Shooting the longest bullet ever made (3 foot long NERF dart) 

you know you just essentiality make an APFSDS round right?

Depends say you throw a tank shell or 50 cal at it then it would have stopped it. Oh and I mean physically throw it with your hands.

I just bought the FATPP knife, now please give me validation

The 5th pocket is for a Zippo lighter or Bic lighter

@@Glueings wouldn't it be an APDS round because there are no fins?

I'm amazed the gun didn't explode with that super long dart inserted. Thought for sure it was going to turn into a pipe bomb

@@Gameprojordan me too , I was definitely expecting it to completely explode. the pressure in that chamber must have been just absurd

@@Gameprojordan Especially with how tight it seemed to fit. I mean, he really forced it into the barrel

@@jacobkudrowich the pressure probably wasn't much different than a regular bullet. It looks like they machined it out of aluminum. The normal bullets are made of lead which is softer and much denser than aluminum. Depending on how soft the lead, it obturates when fired (it expands inside the barrel slightly in order to fill the rifling grooves) I would bet that lead bullet weighs about the same or slightly less than the aluminum one. black powder also creates much lower pressures than modern smokeless. The tight fit is caused by the plastic sabot, there is space around the actual slug that allows some pressure to be relieved

@@Eralen00 they literally say in the video that the super long one weighs 5000 grains, which is over 7.5x the weight of the 650 grain projectile that gun normally fires. also, sabots are _specifically_ so that the pressure is _not_ relieved until after the projectile has left the barrel.

It hit the other end of the pool and left a small dent in the concrete. If we used full powder it would've defintiely gone through

same name ?

That’s what I asked

I hoped they would have at least put like a 4x4 steel plate against the far wall

@Angry Combat Wombat why not? It would weigh less in the water than outside of it technically

Got me laughing

@@emilyyeary8829same thing same thing

Real

Pro nerfers hate this single trick

I think that only applies to bullets that don't stick 18 inches out the front of the muzzle.

Make it infinite twist then

I don't think that applies underwater because water won't compress like air does, pretty sure that has a different affect on trajectory stabilization... I could be wrong tho...

@@gizmop0ny Eventually, the twist rate is too high and firing a bullet through it would just break the barrel. This is why modern tank guns use fin-stabilised projectiles, because it allows the round to be longer, allowing it to penetrate more armor.

@@gizmop0ny first off, u like mlp, second off, it varies for bullet lenght, and in physics there isn't infinity

partially unrelated but you are based

At first I was thinking APFSDS but then I realized no fins.

Apds? Hell nah thats an old rifle bulled like the of the carcano

Just imagine. An air powered nerf gun firing APFSDS rounds. Edit: I now realize the error in my words. I understand what SABOT is and I made a goof.

@@Jo-un6es that's a very underwhelming thought . Thanks for that

Thats what she said

That’s not what she said

ru-vid.comGh-dEaFuYuQ

I mean it is :(

@BADtime you mean he? 🤨

Arrows didn't become obsolete as much as they changed form to be better. Check out APFSDS ammunition.

@@MotivationSHCUM wasnt used for many decades since the cannarrow disappeared

so a gunpower dart gun but bigger

Humor?

Where?

ru-vid.comGh-dEaFuYuQ

@@FirstnameLastname-wo2zq a lil bit of innuendo here and there

Jesus Christ loves y’all! God bless y’all ! !

While you are correct in that the Russians use specialised 5.45x39, I believe they still use APS underwater rifles

@@jared.p240 I guess it depends on the mission. Amphibious vs fully underwater. ADS can use even its underwater ammo on the surface and go fully ground-based with a magazine change. APS doesn't have that capability.

@@Tounushi True. I find it kinda strange that they've kept the APS rifle in service when clearly the ADS is a much better choice

@@jared.p240 Russians seem to keep everything in storage past obsolescence. If it's even remotely usable, why not keep it and use it until it's worn through?

@Swatcomingbacklater Cared enough to post an insult. If you hadn't, you'd just ignored the comment and moved along. You caring even that much and the fact that I apparently violated your delusion of sovereignty over this comment section gives a perverse sense of validation to me. And I thank you for pleasuring me this way.

imagine this is why they called it that, so they could see comments like this

The hinge is connected directly to the outside wall of the chamber, the only spots where gas can come out are the primer hole and the end of the barrel. You would have to have a ruptured primer for gases to escape through that hole, which I find highly unlikely.

@@cleveland2286 no he is correct, it is a drop down style, it is sealed but the expanding gasses against the water causes the water pressure to make the bubbles the gas has to expand back wards. And it will find any opening it can. Because the water has more density than air, and as soon as that rod left the barrel, the water trailing behind will try to fill the void and the gas can't push against that water rushing in. This is also how you rupture barrels. Same effect if you fire a shot gun or rifle with just the barrel tip in the water. It is also a black powder it burns slower than modern cordite cartridges.

@@Robert53area Any space in between the walls of the primer and the chamber would not be able to produce a visible volume of gas in that amount of time. I find it highly unlikely. Primers are usually brass or copper, force fit into their hole they should create a very good seal considering their malleability. There is either a ruptured primer, or that was not gas escaping.

