@@ChristopherbiggsWA i love how these muppets keep typing these dumbass comments without a single one of them referencing what they mean. As if the laws of thermodynamics were actually broken lmao.
agast! the chaps and chums here in grand ol' 1940 thought the world would have harnessed the power of the atom to build power plants to charge batteries in your motorcars. I detect profiteering most foul.
@@pathevermore3683 Egads! You dare to accuse the companies involved in the selling of car fuel to take advantage of the modern consumer to make a quick buck? They wouldn't dare! After all, there is no profit incentive to drive them towards making such a decision.
@@namethathasntbeentakenyetm3682 I do say that sounds proposterous! The offshore oil companies who care so much for the oceans they work in would surely never try to stifle Gods green earth by preventing atom doohickey power if it wasn't truly a danger to us all
Imagine believing dino bones turn into fuel.. Like do the math on that first of all. If you can't do that then try to super heat fossils and see if you get oil out of it lmao
@@gainorwood1716 And I bet you believe those earth cross-sections that show what the earth looks like 3500 miles to the core when we can't dig beyond 7.5m. It's all theories so stop talking like you know things. One thing I've learned, don't believe the mainstream thought without concrete proof. Wells refill, THAT'S a fact! They want to artificially inflate prices by telling you it's a scarce resource. They do it with many resources.. like gold and diamonds.
yep, because gas prices and shortages are totally because we are running out. Not anything to do with the stated goal of destroying the industry, nope, we just cant seem to find it in the ground anymore:/
Gasoline engine: Yes. Cannon: Yes. Rube Goldberg machine: Yes, but not with any consistentcy. Perpetual motion machine: No. If it was possible it would mean that our current understanding of physics was wrong.
@@awkwardcultism I have a genuine question for you. The wind and the ocean have enourmous amounts of energy but it doesn't come from nowhere, magnets are not permanent but some in a human lifetime can be imagined as such, same as radioactive materials with a long half life. Gravity doesn't run out either. These forces can be harnessed and more power can be got out than was put in by us (humans) as we don't make the waves, gravity, or the magnetic forces. No device that used any of the above could be described as a perpetual motion machine, but I would suggest some people consider perpetual motion machines to include machines that run without needing a fuel we give it. A solar pannel could be seen as something for nothing in practical terms; the sun will outlive us. Wave generators too would be an example. In the universe, you can't get something for nothing. On Earth we can get electricity for 'nothing' as far as our investment of a fuel is concerned. The question is this: Do you think our focus on the physics of the universe deters some people from potentially inventing something which might be relatively simple because they immediately dismiss the idea as being impossible because you can't get something for nothing?
@Fugp Basis lol. in a recent interview he did with youtuber everyday astronaut he mentioned sometimes he feels like he is in a kafka esque/ goldberg cartoon ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-t705r8ICkRw.html @ 24:07
@Fugp Basis So how do you know who I am or if I’m uneducated or not? Or a wacko ? Pretty fucking ignorant for someone to assume shit while telling others they have zero clue. Makes no sense !
Oil: constantly being produced in the earth. Russia proved "peak oil" to be a lie. They went back to wells that had supposedly "run dry" and re-drilled the same holes. The surrounding rocks had acted as an oil filter and had become clogged up.
