Samantha Woll Trial -- Suspect Michael Jackson-Bolanos returns to stand 

to solve this case you just need to look at this guy… there, easy…

They did all that & guess what, the boyfriend never left his home. He had used his phone during that time as well, was online, actively using it. They have solved the case, the man sitting in front of you. The one who didn’t know what ethnicity she was, so he claimed, “Italian, French, Irish, British, whatever”, but now can say he knows if she was black or white, something he claims he didn’t know to begin with, until the police caught him in a lie. Someone would never think that ethnicity would mean anything other than black, white, Asian, mexican, etc, unless they heard them speak. He told on himself!!! The same with putting his jacket in the “dirty clothes hamper” & then was mad when the gf brought it up that she washed the jacket, he hung up immediately, then immediately called back & started yelling at her for bringing up about her saying anything on a recorded line about washing evidence, lol. He sits there & him & his atty on the phone & how he’s speaking then to how he’s trying to be proper on the stand, lol. He’s literally hung himself since he comes out and tells his atty that he didn’t take anything out of her pockets, that he didn’t take anything from her. This atty wasn’t too smart & knew he should not have been talking like that on the phone. For them to think that BK could kill 4 athletic college students, on 3 levels, from leaving his car, entering the back side of the home, & kill 4 strong people, & back out with zero blood found al all in less than 8 minutes, and are prosecuting him for doing this, as 1 man. For people to claim this man is innocent cause he didn’t have the time is ludicrous. He’s told on himself.

@@dudemorris7769the ex boyfriend was NOT actively on his phone. All they said was that he had a podcast on. It doesn’t mean he was there listening to it. He could’ve turned the podcast on and left his phone at home so that it would seem that he was home. That would be him trying to outsmart people like he said he does.

Amazing so many clueless people who know nothing about the legal system, how investigations are done, how they clear people, including ones who admit to crimes they didn’t commit, & how they catch the ones who did do it, those ones who lie about not doing it, yet the evidence shows they did do it, by not only DNA, phone records, & video surveillance, but the continued lies told over & over again. Had he told the truth in the beginning instead of lying over and over, he may not be in this situation. The entire ethnic thing, black or white is what’s going to be the precursor to his being caught by the jury. Claiming on the stand he didn’t know if she was “Italian, British, Irish, French, hahahah, hahahaa, whatever else he tried to say” is what’s going to nail him as why would he think that meant ethnicity unless he heard her speaking??? He’s not as smart as he thought he was, 😂😂😂😂😂.

This dude is guilty and all these comments talking about “he’s innocent” are out of their mind… he LIED NON STOP. He claims to have found a dead body while coincidentally finding a dead woman and getting her DNA on him… lock his bummy a$$ up

But it was the defense that played it first.

yep, let’s find even more ways to keep criminals and murderers out of jail…

looks more like a guy scared of going to prison for breaking into cars, therefore killing a witness…

@@theflyingdutchman_01 no defensive wounds on him, no blood and tissue on his knife. He breaks in the best thing to do is run if he hears someone. It’s dark and he is wearing dark clothing

​@@mrsjayhowardher blood was on his hands and coat.

oh, cuz the boyfriend is just a poor weed smoking jew on meds. gods chosen that talks like a queer.

The evidence compels the state to go for the man who did the crime 🤷

You mean who they BELIEVE did the crime. Now they get to prove it or not.​@udhehfhehcuw9169

@@davidretondo2871 yes, 💯 fair comment. They have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Because they believe they’ve presented sufficient evidence to negate the confession. After all, false confessions are a thing!

Just ask Trump.

As you know take a stand in one's defense is a huge risk. All the defense is looking for a break in the link of the prosecution. He probably has already formulated at least 1 reasonable doubt.

for a murderer…

seems your brain’s not functioning…

Dude is guilty… what is wrong with everybody commenting this man is innocent?

Brian a Beast ! Focus on my case not his hair.

The evidence is too strong. Nobody can get him off.

better pray for justice - this guy is guilty af…

Yeah, seems pretty squared to me. I’m out robbing. I’m not out killing people. I’m out stealing. I’m not out touching women. I’m out breaking into cars. I’m not doing anything to children at what point do you just say no no thanks.

I do hope you’re praying that the killer is convicted. Sounds like you’re only praying that his man right here get off & justice not continue to be corrupt. Regarding if he’s innocent or not will determine the evidence shown & reasonable doubt. It only takes one person to hang a jury & theatrics can sometimes pull it off. By what the prosecutor has shown thus far, this man is guilty & the majority of the reasoning is on his testimony alone, his interrogation & conversations with the police, on the phone when he didn’t think he was being recorded, his character evidence that he doesn’t hurt anyone or hurt women, & then knowing that he’s been convicted of beating up & striking both men & women in the past. All that character evidence should be able to come into the case & be heard by the jury. Seems they are trying to hold a lot of his past discretions out.

Its all so jewish...

one of the great weaknesses of this justice system is, that someone with your mindset could end up on a jury…

what convinced you, his charming personality, his impeccable character? what?

I've never seen a more guilty dude.

I believe him too. He's well composed, confident and not stumbling on his testimony. He's credible.

hope you never ever get to be on a jury…

Sad but true.

please go and see a brain repair specialist…

The jury is deadlocked so the judge sent them home for weekend. They will return Monday to continue deliberations.

@@rachelmoore1991 thank you

How would you like for him to dress like an unhoused person?

@@imhereforitall9218 like how he looked on the day of the murder? But you right. He has the right to dress himself up

still looks the part though…

@@imhereforitall9218tu insinues que l avocat de la défense ressemble à un clochard?!c est vraiment méchant et irrespectueux !

@@imhereforitall9218l apparence et le nombre d études ne font pas l intelligence!

He’s a criminal for stealing cars but let’s talk about the crazy ex boyfriend who admitted to killing her ,

@@kimboyd5985 they proved he couldn't have done it. The ex said he doesn't remember doing it. Just that he thought it had to be him.

Me either. They got the wrong guy.

yeah, right… he looks like a real valuable contributor to society and a great achiever…

@@theflyingdutchman_01 that doesn't make him a crazed murderer. Someone drugged that lady. The weirdo that confessed . Have you watched the trial???

@@CaliforniaForever no, sorry. Justice is important. Prosecutors dont just “give it up” bc idiots online are not entertained

I do not like this prosecutor. I bet he's found not guilty.

So what about the ex boyfriend? Who admitted? To killing her you’re going to ignore that. You just want the guy in jail it’s OK for the ex-boyfriend to lie but not him double standard

@@michaellauderdale-yr9om I would argue you have the double standard. The bf must be guilty bc of what he said, but the defendant with the dna evidence against him can lie over and over again and that’s fine bc he was “scared.” If we take out both of their statements only one has dna evidence against him. But you can’t take out both of their statements. You have to go with the proven liar bc of your narrative

@@udhehfhehcuw9169 so what he touch her I wood lie too that’s were the dna comes from your argument is stupid so he lied he’s guilty not the guy who admitted it come on so why did ex-boyfriend? Admit to killing her. If he didn’t do it. Explain that. Since you’re ignoring. For some reason.

yes, he is.

Innocent with a shadow of doubt

@@resourcegyrl no he guilty brah

Yep

Innocent??? Have you actually been following this case? Dude has lied non stop, he “found” this woman dead while admittedly committing crime in the night… his DNA on her, her DNA on him… gtfoutta here

🤨

He's guilty and you're blind and lack common sense.