@@Robert53area Exactly right. Well said man

ru-vid.comGh-dEaFuYuQ

Same

ru-vid.comGh-dEaFuYuQ

Ya I thought that was neat, but then I figured that since its a modern muzzle loader its probably made better than the traditonal ones ppl think of. Also the sabot would be keeping the powder dry if its tight enough.

*wouldn't _have_ thought

😏

fat pp💀

We do a lil trolling

California ballistics

California physics

@@benc589 I'm pretty much guaranteed going to hell either way my guy

ru-vid.comGh-dEaFuYuQ

@@DeathDealer_1021 We*

@@benc589 y'know, having gone back and actually read this comment, you seem like an actual person. So, a few things: 1. If you think belief in him isn't enough, you are either being deceitful or you've been going to... Well, actually, most churches here in Florida. Jesus died for our sins, and sincerely believing in him is enough to get into heaven. 2. When do you think the Roman empire was? When Jesus was alive, the Roman empire was already hundreds of years old. Persecution of the Jews was the entire thing Jesus was preaching against, and it's why he was crucified. Despite what revisionist history (ACTUAL revisionist history) would tell you, Jesus, if he was a real person, would've been a middle eastern Jew. More importantly, if you seriously believe that the entirety of history going back to Jesus' birth and before is fake, just know that you sound like you're insane. 3. I don't even know what to say about that last paragraph. What fucking drugs are you on?

Dunno why but the guy doing all this formal text while ending the paragraph with "tho" made me laugh

I will run for my life

Id wonder why they are bringing a firearm to a foam dart fight

Aye some kid is gonna wipe out a 50cal in a nerfwar

America

ru-vid.comGh-dEaFuYuQ

should i just fire this off into the mountain?

​@@BB_GreenTheEyoure too innocent

Yeah, I think the highway’s in that direction

“Thrusting”

ru-vid.comGh-dEaFuYuQ

You are no cap a genius

Yes and no there is a lot of force going out the barrel, but their is little force to stop it from going the other way. A table stand versus a person. Whe a person is holding the fire arm and aiming, usually as they are pushing with their shoulder against the butt plate, which counters the recoil. This is why you see people who are new to shooting drop rifles, someone usually tells them to just put it in the shoulder pocket not pull it tight in the pocket and lean into it. That's a counter acting force... The table mount is clamped down not weighted down, there no weight for the amount of mass being pushed out. They increased the mass of the projectile without increasing the counter weight. Would this hurt, probably give you a nice bruise. But break a should, nope.

@@Robert53area mmmmmm yesss. I was awaiting the YT comment physicist. Y'all crack me up with how much effort you put into these comments. I have asperger's and I don't even feel compelled to explain to people on the internet like this.

@@DustyTheDog well, he debunked your fallacious comment

@@Frosty_V0 didn't debunk anything. Just said some stuff without any proof. Very similar to what I said, BUT with the key difference that you can look up what I said and watch them test different possible configurations of firing that might result in a person being thrusted back, or obtaining injury. Who is this guy? I could say the opposite of what he says, and that what he says is just a misinterpretation of physics. Similar to how people think cold water boils faster, when it doesn't(because of some thermal shock or something people think happens). But who am I to challenge his statements, too?

ru-vid.comGh-dEaFuYuQ

Yes we are going to ignore that

What about fat pp?? Why that name

I can't 🤣

Lmao that’s what I said

Ikr

Lol

lol

Facts

it’s not a musket

@@toffeevr449 Kuopion yliopistollinen sairaala yourself

@@toffeevr449 Kuopion yliopistollinen sairaala yourself

That what she said

@@DynamicSaturn36Gaming :I bruhhhhhhhhyh

@@samanthamcneely6466 I'm Sorry I Had To Make That Joke

@@DynamicSaturn36Gaming I saw the comment I was expecting that reply

Uh huh right huge

I was wondering the same thing.

Yah, muzzleflash ftw! Esp with black powder instead of smokeless

The first few would've blown up from the gasses

I believe if they showed it in slow motion wed know the answer to that question.

That makes no sense whatsoever. A break action would make it possible to load if from the breach thus making it not a muzzle loader . The primer doesn't get breach loaded either it is on the outside of the chamber with a small flash hole. Your conception of a muzzle loader was so far off reality I'm actually confused you ever could have thought that

These Inline bullshit “muzzleloaders” aren’t real muzzleloaders.

@@jacobkudrowich All I'd seen of modern muzzle-loaders before this were ads. All I'd seen in those ads was the shooter push the projectile down the barrel and then add a unit into the breech. It'd looked like only the projectile was muzzle-loaded while a case with the primer and powder was added through the breech. The entire concept of calling that a muzzle-loader was asinine. Here it's clear both the powder and projectile are muzzle-loaded while the primer is placed on a in-line nipple that is covered by the action. My mental image of caplock muzzle-loaders still has the nipple on the side.

@@williamthegunnut3839 They did try to make in-line muzzle loaders in the olden days. Moses Babcock made a caplock shotgun with an inline nipple for the sake of ambidextrous operation.

@@Tounushi yeah but those didn’t have a fucking polymer plastic camo stock and aimpoints on them.