll say why at the video the temps are good? Because he is using the asus strix model, a 449$ model, while the founders edition is 399$.
But raytracing runs like shit on anything less than 2080 or atleast 2070s but when DLSS 2.0 Comes into the picture though, that's when the tables turn. A 2060s will outperform the 5700xt by a mile. Even with RT ON! I wonder if AMD will have anything as good as DLSS 2.0. Whaddya think?
@@SantoshKumar-ws2qz some reviews say dlss 2.0 is cheating. giving low resolution on some unimportant textures. AMD has a long way when it comes to graphics against Nvidia. but Nvdia greedy and AMD if their generous can utilize their multi processors and that PCIE 4.0 to outperform Nvidia. giving better gpu at a lower price. im planning to buy that 3060 in the future preferably the 3060 S. but also thinking about the AMD rx6700xt. because of the freesync cant afford those gsync monitors. since I can only afford max 500usd for gpu. prefer good looking game even at lower fps. 60-80 fps is fine by me.
@Austin Chia you need to spend a chunk of extra money to buy an AIB card that has a beefy cooler and doesn't have overheating issues (like the Sapphire Nitro+ or the Powercolor Red Devil, etc.)
Как это так ? Rtx 2060 super конкурент rx 5700xt ? Ещё недавно она конкурировала с 2070super, на верю и надо это проверить. Карта есть, а 4к монитора нету
Это странно, ведь 5700xt конкретно унижала 2070 super, да такое было, а если учитывать что amd гораздо дешевее...но драйвера... но их навернякак пофиксят... ля, не знаю что брать.
АcаdеmеG я тоже в ах с этого видоса. Походу прикуплю баксов и зимой побегу за 6000 серией или же 3000 от нвидии. Смотря кто кого раком нагнет. Или же по дешевке 5700хт взять как недавно вегу 64 сливали на к у. за 19к. Все равно этой карты надолго ещё хватит.
I try. before I had gtx1060 and i7 gen8, 2666mhz 16gb laptop. it was crush all the time in game half or 2 hours later. Now I spend 2000$ and make a system as x570, rx5700xt, 3200mhz 32gb ram, ryzen 7 3700x. Both system have SSD, second faster 3500mb/s and also have HDD. Both system have over temperture problem. Even laptop kill keyboard twice time because of heat. So I buy 5 middle high class fan and cpu tower(arctic due 34). 2 x140mm arctic (exhoust) and 2x 140 akasa viper fan (intake). and 1 x 120 msi fan (exhoust). also board, graphic card and case are MSI. there is no cable agains airflow. exoust and intake airflow equal But I can start windows 50-60 degree in and on gpu and 40 degree cpu. When open new game as "borderland" I can reach 90-104 degree in gpu, 60-70 degree on gpu. and 50-60 on cpu. AS A RESULT: HTC VIVE VR newer crush in new system. no frame lost in new second system. Half-life allyx lose some farame when i turn fast in old system. In New sytem is more fluent. But i can hear fan sound, agains earpiece sound. Performance between 2 system not too much agains 1000$ more. Maybe %20 more but my eyes can't catch the difrences between. I play RDR2 90fps (1080p) full hd 144mhz, borderland 117 fps, with high fan sound. Toatly you need a 3 x fan rx5700xt , mine is MSI evoke OC model and has 2 fan. Now I Plan to change tamper glass with aluminum case and (intake)140x akasa viper fan through graphic card.
Why do core clock frequencies vary on the 5700xt and nvidia is always maintained at 1890 Mhz? I have a GTX 1070 and the frequency s of core clock vary like the 5700xt...
AMD markets Navi cards with Game Clock and Boost Clock. Not sure what are those mean, but I realize that if the game doesn't have any graphic demand, it will stay at Game Clock. As the demand increases, it will increase the clock until its Boost Clock. Just my observation with my RX 5700...
Before watching this i thought 5700xt is best for my need, but now i tend to 2060s, atm it's avg 50€ cheaper and need less power at almost same performance. Btw why 5700xt is at reduced tessallation ( top of tiger tank) ? AMD has still probs with tessellation performance?
