RX 6400 vs. GTX 1050 Ti | Low End Gpu Test in 2022 

You can always buy a last Intel or new APUs from AMD xD. It was a gpu to laptops with integrated card and media engine. For duplicate media engine they did this.

amd encoder on budget rx cards are trash anyways

@@amadeos.a.7929 Even the strongest AMD APU currently, the 5700G is nowhere near the 1050Ti, it's between the 1030 and the 1050, plus it's expensive, you could get a i3-12100 and the RX6400 for cheaper and it's actually better.

@@MaxIronsThird Ryzen 5000g igpus and rx 6400 don't make much difference in the current aaa games as they both going to struggle anyways, at least you save alot of power with the igpus. You need at least a minimum of GTX 1060 6gb. 4 cores like the i3 12100f has been around for over a decade already, aren't the majority of market share anymore and future games and productivity softwares are going to take advantage to the multiple cores like 6 and more cores as technology becomes more ressources hungry now.

@@AznKei1 You have no idea what you're talking about. The RX6400 is just 15% weaker than the 1060, a new one is cheaper than a used 1060, and uses 3x less energy, while sure the 12100(Alder Lake) is just a quad-core CPU, Alder Lake single core performance is through the roof compared to something like Coffee Lake, and can push upwards off 200FPS in some games, the 12100 is 15% faster than the 8700K(Coffee Lake's flagship), the i3-8700K can't even beat the i3-10100(Comet Lake) is most cases. 4C Comet Lake = 6C Coffee Lake That's a 50% increase. Then Alder Lake Single Core performance is 15% faster than Comet Lake. 150 x 1.15 = 172% Ryzen 2 and Comet Lake are much better than the stuff Intel was recycling every year to consumers, since Broadwell.

true.

but you can`t realistically compare 2 gpus if there`s bottleneck

@@salvatore8426 true

-10 fps estaria rindiendo igual que la 1050ti en dado caso tenga menos costo que la 1050ti aun sigue siendo una gran compra

@@erazochavesiancarlo5988 It's not -10fps, it's -10% which still is way better than the 1050Ti, it only starts running similar to the 1050Ti on 2.0, but who's still on Sandy Bridge at this point?

Me

@@FoxyCAMTV A graphics card is not your biggest problem then.

a lot of people still are you'd be suprised @@MaxIronsThird

Basically the same, on CPU heavy games like Cyberpunk, Watch Dogs Legion and Hitman 3, you might see 5% lower fps,(10% in PCIe3.0). The better pick is the i3-12100, it's better than the i5-10400 and has Gen4 PCIe.

I have an I5 6500T(2.8ghz with boost, 4c4t) and an rx 6400 through pcie3 and I get 45-60 on RDR2 at 1080p at 1080p with Ultra Textures, Tree an Fur with the rest set to medium. I get 60 FPS on GTA 5 at 1080P high on every setting. My CPU stays between 55-95 usage but mostly at 75ish though. Even with the old 35 watt CPU the GPU is still the bottleneck. With all that said it's my RV gaming rig that I run off solar and it only uses a 180 watt PSU. Not bad for 1080p 60fps gaming system.

1050ti 75w/6400 54w

@@paulretrocomputingroom They are not maxed out when normal gaming even if the GPU is at 100%

@@sergiougazio7976 Can't you just see that they're at 99 to 100% usage at all times?

@@MaxIronsThird I meant that the watt usage is not maxed out at 53w when gaming even if the gpu is at 100%. Only very few games makes the watt usage go to 53w.

Now that's what I call budget gaming rig

@@orleu_sko I have an i5 2320 and an rx 6400

rx 6400 is better

6400 still better and cheaper.

@@yacquubfarah6038 I have the same CPU i5 2320 and I keep wondering what should I choose between these two because I'm using an pcie 2.0 mobo believing that 1050 TI will do better than rx 6400 because of optimization. Now amigo since you have these specs (i5 2320 and rx 6400) can you please tell me how is the performance? is there any hiccups while gaming or can you give me advice what to choose between those to the 1050 ti or the rx6400 please reply thanks!

should be ok

6400 still better by quite a margin, just 5 to 10% loss in performance.

still the same thing if the cpu doesn't bottleneck the gpu there's no different, if you put i5-9600k it's still would perform the same thing. The different is pcie gen where rx 6400 would perform way more better on pcie gen 4 then gen 3

the 12100 would have no problem getting the same fps its an extremely good processor for the price. and 50% is unrealistic.

@@nothinginteresting1833 10% reduced performance on Gen3.

its 6% slower with pcie 3 and in some games the fps is almost identical to pcie 4.0. And it actually trades blows with the 1650 it gets higher fps in some games and in others the 1650 gets higher fps.

The 1650 at a typical $209 is the real rip off now!

5 to 10% slower, not fps.

1050ti is a low-mid card from 2016. 6400 is a low end card from 2022.

It's a benchmark though, it's supposed to be the same.

ты похоже не туда смотришь, смотри на AVG FPS

on par with the 1650 from 2018 though, and this is a super low end card, the the 6500XT is even better.

on par with the 1650 from 2018 though, and this is a super low end card, the 6500XT is even better, matching the 1650S. Nvidia will launch the RTX2050 next month for $200, and it will be weaker than the 6500XT.