Hi, my name is Andrei, I work in a computer store where I take various components for tests in my videos.
On advertising please contact : frak61822@gmail.com (Сarefully check the email address, they can write fakes on my behalf with one character changed!!!)
You can also order advertising through a convenient service PinTop - pin.top/TestingGames
I don't have a telegram channel, anyone who offers to go to telegram on my behalf is a scammer!!!!
@club4ghz Nah....Nvidia learnt their lesson with lots of unsold 4080s at $1200. The 5080 will launch at $1K. People won't pay (in large numbers) more than $1K for a 2nd tier card.
@@Dr.D00p lol they sold enough of the 4080. The new one of 4080s was only to get more people who buy. But I think 2025 will come 5080. But they don't need the gaming market. If you watched the news, they get enough money with other things and KI.
its insane that people will still pay 220 euros for used 1080 ti that can die at any time price is that high in my country i got new 4060 with 3 coolers for 340 and it is amazing card Never had raytracing before it looks really good
Very nice addition to the video. Now with the graphics settings labels on the bottom right corner. I think this is much more useful than the graph at the end of every tests lamo. 🤷♀
The fact you can use every single setting in cyberpunk is pretty incredible. Back when we tested the 3090ti we didn't have path tracing only ray tracing. The fact this card is doing even better with path tracing on which is more demanding is insane. I do hate that people think this is how we should benchmark gpus. We shouldn't it should be native and dlss only. Ray tracing and path tracing are not set standards they shouldnt be based on 4k performance because it's not.
bruh that Frame Gen is On. that is usually what comes with 4090 and thats what gave 55 fps in 4K dlss 3 PT on. that fake frames were added around 20-30 fps. it was actually running on 20 fps with dlss and without dlss it will run on 7 fps. we are just being fooled with Decreasing Resolution and Increasing fake frames. Raw performance is a joke now. i missed the generation where no shits like dlss or fg was there. the only native raw experience.
@Xarbn I'm talking about with dlss and yes frame gen now but try it on the 3090ti with just dlss and see what happens. Point is this isn't just ray tracing it's path tracing much more demanding.
Raw power is almost impossible these days. You need to use DLSS and FG. Or at least lower the resolution to the point where the card is not intended to like a 4K card can only play 1440p if you still want native res performance so there's that. 🤷♀
@@Jakiyyyyy not even Native 1440p and RT gives good results these days. Especially with cards like 4070 ti or 4080, you gotta buy a shitty 4090 to play on 1440p native "with PT or RT on". 4K dlssq is just around 2K/1440p upscaled to look 4K. so basically 4090 its a 1440p card when you wanna use RT or PT. i think these RT and PT is shitty gimmick. if i want to experience native 4K 100Fps PT on, i gotta wait for 7000 series rtx or maybe higher.
@Jakiyyyyy exactly peoppe just don't get it devs have leaned into this and for actual good reasons. Right now anti aliaisong is rough lately. Dlss and dlaa is actually beating it most of the time. People can say what they want but that combination can look better then most regular anti aliasing natively. But yeah devs are pushed for time more and more. They don't hab time to scrub and soften all of the areas they used to. Also the games have way to many angles and lines now to expect them to do so.
It's funny 4070 super for price/performnace is king. But frames per dollar the 4080 super is close which kind of makes it worth it. You wanna get the most out of your money? Get that bevause the boost from dlss is also larger on the 4080 super compared to the 4070 super.
I bought the 6750xt, imo I dont see 10FPS more as worth 100€ as I dont play the games on max settings. I only want to achieve them 60 on good graphics thats it.
Is the processor used in this video is the perfect one for all three, because I decided to buy 1660 super and i want a perfect cpu with, some one tell me
I was thinking of buying 3070ti but it had 8G of vram and 4070 is a bit expensive in my country,I didn’t think of the 2000 gpus but this 2080ti looks good for me
If your purpose is just for playing games, having 12GB of VRAM is TOO MUCH for you. However, for video editing or rendering purposes, VRAM becomes crucial. Higher VRAM capacity can significantly impact rendering performance-the more, the better. But having 12GB VRAM on the RTX 3060 doesn't necessarily mean it outperforms the RTX 4060 8GB in rendering and video editing tasks. The RTX 4060, with its higher CUDA core count, can still excel despite its lower VRAM capacity. You'll only need higher VRAM if you're handling larger projects with extensive scenes and heavy textures. In terms of future-proofing, a higher VRAM size can make your GPU more future-proof. The RTX 3060 12GB can be considered future-proof in terms of VRAM size. However, the RTX 4060 is also future-proof due to its newer architecture, which may offer better compatibility with newer software and longer support from NVIDIA compared to the RTX 3060. Regarding power consumption, the RTX 4060 consumes less power than the RTX 3060 due to its newer architecture. If you live in a city with expensive energy costs, this difference in energy consumption should be a consideration. I hope it helps...😉
I have 60 fps with ray tracing and everything is ultra. Another processor and memory 7800mhz. After off ray tracing i had around 110 fps. Iam using DLA with frame gen.
This low profile 70 watt GPU is amazing for what it does only if you have a slim factor desktop otherwise i would not recommend this graphics cards but still brings new life to a slim factor PC, you can play all your favourite games
The VRAM usage of both shows 12 GB isn't future proof. Games are projected to demand more VRAM, so the 16 GB version of 4060 Ti is the better option in that regard.
for me, i set my budget for what i am willing to spend and then get the best part i can for that price. if i say, oh its only $100 more.. then there is another card that's only $100 more that that and so on.. where do you stop?
So I ordered an RTX 4080 Super last week for 984 Euro, which is a good price for Europe. And when I follow the results of this video, an RTX 4090, that would cost at least double of what I paid here in Portugal would only give me about 25 -33% performance boost. Plus more energy consumption. To be honest, If I would have ordered the RTX 4090 at that same store with the same promotion, I would have paid 548 euro more, but that would still be 1,5 times the costs for a maximum of 33% of performance boost. Even though I am still ripped of by Nvidia, because I think the RTX 4080 Super should cost about 600 and the 4090 about 900, I think I made the right choice. Let's see how much performance I can buy for these 984 euro's once the RTX 50 series is out.
