Тёмный

SIGMA 17-50MM 2.8 LENS | What's the problem with it? 

Dec Johnson
Подписаться 107
Просмотров 6 тыс.
50% 1

This is a shot vlog showing the capabilities of the Sigma17-50mm Lens. Travelling to the Peak District using this lens for the entire vlog.
let me know what you think of Sigma Lens in the comments below!

Опубликовано:

 

21 фев 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 12   
@DineshGohil
@DineshGohil 2 года назад
Thank you so much for sharing your experiences on this lens 😀🤗
@alejandrachavez4180
@alejandrachavez4180 8 месяцев назад
Hi, I need help. I just bought a 17-50 mm sigma lens for my Nikon 5300 but the autofocus is not detecting it and I don't know what to do. I already updated the camera's firmware to 1.03 and nothing. First time that the camera gives me this problem because I have the 50 mm and the 70-300 and neither of them had given me this problem And the truth is that it is very difficult for me to focus manually. Thank you
@PierangeloGatto
@PierangeloGatto 10 месяцев назад
To say what you said about the lens, a 15" video was enough. ;)
@eprohoda
@eprohoda 2 года назад
mate! yu uploaded best content! farewell! =))
@JeneralMat-zp2ii
@JeneralMat-zp2ii 11 месяцев назад
Hi... Can you review this on canon new apsc camera since there's no 24-70 equivalent lens in canon apsc r ecosystem right now... Thanks.
@tooxtalivai0690
@tooxtalivai0690 2 года назад
Wireless mic?
@decjohnson6941
@decjohnson6941 2 года назад
What did you think of the lens?
@hellostranger2709
@hellostranger2709 Год назад
I just bought one for my Nikon D3400. Sadly, the live view focusing won't work
@anton0000001
@anton0000001 Год назад
I don’t find the motor at all noisy, what I ah e noticed is the that at low apertures, it’s extremely “soft”! 2.8-5.6 at 50mm is terrible! So disappointed in this lens for that!
@odarrien
@odarrien 11 месяцев назад
I'm very disappointed in this lens for photography. I've been shooting between 2.8 and 5.6 and its indeed very soft, missing focus a lot, and generally not rendering images well. Also, i don't know if it's just my perception but images seem 'noisy' even at iso 400 compared to some of my other lenses such as the canon nifty-50. Feel like ive just wasted money on it. Ill give it a try soon for landscapes and see if it fares much better at f8-11..... but still, thats not the application i needed it for. Sigh.
@chelseadaddy7061
@chelseadaddy7061 8 месяцев назад
I have the same lens. Beautiful stills but not good for video
@JoseMarquez-oo7sl
@JoseMarquez-oo7sl 10 месяцев назад
All talking
Далее
Best Inexpensive Camera Lens? | Sigma 17-50 f2.8 Review
13:54
Sigma 17-50 2.8 Review
18:07
Просмотров 412 тыс.
Дарю Самокат Скейтеру !
00:42
Просмотров 953 тыс.
когда мучает жажда // EVA mash
00:58
Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 vs Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
13:27
Просмотров 88 тыс.
My Most Used Lens | Sigma 17-50 f/2.8
6:52
Просмотров 13 тыс.